-Caveat Lector-

from:
http://www.aci.net/kalliste/
<A HREF="http://www.aci.net/kalliste/">The Home Page of J. Orlin Grabbe</A>
-----

Today's Lesson From La-Bas

by J. K. Huysmans


"But all this," said Des Hermies, "does not explain how, from a man of
piety, he [Gilles de Rais] was suddenly changed into a Satanist, from a
placid scholar into a violator of little children, a 'ripper' of boys
and girls."

"I have already told you that there are no documents to bind together
the two parts of this life so strangely divided, but in what I have been
narrating you can pick out some of the threads of the duality. To be
precise, this man, as I have just had you observe, was a true mystic. He
witnessed the most extraordinary events which history has ever shown.
Association with Jeanne d'Arc certainly stimulated his desires for the
divine. Now from lofty Mysticism to base Satanism there is but one step.
In the Beyond all things touch. He carried his zeal for prayer into the
territory of blasphemy. He was guided and controlled by that group of
sacrilegious priests, transmuters of metals, and evokers of demons, by
whom he was surrounded at Tiffauges."

"You think, then, that the Maid of Orleans was really responsible for
his career of evil?"

"To a certain point. Consider. She roused an impetuous soul, ready for
anything, as well as for orgies of saintliness as for ecstacies of
crime.

"There was no transition between the two phases of his being. The moment
Jeanne was dead he fell into the hands of sorcerers who were the most
learned of scoundrels and the most unscrupulous of scholars. These men
who frequented the chatreau de Tiffauges were fervent Latinists,
marvellous conversationalists, possessors of forgotten arcana, guardians
of world-old secrets. Gilles was evidently more fitted to live with them
than with men like Dunois and La Hire. These magicians . . . [were] the
patricians of intellect of the fifteenth century. Not having found
places in the Church, where they would certainly have accepted no
position beneath that of cardinal or pope, they could, in those troubled
times of ignorance, but take refuge in the patronage of a great lord
 like Gilles."
=====
Nukes R Us

China Says It Has Neutron Bomb

And what's more we built it ourselves and Taiwan doesn't have one

BEIJING - Buried in a tiresome-looking 40-page government report lay
what appeared to be a minor scientific detail, almost invisible because
it was mentioned so casually, in a passing reference three sentences
long.
But it was not minor at all. China has designed a neutron weapon, the
report said, as well as miniaturized nuclear weapons.

It was the timing, not the content, of the revelation that made it so
significant when it emerged on Thursday morning. Scientists have known
for years that China had neutron weapon capability, having detected
multiple tests over the last 11 years, but Thursday was the first time
that China had publicly asserted owning such technology.

Why now ?

The target of this news was apparently Taiwan. Coming just days after
Taiwan dropped its adherence to the idea that it and China are part of
the same country, the revelation was timed to send a discreet message
across the Taiwan straits: We got the stuff, so watch out.

The neutron weapon news was hidden in a report intended to rebut the
findings of the Cox Committee report, which was released by a U.S.
congressional committee in May. The Cox report accused China of having
stolen information on the designs for the neutron weapon as well as for
the W-88, the most advanced miniaturized warhead.

The rebuttal denies that China took any secret nuclear technology from
the United States, and accuses the Cox report of being politically
motivated, full of distortions and painted with a layer of racism
directed at Chinese people and at Chinese-Americans. The principal
suspect in the espionage allegation is Wen Ho Lee, a Taiwan-born
American who was fired from his job at the Los Alamos laboratory, but
has yet to be charged with any crime for lack of evidence.

China's assertions on Thursday, similar to earlier Chinese denials of
the Cox report, were most curious for their timing, inexplicably coming
nearly two months after the Cox report was released.

The question of the week in Beijing is how China will ultimately respond
to Taiwan's shifting stance toward the mainland. Zhao Qizheng, the
senior official who delivered the rebuttal Thursday, said when asked
afterward that he could not say whether China would take military
action.

Paradoxically, the announcement on Thursday may signal China's decision
to keep to a relatively restrained response to the goings-on in Taiwan.

