-Caveat Lector-
This is a real problem for China. I read another account that there are 125
million young men without hope of finding a Chinese wife. This account
states 111 million. By either account, this is a chilling statistic. These
are ideal soldier material, if their "spoiling" can be overcome.
I have an acquaintance who has gone to China twice, adopting these unwanted
baby girls. Both are beautiful, healthy children. I have even considered
this myself but do not think I could raise a child today on my own. The
friend who adopted the girls is not wealthy. She is my dog-groomer and she
and her husband both must work. She says that just getting the girls to
this country insures they will at least survive. She also told me there was
little trouble with the Chinese but be sure to have a visa from this country
to bring the child home. Anyone even considering adopting might consider
these baby girls. It could be a matter of life and death for them.
Amelia
----- Original Message -----
From: Para <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 04, 1996 7:32 AM
Subject: [CTRL] THE CULLING OF THE LITTLE EMPRESSES
> -Caveat Lector-
>
> Daily Mail, (UK)
> Saturday, 3 July 1999
> ======================================
>
> "THE CULLING OF THE LITTLE EMPRESSES"
> By
> Leslie Ann Downs
>
> Take a look at this picture.
> Boys massively outnumber the girls - evidence of a society that is purging
> despised female babies ... with chilling social consequences
> [The photo mentioned is not included here, however, picture a school
> classroom of 27, 10-year-old kids, of those 27 kids in view, only 3 are
> readily identifiable as girls.]
>
>
> There's something a little odd, and more than a little sinister, about
> these serried ranks of eager, happy, healthy little Chinese boys in a Fu
> Guang primary school in. southern China.
>
> Where are all their sisters?
>
> Answer: there aren't any. The lives of the sisters of these 'Little
> Emperors' (as the Chinese call their beloved, and often thoroughly
spoiled,
> sons) were snuffed out long before they could join their brothers at
school
>
> Drowned at birth, stuffed into rubbish bins or suffocated - or, if the
> parents could afford it aborted after an illegal sex-determination scan
> showed that the foetus was a girl.
>
> For two decades now, China, with a population of 1.3 billion has operated
a
> draconian 'one-child-one-family' policy. In theory, a good idea: China has
> around one-quarter of the world's population, but only 7pc of the world's
> arable land.
>
> If the population grows too fast, then starvation might well result. But,
> as so often in China, 'good ideas' executed with brutality and repression
> and skewed by corruption, tend to backfire at great human cost. In this
> case, it's at the cost of baby girls' lives.
>
> Traditionally the Chinese have always wanted boy children. So, if you're
> allowed only one child, every Chinese family is desperate to make sure
that
> it's a boy.
>
> Leo, from prosperous Canton, is one such parent. While his wife was in
> labour, he and his friends were drinking rice-wine toasts: 'This is for a
> boy!'
>
> As he drunkenly explained: 'We get one chance only. Any Chinese who says
> that he does not want his child to be a son is a liar. Some blame their
> wives, and some find a second wife and try again. A second wife is cheaper
> than the fine.'
>
> The fine for a second child in the city (rural families are allowed two if
> the first is a girl) is now £9,000 - a fortune when the average rural wage
> is less than £30 a month.
>
> Leo's wife, however, was taking no chances on mere rice-wine toasts.
> Without her husband's knowledge, she'd secretly paid a local doctor for an
> illegal scan to make sure that her child was a boy, thereby saving her
> marriage.
>
> Within a week of the boy's birth, his delighted father was celebrating
with
> rice wine again, baby in tow, showing off his triumph to his friends.
> 'Zhong Le!' (Bingo) he shouted repeatedly. Of course, Leo s wife, a
> city-dweller, could afford to bribe a doctor - poor rural women don't have
> the money.
>
> 'The pressure for a boy is too much,' she says. 'Most of my friends pay a
> doctor for a scan ... often they will stay with the doctor for an illegal
> abortion. Ninety-seven per cent of all abortions (many of them brutally
> enforced by the dreaded Birth Control Committees to prevent the
> 'unauthorised' birth of an extra child) are estimated to be of female
babies.
