-Caveat Lector-
an excerpt from:
Scarlet and the Beast - A History of the War
Between English and French Freemasonry
by John Daniel (C)1994
Chapter 13 -- part 3 of 3
THE PROTOCOLS OF THE
LEARNED ELDERS OF SION
Protocols of Sion and the Priory of Sion
The authors of Holy Blood, Holy Grail suggest that the Priory of
Sion, and not the Reform Jews, was connected to the Protocols of
Sion in Russia. The authors build their case around Rosicrucian
French Masons who had worked their way into the good graces of
Czar Nicholas II. Here is their story:
The role of Rasputin at the court of Nicholas and Alexandra of
Russia is more or less generally known. It is not generally known,
however, that there were influential, even powerful esoteric
enclaves at the Russian court long before Rasputin. During the
1890s and 1900s one such enclave formed itself around an individual
known as Monsieur Philippe and around his mentor, who made periodic
visits to the imperial court at Petersburg. And Monsieur
Philippe's mentor was none other than the man called Papus.(82)
Papus (1865-1916), a Gentile, was the Masonic code name for Dr.
Gerard Encausse, a 33rd degree Mason from Paris, who became the
occult adviser of the ill-fated Czar Nicholas II.(83) Papus was
Grand Master of both Memphis and Mizraim Freemasonries, the two
Rosicrucian lodges that had merged in 1875. One of Papus's
acquaintances was Claude Debussy (1862-1918), a famous composer who
set a number of Victor Hugo's poems to music. Debussy was the next
Grand Master of the Priory of Sion following Hugo's death in 1885,
and reigned in that position until 1918.(84)
Freemason A.E. Waite tells us that in 1894 Papus was also the
Grand Master of the Martinist Masonic Supreme Council in Paris.
Martinism admitted both male and female members on equal terms.
This Order had a number of lodges throughout Europe and Russia.
Chapters were also established in Great Britain, the United States,
Argentina and Guatemala, as well as throughout the Orient.(85)
Martinism was originally founded in 1754 by a Rosicrucian Spanish
Jew named Martines de Pasqually, or Martinez Paschalis. The emblem
for this branch of Freemasonry consists of six dots, which we have
learned in a previous chapter is a subtle form of the Masonic
six-pointed star. The six-pointed star is the same herald of
the Priory of Sion, the Mizraim Masonic Lodge and Zionism.(86)
Pasqually's Lodges were first organized at Marseilles, Toulouse,
and Bordeaux, then in Paris. Before long Rosicrucian Martinist
lodges spread all over France, with the center at Lyons. Martinism
was thought to have been a Jewish secret society. It was operated,
however in the same manner as was the Mizraim Lodge, in that Jews
and Gentiles alike were members. Behind the scenes, however, was
the Priory of Sion, distinguished by the Rose-Croix capstone in
Martinist Lodges.
Nesta Webster explains: "After the first three Craft degrees came
the Cohen degrees of the same -- Apprentice Cohen, Fellow Craft
Cohen, and Master Cohen -- then those of Grand Architect, Grand
Elect of Zerubbabel of Knight of the East; but above these were
concealed degrees leading up to the Rose-Croix, which formed the
capstone of the ediflce."(87)
Webster also claims that Martinist "disciples inherited from
Pasqually a large number of Jewish manuscripts."(88) She leaves
the reader with the impression that these manuscripts are none
other than the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Sion -- in
existence a full century before they were stolen from its sister
Mizraim lodge in 1884.(89) If so, these documents may only have
suggested Judaic origins because of the Davidic claims expressed
within them by the Priory of Sion.
A century later the stamp of "Priory of Sion" is even more evident
on Martinism when a Freemason named Alphonse Louis Constant
(1810-1875) joined the Martinist Order. Constant was a Gentile
Mason who assumed the Jewish name -- Eliphas Levi. This is the
same Eliphas Levi who assisted the Grand Master of Sion, Charles
Nodier, in methodically sifting and cataloging thousands of Templar
documents looted from the Vatican by Napoleon Bonaparte. Levi was
also acquainted with Nodier's successor, Victor Hugo. After Levi
joined the Martinist Masonic lodge, the lodge merged with both the
Memphis and Mizraim Lodges.