Although any mention of a neutron bomb sounds intimidating, since it is
designed to kill people with intense doses of radiation that leave
buildings undisturbed, the way the news was delivered was notably
lacking in the kind of rancor and fist-on-the-table banging that Beijing
has shown in the past.

''Beijing learned from the last time, in 1996,'' said a former Clinton
administration official visiting Beijing. ''They know it's
counterproductive to launch missiles.''

The former official was referring to China's aggressive stance toward
Taiwan three years ago, when Beijing was infuriated by political
maneuvering by President Lee Teng-hui of Taiwan that led to his visit to
the United States, the first by a Taiwanese president since Washington
dropped diplomatic recognition two decades ago.

China launched missiles into the ocean near Taiwan to try to intimidate
voters just before the presidential election in Taiwan. Instead, the
panic gave Mr. Lee a decisive victory.

This week, Mr. Lee made another move that risked angering Beijing,
dropping Taiwan's long-standing adherence to a ''one China'' formulation
that has helped avert war with China for decades by sidestepping the
sensitive issue of sovereignty.

China's media responded with tough-sounding warnings, and a typical dose
of vitriol in the People's Daily editorials. But no senior leader
emerged to speak on the matter. On Thursday, for instance, state
television's evening news calmly reported on a trip to Mongolia by
President Jiang Zemin and on a meeting held by Prime Minister Zhu Rongji
on the economy, without highlighting the neutron bomb.

China first tested a neutron weapon on Sept. 29, 1988, and did so on
numerous occasions afterward. But until Thursday it has never publicly
discussed that technology.

The rebuttal, awkwardly entitled ''Facts Speak Louder Than Words and
Lies Will Collapse on Themselves,'' asserts that China began work on
neutron weapon research in the 1970s, when the United States and the
Soviet Union intensified their arms race.

''China had no choice but to continue to carry out research and
development of nuclear weapons technology and improve its nuclear
weapons systems, mastering in succession the neutron bomb design
technology and the nuclear weapon miniaturization technology,'' the
report says.

It denies that China stole the technology involved in those two designs,
and argues that many design details of the nuclear weapons cited in the
Cox report are available in unclassified documents and on the Internet.
It also rejects allegations in the Cox report that China stole U.S.
satellite launching technology from sites in China where satellites were
launched.

China's leaders act offended and exasperated by the allegations of
espionage, which occur as they are involved in other struggles with the
United States.

This week, U.S. officials are in Beijing negotiating compensation for
NATO's bombing of the Chinese Embassy in Belgrade. Chinese leaders still
say they find it hard to believe the bombing was accidental, as NATO
insists.

Only if the compensation issue is settled will China and the U.S. be
able to proceed on resuming negotiations on getting China membership in
the World Trade Organization, a goal that China's leaders still seem
determined to seek.

International Herald Tribune, July 16, 1999


Digital Society

New Telephone Has 24-Hour Link to Internet

British Telecom kicks American butt

THE world's first telephone kiosk with 24-hour Internet access and
e-mail facility was unveiled yesterday.
BT announced plans to instal 1,000 of the phones in airports, railway
stations and shopping centres by March. The company also planned to
instal a video link on the new "multiphones", allowing the caller to see
the person to whom they are speaking.

The first phone was unveiled by the model Caprice at the Eurostar
terminal at Waterloo yesterday. Malcolm Newing, BT Payphones director,
said: "The multiphone is a world first for BT.

"We have been around the world and have not found a phone which offers
the same services and nationwide telephone link-up. With multiphone we
are bringing multimedia to the masses. Over 50 million people do not
have access to the Internet either at work or at home and it is our
intention to open up the technology to them.

"In addition, new developments will be added to the multiphone later
this year, including the videophone. We are bringing this in almost two
years early and our first videophone will be in the Millennium Dome.

"We are starting out with a thousand phones but if they are successful,
which we believe they will be, the number will multiply many times
over." The multiphone looks similar to BT's existing payphones but has a
12in colour, touch-sensitive screen that allows the user to pick from a
range of options.

