-Caveat Lector-

from alt.conspiracy
-----
As always, Caveat Lector.
Om
K
-----
<A HREF="aol://5863:126/alt.conspiracy:534750">Clinton, Bush, Hearings on
CIA..........
</A>
-----
Subject: Clinton, Bush, Hearings on CIA..........
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Goldman)
Date: Wed, 30 June 1999 03:20 PM EDT
Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

>From www.copvcia.com website:

Don't Blink!

All Promises Broken - Volume II Hearings Held Without Notice - Behind Closed
Doors

You Might Miss What's Next

by

Michael C. Ruppert

Posted June 29, 1999 - Copyright 1999 From The Wilderness, Michael C.
Ruppert. All Rights Reserved

On May 25, just four days after we published our last issue, under the
totally misleading heading of "CIA and Drugs in Los Angeles" the House
Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI) held a closed door
hearing. It took us until June 22 to determine that the Committee heard
testimony that day from Department of Justice Inspector General Michael
Bromwich, who had not appeared before the Committee since the release of his
report last year. And it also heard from current CIA Inspector General Britt
Snider, who discussed Volume II of retired CIA IG Fred Hitz's report on the
whole Contra war - not Los Angeles. Los Angeles was Volume I. That's right -
They have had the hearing on Volume II. They did it in secret. The press did
not cover it. And it remains unclear, at this moment, as to whether HPSCI's
final report will even be declassified or made available to the public in any
form at all. This is not only a breach of every promise made to us in 1996 by
both Houses; it is, in my opinion, a complete breach of trust between the
government and the people.

In a June 22 conversation with HPSCI Deputy Staff Director, Tim Sample, I was
told that the Committee "would like to wrap this up this summer." I was also
told that the protocol for closing the investigation out had not been
finalized. It is "not known" whether there will be another hearing. It is
"not known" whether or if the Committee's final report will be declassified
or ever released. It is "not known" if any additional witnesses will be
called. I and retired DEA Agent Cele Castillo and presumably the other major
figures in the investigation have all received letters asking us to submit
whatever other evidence "we are aware of" before the Committee closes its
work.

This is a sign of true desperation as the Republican controlled Committee
must absolutely close the issue - to protect George W. Bush - before the 2000
Presidential campaign begins in earnest in October. It must also protect the
biggest secret of all from the American people: The entire economy, and the
entire political system itself, is currently hooked and dependent upon - drug
money.

I have been saying for years that you could show a video of George Bush
ordering drug runs, CIA agents laundering money and flying airplanes full of
drugs and no one in power would do anything about it. They would not be able
to. In this issue I will tell you, and the House, about something almost as
damning - a partially authenticated letter, written on CIA letterhead and
stamped "Top Secret", ostensibly written and signed by CIA Director William
J. Casey in late 1986, that admits to direct participation in the drug trade
[SEE STORY THIS ISSUE]. I have been aware of the existence of this letter for
approximately five months. I have had it read to me in its entirety. It was
not until I was given this last chance by HPSCI to present "all of the
information of which you are aware on the allegations" that I was able to
obtain an "On the Record" statement about the letter from Attorney Ray
Kohlman. The letter will be admitted into evidence in a new trial motion for
former Green Beret William Tyree in the near future. When that happens, From
The Wilderness will publish the letter, both on the Internet and in the
newsletter.

Now that the House has indicated its intent to close the matter for good and
all it is time to bring the letter forward - for good and all. I will also
see to it that the letter is widely distributed enough so that any of the
major news organizations will be able to follow up on it. The information in
this issue is enough for the House Intelligence Committee to go to the CIA
and compel it to confirm or deny the letter's authenticity.

Reading The Right Map

If nothing happens with further hearings, or with the letter, I will tell you
in advance exactly why.

Contributing Editor Catherine Austin Fitts, who was a Managing Director at
Dillon Read before becoming Assistant Secretary of Housing under George Bush
and who holds an MBA from Wharton makes things very simple. She points out
that the four largest states for the importation of drugs are New York,
Florida, Texas and California. She then points out that the top four money
laundering states in the U.S. (good for between 100 and 260 billion per year)
are New York, Florida, Texas and California. No surprise there. Then she rips
the breath from your lungs by pointing out that 80 per cent of all
Presidential campaign funds come from - New York, Florida, Texas and
California.