Levi apparently had access to the forgotten Protocol documents in
the Mizraim Lodge a decade before they were discovered in 1884
Webster informs us that "[b]efore his death in 1875 Eliphas Levi
announced that in 1879 a new political and religious 'universal
Kingdom' would be established, and that it would be possessed by
'him who would have the keys of the East."(90)
Three Protocols have significant relationship to this prophecy:
Protocol 15: When the King of Israel sets upon his sacred head
the crown offered him by Europe he will become patriarch of the
world.
Protocol 17: The King of the Jews will be the real Pope of
the Universe, the patriarch of an international Church.
Protocol 24: I pass now to the method of confirming the
dynastic roots of King David to the last strata of the earth.
The prop of humanity in the person of the supreme lord of all
the world of the holy seed of David must sacrifice to his people
all personal inclinations.
These Protocols are highly suggestive of the Priory of Sion, those
who claim to be of the seed of David. Eliphas Levi most likely was
referring to Sion's King of Jerusalem cult when he prophesied,
"A new political and religious 'universal Kingdom' will be
established, and it will be possessed by 'him who would have the
keys of the East."'
The authors of Holy Blood inform us that Victor Hugo and Eliphas
Levi were both members of the same Martinist Lodge.(91) As we have
seen, Victor Hugo was associated with Maurice Joly and Adolphe
Cremieux in the sister Lodge of Mizraim Freemasonry. Papus, who
was Grand Master of both the Mizraim and Memphis lodges, was also
a Martinist, and acquainted himself with Hugo's successor Claude
Debussy. All these men, except Cremieux, were Gentiles. This
circumstantial evidence points to the Priory of Sion as the author
of the Protocols. In the Old Testament, King Solomon himself, who
is revered by all Masons, says in Proverbs 14:9, "The common bond
of rebels is their guilt."(92) In other words, these Masonic
rebels are guilty by association.
French Martinism and English Freemasonry
English Freemason A.E. Waite states that French Martinism had shut
its doors to Masons belonging to English Freemasonry.(93) Yet
Edith Miller, in Appendix IV of Occult Theocrasy, reproduced a
private letter dated March 26, 1906, from one "Dorec" to 33rd
degree Grand Orient Mason Theodore Reuss, informing him that 33rd
degree English Mason John Yarker was the Martinist delegate in
London.(94)
Miller claims the existence of another private letter, in which
Papus refers to himself as the delegate of John Yarker for the
Swedenborg Rite in France. Correspondence of this nature between
the most noteworthy Masons of that day contradicts Mr. Waite and
reveals that Mr. Waite is spreading disinformation by alleging
a feud between English Masonry and French Martinism where none
exists.(95)
It is true that Rosicrucian English Freemasonry severed fellowship
in 1877 with Templar French Grand Orient Freemasonry. However
Martinism is not Grand Orient Templarism, but rather,
Rosicrucianism. Naturally there would be a tie to English
Freemasonry. Obviously the French Martinists would want to keep
this familial tie secret in order to keep abreast of the
developments in Templar French Masonry. Martinism apparently
functioned as an intelligence lodge for English Freemasonry,
as did Mizraim. Later the two merged with Memphis, their English
counterpart.
A.E. Waite could not have been ignorant of this fact. If
cognizant, he would have published an opposing view in an attempt
to hide the facts. His motive would be to protect Rosicrucian
Orders on the Continent, which were subversive to the Templar Grand
Orient. No other interpretation makes sense of why the hierarchy
of the Templar Grand Orient -- Dorec and Reuss -- would expose the
connection.
Apparently, Rosicrucian Martinism was a front for the Priory of
Sion. English Freemasonry used it as an intelligence gathering
lodge in the same manner as it did the Mizraim Lodge. Both having
similar doctrine, they merged in 1875. As the Mizraim Masonic
Lodge provided for Great Britain moles in the French Templar
Scottish Rite Lodge, through double agents such as Cremieux and
Levi, so Papus served in that same capacity when Mizraim merged
with Martinism following the deaths of Levi and Cremieux in 1875
and 1880.
