Folks, Make sure you open the Attachment.
Bard

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, September 19, 1999 9:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 3 NEW MYSTERIOUS DEATHS!!!


Subject: 9/11/99 -- 3 of 4 Dead Deltas Were at Waco


AS THREATENED CIA AGENT TALKS, SUBPOENAS FLY AND
DELTA FORCE PERSONNEL PRESENT AT WACO SUDDENLY DIE....

MYSTERIOUS DELTA FORCE DEATHS--FALLING OUT OF HELICOPTERS,
DROWNING, GUNSHOTS....?

ALEX JONES:  "THESE ARE NOT BEING REPORTED IN THE NATIONAL
MEDIA AS TRAINING ACCIDENTS NORMALLY WOULD BE, AND INSIDE
SOURCES LINK THESE MEN TO THE SLAUGHTER AT WACO"

FAYETTVILLE ONLINE (Article -- See Below)
http://www.infowars.com/training_deaths.html

>Radio talk show host Alex Jones asserted today that
>he has confirmed that at least 3 of the 4 Delta Force members
>killed in training accidents  on 2 successive days last week
>were at Waco during the siege  that killed 86 Branch Davidians.
>
>The 3 dead Delta Force soldiers confirmed to have been at Waco
>were Lt. Col. Timothy A. Boyles, Sgt. Eric Ellingson,
>and Master Sgt. Gaetano Cutino. Cutino was the brother of Judge
>Fran Gull of Fort Wayne, Indiana.
>
>The presence at Waco of the 4th dead Delta Force member, Sgt.
>Jamey Dimase, 3rd Battalion, 75th Ranger Regiment, Fort Benning,
>Ga., has yet to be confirmed or denied.
>
>Alex Jones can be heard daily on shortwave radio at 9.400 MHz from
>1pm 2pm. Jones also has a web page at http://www.inforwars.com.
>
>David Feustel
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>http://www.mindspring.com/~dfeustel

ARTICLE:
FAYETTVILLE ONLINE
Saturday, September 11, 1999

Third soldier dies while training
Army officials order safety review

By J.S. Newton --Staff writer

The U.S. Army Special Operations Command has had another fatal training
accident involving a Fort Bragg soldier. It is the third training death in
as
many days for Fort Bragg-based special operations forces.

��It�s all in the hands of God what happens to us every day,�� said Carol
Darby,
a spokeswoman for USASOC.

Following the incidents, the command ordered a thorough worldwide review
of all of its safety precautions.

Two soldiers from the 1st Battalion of the 3rd Special Forces Group died
Tuesday night when they were swept away during a water training exercise
in the Savannah River, Ga.

On Friday, officials identified 40-year-old Lt. Col. Timothy A. Boyles as
the
second victim from the river accident. He was commander of the 1st
Battalion.

The identity of the first victim, Sgt. Eric Ellingson, was revealed
Thursday.

The most recent fatality occurred Thursday night when 36-year-old Master
Sgt. Gaetano Cutino died on a helicopter insertion exercise near Sicily
Drop Zone on Fort Bragg.

He apparently died from injuries sustained while ��exiting from an MH-6
��Little Bird�� helicopter,�� military officials said. Cutino was assigned
to
the U.S. Army Special Operations Command.

Fran Gull, a Superior Court judge from Fort Wayne, Ind., was Cutino�s
sister.

She said her brother was a John Wayne fanatic and former high school
football player. But what he loved most was his family and his job.

��He loved soldiering,�� she said. ��He was a wonderful father to his three
kids,
and he was a wonderful husband to his wife.��

Adding to an already tragic week for USASOC, military officials announced
Friday that an Army Ranger had accidentally died in Germany from a gunshot
wound to the chest.

Sgt. Jamey Dimase, who was 26, of the 3rd Battalion, 75th Ranger Regiment,
Fort Benning, Ga. was participating in marksmanship training at the time of
his death, military officials said.

Local military officials said there is no relationship between the rash of
accidents. ��It�s just a coincidence,�� said Jimmy Dean, a spokesman
for the Special Forces Association in Fayetteville. ��There might not be
another (death) in five years.��

Dean said he and a group of retired Green Berets had been discussing
the river death Friday morning. He said he and other retired Green Berets
all have drawn the same conclusions.

��It�s just one of those things,�� he said. ��When you conduct training, you
are going to have accidents.��

He said special operations work requires training that is realistic.

��Safety is a big part,�� he added. ��But it still happens.��

Nevertheless, the commander of the United States Army Special Operations
Command, Lt. Gen. William Tangney, ordered a comprehensive safety review
��at all levels�� under his command, Darby said.

