-Caveat Lector-

A few points:

1) No front door. Feds "buried" this. Why hide evidence if it
exonerates ?

2) No independent investigations allowed by Feds, i.e., Failure
Analysis Associates, Fairfax,Va.  Texas Rangers dis-allowed.
Everyone dis-allowed. Schumer, Feinstein and Lantos were
point-people on floor of Congress to shout down ANY independent
analysis.

3) Media was kept MILES away. Usually Feds like the coverage of
'dog-and-pony' shows. (BATF funding hearings were soon after...)

4) Military 'Special Forces' brought in.

5) CS gas used by countless 55 gallon drumfuls - for 6 hours -
with hi-pressure/hi-volume pumps mounted in tanks. Kind of like a
fuel-injector pump in your car....waiting for a 'spark'.......or
burning Coleman and kerosene lantern (power cut by Feds) to
ignite the fine aerosol....like a grain elevator.

6) After the melee, bulldozers took over and bulldozed the
'evidence' into fine particles of oblivion. NO ACCESS for
ANYBODY. Obviously, it was easier to get into a U.S. Nuclear
Weapons Lab that to get a look at the site.

7) Kangaroo trials of survivors. Inadmissable evidence was the rule, not the
exception. Hard for the witnesses to talk - when dead or in Federal
prison (familiar m.o.).

8) Congress holds White Wash Investigation. Most evidence
suppressed and/or shouted down....by the Democratic operatives
(some noted above).

9) Entire Waco Operation controlled from White House War Room Bunker - by
Clinton, Webb, and Reno.

Below is an editorial followed by a news story:


http://www.dallasnews.com/editorial/0730edit1branch.htm

Dallas Morning News
Editorial
July 30, 1999

Branch Davidians
Conspiracy theories thrive on withheld information

07/30/99

Six years after the Branch Davidian standoff came to a tragic,
fiery conclusion at Mount Carmel, questions about what really
happened on that fateful day remain very much alive.

Fueled by conspiracy Web sites and an Academy Award-nominated
documentary, speculation continues that David Koresh and his
followers were victims in the final assault on their armed
compound.

Skeptics dismiss the conclusion that the Branch Davidians
committed mass suicide by setting their building on fire as
armored tanks and federal agents were bringing the 51-day siege
to a close.

Now, the chairman of the Texas Department of Public Safety has
raised more doubts about the final report concerning the federal
government's handling of the standoff.

James B. Francis Jr. points to evidence held by the Texas Rangers
that could be "problematic" to the conclusion that all the fires
at the Branch Davidian compound came from inside sources.

Mr. Francis refused to identify the evidence. But others have
said it includes 40 mm munitions that would not be readily
available to Mr. Koresh and his followers.

The Texas DPS chairman has not gone public with his concerns
about the evidence to embarrass federal officials. Instead, he is
trying to warn Washington, D.C., that withheld information only
fuels public suspicion.

The Texas Rangers have been caught in the middle of a tug-of-war
between the U.S. Justice Department and those trying to research
the Branch Davidian raid.

Rather than denying their right to see the evidence, federal
officials have simply said it was out of their hands. It is time
to take the locks off the evidence. Although there are still
civil suits pending by surviving members of the Branch Davidians,
public disclosure of the material should be a primary goal.

Federal officials should turn the evidence over to U.S. District
Judge Walter Smith of Waco, who already has presided over several
suits involving the 1993 raid and still has more cases pending in
his court.

Judge Smith has been handling litigation involving the Branch
Davidians since he was a state judge. He would be qualified to
set the legal guidelines for public disclosure.

The Texas Rangers need to be relieved of this assignment. And the
U.S. Justice Department needs to recognize that speculation about
Mount Carmel will never die as long as a shred of evidence is
being withheld.


http://www.dallasnews.com/texas_southwest/0730tsw1branch.htm

Dallas Morning News

Reno sees no evidence FBI caused Branch Davidian fire DPS
official says reports, compound debris may be at odds

07/30/99

By David Jackson and Lee Hancock
The Dallas Morning News

Attorney General Janet Reno said Thursday that there is no
evidence that FBI ordnance helped start the 1993 fire that
consumed the Branch Davidian compound near Waco.

"I have gone over everything, and I know of no such evidence,"
Ms. Reno said at her weekly news conference in Washington.

Meanwhile, officials in Texas said the Texas Rangers are
reviewing evidence now in a dispute regarding the
tank-and-tear-gas assault of April 19, 1993.

James B. Francis Jr., chairman of the Texas Department of Public
Safety, said he would not comment on Ms. Reno's statements. He
also would not withdraw comments he made earlier this week.

On Tuesday, Mr. Francis told The Dallas Morning News: "There's
some evidence that is at least problematic or at least
questionable with regard to what happened. With the proper
experts analyzing it, it might shed light as to whether an
incendiary device was fired into the compound that day."

