-Caveat Lector-

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: The Conspiracy Was Strong
   Date: Fri, 20 Aug 1999 21:03:50 -0400
   From: "Timothy Aho" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
     To: "Watch Unto Prayer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

 To: The WatchmenFrom: Watch Unto Prayer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://watch.pair.com/pray.htmlDate: August 20, 1999
                       THE CONSPIRACY WAS STRONG

                                   by

                               Barbara Aho

               And the conspiracy was strong; for the
               people increased continually with Absalom.
               II Sam15:12a

"Worrying Connections" was the subject of an article written by Andrew
Gould to expose the improper connections between certain Hebrew Roots
and Revival ministries. Mr. Gould's article and other anti-HRM material
were removed some time ago from the websites of various Discernment
ministries subsequent to a threat of litigation from Messengers of
Messiah Ministries. Watch Unto Prayer was also named in this threat;
however it was never our intention to issue a retraction nor to withdraw
our material from the Internet, as demanded by Peter Michas.

That these Discernment ministries would so easily capitulate and then
berate our attempt to expose this major heretical cult is unfortunate,
but not altogether surprising. As I have interacted with these
ministries, I have pondered many "worrying connections" within their own
ranks. Having confronted those whom I knew personally, but to no avail,
I believe that the Christians who follow them have a right to the
following information.

               "And we beseech you brethren, to know them
                which labour among you..." (I Th. 5:12)

                       THE DISCERNMENT CONFERENCE

In June of 1997, I attended a Discernment Conference in East Lansing,
Michigan, which was organized by Jewel van der Merwe of Discernment
Ministries and Sarah Leslie of the Christian Conscience. The speakers at
this conference included Dean Gotcher, Nancy Flint, Russ Bellant, Berit
Kjos, Cynthia Weatherly, Sarah Leslie and Jewel van der Merwe. Ed
Tarkowski had been scheduled as a speaker but was unable to attend. Gary
Kah, author of "En Route to Global Occupation" and other books on the
New World Order, gave an informal talk after the conference.

Upon my return from East Lansing, I wrote and circulated a report titled
"The Unitarian Creed." Being at a loss to explain why this experience
occurred at a Discernment Conference, I simply described my encounter
with a Unitarian minister who introduced himself and wished to persuade
me to the Unitarian doctrines that the Holy Spirit is an emanation
rather than a person and that Jesus was a human son of God in the same
way believers are sons of God.

Sir Anthony F. Buzzard also explained that he had left the formerly
Unitarian Worldwide Church of God after that denomination embraced
orthodox doctrine in 1994 and affiliated with the Church of God General
Conference which maintains the Unitarian doctrine. The CGGC headquarters
and college, Atlanta Bible College, where Sir Anthony is on staff, are
located in Morrow, GA, a suburb of Atlanta.

Sir Anthony had given me his card and contacted me via e-mail soon after
the conference, wishing to discuss further reasons why the New Testament
gives no clear statement of Jesus' divinity or of the person of the Holy
Spirit. When I looked up the web page of Anthony Buzzard's Restoration
Fellowship, I was astonished to discover that this British gentleman had
been nominated in 1996 for the Templeton Prize. This $1,000,000 "Prize
for Progress in Religion" is given annually by New Age financier John
Templeton at the World Parliament of Religions, which has included among
the distinguished recipients Billy Graham, Bill Bright, Chuck Colson,
Mother Teresa, Cardinal Suenens and various Buddhist, Hindu and Muslim
leaders. This honor is advertised in Anthony Buzzard's Profile.

I might have reasoned that Sir Anthony Buzzard was simply using the
Discernment Ministries as a Christian cover for his globalist agenda,
however this conference was "By Invitation Only" and no one could have
been present without the approval of the organizers. I therefore spoke
to Sarah Leslie thinking that there must have been some mistake in the
process of selecting conferees. She replied that Jewel van der Merwe had
invited him. When I expressed my alarm to Jewel that someone with
Anthony's credentials had been invited to a Discernment Conference, she
thanked me for being nice to him and explained that he is "confused."
Still disturbed about this experience one year later, I wrote to Sarah
via e-mail and received the following reply:

     >From: Lynn D. Leslie
     >Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 1998 11:38 AM
     >To: Timothy Aho
     >Subject: Re: More Thoughts...

     >I do not know Anthony Buzzard other than having been
     introduced to him via Jewel. At >that time I firmly cautioned
     her that this man was an apostate and to stay away from >him.
     I do not know if she heeded my warning.