Darby said Tangney wants to assure all soldiers are reminded of safeguard
requirements and that commanders emphasize risk management during
planning and execution of their training.

Tangney�s jurisdiction stretches across more than 50 areas throughout
the world. It is not known how long the review would take, she said.

Darby said accidents like these hit the tightly knit Special Operations
community hard.

��It�s like losing a member of their family,�� she said.The commander,
Boyles
began his job as commander of 1st Battalion, 3rd Special Forces Group
(Airborne) in June.

He was commissioned in the Army in 1983 after completing ROTC at West
Virginia State College. He completed the Special Forces Qualification course
in 1989.

He is survived by his wife, Tina L. Boyles, and daughter, Alexandra, both of
Fayetteville. He is also survived by his mother, Johnnye F. Boyles of
Charleston, W.Va.Husband and father        | Cutino was from North Reading,
Maine. The Special Forces senior sergeant entered the Army in August 1980.
He graduated from the Special Forces Qualification Course in March 1989.

Cutino has had several positions in special operations units including: 1st
Battalion, 75th Ranger Regiment, Hunter Army Airfield, Ga.; 1st Battalion,
1st Special Forces Group (Airborne), Okinawa, Japan; and 1st Special
Warfare Training Group, U.S. Army John F. Kennedy Special Warfare
Center and School here.

His awards and decorations include two Meritorious Service Medals, three
Army Commendation Medals, two Army Achievement Medals and six awards
of the Army Good Conduct Medal. Cutino earned the Ranger and Special
Forces Tabs as well as the Military Freefall Jumpmaster and Parachutist
badges. He was also authorized to wear various parachutists wings from
Korea, Thailand, the Philippines, Poland and Australia.

The military would not say specifically what he did. His sister said he
seldom discussed his job because of its clandestine nature.

��He didn�t talk much about his work because of what he did,�� she said.
��But
he loved jumping.��

He is survived by his wife, Kathleen M. Cutino and three children --
Vincent,
Anthony, and Nicholas -- all of Fort Bragg.

Funeral arrangements are being made for Ellingson at the Smith Funeral
Chapel, 120 N. 26th St., in Billings, Mont. A memorial service will be at 2
p.m. Wednesday at the John F. Kennedy Chapel on Fort Bragg.

Arrangements for the other soldiers are pending.
From: Bard [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, September 18, 1999 11:28 PM
To: Snetnews; Roundtable; Globalist Agendas Debate and Discussion List;
FreedomFight; Conspiracy Theory Research List; Conservative
Cc: Carol Moore; ChristianPatriot; APFN; Patriot Information Mailing
List; TFIJDSHOW
Subject: U.S. Army Sergeant First Class Steven Barry (ret.), WACO 

Steven Barry was on Drudge, Fox News Channel, 10PM PacTime 9/18
According to Matt he is the second person to come forward
regarding the use of Delta Force.
Bard

http://www.thenewamerican.com/tna/1999/09-27-99/vo15no20_waco.htm

Two years ago in these pages ("Quartered Among Us," September 1, 1997), U.S. Army 
Sergeant First Class Steven Barry (ret.), who at the time was an active duty Special 
Forces soldier, pointed out that the Waco episode illustrates the danger of "fusing � 
military and law enforcement operations." SFC Barry noted that the FBI�s Hostage 
Rescue Team is a carbon copy of the Combat Action Group (CAG) of the Pentagon�s Joint 
Special Operations Command: "HRT uses the same equipment, the training is identical, 
and HRT uses CAG�s training facilities, instructors, and standard operating 
procedures."

"Trial Balloon"

"Waco was not an aberration," concluded SFC Barry. "It was a �trial balloon� sent up 
by those who perceive a �coalition� of military and law enforcement to be a good 
thing. It was, therefore, a portent of the future. And the military�s involvement in 
that unspeakable outrage, along with its subsequent cover-up of its involvement, bodes 
ill for America�s future."
-------------------------------------------------------------

COMPLETE ARTICLE:
Vol. 15, No. 20
September 27, 1999
Table of Contents More on Waco
 

Waco Deception Up in Smoke
by William Norman Grigg

Clinton Administration scandals display a common pattern. The initial disclosures of 
wrongdoing are indignantly denied. Pleas are issued by Administration spokesmen for 
people to "stay calm" and wait for "all the facts" to come out. A cover-up of the 
relevant facts is then undertaken. When damaging facts leak, Administration 
spin-controllers minimize their significance, or � if necessary � preside over a 
controlled release of further facts over a protracted period of time. When the full 
truth about criminal misbehavior, or some significant portion thereof, is finally made 
public, Administration spinners and their media allies insist that the public has 
grown weary of the matter and that it�s time to "move on."

