-Caveat Lector- from: http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/News_Releases/1999/nret9003. html <A HREF="http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/News_Releases/1999/nre t9003.html">FCC News Release:</A> ----- Text | Word97 NEWS Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554News media information 202 / 418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202 / 418-2830 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 202/418-2555 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ This is an unofficial announcement of Commission action. Release of the full text of a Commission order constitutes official action. See MCI v. FCC. 515 F 2d 385 (D.C. Circ 1974). ------------------------------------------------------------------------ FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE AUGUST 27, 1999 NEWS MEDIA CONTACT: Meribeth McCarrick at (202) 418-0654 FCC ADOPTS CALEA TECHNICAL STANDARDS The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has adopted technical requirements for wireline, cellular, and broadband Personal Communications Services (PCS) carriers to comply with the assistance capability requirements of the Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act of 1994 (CALEA). Specifically, the FCC required that all capabilities of the Telecommunications Industry Association (TIA) interim standard (J-STD-025) and six of nine "punch list" capabilities requested by the Department of Justice (DoJ)/Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) be implemented by wireline, cellular, and broadband PCS carriers. With the exception of packet-mode communications, the FCC required that all capabilities of the interim standard be implemented by the CALEA compliance date of June 30, 2000. The FCC required that a packet-mode communications capability and the six punchlist capabilities be implemented by September 30, 2001. Specifics of Today's Action: •Actions Regarding the Interim Standard (J-STD-025) The FCC concluded the following regarding the location information and packet-mode communications capabilities of the interim standard: Location information: The FCC required that location information be provided to law enforcement agencies (LEAs) under CALEA's assistance capability requirements for "call-identifying information," provided that a LEA has a court order or legal authorization beyond a pen regist er or trap and trace authorization. The FCC found that location information identifies the "origin" or "destination" of a communication and thus is covered by CALEA. The FCC, however, did not mandate that carriers be able to provide LEAs with the precise physical location of a caller. Rather, it permitted LEAs with the proper legal authorization to receive from wireline, cellular, and broadband PCS carriers only the location of a cell site at the beginning and termination of a mobile call. Packet-mode communications: The FCC required that carriers provide LEAs access to packet-mode communications by September 30, 2001. However, the Commission acknowledged that significant privacy issues had been raised with regard to the J-STD-025 treatment of packet-mode communications. Under the J-STD-025, law enforcement could be provided with access to both call identifying information and call content, even where it may be authorized only to receive call identifying information. Accordingly, the FCC invited TIA to study CALEA solutions for packet-mode technology and report to the FCC by September 30, 2000 on steps that can be taken, including particular amendments to the interim standard, that will better address privacy concerns. •Actions Regarding the Capabilities Requested by DoJ/FBI Of the nine items in the DoJ/FBI punch list, the following capabilities were required by the FCC: Content of subject-initiated conference calls -- A LEA will be able to access the content of conference calls initiated by the subject under surveillance (including the call content of parties on hold), pursuant to a court order or other legal authorization beyond a pen register order. Party hold, join, drop on conference calls -- Messages will be sent to a LEA that identify the active parties of a call. Specifically, on a conference call, these messages will indicate whether a party is on hold, has joined, or has been dropped from the conference call. Subject-initiated dialing and signaling information -- Access to dialing and signaling information available from the subject will inform a LEA of a subject's use of features (e.g., call forwarding, call waiting, call hold, and three-way calling). In-band and out-of-band signaling (notification message) -- A message will be sent to a LEA whenever a subject's service sends a tone or other network message to the subject or associate (e.g., notification that a line is ringing or busy, call waiting signal). Timing information -- Information will be sent to a LEA permitting it to correlate call-identifying information with the call content of a communications interception. Dialed digit extraction --The originating carrier will provide to a LEA on the call data channel any digits dialed by the subject after connecting to another carrier's service., pursuant to a pen register authorization. The FCC found that some such digits fit within CALEA's definition of call-identifying information, and that they are generally reasonably available to carriers. In requiring the six punch list capabilities, the FCC noted that it determined that five of them constitute call-identifying information that is generally reasonably available to carriers and therefore is required under CALEA. The FCC found that while the cost to carriers of providing some of these five capabilities is significant, it is not so exorbitant as to automatically require the exclusion of any capability from the final industry standard. The following punch list items were not required by the FCC: Surveillance status -- Carriers would have been required to send a message to a LEA to verify that a wiretap had been established and was functioning correctly. Continuity check tone (C-tone) -- Electronic signal would have alerted a LEA if the facility used for delivery of call content interception failed or lost continuity. Feature status -- A LEA would have been notified when, for the facilities under surveillance, specific subscription-based calling services were added or deleted. The FCC found