___________________________________________

What's going on in your world?  Find Out.
Visit Stratfor's Global Intelligence Center
http://www.stratfor.com/world/default.htm
___________________________________________

OTHER FEATURES ON STRATFOR.COM

Kuchma Capitulates to Russia
http://www.stratfor.com/CIS/commentary/c9907132305.htm

Continued Recession Threatens Czech Republic EU Bid
http://www.stratfor.com/CIS/commentary/c9907132340.htm

Student Unrest May Give Leverage to Iran's Conservatives
http://www.stratfor.com/MEAF/commentary/9907132110.htm

Australia's Foreign Policy Shift Accelerated
http://www.stratfor.com/asia/specialreports/special26.htm

Iraqi Armored Battalions Beat the Heat
http://www.stratfor.com/MEAF/commentary/9907131800.htm

Budapest Denounces New Slovak Language Law
http://www.stratfor.com/CIS/commentary/c9907130001.htm
__________________________________


STRATFOR.COM
Global Intelligence Update
July 14, 1999

Taiwan Sticks to Sovereignty Declaration -- Much to U.S. Chagrin

Summary:

Taiwan has refused to back down from President Lee Teng-hui's
declaration that the island was abandoning the "One China"
concept, despite economic, political, and military threats from
Beijing.  However, Taiwan has yet to face the likely threats from
the U.S., which is attempting to mend relations with Beijing and
so does not appreciate being put in the middle of a new crisis.

Analysis:

Taiwan has refused to back down from President Lee Teng-hui's
declaration that the island was abandoning the "One China"
concept.  Lee's abandonment of one ambiguous policy for a
slightly less ambiguous but much more confrontational one -- just
a step short of a declaration of Taiwan's independence -- has
drawn threats from mainland China and subdued but substantial
concern from the United States.  On July 13, Lee reiterated
Taiwan's new policy of national sovereignty. "The Republic of
China has always been a sovereign state, not a local government,"
Lee said to visiting Honduran Foreign Minister Roberto Flores
Bermudez.  And to emphasize Taiwan's newly declared sovereignty,
the Taiwanese Foreign Ministry issued a statement on July 13
proclaiming Taiwanese sovereignty over the Spratly Islands in the
South China Sea.  The statement condemned recent Philippine and
Malaysian activities on the islands and declared that the
Spratlys and the entire South China Sea belong to Taiwan
"legally, historically, geographically, or in reality."

Taiwan has apparently evaluated and accepted the potential
consequences of its declaration.  An official from Taiwan's
Industrial Development Bureau was quoted by Agence-France Presse
on July 13 as saying, "Taiwan should see its exports pummeled by
7.64 percent should the mainland authorities slap a trade
sanction" on Taiwanese exports to mainland China. However, this
would have the effect of reducing Taiwan's trade surplus with
China from $14.29 billion to $12.89 billion.  Evidently $1.4
billion is an acceptable cost.  And while both the Taiwan dollar
and the stock market fell July 13 in response to increased
tensions with China, the drops were not dramatic. The Taiwan
dollar closed at 32.275 against the U.S. dollar, from a closing
of 32.255 the previous day. The Taiwan stock market weighted
average fell 3.1 percent, following a 1.0 percent drop the
previous day.

Taiwan also appears confident, for the time being, that China
does not pose a military threat.  Hong Kong's Ming Pao daily
cited anonymous People's Liberation Army officers on July 13 as
stating that China is considering holding large-scale military
exercises in a show of force over Taiwan's decision to redefine
relations with China as "state-to-state."   However, Taiwanese
Defense Ministry spokesman Kung Fan-Ding responded, "There is no
sign that Chinese communist troops are preparing for large scale
war games. But the military are keeping a close watch on any
development."  The fact that the U.S. aircraft carriers Kitty
Hawk and Constellation are in or near the region can only bolster
Taiwan's confidence.

Finally, Taiwan holds to the notion that negotiations with the
mainland can continue, despite Beijing's threat that the
declaration of sovereignty could lead to a break in talks.
Taiwan Presidential Deputy Secretary General Lin Pi-Chao said
July 13 that Taiwan was still pushing for talks with Beijing,
despite a redefinition of the relationship between Taiwan and
China. According to Agence France Presse, Lin said, "We have
made preparations to push for political dialogue and drafted
several proposals based on Taiwan's new status declared by
President Lee. We are willing to adopt a more positive attitude
on the negotiation table if their reaction is practical and
rational." Lin added, "We definitely would not see a backstep in
cross-strait relations, and we hope Wang Daohan, chairman of the
Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait (ARATS), would
visit Taiwan as scheduled."

