This should make for interesting reading.  John Lee
 

 

 

TODAY's COMMUNIQUE By Authority of Ephesians 5:11

==================

http://www.cityoflondon.gov.uk

THE CITY

========

When people think of England such terms as 'Great Britain,' 'The Queen,'

'The Crown,' 'Crown Colonies,' 'London,' 'The City of London,' and 'British

Empire' come to mind and blend together into an indistinguishable blur.

They are generally looked upon as synonymous, as being representative of the

same basic system. During the 1950s and 1960s the author lived in England

(London for five years) without even beginning to realize the vast

difference that exists in the meaning of some of the above terms.

When people hear of 'The Crown' they automatically think of the King or

Queen; when they hear of 'London' or the 'The City' they instantly think of

the capital of England in which the monarch has his or her official

residence.

To fully understand the unique and generally unknown subject we must define

our terms:

When we speak of 'The City' we are in fact referring to a privately owned

Corporation - or Sovereign State - occupying an irregular rectangle of 677

acres and located right in the heart of the 610 square mile 'Greater London'

area. The population of 'The City' is listed at just over four thousand,

whereas the population of 'Greater London' (32 boroughs) is approximately

seven and a half million.

The 'Crown' is a committee of twelve to fourteen men who rule the

independent sovereign state known as London or 'The City.' 'The City' is

not part of England. It is not subject to the Sovereign. It is not under

the rule of the British parliament. Like the Vatican in Rome, it is a

separate, independent state. It is the Vatican of the commercial world.

The City, which is often called "the wealthiest square mile on earth," is

ruled over by a Lord Mayor. Here are grouped together Britian's great

financial and commercial institutions: Wealthy banks, dominated by the

privately-owned (Rothschild controlled) Bank of England, Lloyd's of London,

the London Stock Exchange, and the offices of most of the leading

international trading concerns. [Such as the British Invisibles, I kid you

not]. Here, also, is located Fleet Street, the heart and core of the

newspaper and publishing worlds.

TWO MONARCHS

============

The Lord Mayor, who is elected for a one year stint, is the monarch in the

City. As Aubrey Menen says in "London", Time-Life, 1976, p. 16: "The

relation of this monarch of the City to the monarch of the realm [Queen] is

curious and tells much." It certainly is and certainly does !

When the Queen of England goes to visit the City she is met by the Lord

Mayor at Temple Bar, the symbolic gate of the City. She bows and asks for

permission to enter his private, sovereign State. During such State visits

"the Lord Mayor in his robes and chain, and his entourage in medieval

costume, outshines the royal party, which can dress up no furhter than

service uniforms." The Lord Mayor leads the queen into his city.

The reason should be clear. The Lord Mayor is the monarch. The Queen is

his subject ! The monarch always leads the way. The subject always stays a

pace or two behind !

The small clique who rule the City dictate to the British Parliament. It

tells them what to do, and when. In theory Britian is ruled by a Prime

Minister and a Cabinet of close advisers. These 'fronts' go to great

lengths to create the impression that they are running the show but, in

reality, they are mere puppets whose strings are pulled by the shadowy

characters who dominate behind the scenes. As the former British Prime

Minister of England during the late 1800s Benjamin D'israeli wrote: "So you

see... the world is governed by very different personages from what is

imagined by those who are not behind the scenes" (Coningsby, The Century

Co., N.Y., 1907, p. 233).

This fact is further demonstrated by another passage from Menen's book: "The

Prime Minister, a busy politician, is not expected to understand the

mysteries of high finance, while the Chancellor of the Exchequer [Budget

Director] is only expected to understand them when he introduces the budget.

Both are advised by the permanent officials of the Treasury, and these

listen to the City. If they suspect that some policy of the government will

[back-fire]... it is no use their calling up British ambassadors to ask if

it is so; they can find out more quickly from the City. As one ambassador

complained to me, diplomats are nowadays no more than office boys, and slow

ones at that.

"The City will know. They will tell the Treasury and the Treasury will tell

the Prime Minister. Woe betide him if he does not listen. The most striking

instance of this happened in recent history. In 1956 the then Prime

Minister, Sir Anthony Eden... launched a war to regain the Suez Canal. It

had scarcely begun when the City let it be known that in a few days he would

have no more money to fight it; the Pound would collapse. He stopped the

war and was turned out of office by his party. When the Prime Minister

rises to address the Lord Mayor's banquet, he hopes that the City will put

more behind him than the gold plate lavishly displayed on the sideboard" (p.

