-Caveat Lector-

http://www.drudgereport.com/flash.htm

Stonewall, Mr. Bush
By Peggy Noonan
WALL STREET JOURNAL 8/20/99
It was 1948, and Harry Truman, who assumed the presidency on
the death of FDR three years before, was running as the
Democratic nominee for president. It was a tough, close race. His
opponent, and the favorite, was New York Gov. Thomas E. Dewey,
a more or less liberal Republican and a man of such compact
tidiness that Alice Roosevelt's description of him--"He looks like
the little man on the wedding cake"--clung to him forever.
You probably remember what happened in that campaign, which
was painfully low and dirty. Dewey's operatives floated the rumor
that in the 1920s, when Truman was a young man in Missouri, he
had regularly frequented speakeasies. This was during Prohibition,
so if it was true young Truman had broken the law.
The rumors spread like fire. One said he regularly sipped whiskey
with Mike Pendergast in the speakeasy on 12th Street and Vine.
Another said no, that wasn't Mike Pendergast, that was Harry's
wife, Bess. (Republicans were very rude in those days.) Anyway,
for weeks it was all anyone could talk about in Manhattan and
Washington.
Truman at first refused to respond to the rumors, saying it was all
part of an attempt by the conservative newspaper establishment to
darken his reputation. But the press persisted, and the peppery
Truman finally lost his temper. Out on a morning constitutional
along Pennsylvania Avenue, he stopped, turned toward the small
band of reporters who were following him, pointed his cane in the
direction of the White House and spat out what came to be known
as the Whiskey Statement. "We are in the middle of a serious
contest over who will live in that house and lead our country the
next four years, and all you people want to know is whether I drank
whiskey as a young man. Joe Stalin is taking over Eastern Europe,
and you want to know if I drank whiskey. The Negroes of the
Southern states are asking for an equal place in our schools, and
you want to know if I drank whiskey. We've got charges of
communists stealing the A-bomb, and you want to know if I drank
whiskey. Well let me ask you--Mr. Rogers of the Herald Tribune
there--did you drink whiskey during Prohibition?"
"No," said Rogers firmly.
There was silence, and then Rogers cleared his throat.
"I was a gin man," he said. Everyone laughed.
"I liked a Gibson now and then," said a voice from the back of the
pack. It was Mr. Reston of the Times.
"It was more than now and then," laughed Walter Lippman, who
offered that while he rarely went to speakeasies, he always carried
a flask. "In fact," he said, "I still do."
He took it from his back pocket, and it shone like bright money in
the sun. The burnished silver carried an inscription: "To Walter,
with affection from Eleanor and Franklin."
"Let me see that," said Truman. He opened it, sniffed, and winked.
"To the Republic," he said as he took a drink.
"To the Republic," the reporters said as they passed the bottle.
"And now let us talk of the challenges that threaten the peace of
our country," Truman said as he led them back to the White
House. "Let's keep it high and worthy. And let's never discuss that
other again."
And you know, they didn't.
And Truman won.
***
Oh dear, I appear to have made that up. Which is very wicked of
me, as alcohol isn't drugs, and of course alcohol is now legal and
drugs are not, so it doesn't quite compare to . . . today, and our
latest drug story involving a candidate for office, Gov. George W.
Bush.
And of course the story I made up could never have happened,
because reporters in Harry Truman's day wouldn't have considered
it a story that young Harry broke the law and went to a speakeasy.
They wouldn't think it implied anything. And not because President
Harding, during Prohibition, drank whiskey in the office while
playing poker. That wasn't the reason.
The reason, I think, was that things were a little more human then,
back in the old America. Human beings seem to have had more
space for normal failings. They were allowed to smoke cigarettes
even though everyone knew they were bad for you; they were
allowed to drink, and to be eccentric, and to wear woolen suit
jackets in the summertime.
They were like the people you see in old movies starring Humphrey
Bogart and Spencer Tracy. Recently Tracy's "State of the Union"
was on, and one of the great things about it was that Tracy, who
plays an independent candidate for president, is rumored to be
having a fling, as they used to say, with his press aide, played in a
really deadly this-is-really-Clare-Booth-Luce way by the young
Angela Lansbury. And the fling, though gossiped about, doesn't
become public even though everyone knows about it, because it
was simply understood people are imperfect and do not-wonderful
things.
I guess I should note here that Tracy and Ms. Lansbury were
having what used to be called a love affair. It wasn't a story about
some sick manipulator being serviced in the hallway, or having
phone sex when he knows that foreign governments might be
listening in. Back in the '40s and '50s they made a lot of good
horror movies but no one would have dreamed that up.
In those days, they were more sophisticated. They had a more
easygoing sense of what humans are and what they're allowed. We
think of ourselves as sophisticated, but we're less sophisticated as
a people than we were. We have stranger perversions, we act up,
we're odd; but we're prissy in a way that people didn't used to be.
We're more sinful and less sophisticated--what a combination!
What changed the climate? Ted Kennedy, Gary Hart and Bill
Clinton. Mr. Kennedy by carrying on to such an extent that The
New Republic finally tagged him on it in the early '80s, a first, and
written in memorable prose by a woman. Mr. Hart by having a
social life that was simply too interesting for those who knew of it,
reporters, not to talk about it and, when he dared them to find the
evidence, to do so. And Mr. Clinton because--well, you know.
Suffice it to say that for years after Caligula, the Roman leaders
who followed were probably all asked, over and over, if they had
ever dated a horse, or killed their sister. Likewise, Mr. Clinton's
actions, and Mr. Hart's, instituted the Sexual History Frisk from the
press. And naturally it was followed by a Drug History Frisk.
I miss the old days, which I am nostalgic for even though I wasn't
there. I miss the old tolerance--a real tolerance that wasn't officially
enforced by ideologues but that bubbled up from an old shared
knowledge that we're all human, and damaged, and strange.
Which gets us to W. I guess he messed up with that Clintonesque
parsing of I haven't done anything bad in seven years (or 15 years
or 25 years). And I guess he messed up before that by violating his
own privacy to announce that he'd never been unfaithful to his wife.
But I hope he quiets up now and says nothing. Because no one
who knows him or works with him or reports on him says he has a
drug problem. They say that if he did something, it happened way
back there on 12th Street and Vine. Which is where it ought to
stay. And I hope he remembers, and the press realizes, that an
admired man who runs for office will not be helping the country if he
issues a nice big public confession that will be deconstructed by
kids to mean "I took coke, and I'm your next president--so go take
some coke!"
I hope he stonewalls. Because if he does, in time it will be like
every Clinton scandal: it will go away.
I hope this one does.
To the Republic.




"Freedom is slavery." - George Orwell (and Bill Clinton)

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to