This approach has served the Administration well in its efforts to surmount the 
Chinagate treason scandal, the Lewinsky affair, and numerous other episodes. Not 
surprisingly, the FBI has followed a similar approach in managing disclosures about 
its conduct in the 1993 slaughter of the Branch Davidian sect in Waco, which is the 
subject of a federal wrongful death lawsuit by survivors and families of the victims. 
An order from U.S. District Judge Walter Smith requiring federal authorities to turn 
over all relevant evidence left from the April 19, 1993 siege turned up a shell casing 
from an M-651 CS canister, a 40 mm incendiary grenade "that releases tear gas with a 
burning explosive capable of sparking fires," observed the Dallas Morning News.

Spin Strategy

Confronted with inescapable facts, the Justice Department followed standard Clinton 
Administration procedure. First came the admissions of proven facts that had long been 
denied. In late August, Danny Coulson, a founder of the FBI�s "Hostage Rescue Team" 
(which was involved in both the Davidian massacre and the murder of Randy Weaver�s 
wife and son at Ruby Ridge) told the Dallas Morning News that pyrotechnic grenades had 
been used by the FBI during the final assault on the Mount Carmel church. After 
stalling for a news cycle by issuing further half-hearted denials, the FBI, in the 
words of the August 26th New York Times, "backed away from six years of unqualified 
denials to Congress and to the public" and admitted that the canisters � which were 
"�pyrotechnic� only in a limited sense," the Bureau hastened to specify � had indeed 
been used at Waco. (The "limited sense" qualification, which savors of Bill Clinton�s 
equivocation over the meaning of the word "is," offers another example of 
sophisticated dishonesty.)

The coinage of new euphemisms is a major Clinton Administration industry, and FBI 
spokesmen enriched the vocabulary of double-speak by allowing that they would have to 
"recant or modify" the previous unqualified denials that FBI personnel had fired upon 
the Branch Davidians on that tragic April morning. This provided a segueway into the 
next step of the Administration�s familiar spin strategy � playing for time to devise 
a new cover story: "We�ve seen the reports, and we�re trying to get to the bottom of 
them," stated Justice Department spokesman Myron Marlin. Attorney General Janet Reno 
and FBI Director Louis Freeh, clinging to the story that they have been the helpless 
victims of unreliable information, promised a new, comprehensive investigation of the 
matter � which is to say that they began the search for a subordinate who would be a 
credible scapegoat.

Unfortunately for the FBI and the Justice Department, the chosen spin for the 
"discovery" of the pyrotechnic shell casings undermines their case. The Bureau�s 
official line is that a Bradley Fighting Vehicle carried an FBI agent to within 40 
yards of the Mount Carmel church about six hours before the catastrophic fire. The 
tear gas grenades, according to the FBI�s account, bounced harmlessly off a concrete 
structure without causing any lasting damage. Furthermore, as the Times pointed out, 
the FBI has "no new information to challenge the finding that the Davidians themselves 
started the fire."

In other words, the detailed account explaining the presence of the expended grenades 
was not new information. The FBI has knowingly, systematically, lied to Congress and 
the public about this matter, and the new "investigation" is an exercise in 
misdirection and delay.

Controlled Release?

Why did the FBI and Justice Department offer a damaging admission that undermines 
their new cover story? One possibility is that the admission was part of the third 
step in the Clintonite spin control process � the effort to minimize the significance 
of the long-denied but now inescapable facts. By admitting that two grenades were 
fired at the church several hours before the fires began, the Administration offered a 
tardy admission which actually allows them to cling to the official story that the 
Davidians were responsible for the catastrophic fire.