Sir Anthony Buzzard's web page of referrals to Christian Resources
includes the Christian Conscience, CROSS+WORD, Focus on the Family, and
Jews for Jesus.  Discernment Ministries was formerly listed but has been
removed. I would learn also that Anthony Buzzard attended a
pre-conference to the East Lansing seminar that had been held in
Atlanta, Georgia and included only the leadership. Why Atlanta? Who was
setting the agenda for the Discernment Conference? Do the Discernment
Ministries have a larger agenda of which Christians are unaware?

Sir Anthony Farquhar Buzzard is the son of the late Sir Anthony Wass
Buzzard (1902-72), who was the head of British Naval Intelligence. In
1955, Sir Anthony W. Buzzard collaborated with Bilderberger and Fabian
leader, Denis Healey, later the British Minister of Defence, to divest
Great Britain of its nuclear deterrent. Their partnership with two other
prominent individuals led to the establishment of the Institute for
Strategic Studies, now the International Institute for Strategic
Studies. Originally financed by the Ford Foundation, the International
Institute for Strategic Studies has been regularly represented at
Bilderberger Conferences.

A main goal of the Bilderberg Group from its official formation at the
Hotel Bilderberg in Oosterbeek, Holland in May 1954, was to install a
European superstate. The European Union has been designed from the very
beginning by those who control the Bilderberg Group -- the House of
Rothschild, the Rockefellers, and the "blue blood" families of Europe.
The first president of the Bilderberg Group was Prince Bernhard of the
Netherlands. In his book, The New Unhappy Lords, A.K. Chesterton
disclosed the role of the elder Anthony Buzzard with the early
Bilderbergers:

     My friend and colleague Austen Brooks drew the attention of
     readers of Candour to another exceedingly curious
     extra-governmental body working along lines which would
     suggest its affiliation with the Bilderberg group. Early in
     1962 a dozen "leading churchmen" (of whom, needless to say,
     one was Canon John Collins) published an "appeal to the
     British Government and people" urging that Britain should be
     prepared to renounce her independent nuclear deterrent.
     Commenting on this, the Observer wrote: "Behind the statement
     lies a strange and little-known relationship between Church
     leaders and some of Britain's best-known military pundits. The
     connection started back in 1955, when Richard Goold-Adams,
     foreign affairs commentator, Denis Healey, the Labour
     politician, Professor Blackett and Rear-Admiral Sir Anthony
     Buzzard, former head of Naval Intelligence and an active
     Churchman, were worried about the lack of serious thinking
     about strategy in Britain and, in particular, the undue
     reliance on the strategic H-bomb." (Note the nuclear surrender
     hand in the "strategic" glove.) This quartet, according to the
     Observer, "raised the problem" with the then Bishop of
     Chichester, the late Dr. Bell, who in turn "interested" the
     chairman and secretary of the Churches' Commission on
     International Affairs, Sir Kenneth Grubb and the Rev. Alan
     Booth, and in January, 1957, a conference - described by the
     Observer as "a strange assembly, eighty-strong, hard-headed
     military men, journalists and politicians surrounded by
     clerical cloth" - was held at the Bedford Hotel in Brighton. A
     continuation committee was set up and the Brighton Conference
     Association came into being to work against "the undue
     reliance on the strategic Hbomb". (pp. 208-9)

Chesterton's account of the British "peace" team also reported the
remarkable developments which followed the 1957 Brighton Conference.

     It was at this point of the story that the Observer opened the
     bag and let the cat out. "After a year or so," it wrote, "the
     money they had collected was beginning to run out. But just at
     that moment, Denis Healey managed to interest the Ford
     Foundation in this enterprise. He asked for only 10,000
     dollars. They offered ten times as much, and with this the
     Brighton Conference Association wound itself up and the
     Institute for Strategic Studies came into existence." (p. 209)

Thus, in 1958, the International Institute for Strategic Studies, known
as the IISS and located on Tavistock Street in London, was formed as a
result of decisions made at Bilderberg '57. E. H. van der Beugel, who
chaired Bilderberg after the death of founder, Joseph Retinger in 1960,
later became president of the IISS. Bertram Christoph, representative to
Bilderberg for Germany and Bilderberg attendant in '95, '96, and '98, is
a former director of the IISS. The Royal Institute of International
Affairs web site maintains a link to the IISS -- brainchild of Healey,
Buzzard, Blackett and Goold-Adams and funded by the Ford Foundation.