Civics test: Who are the current governors of Texas and Florida? From The
Wilderness has been working on a story for an upcoming issue that will show
conclusively, using testimony of law enforcement officers and U.S. Government
records, that Dominican drug gangs, who dominate the trade in the northeast
United States - especially New York and Pennsylvania - have been making
regular campaign donations to the Clinton-Gore-Democratic camp since the
early 90s. California drug sales are currently split between Democratically
allied crime factions and entrenched hard core Republican strongholds from
the Reagan era. People who shudder at the thought of the Chinese buying into
presidential politics would choke if they knew how much drug money was
involved. Why? Again, the answer is simpler than you might think. While the
Department of Justice estimates that $100 billion in drug funds are laundered
in the U.S. each year, other research, including research material from the
Andean Commission of Jurists cited by author Dan Russell in his soon to be
published book Drug War place the figure at around $250 billion per year.
Catherine Austin Fitts places the figure at $250 to $300 billion. Given the
fact that the UN estimated that in the early 1990s world retail volume in the
illegal drugs was $440 billion, $250 billion seems about right. Fitts, using
her Wall Street experience as an investment banker is then quick to point out
that the multiplier effect (x6) of $250 billion laundered would result in
$1.5 trillion dollars per year in U.S. cash transactions resulting from the
drug trade. How many jobs does $1.5 trillion represent? Why do President's
get re-elected? As Bill Clinton's staff recognized in 1992, "It's the economy
-Stupid!" During the Contra years, when the CIA and Bill Clinton were
swimming in cocaine, and Arkansas became the only state in the Union to ever
issue bearer bonds (laundry certificates), employment in Arkansas rose to an
all time high because there was so much money floating around. So what if
they don?t count all the dead bodies like two young boys Kevin Ives and Don
Henry, shot, bludgeoned and dismembered on a railroad track after witnessing
CIA drug drops. "It's the economy - Stupid!"

The Pop

Corporations trading on Wall Street, including many implicated in money
laundering schemes where products are sold with questionable bookkeeping
throughout drug producing regions, all have stock values that are based upon
annual sales. Known as "price to earnings" or "The Pop" the multiplier effect
in stock values is sometimes as much as a factor of thirty. Thus, for a firm
like GE or Piper Aircraft to have an additional $10 million in sales based
upon the drug trade, the net increase in these companies' stock value could
be as much as $300,000,000. Did GE sell $10 million dollars worth of consumer
products in Latin America last year? Easily. And since GE owns NBC is there a
chance that accurate reporting on the drug trade and CIA's involvement
therein might hurt their stock?

Disney owns ABC and has a huge retail, resort and entertainment empire that
benefits from the "drug multiplier." Would ABC consider hurting its parent's
stock value? Ronald Reagan's CIA Director, William Casey had been Chief
Counsel to Cap Cities Broadcasting until 1981. His old law firm represented
Cap Cities when it bought the ABC network in 1985. ABC's Peter Jennings, by
the way, had been doing a series of investigative reports on the CIA drug
bank (and successor to the Nugan Hand bank) Bishop, Baldwin, Rewald,
Dillingham and Wong when the buyout was initiated. Cap Cities (not
surprisingly) secured SEC approval in record time and effectively and
immediately silenced Peter Jennings who had previously refused to back down
from Casey's threats. Thereafter ABC was referred to as "The CIA network." I
have no doubt that the ABC "object lesson" was front and center for CNN
founder Ted Turner and Time-Warner when Henry Kissinger, Colin Powell and
(CIA vet) John Singlaub put the pressure on in the wake of April Oliver's
1998 "dead bang accurate" Sarin gas stories connecting CIA to the killing of
American defectors. Every major media corporation in the country trades on
Wall Street. There are no "independents" left and the American people are
left with the increasing cognitive dissonance of recognizing that they are
being fed useless bullshit. I wonder how they would respond to real a news
corporation if they saw or heard one.

It's Legal to be Bad

It is also perfectly legal for a Wall Street brokerage or investment bank to
go "offshore" and borrow once laundered drug money to finance a corporate
merger or leveraged buyout (LBO). Why do this? If you were a major
multi-national corporation in a cutthroat competition to buy a company with a
hundred million in sales (which might boost your stock value $3 billion) you
would be willing to pay a seemingly outrageous price. [How much would you be
willing to spend to make $3 billion? - 2.9?]. All an LBO is is an acquisition
financed on borrowed money. If you are Goldman-Sachs, arranging the deal, and
you can borrow laundered drug money at five per cent or a bank's money at ten
per cent where are you going to go? Remember that since the cost of capital
is lower using laundered drug money you are now able to outbid all the other
competitors because your total payback stays the same. Does this actually
happen? In 1998 the Russians asked for only $18 billion to save their entire
economy. With $440 billion a year moving around how could it not happen?