There are other Martinist ties to British Freemasonry. In 1887
Martinist Freemason Papus joined the Theosophist Society, a
Rosicrucian order headquartered in New York, with a branch in
Paris. The Theosophist Society was founded in 1875 by female
Freemason Helena Blavatsky, who moved her headquarters from New
York to London in 1887. In 1891 Papus helped found the Gnostic
Catholic Church. In 1895 he became a member of the Order of the
Golden Dawn, an English Masonic Rosicrucian order founded in 1887
in London, with a branch in the Paris Lodge Ahathoor. In 1902
Papus became Grand Master of the newly formed homicidal Ordo Templi
Orientis (O.T.O.) at Paris, a spin-off of the Golden Dawn.
In 1899 Philippe de Lyon, protege of Papus, went to Russia and
established the Priory of Sion's Martinist lodge at the imperial
court, possibly initiating Grigorii Rasputin, since it is known
that Grigorii was a Martinist. Philippe was introduced to the
Imperial Court first, oddly enough, by the same man who was
Rasputin's sinister adviser, the anti-Zionist and Reform Jew,
Manoussevitch Manouilof (see chapter 19). In 1900 Papus followed
Philippe to St. Petersburg, where Papus became a confidant of the
Czar and Czarina. Papus visited Russia on at least three
occasions, the last in 1906. When he became Grand Master in France
of London's O.T.O., Papus then carried the rituals of this
homicidal Masonic lodge to Russia, initiating many Russians in St.
Petersburg in preparation for the Russian Revolution. Papus died
on October 25, 1916, one year before he could taste the rotten
fruits of his labor in the bloody Bolshevik Revolution.(96)
Substantial evidence suggests that high Masons in France, England
and Russia were involved in the Russian Revolution. In fact
communications were shuttled back and forth between Europe and
Russia prior to the Bolshevik Revolution by high Masons. Among
them were 33rd degree John Yarker, who represented the Martinist
Order at London; 33rd degree Papus, who, according to Miller's
documents, was under the control of Yarker; Freemason Philippe,
who was the mentor of Papus; and Rasputin, who in turn was the
Martinist mole in the Royal Court at St. Petersburg following
Philippe. All these High Masons were Gentiles, not Jews.
As evidenced by the Masonic activities between Russia and France at
the turn of the 20th century, both English and French Freemasonry
were cooperating in fomenting the Russian Revolution. These
activities, with the arrival of the stolen Protocols taken from a
French lodge and carried to Russia, were significant in stopping
Zionism at the Russian border. In 1903 the Protocols of the
Learned Elders of Sion were first translated into Russian and
published. Whether engineered by this coalition of subversives or
not, the events which led up to their circulation could not have
been by accident. The authors of Holy Blood, Holy Grail outline
the sequence of events. The Protocols were stolen from the Mizraim
Lodge in 1884 and taken to Russia by Mlle. Justine Glinka. She
gave a copy to Alexis Sukhotin, the marshal of the district of Orel
who in turn showed them to two friends, Stepanov and a contemptible
old man named Sergei Nilus. In 1903 Nilus presented the Protocols
to the Czar. The Czar, who had placed himself under the occult
council of the two subversive Freemasons, Philippe and Rasputin,
declared the document to be an outrageous fabrication and ordered
all copies of it destroyed. Nilus was banished from the court in
disgrace.(97)
The document, or a copy of it, survived. In 1903 it was serialized
in a newspaper, but failed to attract interest, In 1905 it was
published again as an appendix to a book by a distinguished
mystical philosopher, Vladimir Soloviov. This time it began to
attract attention. In following years it became one of the single
most infamous documents of the twentieth century.(98)
Protocols of the Priory of Sion
The authors of Holy Blood, Holy Grail argue strongly that the
Protocols have a Masonic source -- the Priory of Sion:
Modern scholars have dismissed them as a total forgery, a wholly
spurious document concocted by anti-Semitic interests intent on
discrediting Judaism. And yet the Protocols themselves argue
strongly against such a conclusion. They contain, for example, a
number of enigmatic references -- references that are clearly not
Judaic. But these references are so clearly not Judaic that they
cannot plausibly have been fabricated by a forger, either. No
anti-Semitic forger with even a modicum of intelligence would
possibly have concocted such references in order to discredit
Judaism. For no one would have believed these references to be
of Judaic origin.