     The persuasive Mr. Healey, who "managed to interest" the Ford
     Foundation in the "enterprise" which was working to get rid of
     Britain's Nuclear deterrent, was then the Labour Party's
     shadow Minister of Defence. He was also a leading member of
     the Fabian Society, a member of the Bilderberg group and,
     almost certainly, a member of the Royal Institute of
     International Affairs. Small wonder that the policy of the
     Institute for Strategic Studies, which the American Ford
     Foundation had brought into being, was soon adopted as the
     official policy of the Labour Party. In October, 1964, the
     Fabian Bilderberger Denis Healey became Minister of Defence,
     an appointment which was the signal for the almost immediate
     abandonment of a number of British military aircraft projects.
     Then, early in April, 1965, came what was for all practical
     purposes the renunciation of the British independent nuclear
     deterrent - the abandonment of the magnificent British
     aircraft TSR2. The announcement of this abandonment was made,
     curiously, not by Mr. Healey but by his colleague Mr. James
     Callaghan, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, in his Budget
     speech. What Mr. Callaghan did not announce was that only a
     couple of months earlier the Ford Foundation had made a
     further grant to Mr. Healey's Institute for 100,000 dollars
     look parsimonious. This was a grant of 550,000 dollars over
     six years. (p. 209-10)

Two years later, the Ford Foundation, which funds and whose members
serve as trustees on the Council of Foreign Relations, would also
provide a grant to the London School of Economics for a Centre for
International Studies. Established as a long-term investment to educate
and train an elite workforce to carry out the schemes of socialist
reform, the London School of Economics is now one of the largest schools
of the University of London, having also an international reputation.
The L.S.E. also provides consultants to many organizations, including
the U.K. government, international bodies such as the World Bank, the
International Monetary Fund and the United Nations. The European
Institute of the LSE participates actively in the European Series
conferences and hosted the 1996 conference which held discussions on
European Union, i.e., EMU: How Would a Single European Currency be
Managed? European Governance and Law, Europe in the World Economy.

                   Colleagues of Anthony Wass Buzzard

                              Denis Healey

The European Spider's Web traces the development of support for the
European Union within England to the very institution from which Denis
Healey and Sir Anthony F. Buzzard received their education -- Oxford
University, home of the Rhodes scholarships:

     Labour Party support [for joining the European Economic
     Community] came from leading figures like the Bilderbergers -
     James Callaghan, who would later be Prime Minister; Denis
     Healey, who attended the first Bilderberg meeting in 1954 and
     a stream of those that followed... Appropriately, all of those
     people except for Callaghan were products of the Elite's UK
     production line, better known as Oxford University. This is a
     massive recruiting and conditioning centre, not just for
     British youngsters, but also for the overseas students, like
     Bill Clinton, who attend Oxford under the Rhodes Scholarship
     scheme set up by that arch manipulator of the Elite agenda,
     Cecil Rhodes.

Not only did Denis Healey become a regular attendee of the Bilderberger
Conferences, but proudly explained in his book, The Time of My Life,
that he recruited British members for the Bilderberg meetings:

     "Of all these meetings, the most valuable to me while I was in
     opposition were the Bilderberg Conferences... They were the
     brainchild of Joseph Retinger... After the war he organized
     the Congress of the Hague, which launched the European
     Movement... I was invited to the first [Bilderberg] meeting
     and later acted as convenor of the British who attended." (pp.
     195-96)

A.K. Chesterton also wrote in The New Unhappy Lords of the Bilderberg
Group which met on two occasions off the Atlantic coast of Georgia -
specifically Jekyl Island (1908) and St. Simon Island (1957). Of
interest, the 45th Bilderberg Meeting was held near Atlanta, Georgia,
from June 12-15 of 1997. The following rather lengthy excerpt from
Chesterton's book identifies as participants in the 1957 St. Simon and
1958 Buxton meetings members of the international power elite, including
Denis Healey, who collaborated toward world government.