And a major drug dealer, like a Carlos Lehder, a Pablo Escobar, an Amado
Fuentes, a Matta Ballesteros or a Hank Rohn, sitting around with ten billion
dollars of useless illegal money, is more than happy to loan it at five
percent because his money is now legal and liquid. And, if one goes to prison
or dies, there is always another dealer to fill the void so that the supply
is not interrupted. The drug trade now has power because it is underwriting
the investments of the largest corporations in the world. It underwrites
politicians. It has hooked the gringos on Wall Street whose own children
sometimes die from its drugs. Wall Street cannot afford to let the drug
barons fall. Congress cannot afford to let the drug barons fall. Presidents
and their campaign finances cannot afford to let the drug barons fall. Why?
Because our top down economy, controlled by one per cent, cannot take the
risk of letting competition (business or political) have the edge of using
drug money. The third world has its revenge for European colonialism but Wall
Street still calls the shots. And for every million dollars of increased
sales or increased revenues from a buyout, the stock equity of the one per
cent who control Wall Street, increases twenty to thirty times. Remember -
The National Security Act of 1947, which created the CIA, was written by Wall
Street lawyer and banker Clark Clifford. Clark Clifford is the man who
brought the CIA backed drug bank BCCI into the United States. Allen Dulles
who virtually designed the CIA and served as its Director, and his brother
John Foster who was Eisenhower's Secretary of State, were Wall Street lawyers
from the firm Sullivan and Cromwell. Dwight Eisenhower's personal liaison
with the CIA was none other than Nelson Rockefeller. William Casey was
Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission under Richard Nixon.
Former CIA Directors from William Raborn to William Webster to Robert Gates
to James Woolsey to John Deutch all sit or have sat on the Boards of the
largest, richest and most powerful companies in America. As we near the
millenium one thing is clear to anyone who sees the economic system clearly.
The system is on the verge of implosion. Privately owned and operated prison
companies trade on Wall Street. One of those, Wackenhut, is a virtual CIA
proprietary. We have entered, at the end of the industrial age, a phase of
growth where we must incarcerate an ever expanding number of people to
sustain the growth of all the companies profiting from law enforcement,
crime, imprisonment and war. And the overheated stock market must grow or
collapse. The reason this nation spends five dollars on prisons for every one
dollar on higher education - even after seven straight years of falling crime
rates - is because there is more profit in it in the current economic model.
Hell, we have turned police departments into profit making entities through
asset forfeiture. This is insane! This economic model is patently no more
sustainable than a snake eating its own tail can be considered nourishment.
Organized crime has become the government and it seeks to make all citizens
become subliminally guilty participants, fearing for their own livelihoods,
believing that the system will collapse if someone really tackles the issues
facing us - as surely as the iceberg faced the Titanic.

The system will collapse anyway - unless the economic model is turned upside
down - unless a way is found or offered which will make it more profitable
than all other ways - to do the right thing. The only thing that will sustain
the current economic system, and its dependence on drug capital, is a police
state. New enforcement programs involving HUD and the Department of Justice
such as Project "Safe Streets" and "Weed and Seed" - along with their
corresponding butchery of the Constitution - show an emerging police state
already. The conduct of Congress and the White House in the CIA drug
investigations further demonstrate the arrogance, the fear and the
ever-increasing sloppiness of a system out of control. The veneer, the
illusion that we live under the rule of law cracks before our eyes, grows
thinner and ever more difficult to sell with each passing minute. All at once
the fears of the right of a New World Order and the fears of the left, of new
concentration camps and genocide suddenly become one and the same thing.
Dogma matters little to the oppressed. Pain tastes the same whether you call
it Fascism or Communism. Carlos Enrique Lehder Rivas, co-founder of the
Medellin Cartel, who was given a life sentence in 1990, now enjoys the
sunshine at his home in the Bahamas. He frolics regularly with gaming magnate
and owner of the Atlantis Hotel Sol Kerzner. His guests at parties include
Kevin Costner who played (I am sorry to say) both Elliot Ness and Jim
Garrison. Manuel Noriega will probably be out of prison before Bill Clinton
leaves office. The Kosovo Liberation Army has been funded with drug money and
has trained with Islamic terrorist Osama bin Laden. The son of a documented
drug trafficker, who very few people in this country even know anything
about, is "scheduled" to become our next President, simply because he has the
most money and he and his backers control most of "The Pop." How much time
can this government have? How much time does it deserve? Bill Clinton's
Farewell Address should probably be, "Apres moi, le deluge."



Mike Ruppert

-----
Aloha, He'Ping,
Om, Shalom, Salaam.
Em Hotep, Peace Be,
Omnia Bona Bonis,
All My Relations.
Adieu, Adios, Aloha.
Amen.
Roads End
Kris

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to