Thus, for instance, the text of the Protocols ends with a single
statement, "Signed by the representatives of Sion of the 33rd
Degree."
Why would an anti-Semitic forger have made up such a statement?
Why would he not have attempted to incriminate all Jews, rather
than just a few -- the few who constitute "the representatives of
Sion of the 33rd Degree?" Why would he not declare that the
document was signed by, say, the representatives of the
international Judaic congress? In fact, the "representatives of
Sion of the 33rd Degree" would hardly seem to refer to Judaism at
all, or to any "international Jewish conspiracy." If anything,
it would seem to refer to something specifically Masonic.
The Protocols contain other even more flagrant anomalies. The text
speaks repeatedly, for example, of the advent of a "Masonic
kingdom."
The authors of Holy Blood, Holy Grail concluded: "On the basis of
prolonged and systematic research we reached certain conclusions
about the Protocols of the Elders of Sion. They are:
1. There was an original text on which the published version of
the Protocols was based. This original text was not a forgery. On
the contrary, it was authentic. But it had nothing whatever to do
with Judaism or an "international Jewish conspiracy." It issued,
rather, from some Masonic organization or Masonically oriented
secret society that incorporated the word "Sion."
2. The original text on which the published version of the
Protocols was based need not have been provocative or inflammatory
in its language. But it may very well have included a program for
gaining power, for infiltrating Freemasonry, for controlling
social, political, and economic institutions.
3. The original text on which the published version of the
Protocols was based fell into the hands of Sergei Nilus. Nilus did
not at first intend it to discredit Judaism. On the contrary, he
brought it to the czar with the intention of discrediting the
esoteric enclave at the imperial court -- the enclave of Papus,
Monsieur Philippe, and others who were members of the secret
society in question. Before doing so he almost certainly doctored
the language, rendering it far more venomous and inflammatory than
it initially was. When the czar spurned him, Nilus then released
the Protocols for publication in their doctored form. They had
failed in their primary objective of compromising Papus and
Monsieur Philippe. But they might still serve a secondary purpose
-- that of fostering anti-Semitism. Although Nilus' chief targets
had been Papus and Monsieur Philippe, he was hostile to Judaism as
well.
4. The published version of the Protocols is not, therefore, a
totally fabricated text. It is, rather, a radically altered text.
But despite the alterations certain vestiges of the original
version can be discerned.... These vestiges -- which referred to
a king, a Pope, an international church, and to Sion -- probably
meant little or nothing to Nilus. He certainly would not have
invented them himself. But if they were already there, he would
have had no reason, given his ignorance, to excise them. And while
such vestiges might have been irrelevant to Judaism, they might
have been extremely relevant to a secret society. As we learned
subsequently, they were -- and still are -- of paramount importance
to the Prieure de Sion.(99)
The authors of Holy Blood, Holy Grail conclude that the Protocols
issued from the 33rd Degree Supreme Council of the Rite of Mizraim,
which in turn is controlled by the Priory of Sion! They were
"signed by the representatives of Sion of the 33rd Degree."
The phrase "representatives of Sion" does not imply that the
signatories were part of a group called "Sion," but rather,
is indicative of agents, or, shall we say, a front for some
organization which incorporates the name "Sion": namely the
Priory of Sion. The Mizraim Lodge was that front.
The mistake made by the Supreme Council of Mizraim is the mistake
made by all Freemasonry. It never destroys any of its written
work. Every word spoken in every Supreme Council throughout the
world is recorded and safeguarded for posterity.