     If the facts concerning the Royal Institute of International
     Affairs and the Council on Foreign Relations be accepted, it
     will be seen that the proper study of political mankind is the
     study of power elites, without which nothing that happens can
     be understood. These elites, preferring to work in private,
     are rarely found posed for photographers, and their influence
     upon events has therefore to be deduced from what is known of
     the agencies they employ. There are dozens of such agencies,
     and financial support received from one or other or all three
     big American foundations - Rockefeller, Carnegie and Ford -
     provides an infallible means of recognizing them. One of the
     most blatant of these agencies, despite its adoption of a
     secret society technique, is the Bilderberg Group, which seems
     to have been inspired by an important event. In the year 1908,
     secret agents of the New York Money Power and their Washington
     fuglemen had themselves transported in the dead of night to
     Jekyll Island off the coast of Georgia. As the result of their
     plotting there was created, four years later, the means
     whereby the Money Trust was enabled to seize control of the
     entire American economy through the mechanism of the Federal
     Reserve Board. In February 1957, a similarly hush-hush
     conference took place at St. Simons Island in the same region.
     A "summary" of the proceedings was entered by Senator Wiley,
     champion of the Left-wing, in the appendix of the
     Congressional Record. It referred to "the preservation of
     peace" under the auspices of Nato, which revealed nothing. The
     composition of the gathering, however, was revealing. Nobody
     with Right-Wing views was permitted to attend. Wiley was
     accompanied by Fulbright, both of the U.S. Foreign Affairs
     Committee. Sulzberger of the New York Times was there. So was
     the mysterious Gabriel Hauge, said by the Wall Street Journal
     to be "the expert who tells Ike what to think". So was the
     only less mysterious George Kennan, former Ambassador to
     Russia. So were the representatives of the Rockefeller
     Foundation and the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
     A Supreme Court Judge was reported to have been present,
     although he did not register. Westbrook Pegler, the courageous
     American columnist, believes that he was Felix Frankfurter,
     the patron of Dean Acheson and Alger Hiss among other dubious
     proteges. There was also Lord Kilmuir, who as Sir David
     Maxwell Fyfe figured among that of a more improbablelooking
     Scot than could be imagined. What these agents...were plotting
     was nothing to the benefit of the sovereign independence of
     the nations of the Western World.

     The following people were also present:-

     J.H. Retinger, Polish Charge d'Affaires in Russia, 1941;
     Joseph E. Johnson, President, Carnegie Endowment for
     International Peace; Hon. F.D.L. Astor, Editor, The Observer,
     U.K.; G.W. Ball, Attorney, Cleary, Gottlieb, Friendly and
     Ball, U.S.; Fritz Berg, Chairman, Federation of German
     Industries, Germany; M. Nuri Birgi, Secretary-General,
     Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Turkey; Eugene R. Black,
     President, International Bank for Reconstruction and
     Development; Robert R. Bowie, Ass. Secretary of State for
     Policy Planning, U.S.; McGeorge Bundy [Skull & Bones], Dean
     Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Harvard University; Hakon
     Christianson, Chairman, East Asiatic Company, Denmark; Walter
     Cisler, Presidedent, Atomic Industrial Forum, U.S.; Pierre
     Commin, Secretary, French Socialist Party; B.D. Cooke,
     Director, Dominion Insurance Company, U.S.; Arthur H. Dean,
     Law partner of John Foster Dulles, formerly of Sullivan and
     Cromwell, U.S.; Jean de la Garde, French Ambassador to Mexico;
     Thomas E. Dewey, Attorney, former Governor of New York, U.S.;
     Sir William Eddlitt, Air Chief Marshal, Royal Institute, U.K.;
     Fritz Erler, Socialist M.P., Germany; John Ferguson, Attorney,
     Cleary, Gottlieb, Friendly and Ball, U.S.; Lincoln Gordon,
     Professor, Consultant to Nato's "Three Wise Men"; Sir Colin
     Gubbins, Industrialist, U.K.; Lawrence R. Hafstead, Technical
     Adviser, Atomic Energy Commission; Jens Christian Hauge,
     Socialist M.P., Norway; Brooks Hays, House Foreign Affairs
     Committee; Denis Healey, Labour M.P. (now Minister of
     Defence), U.K.; Arnold D.P. Heeney, Ambassador to U.S.A.,
     Canada; Michael A. Heilperin, Economist, U.S.; Henry J. Heinz,
     President, H.J. Heinz & Company, U.S.; Leif Hoegh, Banker,
     Norway; Paul G. Hoffman, Former Director, E.C.A., U.N.
     Delegate, U.S.; C.D. Jackson, President, Time Inc., Former
     Special Assistant to the President, U.S.; Wm. H. Jackson,
     Former Special Assistant to the President U.S.; Per Jacobson,
     Man. Director, International Monetary Fund, Sweden; Georg Kurt
     Keisinger, Director of Special Studies, Rockefeller
     Foundation; Pieter Liefnick, Director, International Monetary
     Fund, Netherlands; Imbriani Longo, Director-General, Banco
     Nazionale del lavoro, Italy; Paul Martin, Minister Health and
     Welfare, Canada; David J. Mcdonald, President United
     Steelworkers; Geo. C. McGhee, Director, Middle East Institute;
     Ralph E. McGill Editor, Atlanta Constitution; Alex W. Menne,
     President, Association of German Chemical Industries, Germany;
     Rudolf Mueller, Lawyer, Germany; Robert Murphy,
     Deputy-Under-Secretary of State U.S.; Frank C. Nash, Attorney
     former Assistant Secretary of Defence, U.S.; Geo. Nebolsine,
     Attorney, Coudert Bros, U.S.; Paul H. Nitze, Director, Policy
     Planning, State Department, U.S.; Morehead Patterson, Deputy
     Commissioner of Disarmament, U.S.; Don K. Price,
     Vice-President, Russian Institute, Columbia University; David
     Rockefeller, Chairman of the Board, Chase National Bank; J.H.
     Van Joijen, Ambassador to U.S., Netherlands; Dean Rusk,
     President, Rockefeller Foundation; Paul Rykans, Industrialist,
     Netherlands; J.L.S. Steele, Chairman, British International
     Chamber of Commerce, U.K.; Terkel M. Terkelson, Editor,
     Denmark; John M. Vorys, Member, Foreign Affairs Committee;
     Fraser B. Wilde, Comm. on Economic Development; Otto von
     Amerongen Wollf, Partner, Otto Wollf, Germany; W.T. Wren,
     Chairman Allied Iron Founders, U.D.; Paul van Zeeland,
     Financier, former Prime Minister of Belgium.