>
> When it comes to punishing those who break the 'one-child' rule the (often
> corrupt) Birth Control committees appear to have untrammelled powers.
Women
> who break the rules are often forced to have an abortion (even up to the
> moment of birth), forcibly sterilised and even imprisoned.
>
> Neighbours are paid to 'snitch' on anyone who might be trying to get away
> with an extra birth. It is no longer legal to destroy a famous house if a
> wife has 'transgressed' the birth quota, but it happens anyway - unless
the
> bribe to the local Birth Control Committee is large enough.
>
> So desperate are Chinese couples for a boy that, if they've aborted (or
> murdered) a baby girl and now find that they cannot have a child, they
turn
> to kidnap gangs who will charge rural parents up to £1,000 for a stolen
boy.
>
> Even my family has been affected by the boy-kidnapping trade. My
> sister-in-law, Nellie, is a Chinese Singaporean. Nellie and my brother's
> son, Martin, looks sufficiently Chinese to tempt these ruthless gangs and,
> while he was still of lucrative 'kidnappable' age, Nellie lived in terror
> for him.
>
> The kidnapping of boy babies for the Chinese market has even spread to
> Singapore!' she told me.
>
> In Shenzhen, a rich southern city during one two-month period last year,
no
> fewer than 56 advertisements appeared in the local Press from desperate
> parents trying to find their stolen boy children.
>
> One such couple, Yau Chau Chi and her husband Au Ming Chen, had their
> two-year-old son, Kam Ching snatched from outside their home.
>
> The kidnappers, after reading their appeal, clearly decided that - in
> addition to selling the toddler to some rural family - they could make a
> quick buck out of the heartbroken parents as well. They demanded a ransom
> of £1,500. Kam Ching's parents, not rich by our standards, managed to
> scrape the money together, paid it to an intermediary - and still, 18
> months later, do not have their child.
>
> In their view, the police have been dilatory and careless. "It's
hopeless,"
> says Kam Ching's despairing father. His wife is now too distraught to talk
> about her vanished son any more.
>
> Rural people (and 70pc of China's population is rural) cannot afford scans
> and amniocentesis to determine a foetus's sex. And so they have the baby
> girls murdered at birth, continuing the long feudal practice of female
> infanticide.
>
> As an ancient Chinese saying puts it: 'How sad it is to be a woman.
Nothing
> on earth is held so cheap.' A son can work in the fields, carry on the
> family name and, most importantly, supply financial support for his
parents
> when they get old (there's virtually no pension or social security system
> yet in China).
>
> A girl, when she gets married becomes the property of her husband's
family,
> her own family's investment in her disappears. 'A married daughter is like
> spilled water' (i.e. a complete waste).
>
> Even those girls who are born get given names which emphasise their lower
> status-names like 'Pandi' (expecting a boy), Yanan (second to a boy) and
> Zhaodi (bring a brother).
>
> But, if killing her baby daughter, however much of a 'waste' she would
> prove to be on marriage, is something a heartbroken mother cannot bring
> herself to do, she will abandon her - often well-wrapped, well-dressed and
> with a note pinned to her clothing about her astrological sign, her name
> and an appeal for someone to take her to a state-run 'orphanage'.
>
> I was the first person in this country to write about the 'dying rooms' of
> some of these 'orphanages' where sick and abandoned baby girls were left
> alone in squalor to die of starvation. Deliberate death-by-starvation was,
> I pointed out one of the kinder methods of girl-baby 'culling' being
> practised, both officially and unofficially, in China today. I was, of
> course, bitterly attacked by Chinese authorities.
>
> And, reluctant though I am to give credit of any kind to this grotesque
> regime, the Chinese authorities have improved the lot of their abandoned
> baby girls. They've allowed outside charities to work with the babies, and
> help the hard-pressed (and often loving, but untrained, poorly paid and
> hopelessly ill-equipped) staff.
>
> Besides, thanks to the uproar over the 'dying rooms' story, they've
> discovered that there's money to be made out of these once 'disposable'
> baby girls. Childless couples in the West clamoured for the chance to
adopt
> them - in exchange, of course, for 'donations'.