A handful of modern conspiracy researchers link the covert Priory
of Sion to the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Sion. These
investigators do not see the Protocols associated in any way with
genuine Jewish Zionism that exists overtly. J.R. Church is one of
them. He said, 'The title itself, which mentions the 'learned
elders of Zion,' seems to refer to the mystery religion of the
so-called Holy Grail and to the Priory of Sion organized by Godfroi
de Bouillon in 1099 for the purpose of establishing a world
government and providing a Merovingian king for its throne."(100)
Commentary on the Protocols of Sion
Protocol 1: Our power in the present tottering condition of all
forms of power will be more invisible than any other, because it
will remain invisible until the moment when it has gained such
strength that no cunning can any longer undermine it.
Before us is a plan in which is laid down strategically the line
from which we cannot deviate without running the risk of seeing
the labour of many centuries brought to naught.
This Protocol describes an organism that houses a hidden "power."
We believe the organism is Freemasonry housing the Priory of Sion.
It was the Priory of Sion that founded the Rose-Croix, which In
turn founded English Freemasonry. This began many centuries ago,
as the Protocol indicates. The statement, "Before us is a plan...
the line from which we cannot deviate without running the risk of
seeing the labour of many centuries brought to naught," suggests
that Sion is in serious trouble. Perhaps this refers to the
establishment of the unexpected movement of Zionism in Russia.
The "plan" which is "before us" may also refer to a takeover of
Russia to stop the Zionist movement.
Protocol 3: To-day [sic] I may tell you that our goal is now
only a few steps off. There remains a small space to cross and
the whole long path we have trodden is ready now to close its
cycle of the Symbolic Snake, by which we symbolize our people.
When this ring closes, all the States of Europe will be locked
in its coil as in a powerful vise.
When the hour strikes for our Sovereign Lord of all the World
to be crowned it is these same hands which will sweep away
everything that might be a hindrance thereto.
"Ours" they will not touch, because the moment of attack will be
known to us and we shall take measures to protect our own.
Ever since that time we have been leading the peoples from one
disenchantment to another, so that in the end they should turn
also from us in favour of that King-Despot of the blood of Sion,
whom we are preparing for the world.
The symbols referred to in this Protocol are of course Rosicrucian.
The symbol of the Priory of Sion's Rosicrucian Order is a rose
representing the Serpent, wormed around the upright part of the
Christian Cross. The second symbol of the Rosicrucians was the
circle, or snake biting its own tail, superimposed on the Christian
cross. This same symbol of the snake is incorporated in the 33rd
degree Masonic Jewel (Appendix 2, Fig. 7).
Dr. John Coleman, a retired British intelligence officer, states
in Black Nobility Unmasked, that the Monarchs of Europe have always
referred to themselves as "Crowned Cobras." The monarchs of Europe
carry the Grail blood. All of them, according to Coleman, are
Masons of the British obedience.
The statement: "'Ours' they will not touch," etc., eliminates the
possibility that the Protocol is Jewish. If the Protocols outlined
a Jewish conspiracy, the "our" would have evaded the holocaust of
Hitler, according to this Protocol. Yet, after World War II it was
Freemasonry, as we shall learn in chapter 24, that came back
stronger than ever, founding the United Nations.
Finally, this Protocol identifies the Priory of Sion with the
statement "King-Despot of the blood of Sion, whom we are preparing
for the world." This obviously refers to Sion's reigning "King of
Jerusalem."
Protocol 4: Who and what is in a position to overthrow an
invisible force? And this is precisely what our force is.
Gentile masonry [sic] blindly serves as a screen for us and our
objects, but the plan of action of our force, even its very
abiding-place, remains for the whole people an unknown mystery.
As we have seen, the Priory of Sion's kings believe themselves to
be Jews. When the Priory founded Freemasonry, it was mainly
Gentiles who joined. Gentiles are its predominant members and
leaders. Naturally the Priory would call Freemasonry "Gentile
Masonry."