     The Chairman was H.R.H. Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands.
     Strange, is it not, that the Prince should be the "front" for
     a powerful left-wing secret society?

     Why were these people present: Who sent them? Who paid their
     fares? Who sponsored their meeting? What did they discuss?
     What did they decide? What orders were they given? Was there
     any common denominator of interest among them? Yes, they were
     all promoters of internationalism. Were they instructed in the
     next phase of the advance towards One World? The answer,
     beyond doubt, is Yes.

     The Sunday Times reported during October 1957 that financiers
     and businessmen from Britain, the United States, Canada and
     thirteen other Western nations had begun private talks at
     Fiuggi, Italy, on the European free trade area and the Common
     Market projects. There were sixty delegates, Mr. Maudling, the
     Paymaster-General at the time and the Minister responsible for
     Britain's intended part in the proposed European free trade
     area, and Viscount Kilmuir, Lord Chancellor, attended...

     There is no difficulty in recognising in this secret gathering
     the mysterious Bilderberg Group, of which Prince Bernhard is
     the official sponsor. As the author surmised after the St.
     Simons Island meeting, the purpose was to speed up the cause
     of internationalism and it is interesting to have confirmed
     the fact that these agents of the Money Power were directly
     concerned with the European free trade area. Am I right in
     thinking that the work undertaken by the Bilderberg Group was
     once undertaken by such bodies as Chatham House? It may even
     be that the remorseless light I shed on Chatham House
     activities in the pages of the old Truth may have led to its
     manipulators seeking new facades behind which to work. As Lord
     Kilmuir maintained that all the Bilderberg Group's members
     spoke as private individuals would he also have known whether
     they paid their own expenses when attending these meetings in
     different parts of the world? If they did not, who did?

     In September 1958 another meeting of the Bilderberg Group took
     place in Buxton, Derbyshire... [The very highest agents of the
     arch-conspirators] came not in their official capacities but
     as private citizens. That fact was repeatedly stressed. Yet,
     according to rumour, there arrived for their use crates of
     official documents so secret that the crates had to be locked
     - together with a British officer as custodian - in a room at
     the Buxton police station. When asked about the authenticity
     of this rumour, the Conference's spokesman tried to laugh it
     off...

     At least twenty-four of those who attended the Buxton meeting
     also attended that on St. Simons Island. Among these were John
     J. McCloy and David Rockefeller (both Chase Manhattan) and
     Paul Rykans, a Dutch banker and member of the Anglo-Dutch
     Trade Council and chairman of an "industrial development"
     organisation called MIDEC. One hundred and twenty European and
     six U.S. firms were in this organisation in 1960 for the
     purpose of "developing" the Middle East. One of the U.S.
     members of MIDEC was Rockefeller Centre Inc. Both David and
     Nelson Rockefeller have been and may still be members of the
     Council on Foreign Relations. James S. Rockefeller is or was
     the president of the First National City Bank of New York.
     Anybody who likes to get a Directory of Directors and a few
     dozen copies of the International Monetary Fund weekly will
     find plenty of evidence to indicate that a good deal of
     so-called "economic policy", whether in Washington or
     Indonesia, Australia or Sweden, emanates from a relatively
     small circle of interested parties.

