-Caveat Lector-

Tuesday June 22 3:53 PM ET

Senators Discuss Action On Nuclear Labs

By Tabassum Zakaria

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Republican senators and the energy secretary Tuesday
agreed the structure of the Energy Department must change to better guard
secrets at U.S. nuclear weapons labs but there was no consensus on what
should be done.

In an unusual meeting of four senate committees, there was general agreement
that a quick legislative solution would be best, to strike while public
furor was hot over allegations that China's spies got some top U.S. nuclear
weapons secrets in the past 20 years. China has denied it stole U.S. nuclear
secrets.

But disagreements quickly emerged over how best to improve security.

While key Republican senators seemed ready to agree on a plan, to become law
both the Senate and House must approve the same bill and the president must
sign it.

Three key Republican senators said they were drafting a plan that would
consolidate the nuclear weapons programs in one area of the Energy
Department's bureaucracy.

The plan was based on recommendations by a presidential advisory board that
suggested creating a semi-autonomous agency within the Energy Department to
oversee nuclear weapons programs. It would be headed by an under-secretary.

Energy Secretary Bill Richardson said he agreed with most of the report from
the board chaired by former Sen. Warren Rudman, but disliked the notion of a
``semi-autonomous agency'' within the Energy Department because it would
undermine his authority.

The comments came at a joint hearing by an unprecedented four committees
whose membership comprised more than half the 100-member Senate. About 30
senators actually showed up.

Republican Sens. Frank Murkowski of Alaska, Pete Domenici of New Mexico and
Jon Kyl of Arizona planned to offer jointly an amendment to restructure the
nuclear weapons programs.

It would be attached to a funding bill for U.S. intelligence programs that
may be considered by the Senate this week.

``What has happened is a disaster of major proportion for the national
security of our nation,'' said Murkowski, who chaired the hearing. The full
``geopolitical'' impact of the security lapses would probably not be known
for another decade or two, he added.

Over the past 20 years more than 100 reports by various government entities
have been issued criticizing security at the labs and recommending changes,
Rudman said.

Among the people interviewed by the advisory board, ``one employee said the
(Energy Department) was about as organized as the Titanic in the 11th
hour,'' Rudman said.

Every time a president or energy secretary has tried to institute changes,
``the bureaucrats have won,'' he said.

Richardson said he was prepared to accept the creation of an under-secretary
post to head the nuclear weapons programs but opposed establishing a
separate agency within the department. He warned against creating an
``empire'' through a separate structure that a future energy secretary would
not be able to control.

Richardson agreed on the need for oversight and said he would like to have
``junkyard dog types'' who would point out failings in the way the labs were
managing security.

A culture of ``arrogance'' at the labs was also cited as an impediment to
security because of scientists' disdain for edicts from bureaucrats whom
they consider less intelligent than they are.

But some senators said that that scientific culture would be difficult to
change and the answer was a structural change in the bureaucracy that would
ensure security lapses were caught.

When one Republican senator tried to place the blame for lab security lapses
on the Democratic Clinton administration, Rudman, a Republican, responded:
``I think you all deserve some blame,'' noting that Congress had taken no
action despite the many reports issued over the years.


--
The mass of men lead lives of quiet desperation and go to the grave with

the song still in them. - Henry David Thoreau

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to