The Department of Public Safety has asked a federal judge to take
possession of all evidence arising from the criminal prosecution
of the Branch Davidian siege. The state agency has been custodian
of the evidence since it was asked in 1993 to investigate the
Branch Davidian siege and its fiery ending, in which more than 70
people died.

Last week, the Justice Department told U.S. District Judge Walter
Smith that it was negotiating with DPS officials on the
disposition of the evidence and needed more time to respond to
the DPS motion asking the court to take custody of it.

Mr. Francis, however, said the DPS is not negotiating with
federal authorities and does not intend to allow anyone access to
the evidence until instructed by Judge Smith. He said that
includes the FBI, which sought to examine the material after the
DPS made its motion.

"We want the U.S. judiciary to make a determination as to what
the evidence showed," Mr. Francis said.

He added: "We're not negotiating with anybody. We're waiting on
the court to decide what to do."

The evidence is expected to come into play in a wrongful-death
lawsuit that siege survivors are pressing against the federal
government. Judge Smith ruled July 1 that the suit may go to
trial.

The warehoused evidence has been made available for review to
Michael McNulty, a documentary filmmaker from Colorado. Mr.
McNulty, who researched and helped produce a 1997 film on the
Branch Davidian siege, is now completing a second documentary on
the incident.

He has focused on two 40 mm projectiles and a 40 mm shell casing
found in the compound wreckage.

Mr. McNulty said his film company has hired a consulting firm to
conduct chemical tests and other studies of the 40 mm munitions.

"Preliminary tests show that it is definitely a pyrotechnic
device with unusual characteristics," Mr. McNulty said. "We're
still trying to determine its function."

Assisting in that investigation is former FBI crime lab agent and
whistle-blower Frederic Whitehurst. Dr. Whitehurst, who has
accused the FBI lab of sloppy practices, left the bureau as part
of a $1.6 million settlement of a lawsuit accusing his bosses of
retaliation.

Mr. McNulty said the former FBI agent has been paid to serve as
narrator for the new Waco film.

Asked about Mr. McNulty, Ms. Reno said: "I am aware that there is
a filmmaker who has reached some conclusions. But we reviewed
those initially. I don't know of any additional information that
he has provided."

Justice Department and FBI officials noted that numerous
congressional committees and outside auditors have reviewed the
FBI's conduct and absolved the agency of blame for the fire.

They also pointed to surveillance tapes within the compound
before the blaze started.

"Our listening posts detected that the Davidians were planning to
set the fire, and that the fires started simultaneously in
several spots in the compound," Justice Department spokesman
Myron Marlin said.

Mr. McNulty said Assistant U.S. Attorney Bill Johnston of Waco
contacted him last week and asked him to speak to a Texas Ranger
about the 40 mm devices. He said the Ranger questioned him
extensively about at least six "flash-bang" grenades the
filmmaker said he found in the evidence locker.

He said the devices raise additional questions because five had
been mislabeled in evidence logs as silencers and the logs showed
that four were recovered from areas of the compound where arson
investigators said the compound fire erupted.

Flash-bang grenades emit a loud, concussive noise and flash, and
they are used by law enforcement officials to temporarily stun
suspects. Because they are pyrotechnic, they are capable of
starting fires.

ATF officials used several of the devices during their initial
raid on the Branch Davidian compound in February of 1993. A U.S.
Justice Department review of the ensuing standoff indicated that
FBI agents used at least five of the devices during the last
weeks of the standoff when sect members strayed from the
compound.

Officials in Texas have said many of these matters are under
review by the Rangers.

Ms. Reno said the Department of Justice will look at anything
brought to its attention.

"What I have always said is we will always review anything and
everything to make sure that we exhaust every lead," Ms. Reno
said. "But we have reviewed it and reviewed it, reviewed other
reports, and find no evidence of it."

Mr. McNulty said he has repeatedly contacted officials in
Washington, sending at least a dozen written requests in the last
18 months, seeking information and answers about what he says is
"new evidence in the case."

"As recently as July, we have sent requests, along with still
photographs, documents and videotapes that illustrate our
questions," he said. "We're offering them an opportunity to
explain the evidence that we have discovered, and we've gotten no
response."

One current FBI official, speaking on condition of anonymity
because of the pending lawsuit, said the bureau is "100 percent"
confident it did not fire any incendiary device into the
compound.

"I'm afraid these conspiracy theories are going to continue on
forever," the official said. "There have been so many
investigations - it just isn't there."


=================================================================
           Kaddish, Kaddish, Kaddish, YHVH, TZEVAOT

  FROM THE DESK OF:                    <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
                      *Mike Spitzer*     <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
                         ~~~~~~~~          <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

   The Best Way To Destroy Enemies Is To Change Them To Friends
       Shalom, A Salaam Aleikum, and to all, A Good Day.
=================================================================

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to