     The following is a list of the names of conspirators who
     attended the Buxton meeting. I use the word "conspirators"
     deliberately. Men pursuing purposes which will bear the light
     of day do not hold secret meetings in different parts of the
     world. The whole business could be treated as schoolboy
     silliness were it not for the fact that there emerged from
     such gatherings policies hostile to the traditional order of
     life...

     J.H. Retinger (Hon. Secretary); Jo. E. Johnson (Hon. Secretary
     in the U.S.); Herman J. Abs, Germany; Dean Acheson, United
     States; Giovanni Agnelli, Italy; G.W. Ball, U.S.; Walworth
     Barbour, U.S.; Wilfred Baumgartner, France; Sir Edward
     Beddington-Behrens, U.K.; Berthold Beitz, Germany; Fritz Berg,
     Germany; Muharrem Nuri Birgi, Turkey; P.A. Blaisse,
     Netherlands; James C. Boden, Germany; Erik Boheman, Sweden;
     Max Brauer, Germany; Randolph W. Burgess, U.S.; Lewis Camu,
     Belgium; Guido Carli, Italy; Clifford P. Case, U.S.; Victor
     Cavendish-Bentick, U.K.; Sir Ralph Cochrane, U.K.; Erich
     Dethleffsen, Germany; Fritz Erler, Germany; John Ferguson,
     U.S.; H.T.N. Gaitskell, U.K.; Walter L. Gordon, Canada; Joseph
     Grimond, U.K.; Sir Colin Gubbins, U.K.; Walther Hallstein
     (Chairman, European Common Market Commission); Joseph C.
     Harsch, U.S.; Gabriel Hauge, U.S.; Denis Healey, U.K.; Michael
     A. Heilperin, U.S.; H. J. Heinz II, U.S.; Leif Hoegh, Norway;
     C.D. Jackson, U.S.; Viscount Kilmuir, U.K.; E.N. van Kleffens;
     Viscount Knollys, U.K.; Ole B. Kraft, Denmark; Thorkil
     Kristensen, Denmark; Giovanni F. Malagodi, Italy; John J.
     McCloy, U.S.; Geo. C. McGhee, U.S.; Philip E. Mosley, U.S.;
     Roger Motz, Belgium; Rudolf Mueller, Germany; Alfred C. Neal,
     U.S.; Geo. Nebolsine, U.S.; Paul H. Nitze, U.S.; David
     Ormsby-Gore, U.K.; P.F.S. Otten, Netherlands; P.N. Pipinelis,
     Greece, Alberto Pirelli, Italy; Pietro Quaroni, Italy; Sir
     Alfred Roberts, U.K.; David Rockefeller, U.S.; Michael Ross,
     U.S.; Jacques Rueff; Paul Rykans, Netherlands; Carlo Schmid,
     Germany; C.V.R. Schuyler; J.L.S. Steele, U.K.; Terkel M.
     Terkelson, Denmark; Henry Tiarks, U.K.; Every A. Vermeer,
     Netherlands; Marc Wallenberg, Sweden; Otto Von Amerongen,
     Germany; Paul van Zeeland, Belgium; J.D. Zellerbach, U.S.

     In 1961 an article in the Toronto Star Read as follows: "The
     Tenth Bilderberg Conference attended by seventy delegates from
     Europe and North America wound up yesterday after three days
     of discussion of common problems. Participants, whose names
     were not disclosed, included leaders of the political,
     industrial, labour and professional fields of both continents,
     an official statement said. Chairman of the meeting was Prince
     Bernhard of the Netherlands, who left Quebec yesterday for
     home after making private visits to cities in Mexico, the U.S.
     and Canada. The statement said although the conference
     "followed the original Bilderberg concept of not attempting to
     reach conclusions or to recommend policies, there was
     substantial agreement on the need to promote better
     understanding and more effective co-ordination among the
     Western nations. Points of particular concern included the
     role of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation in world
     policy, the strengthening of both the nuclear and non-nuclear
     deterrent power of the alliance and the responsibility for
     control of atomic weapons inside Nato", the statement said.
     'The implications for Western unity of the change in the
     relative economic strength of the U.S. and Western Europe also
     were discussed at some length.'" (pp. 197-205)

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to