that these three capabilities, while potentially useful to LEAs, were not required by the plain language of CALEA. However, carriers are free to provide these capabilities if they wish to do so. •Timetable for New Capabilities The FCC invited the TIA Subcommittee TR45.2 to revise the interim J-STD-025 to add the six required punch list capabilities. The FCC stated that those capabilities can be most efficiently implemented by permitting the Subcommittee to make the modifications. The FCC noted that LEAs, carriers, and manufacturers are voting members of the Subcommittee, and that the Subcommittee has the experience and resources in place to resolve CALEA capability issues quickly. The FCC required the necessary revisions to be accomplished by March 30, 2000. Finally, the FCC required that wireline, cellular, and broadband PCS carriers make the packet-mode and required punch list capabilities available to LEAs by September 30, 2001. This will provide carriers with more than two years to implement these capabilities. Because manufacturers have had development of these capabilities under consideration for several years, the FCC found that this amount of time will prove sufficient for the development process to be completed and for carriers to implement these capabilities. Action by the Commission August 26, 1999 by Third Report and Order (FCC 99-230). Chairman Kennard, Commissioners Ness, Furchtgott-Roth, Powell and Tristani. News Media Contact: Meribeth McCarrick at (202) 418-0654; TTY at (202) 418-7233; or e-mail at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office of Engineering and Technology contacts: Geraldine Matise at (202) 418-2322, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Julius Knapp at (202)-418-2468, [EMAIL PROTECTED]; or Rodney Small at (202) 418-2452, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] CCDocket No. 97-213 ET Report No. 99-4 - FCC - ----- from: http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/News_Releases/1999/nrwl9038.html Text | Word97 NEWS Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554News media information 202 / 418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202 / 418-2830 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 202/418-2555 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ This is an unofficial announcement of Commission action. Release of the full text of a Commission order constitutes official action. See MCI v. FCC. 515 F 2d 385 (D.C. Circ 1974). ------------------------------------------------------------------------ FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE AUGUST 27, 1999 NEWS MEDIA CONTACT: Meribeth McCarrick at (202) 418-0654 FCC CLARIFIES ENTITIES SUBJECT TO CALEA AND PROVIDES GUIDANCE ON "REASONABLY ACHIEVABLE" PETITIONS The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has clarified which categories of service providers are subject to the requirements of the Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (CALEA). The FCC also provided guidance regarding the factors it will consider in determining whether compliance with the law is "reasonably achievable" for particular carriers. CALEA was enacted by Congress in October 1994 to ensure that telecommunications carriers' facilities are capable of providing legally authorized electronic surveillance. The FCC shares implementation responsibilities with the Department of Justice. In a separate action today, the FCC adopted standards for carriers to meet the assistance capability requirements of the law. Specifics of Today's Action: Examining the definition of "telecommunications carrier" set forth in section 102 of the Act, the FCC made various clarifications with respect to the entities subject to CALEA, including: •All entities previously classified as common carriers are subject to CALEA, as are cable operators and electric and other utilities to the extent they offer telecommunications services for hire to the public. •CMRS providers are subject to CALEA, except to the extent they offer service that is not interconnected to the PSTN (e.g., dispatch service). PMRS operators are subject to CALEA only where they offer service that qualifies as CMRS. •Resellers, which often operate hybrid networks consisting of their own facilities and resold services, will be responsible for CALEA compliance only with respect to their own facilities. •While facilities used solely for the provision of information services are not subject to CALEA, telecommunications carriers' facilities used to provide both telecommunications and information services are subject to the requirements of the Act. •Under section 109(b) of CALEA, telecommunications carriers may petition the FCC for a determination as to whether compliance with the Act's assistance capability requirements is "reasonably achievable" for equipment, facilities, and services deployed after January 1, 1995. The Act states that the FCC must "determine whether compliance would impose significant difficulty or expense on the carrier or on the users of the carrier's systems." The Act also lists additional factors the FCC must take into account. In today's action, the FCC: •Found that it would be premature to adopt factors in addition to those set forth in section 109(b) or to assign special weight to any one factor generally. •Stated that the section 109 process should be reserved for the examination of specific carrier compliance problems, and should not be used to revisit broad policy goals. •Emphasized that requests for relief from CALEA compliance based on CALEA's costs or its impact on rates, quality of service, or the introduction of services to the market must be supported by specific facts, including quantitative data. Action by the Commission August 26, 1999, by Second Report and Order (FCC 99-229). Chairman Kennard, Commissioners Ness, Furchtgott-Roth, Powell and Tristani. News Media Contact: Meribeth McCarrick at (202) 418-0654; TTY at (202) 418-7233; or e-mail at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wireless Telecommunications Bureau contacts: John Spencer at (202) 418-1310; or e-mail at [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC Docket No. 97-213 WT Report No. 99-24 - FCC - ----- Aloha, He'Ping, Om, Shalom, Salaam. Em Hotep, Peace Be, Omnia Bona Bonis, All My Relations. Adieu, Adios, Aloha. Amen. Roads End Kris DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