18).

History clearly reveals that the British government is the bond slave of the

"invisible and inaudible" force centered in the City. The City calls the

tune. The "visible and audible leaders" are mere puppets who dance to that

tune on command. They have no power. They have no authority. In spite of

all the outward show they are mere pawns in the game being played by the

financial elite.

 

HISTORY of the 'CITY'

====================

From the time of William the Conqueror until the middle of the seventeenth

century the British Monarchs ruled supreme - their word was law. They truly

were Sovereign in every sense of the word.

As British strength and influence grew around the world toward the end of

the 1600s the wealth, strength and influence of the elite merchants in the

City also grew - only at a faster pace. In 1694 the privately owned Bank of

England (a central bank) was established to finance the profligate ways of

William III. The bank was financed by a group of City merchants who used

William Paterson as a 'front.' The names of the founders have never been

made public.

It was at that juncture that the Bank of England and the City began to

dominate and control the affairs of Britain. Their influence and wealth

grew in leaps and bounds in the century that followed. "The Illustrated

Universal History," 1878, records that "Great Britain emerged from her long

contest with France with increased power and national glory. Her Empire was

greatly expanded in all parts of the world; her supremacy on the sea was

undisputed; her wealth and commerce were increased... But with all this

national prosperity, the lower classes of the English people were sunk in

extreme wretchedness and poverty, having been bled dry during the struggle

of the previous twenty years.

It was at this juncture (1815) that the House of Rothschild seized control

of the British economy, the Bank of England and the City - and, through

their other branches, control of the other European nations.

Prior to this period Britain had developed colonies and outposts in the

far-flung reaches of the globe. Having been thrown out of the Western

Hemisphere, Britain now concentrated on acquiring and developing additional

possessions elsewhere.

During its heyday in the nineteenth century approximately 90% of all

international trade was carried in British ships. Other shippers had to pay

the Crown royalties or commissions for the 'privilege' of doing business on

the high seas. During these years 'Britannia Ruled the Waves' through the

domination of the most modern and powerful navy known up to that time.

TWO SEPARATE EMPIRES

====================

To avoid misunderstanding, it is important that the reader recognize the

fact that two separate empires were operating under the guise of the British

Empire. One was the Crown Empire and the other was the British Empire.

All the colonial possessions that were white were under the Sovereign - i.e.

under the authority of the British government. Such nations as the Union of

South Africa, Australia, New Zealand and Canada were governed under British

law. These only represented thirteen percent of the people who made up the

inhabitants of the British Empire.

All the other parts of the British Empire - nations like India, Eqypt,

Bermuda, Malta, Cyprus and colonies in Central Africa, Sinapore, Hong Kong

and Gilbraltar (those areas inhabited by the browns, yellows and blacks)

were all Crown Colonies. These were not under British rule. The British

parliament had no authority over them. They were privately owned and ruled

by a private club in London, England known as the Crown. The Crown's

representative in such areas held the absolute power of life and death over

all the people under his juristiction. There were no courts and no method

of appeal or retribution against a decision rendered by the representatives

of the Crown. Even a British citizen who committed a crime in a Crown

colony was subject to the Crown law. He couldn't appeal to British law as

it didn't apply.

As the Crown owned the committee known as the British government there was

no problem getting the British taxpayer to pay for naval and military forces

to maintain the Crown's supremacy in these areas. Any revolts were met with

terrible retribution by the British navy at no cost to the Crown.

The City reaped fantastic profits from its operations conducted under the

protection of the British armed forces. This wasn't British commerce and

British wealth. The international bankers, prosperous merchants and the

British aristocracy who were part of the 'City' machine accumulated vast

fortunes which they lavishly squandered in their pursuit of prestige and

standing in British Society. Had the wealth been spread out among all the

people in the British Isles prosperity would have abounded. [I am not

suggesting that this should have been done, the thefts from the exploited

should never have occured to begin with - ralph].

In spite of the wealth of the world flowing into the City the majority of

the British people were barely making ends meet. Many were impoverished to

the point of despair. The elite lived in regal splendor. The poor British

peasants were never given a chance to get a cut of the action.