It allows on-line users to set up a free personal e-mail address or sign
up with other e-mail providers accessible on the Internet. Users can
surf the Net on a pay-as-you-go basis using a BT phonecard or credit
card.

The phones also provide up-to-the-minute information on news, sport,
travel and entertainment, much of which is free of charge. E-mail and
Internet calls are to be charged at 10p a minute, while normal phone
calls will be charged at BT's normal rate.

Mr Newing said the new phones, which cost �5,000 to install, were
protected against vandals with the screen made of super-strength glass
to withstand a bashing with the handset. He said the software was also
robust and was used at Canadian nuclear power stations.

Caprice looked genuinely stunned as she pulled a red blanket off to
reveal the high-tech phone. Asked to give a demonstration on how to use
the phone she declined but insisted: "You just press the button, it's
idiot proof." She said she was not a regular Internet user and said: "I
am an idiot with computers, but I can use these."

The London Telegraph, July 16, 1999


The World's Most Overrated Computer

Cracking MacOS Encryption


From:        Dawid adix Adamski, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:          [EMAIL PROTECTED]

The encryption algorithm in MacOS system is simple and the password can be
easily decoded.

Password is stored in Users & Groups Data File in Preferences folder. Offset
is different on each system and depends on Users & Groups configuration, but
it always lie after owner's username. It's not so difficult to find it using
hex editor, even if we don't know owner's username.

Here are some examples of encrypted passwords:
00 04 06 18 0D 0A 19 0B = stayaway
0A 1F 10 1B 00 07 75 1E = yellow
1C 1B 16 14 12 62 10 7B = owner
07 02 13 1A 1E 0F 1A 14 = turnpage
27 25 33 27 27 39 24 7E = Trustno1

AA BB CC DD EE FF GG HH = aa bb cc dd ee ff gg hh

where:
AA BB CC DD EE FF GG HH - encrypted password (hex)
aa bb cc dd ee ff gg hh - decrypted password in ASCII codes (hex)

aa=AA XOR 73H
bb=BB XOR AA XOR 70H
cc=CC XOR BB XOR 63H
dd=DD XOR CC XOR 67H
ee=EE XOR DD XOR 74H
ff=FF XOR EE XOR 70H
gg=GG XOR FF XOR 72H
hh=HH XOR GG XOR 6BH

An example:
Let's take OO 04 06 18 0D 0A 19 0B

00H XOR 73H = 73H = s
04H XOR 00H = 04H; 04H XOR 70H = 74H = t
06H XOR 04H = 02H; O2H XOR 63H = 61H = a
18H XOR 06H = 1EH; 1EH XOR 67H = 79H = y
0DH XOR 18H = 15H; 15H XOR 74H = 61H = a
0AH XOR 0DH = 07H; 07H XOR 70H = 77H = w
19H XOR 0AH = 13H; 13H XOR 72H = 61H = a
0BH XOR 19H = 12H; 12H XOR 6BH = 79H = y