Protocol 5: In place of the rulers of to-day [sic] we shall
set up a bogey which will be called the Super-Government
Administration. Its hands will reach out in all direction like
nippers and its organization will be of such colossal dimensions
that it cannot fail to subdue all the nations of the world.
What is the "bogey" that is to be called "the Super-Government
Administration?" There are two possibilities here. First, this
could refer to Russian Communism, which would be used to conquer
the world. The top governing power in the U.S.S.R. was called the
Supreme Soviet. Soviet in Russian means Council. In other words,
it was the Supreme Council that ruled former Soviet Russia, the
same Supreme Council we find in 33rd degree Freemasonry. Second,
this body could be the League of Nations. Following World War I,
as we shall see in chapter 21, the League was founded by French
Freemasonry. After World War II, English Freemasonry founded the
United Nations. The United States of Europe will be a reality by
1993. We shall learn that it too is of Masonic origin. From this
may come the world kingdom of the Beast -- the ultimate "bogey."
Protocol 8: We shall surround our government with a whole world
of economists. That is the reason why economic sciences [work]
[They come] from the principal subject of the teaching given to
the Jews. Around us again will be a whole constellation of
bankers, industrialists, capitalists and -- the main thing --
millionaires, because in substance everything will be settled
by the question of figures.
Notice this Protocol mentions the "Jews," but in a disconnected
sense, as if they are used by the conspiracy for their economic
prowess alone. This Protocol suggests why English Freemasonry is
overloaded with Jewish bankers and economists. The Priory of Sion
admits that Jews are superior economically. Incidentally, the word
"Jew" is mentioned only twice in the Protocols, and both times in
a disconnected sense.
Protocol 10: These schemes will not turn existing institutions
upside down just yet. They will only affect changes in their
economy and consequently in the whole combined movement of their
progress, which will thus be directed along the paths laid down
in our schemes.
By such measures we shall obtain the power of destroying little
by little, step by step, all that at the outset when we enter on
our rights, we are compelled to introduce into the constitutions
of States to prepare for the transition to an imperceptible
abolition of every kind of constitution, and then the time is
come to turn every form of government into our despotism.
This Protocol enunciates the format of English Freemasonry, called
"gradualism," whereas its adversary, French Masonry, takes over
rapidly and viciously.
Protocol 15: When the King of Israel sets upon his sacred head
the crown offered him by Europe he will become patriarch of the
world.
Twelve royal families in Europe today have Grail blood flowing
through their veins. Two of them carry the title of "King of
Jerusalem:" Otto von Habsburg, Pretender to the Austrian throne,
and Juan Carlos, King of Spain.
Protocol 17: The King of the Jews will be the real Pope of
the Universe, the patriarch of an international Church.
But, in the meantime, while we are re-educating youth in new
traditional religions and afterwards in ours, we shall not
overtly lay a finger on existing churches, but we shall fight
them by criticism calculated to produce schism....
Notice that "The King of the Jews" will replace the Pope. Jews
would not be concerned with replacing the Pope. They do not even
recognize the Church. On the other hand, the Priory of Sion used
the Catholic Church to build its empire. It was subject to the
Roman Church for centuries, but withdrew during the Reformation,
and through Freemasonry became adversarial to the Church.
Naturally, the Priory would want to call their king "the real
Pope of the Universe."
Also, notice the reference to New Age religion. Before the New Age
can be perfected, the Protocol states that "criticism" must first
divide the Church. This "criticism" is likely the new "Biblical
criticism," the sources of which Orthodox Rabbi Marvin Antelman has
revealed to us. In his book, To Eliminate The Opiate, he devotes a
whole chapter entitled "The Birth of Biblical Criticism" to the
subject. He lays Biblical Criticism at the feet of the
Frankist-Reform Jews who were protected by illuminated Masonic
lodges in Germany. Rabbi Antelman confirms that Biblical criticism
did not originate with Orthodox Jews, but rather, was orchestrated
by apostate Jews bent on the destruction of Judeo-Christian
religion.