Simon Haxey in "England's Money Lords Tory M.P.," drew his readers'

attention to the "total disregard or open contempt displayed by the

aristocracy" towards the British people. He also asked, "What part do the

colonial people play in the battle for democracy when they themselves have

no democratic rights and the British governing class refuses to grant such

rights" (pp. 114,115) [we all know the difference between democracy and

republics I hope - ralph]

David Lloyd George, a future prime minister, emphasized the power of the

City and its total contempt for the "wretches" who were not part of the

'club.' In a 1910 speech he stated: "We do most of the business of the

world. We carry more international trade - probably ten times more - than

Germany. Germany carries her own trade largely. The international trade is

ours. Well, we do not do it for nothing. As a matter of fact, our shipping

brings us over a hundred millions (pounds) a year, mostly paid by that

wretched foreigner. I'm taxing the foreigner for all I know... You've heard

a good deal of talk here, probably, about the exportation of capital abroad.

There is no way in which we can make the foreigner pay more... We get the

foreigner in four ways by that. The first way we leave to Lord

Rothschild..." ("Better Times", published 1910).

About seventy years ago Vincent Cartwright Vickers stated that

"...financiers in reality took upon themselves, perhaps not the

responsibility, but certainly the power of controlling the markets of the

world and therefore the numerous relationships between one nation and

another, involving international friendship and mistrusts... Loans to

foreign countries are organized and arranged by the City of London with no

thought whatsoever of the nation's welfare but soley in order to increase

indebtedness upon which the City thrives and grows rich... This national

and mainly international dictatorship of money which plays off one country

against another and which, through ownership of a large portion of the

press, converts the advertisement of its own private opinion into a

semblance of general public opinion, cannot for much longer be permitted to

render Democratic Government a mere nickname. Today, we see through a glass

darkly; for there is so much which 'it would not be in the public interest

to divulge'..." (E.C. Knuth, "Empire of 'The City'", p. 65).

All of the above points were stressed by Roland G. Usher on pages 80, 83 and

84 of "Pan Germanism," written in 1913: "The London and Paris bankers [the

international bankers] control the available resources of the world at any

one moment, and can therefore practically permit or prevent the undertaking

of any enterprise requiring the use of more than a hundred million dollars

actual value..."

The international bankers "own probably the major part of the bonded

indebtedness of the world. Russia, Turkey, Egypt, India, China, Japan, and

South America are probably owned, so far as any nation can be owned, in

London or Paris. Payment of interest on these vast sums is secured by the

pledging of the public revenues of these countries, and, in the case of the

weaker nations, by the actual delivery of the perception into the hands of

the agents of the English and French bankers. In addition, a very large

share, if not the major part, of the stocks and industrial securities of the

world are owned by those two nations and the policies of many of the world's

enterprises dictated by their financial heads. The world itself, in fact,

pays them tribute; it actually rises in the morning to earn its living by

utilizing their capital, and occupies its days in making them still

wealthier."

In 1946 E.C. Knuth wrote: "The bulwark of the British financial oligarchy

lies in its ageless and self-perpetuating nature, its long-range planning

and prescience, its facility to outwait and break the patience of its

opponents. The transient and temporal statesmen of Europe and particularly

of Britain itself, who have attempted to curb this monstrosity, have all

been defeated by their limited tenure of confidence. Obligated to show

action and results in a too short span of years, they have been outwitted

and outwaited, deluged with irritants and difficulties; eventually obliged

to temporize and retreat. There are few who have opposed them in Britain

and America, without coming to a disgraceful end, but many, who served them

well, have also profited well" ("Empire of 'The City,'" p. 65).

 

====== END of CHAPTER 6 from the book "DESCENT into SLAVERY", by Des Griffin

 

You have just completed reading the sixth chapter of ""DESCENT into

SLAVERY", by Des Griffin. If you would like to obtain a copy of this

excellent book, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

 

 

Here is the Table of Contents of this book:

1. A Voice From the Past

2. Early Americans Understood History

3. Insidious Forces At Work ?

4. Confessions of a Noted Historian

5. Rothschild Dynasty

6. The 'Crown' And 'The City'

7. Principles of Banking

8. World at War

9. Treachery at Versailles

10. Setting the Scene for World World War II

11. 'Blood, Toil, Tear and Sweat'

12. 'Urban Renewal' Japanese Style

13. World War II - A Summary

14. 'Urban Renewal' British and American Style

15. The Science of Destruction

16. The Case of the Vanishing Dollar

17. The White House and the New World Order

Index

 

 

=======================================

Did you know that Airplanes "defuel" MILLIONS of GALLONS of JET FUEL into

the CHEASAPEAKE BAY each YEAR ? From BWI Airport ALONE ! In fact by LAW

they MUST "defuel" [read DUMP] remaining fuel BEFORE LANDING by LAW !