tested on:
MacOS 7.5.3, 7.5.5, 8.1, 8.5

I wrote an apple script to break passwords

--------CUT HERE--------
(*          MacOS Pass 2.1 by adix      15.06.99; Apple Script English    *)
global lbin, bit1, bit2, bitk
set hex1 to text returned of (display dialog "Enter encrypted password
(hex): " default answer "" buttons {" Ok "} default button " Ok " with icon
stop)
set Alicia to
"0111001101110000011000110110011101110100011100000111001001101011"
set pass to ""
set lbin to ""
set razem to ""
set i to 1
set skok to 0
set ile to count items in hex1
if ile = 0 or ile = 1 then
 set pass to ""
else
 repeat until (i > (ile - 1))
  set kodascii to 0
  set razem to ""
  set zn to items (i) thru (i + 1) in hex1
  set lbin to hex2bin(zn)
  repeat with a from 1 to 8
   set bit1 to item (a + skok) of Alicia
   xor(a)
   set razem to {razem & bitk} as string
   if i < 2 then
    set kodascii to {kodascii + bitk * (2 ^ (8 - a))}
   end if
  end repeat
  if i < 2 then
   set pass to {pass & (ASCII character kodascii)}
  else
   set zn to items (i - 2) thru (i - 1) in hex1
   set lbin to hex2bin(zn)
   repeat with a from 1 to 8
    set bit1 to item a of razem
    xor(a)
    set kodascii to {kodascii + bitk * (2 ^ (8 - a))}
   end repeat
   set pass to {pass & (ASCII character kodascii)}
  end if
  set skok to skok + 8
  set i to i + 2
 end repeat
end if
display dialog "Password:   " & pass & return & return & "by adix" buttons
{" Ok "} default button " Ok " with icon note
on hex2bin(zn)
 set temphex to {"0000", "0001", "0010", "0011", "0100", "0101", "0110",
"0111", "1000", "1001", "1010", "1011", "1100", -
  "1101", "1110", "1111"}
 set t2hex to "0123456789ABCDEF"
 set bin to ""
 repeat with j in zn
  set t1 to j as string
  repeat with i from 1 to (count items in t2hex)
   if ((item i in t2hex) = t1) then
    set temp to (item i in temphex)
    exit repeat
   end if
  end repeat
  set bin to {bin & temp} as string
 end repeat
 return (bin)
end hex2bin
on xor(a)
 set bit2 to item a in lbin
 if bit1 = bit2 then
  set bitk to "0"
 else
  set bitk to "1"
 end if
end xor
--------CUT HERE--------

Dawid adix Adamski
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Chinese Economy

Is the Renminbi a Millstone Around China's Neck?

The banking sector is weak and economic deflation rolls on.




China's exchange rate peg was a rock of stability in the Asian crisis.
Now there are hints that the country's leaders are starting to see it
instead as a millstone around their necks. With the region on the road
to recovery, it is time to look again at whether the currency is at the
right level.


On competitiveness grounds alone, the case for devaluation is not
convincing. There has been a significant bounce back in other Asian
currencies. True, China's trade surplus declined by 65 per cent in the
first half of the year; but some of this is a result of a crackdown on
smuggling.


But a change in the exchange rate may be needed for another reason - to
counteract the severe deflation crippling the economy.


Prices in China have been falling for a year and a half. Personal saving
is increasing at an annual rate of 20 per cent as consumers delay
purchases and worry about job losses. Investment is in the doldrums,
stockpiles are growing and companies are slashing prices to sell
unwanted goods.


The government's response so far has been a massively expansionary
fiscal policy. This has succeeded in preventing a collapse in growth.
But it has not stopped the deflationary spiral.


Monetary policy is the obvious next step. Interest rates are close to
six per cent, giving real rates of over nine per cent, much too high for
an economy in need of stimulus. China's leaders have been reluctant to
cut rates further because they fear a mass exit by depositors, which
could trigger capital flight and a liquidity crisis in the banking
system.


These risks could be reduced by a more robust statement of support for
the banks, and a strict application of capital controls. But still, the
fragility of the banking system means that a drop in rates down to
Japanese levels is impossible.


Fiscal and monetary policy may not be quite enough. A case can therefore
be made for a devaluation, which by raising import prices would help
alleviate deflation. But China's exchange rate policy is not determined
by economics. It has become a symbol of China's commitment to global
stability, and a proxy for the fight between China's reformers, led by
Zhu Rongji, who want to maintain the rate, and their opponents.


A change in exchange rate policy would have to be conducted very
carefully. It would have to be a gradual slide, rather than a one-off
adjustment, and be of a modest size. Most importantly, to avoid panic,
Mr Zhu must be seen to be totally in control.


For the sake of regional stability, China's economy must be pulled out
of its deflationary spiral. If this cannot be achieved through monetary
and fiscal policy, then the risk of a devaluation may be worth taking.

The Financial Times, July 16, 1999
-----
Aloha, He'Ping,
Om, Shalom, Salaam.
Em Hotep, Peace Be,
Omnia Bona Bonis,
All My Relations.
Adieu, Adios, Aloha.
Amen.
Roads End
Kris

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to