Protocol 20: We shall so hedge about our system of accounting
that neither the ruler nor the most insignificant public servant
will be in a position to divert even the smallest sum from its
destination [sic] with-out detection or to direct it in another
direction except that which will be once fixed in a definite
plan of action.
Is this the Mark of the Beast?
Protocol 24: I pass now to the method of confirming the
dynastic roots of King David to the last strata of the earth.
Certain members of the seed of David will prepare the kings and
their heirs, selecting not by right of heritage but by eminent
capacities, inducting them into the most secret mysteries of the
political, into schemes of government, but providing always that
none may come to knowledge of the secrets. The object of this
mode of action is that all may know that government cannot be
entrusted to those who have not been inducted into the secret
places of its art.
The king's plans of action for the current moment, and all the
more so for the future, will be unknown, even to those who are
called his closest counselors.
Only the king and the three who stood sponsor for him will know
what is coming.
The prop of humanity in the person of the supreme lord of all
the world of the holy seed of David must sacrifice to his people
all personal inclinations. The Priory of Sion is the protector
of the so-called seed of King David.
Notice in the second paragraph the statement that many kings and
their heirs are being prepared, but only one will be selected.
There are twelve royal families of Grail blood in Europe today.
The entire 24th Protocol seems to describe the "hidden hand" in
the Priory of Sion, which we believe is housed in the 33rd degree
of English Freemasonry.
pp 333- 372
--notes--
Chapter 13
1. "Anti-Semitism and Masonry," Mackey's Encyclopedia of
Freemasonry, Vol. III.
2. Robert John, Behind the Balfour Declaration (Costa Mesa, CA:
Institute for Historical Review, 1988) 30.
3. "Israel," World Economic Review, November 1986: 13.
4. John 64.
5. Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, trans. James Murphy (1939; Los
Angeles: Angriff Press, 1981) 174.
6. Antelman, entire.
7. Antelman 33.
8. Antelman 35- 38.
9. John 29.
10. Antelman 33.
11. Antelman.
12. Conspiracy researchers have accused Rothschild of siding
with the Communists when he withdrew his financial support from
the anti-Communist White Army.
13. Hitler 174.
14. John Coleman, King Makers: King Breakers = The Cecils,
audiotape 1984, Christian Defense League.
15. Karl Bergmeister, The Protocols of the Elders of Zion
before the Court in Berne (1938; Mettairie, LA: Sons of Liberty,
n.d.), entire. The author and his wife were in Basel, Switzerland,
August 1987. The author offered to pay a Swiss history professor
his required fee to obtain copies of the Berne court proceedings on
the Protocols. The professor became very interested and began to
ask questions. When the author mentioned the Masonic connection
the historian coldly said, "I don't think I want to work for you."
16. Since the exiling of the Templars from Great Britain, all
Grand Masters of Sion have been from the Continent.
17. Miller 410- 411.
18. Miller 411.
19. Baigent et al, Holy Blood 192, 435- 436.
20. Church 90.
21. Miller 407.
22. James A. Malcolm, Origins of the Balfour Declaration,
Dr. Weizmann's Contribution (1944; Torrance, CA: Institute for
Historical Review, 19831 6- 7. A copy of this document, only 12
pages long, is in the British Museum, and in 1964 was placed in
the Harvard University Library.
23. John 30.
24. Bible, Pilgrim Edition, footnote #6 on Amos 5:26.
25. Spaulding 91.
26. Geoffrey Wigoder, The Story of the Synagogue, A Diaspora
Museum Book (Jerusalem: Domino Press, 1986) 20, 49, 79, 90, 103,
152, 165, 174, 186, 194.
27. John 30.
28. Webster's Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary (Springfield, MA:
Merriam-Webster, 1987).
29. John 30.
30. Miller 407- 408, 443.
31. "Mizraim, Rite of," Mackey's Encyclopedia, Vol. II.
32. Miller 407- 408, 443.
33. Robinson 77.
34. Some of the information the author has been able to gather
for this book has come directly from Masons, who readily answered
his questions after he had given them the Masonic handshake.
35. Dillon 83. This is still practiced today. For example,
when the United States Congress failed to back the Contras
financially, President Reagan went to the CIA for funding.