What about your Lakes and Rivers let alone the fine mist of JET FUEL in our

atmosphere it creates. Yet if you spill some motor oil in your backyard and

get "caught" they might have the EPA SWAT Team [yes they have SWAT teams

too] Surround then confiscate your property. Oh the HYPOCRISY ! Oh the

people are ever so ignorant. If you have research on this "defueling"

debacle, please forward it to ralph, thanks !

 

Did you know that Brit Hume, newsman, had a son named Sandy, also an up and

coming white house/washington dc corresponent ? Did you know that he

SUPPOSEDLY Killed himself ? An up and coming very popular and successful

young man now dead. Please let me know what you find out.

 

http://www.chinfo.navy.mil/navpalib/people/secnav/secnavbi.html

 

RON BROWN'S HIGH LEVEL MUSLIM ASSOCIATE DIED ON TWA 800:

Mohamed Ferrat was supposed to be on Ron Brown's

death flight. He changed plans last minute.

Then he died on Flight 800. WHAT are the ODDS ?

See either:

http://TeamInfinity.com/800

http://TeamInfinity.com/rb.html

 

P.S. RE-READ for updates: Why is almost No ONE cognizant of, or talking

about the FACT that Betty Currie, WhiteHouse Secretary, had a brother and

sister, both now dead with in 6 months of each other. Brother was severely

beaten and hospitalized the night before she testifyed before the Campaign

Finance hearing August 97, see Oregonian January 29, 1998 Page A9, then

killed in a car "accident" late december 1997 within one month of her

testifying in Lewinsky Grand Jury. Sister also now dead. [AP Wire Service]

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.jpfo.org <- Looks like a noble effort to be encouraged

[[EMAIL PROTECTED]] JFPO Jews for Preservation of Firearms Ownership

MIKE HUCKABEE PRESIDENT 2000 http://www.state.ar.us/governor/governor.html

DENNY's GOT the 2nd Amendment MESSAGE, make sure though, Give em a Holler

1-800-733-6697

 

CLASSIC QUOTES:

"We are fans of President Clinton and admire his positions and policies

concerning Israel. Clinton is very positive toward Israel and the Jews, and

Monica and I are Jews,'' Ginsburg said. Ginsburg spoke in a telephone

interview with the Yediot correspondent in New York, Zaddok Yeheskieli.

Ginsburg's remarks were published in Hebrew and translated back into

English by The Associated Press.

"Balanced Budget Biggest Mathematical Lie of Modern History" Martin Gross

Consider the following:

Could it be that the Iraq thing is really all about doing apostate

"Israel's" will and not God's or anyone's else ? Something to

consider BEFORE spilling all kinds of Blood.

 

------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Some call it Communism. I call it Judaism" "Rabbi" Stephen S. Wise

This "Rabbi" is LYING as he should have said TALMUDISM NOT JUDAISM

To be more precise he should have said "Talmudism"

http://www.hoffman-info.com/talmudtruth.html

"The illegal we do immediately. The unconstitutional takes a little longer."

--Henry Kissinger [found @ RocketMail's Daily Quote]

 

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Write [EMAIL PROTECTED] to find the BLOCKBUSTER suppressed book:

 

"Tragedy & Hope" by Carroll Quigley

 

------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

To find out how to get the suppressed hush hush 384 page BLOCKBUSTER book:

"FINAL JUDGEMENT" by Michael Collins Piper, that argues that ISRAEL's MOSSAD

murdered President John F. Kennedy, or Myron Fagan's tapes, contact

[EMAIL PROTECTED] and ask for some sample copies of The SPOTLIGHT.

---------------------------

TO RECEIVE email from ralph: send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and in

the Subject make sure your email address and the word GO-RALPH (no spaces)

is in the subject.

TO STOP RECEIVING email from ralph: send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

and in the Subject make sure your email address and the word WHOA-RALPH

(no spaces) is in the subject.

Reply via email to