The United States, which has intervened in the past as cross-
straits relations escalated to potential military confrontation,
has been extremely cautious in its response to Lee's declaration.
In response to journalists' questions at a regular briefing on
July 12, State Department spokesman James Foley said, "I can only
speak for the United States, and our policy is unchanged.  Our
"One China" policy is long-standing and certainly well known."
According to Foley, the U.S. maintains that Taiwan's future is a
matter for Taiwan and China to resolve, though "the United States
has an abiding interest and concern that any such resolution be a
peaceful one."  Foley said Taiwan's position did not affect the
U.S. defensive commitment to Taiwan under the Taiwan Relations
Act.  Foley refused to declare Lee's statement "unhelpful," or to
evaluate whether or not it would have a negative impact on cross
straits negotiations.  When asked whether the U.S. would attempt
to restrain Taiwan's leaders, or pressure them not to take
actions against U.S. interests in East Asia, as Washington had
done in the past, Foley rejected that characterization of U.S.
behavior.

The U.S. position was somewhat stronger on July 13, when State
Department spokesman James Rubin announced that officials from
the American Institute of Taiwan -- Washington's unofficial
diplomatic channel to Taipei -- would meet with Taiwanese
authorities on July 14 to "clarify from Taipei what the
significance, if any, of these statements are."  Rubin said the
U.S. remains concerned about Lee's comments, noting, "It is not
helpful for the Taiwanese authorities to make statements that
would make it harder to have dialogue."  He went on to say, "We
are also concerned that it's not helpful for Beijing to make
statements that indicate that a dialogue is harder to achieve."

For Washington, Taiwan's sudden declaration of sovereignty could
not come at a worse time.  The U.S. is attempting to repair
relations with Beijing shattered by the bombing of the Chinese
embassy in Belgrade.  In fact, U.S. State Department legal
advisor David Andrews and Deputy Assistant Secretary for East
Asia and the Pacific Susan Shirk will reportedly be in Beijing
from July 14-17 to discuss compensation for NATO's bombing of the
embassy.  While trying to atone for the embassy bombing, the U.S.
is attempting to maintain pressure on Beijing regarding China's
World Trade Organization membership bid.  And the U.S. is pushing
for development of a theater missile defense system with Japan,
South Korea, and possibly Taiwan -- a move that China sees as a
direct threat.  Now Washington must tread a diplomatic minefield
laid by Taiwan.

That alone may help explain why Taiwan chose this time to declare
its sovereignty.  Taiwan has watched China grow more aggressive
in its foreign policy -- pressuring Japan to avoid defensive ties
with Taiwan, asserting Beijing's claim to the Spratlys, building
a strategic alliance with and purchasing advanced weapons from
Russia.  Taiwan has also watched as Chinese reformers, struggling
against vested interests in the government and military, have
been unable to prop up the shaky Chinese economy.  Now, with
rumors of a devaluation of the yuan again in the wind, hopes for
the continued dominance of reformers in Beijing are fading.  With
a return to old-school Communist leaders and state-centric
economic policies in China, Taiwan can only anticipate a
deteriorating cross-strait dialogue regardless of its self-
declared status.  And while China slowly regresses, the U.S.
appears to have lost both leverage and commitment in its China
policy.

Taiwan, anticipating the worst, may be attempting to sabotage
U.S. efforts at reconciliation with China in hopes of realigning
U.S. policy in the region.  It's a risky maneuver -- similar to
attempts underway in the Caucasus and the Balkans -- and there is
no guarantee that Washington will be swayed.   After Kosovo, and
as presidential elections draw near, the U.S. has a great deal of
foreign and defense policy to reevaluate.  It is not ready for
the next crisis quite yet.  Regardless of the direction China
appears to be heading, Washington is unlikely to appreciate
having its hand forced, and will likely attempt to pressure Lee
to retract his statement -- at least for now.

__________________________________________________

SUBSCRIBE to FREE, DAILY GLOBAL INTELLIGENCE UPDATES (GIU)
http://www.stratfor.com/services/giu/subscribe.asp

or send your name, organization, position, mailing
address, phone number, and e-mail address to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THE GLOBAL INTELLIGENCE UPDATES (GIU)
http://www.stratfor.com/services/giu/subscribe.asp
___________________________________________________

STRATFOR.COM
504 Lavaca, Suite 1100
Austin, TX 78701
Phone: 512-583-5000
Fax: 512-583-5025
Internet: http://www.stratfor.com/
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___________________________________________________

(c) 1999, Stratfor, Inc.



Reply via email to