>
> The Chinese do not allow healthy boys to be adopted and, in any ease,
> healthy boys are rarely abandoned in the first place - they are far too
> valuable. Which is why all those happy British families, who justifiably
> show off their adopted Chinese children to the Press, are always showing
> off little girls.
>
> But even the Chinese are beginning to worry about whether the ferociously
> enforced 'one-child' policy is having unforeseen repercussions. The 'good
> idea' of population control has gone badly wrong.
>
> The authorities boast that, without the harshness of their policy China
> would have 300 million more people than it already has. But when you skew,
> wittingly or unwittingly, the normal gender ratio of a population, you set
> in train consequences that are socially devastating. I've already dealt
> with the spate of boy-kidnapping crime. But there is also a staggering
> growth in girl-kidnapping crime as well.
>
> That's because the 'one-child' policy, which encourages the birth of boys
> only, means that (according to one Chinese sociologist I met in Peking) 'a
> whole generation of young men is growing up without hope of ever finding a
> wife'.
>
> 'Having a wife and a family is a "civilising" influence on young men. If
> they can't find wives, they resort to prostitution - which is why we have
> such an increase in Aids and sexually transmitted diseases. And, I'm
afraid
> to say, it also leads to wife kidnapping, which is something we thought
had
> vanished with the communist liberation and the end of the feudal era.'
>
> Ethnic Chinese girls from Vietnam are the prime targets for gangs who
steal
> them, smuggle them across the border and sell them in rural China.
>
> And last year, when I was investigating the famine in North Korea, I was
> astonished to find that even North Korean women who escaped across the
> Tumen river border were also being captured, or willingly selling
> themselves, to gangs who sold them on to local ethnic-Korean Chinese men
in
> search of a wife.
>
> There are now at least 111 million more men than women in China, a
> grotesque gender distortion, which is unique in the world.
>
> And those men, those 'Little Emperors', those 'Little Suns' upon whom
their
> parents' love has been so lavished have become spoiled, self-indulgent
> softies, according to some deeply alarmed Chinese commentators.
>
> In big cities, such as Peking Shanghai and Canton, I'm constantly
> astonished to see so many of these fat little demanding butterballs,
gorged
> on expensive fast food, bullying their besotted mothers in a way which is
> totally at odds with Confucian 'respect your elders' philosophy.
>
> One leading journal, the Peking Review, interviewed university teachers
who
> noted with dismay that many of the 'Little Emperors' now arriving at
> university are unable to tie their laces, peel a boiled egg, or do
anything
> practical for themselves.
>
> 'I think we have now produced the most spoiled, selfish generation in
> Chinese history. It is a tragedy for the future of our society,' one of
> their interviewees lamented.
>
> And, oddly enough, this 'spoiled, selfish generation' of city-dwellers
> looks like being a largely childless generation after all. Children
require
> some kind of sacrifice, the whims and needs of parents can no longer come
> first. But if you have been indulged all your life as a 'Little Emperor',
> why should you want to breed another 'Little Emperor' to take precedence
> over you?
>
> Perhaps, as far as the cities are concerned, China need never have
enforced
> its 'one-child' policy so brutally. Rising prosperity - and selfish
> consumerism - might have (as in most of the developed world) cut the
> population growth anyway. But then China has never chosen the least brutal
> way on offer in order to achieve its ends.
>
> __________________________________________________
> ¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»
> ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
> Today's mighty oak
> is just yesterday's nut
> that held its ground.
>
> http://www.davidicke.com
> __________________________________________________
> ¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»
> ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
> Check out his website & books at:
> http://www.davidicke.com
> .... "The Biggest Secret" ....
> "...And the Truth Shall Set you Free"
> ====================================
>
> Because e-mail can be altered electronically,
> the integrity of this communication cannot be guaranteed.
>
> .
>
> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
> ==========
> CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting
propagandic
> screeds are not allowed. Substance-not soapboxing! These are sordid
matters
> and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and
outright
> frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor
effects
> spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
> gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to
readers;
> be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
> nazi's need not apply.
>
> Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
> ========================================================================
> Archives Available at:
> http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
>
> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
> ========================================================================
> To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
> SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
> SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Om
>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