Hence, the famed "Iran/Contra Affair" involving Oliver North.
36. The Growing Menace of Freemasonry in Britain, 6th ed.
(London: n.p., 1936) 17.
37. de Poncins, Freemasonry and the Vatican 196.
38. Curt Gentry, J. Edgar Hoover: The Man and the Secrets,
(New York: Plume, 1991) 148- 149).
39 Stephen Knight, The Brotherhood 284.
40. Knight 290.
41. John Coleman, "Spy Scandals and Secret Societies," World
Economic Review, October 1984: 1.
42. Phillip Knightley, The Master Spy (New York: Alfred A.
Knopf, 1989) picture facing page 117.
43. A book entitled Henry Kissinger, Soviet Agent was published
in 1974 by Frank A. Capell, and reprinted by Sons of Liberty in
1987. The author documents that Kissinger was born and raised in
Germany during the Nazi regime. According to Capell, as a member
of the German Communist Party, Kissinger was easily recruited by
the KGB after the war and sent to America to be tutored by Nelson
Rockefeller. Henry Kissinger is a man of many colors. He is a
Freemason, and member of all three Masonic obediences -- English,
American and French.
44. Knight, The Brotherhood 284, 286.
45. de Poncins, Secret Powers 51.
46. Miller 417- 418.
47. de Poncins, Secret Powers 51.
48. Miller 270, 733.
49. Miller 412.
50. Webster, Secret Societies 441.
51. Miller 493.
52. Miller 490.
53. Miller 491.
54. Webster, Secret Societies 410.
55. Webster 411.
56. Miller 492.
57. Miller 492- 493.
58. Miller 526.
59. Miller 267, 722.
60. Miller 244.
61. Miller 244, 264, 274.
62. Miller 273- 274.
63. Miller 268.
64. "Hugo, Victor - Political Life," Encyclopaedia Britannica:
Macropaedia.
65. Webster, Secret Societies 409.
66. Nilus 100.
67. Nilus.
68. Miller 408.
69. Nilus 158.
70. Nilus 181.
71. Knight, The Brotherhood 216.
72. Knight 49.
73. Knight 54.
74. Knight 54- 55.
75. Stephen Knight, Jack the Ripper: The Final Solution (1976;
London: Granada, 1977) 158- 159.
76. Knight, Jack the Ripper 161.
77. Miller 407.
78. "Levite of the External Guard," Mackey's Encyclopedia,
Vol. i.
79. Knight, Jack the Ripper 161- 162.
80. Antelman 101.
81. "Anti-Semitism and Masonry," Mackey's Encyclopedia,
Vol. III.
82. Baigent 190.
83. Miller 353, 735.
84. Baigent 131, 154.
85. Waite, "Martinist Rose-Croix," A New Encyclopaedia of
Freemasonry, vol. 2, 161- 163. Arthur Edward Waite, born in
Brooklyn, New York, in 1857, was taken to England by his English
mother at the age of two following the death of his father.
Waite never returned to America, although he had been given
honorary degrees and positions in American lodges. Waite joined
English Freemasonry when he came of age.
86. Miller 354. (see Appendix 2, Fig. 5A in Scarlet and Beast,
Vol. 1).
87. Webster, Secret Societies 166.
88. Webster 165- 166.
89. Webster 310.
90. Webster.
91. Baigent 436.
92. Bible, Living Bible (LB).
93. Waite 161.
94. Miller 354.
95. Miller.
96. Baigent 462.
97. There are many theories concerning the origin of the
"Protocols." One is that they were published in 1903 under the
direction of Czar Nicholas II, for which he invested the staggering
sum of thirteen million rubles, and encouraged Nilus to prepare it.
This theory was one of the first to be promoted, before it was
discovered that there was an original in French, and that the
documents were stolen in 1884 from a French Masonic Lodge.
Some still promote this theory, although it has long since
been discredited.
98. Baigent 190- 195.
99. Baigent.
100. Church 169.
pp 824- 827
.
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