It is important to understand that the FBI�s chief concern is not to offer a candid 
disclosure of the relevant facts; as the Times observed, the FBI and Justice 
Department are "far more worried that the recantation will fuel the suspicions of 
people who have long doubted the Federal Government�s motives and actions in the 
incident." As one anonymous official told the Times, "we�re fighting the conspiracy 
theorists." The Times editorial board, while offering perfunctory criticism of the FBI 
and Justice Department for looking "at best sloppy and at worst untruthful," endorsed 
the Clinton junta�s priorities in an August 27th house editorial by archly stating 
that the new disclosures gladden "the hearts of conspiracy theorists everywhere." This 
is to say that the real scandal here is not the needless immolation of over 80 people, 
or the government�s persistent, culpable dishonesty regarding that tragedy, but rather 
the fact that the evidence is vindicating critics of the government�s actions. Any 
residual doubts that the FBI had engaged in a cover-up dissipated with the September 
2nd "discovery" of a recorded conversation in which Richard Rogers, the Special Agent 
in Charge (SAC) during the final siege, authorized HRT supervisor Steven McGavin to 
use the pyrotechnic grenades. As the Los Angeles Times reported, Rogers "later sat 
behind William S. Sessions, then Director of the FBI, as he testified before Congress 
that no flammable munitions had been used" against the Davidians. Janet Reno ordered 
U.S. Marshals to seize the new evidence from the FBI, purportedly for use in the new 
inquiry � but as Reno�s handling of the "Chinagate" inquiry demonstrates, her priority 
will be to bury the truth, not expose it.

Delta�s Role

On August 27th, the Dallas Morning News reported that former CIA officer Gene Cullen 
had been informed that three or four Army Special Forces troops had been "present, up 
front and close" during the final assault on the Branch Davidian church. "When they 
explained to me the depth to which they were involved down in Waco, I was quite 
surprised," remarked Cullen. "They said basically they were out there in the � Bradley 
[fighting vehicles], the CEV [tanks].... They were active." Absent a presidential 
waiver, such participation would constitute a violation of the Posse Comitatus Act, 
which forbids the military to participate directly in domestic law enforcement 
operations.

On the following day, the Atlanta Journal-Constitution reported that "Army 
anti-terrorism specialists, including the commander of the top-secret Delta Force, 
attended the 1993 meeting at which Attorney General Janet Reno approved the use of 
tear gas against members of the Branch Davidian group near Waco, Texas." On the same 
day, the WorldNetDaily Internet news service published a transcript of 
contemporaneous, non-verbatim notes describing that meeting, which occurred on April 
14, 1993. Among those present at the meeting were Major General Pete Schoomaker, who 
at the time was assistant division commander of the 1st Cavalry Division at Fort Hood, 
Texas; Colonel John Boykin of Delta Force; Dick Rogers, commander of the FBI�s Hostage 
Rescue Team; HRT co-founder Danny Coulson; Attorney General Reno; then-Assistant 
Attorney General Webster Hubbell; and two unnamed individuals who refused to identify 
themselves and are believed to have been White House personnel reporting directly to 
Bill Clinton. A "Special Forces source" who possesses an "unredacted" copy of the 
notes from that meeting provided WorldNetDaily with critical facts that had been 
excised from the "redacted" version; according to the source, the document was signed 
by Colonel (now General) Boykin.

According to the notes, "It was obvious that Attorney General Reno had already been 
briefed on the concept of the operation" � that is, to insert CS gas into the building 
for "up to 48 hours" and then "to use an armored platform with a blade to start 
removing the front of the building." When asked by Reno to offer an assessment of the 
plan, the Delta Force officials replied, "This was not a military operation and could 
not be assessed as such. We explained that the situation was not one that we had ever 
encountered and that the Rules of Engagement for the FBI were substantially different 
than for a military operation." "We can�t grade your paper," stated one military 
official by way of summary.

If this were to be handled as a military operation, continued the officers, it would 
be important to remember that "the principles of surprise, speed and violence of 
action were essential to any operation" and that "momentum should be maintained and 
that ground gained should not be relinquished."

Reno asked the FBI officials present why the standoff should be ended quickly. The 
FBI�s reply focused upon three points. First, "There is no reason to believe that 
Koresh has any intention of coming out voluntarily." Second, "There are indicators 
that children are suffering abuse" � true enough, once it is understood that they were 
being held hostage by armed federal troops and subjected to a psychological torture 
campaign designed with the aid of Soviet psy-war specialist Igor Smirnov of Moscow�s 
Institute for Psycho-Correction. Third, the FBI�s Hostage Rescue Team was losing its 
edge as the standoff wore on.

The military officer who compiled the notes emphasized, "I made it clear that I was 
not encouraging an immediate execution of the operation. My exact words were, �I don�t 
have a dog in that fight.�" He also suggested that the FBI "should consider pulling 
their people off the target for a short while" to "retrain and polish" some of their 
skills. And he emphasized that "the plan which was executed at Waco was an FBI plan 
which neither [redacted] nor I helped prepare." The Special Forces source who 
consulted with WorldNetDaily commented that the notes clearly indicated that their 
author "didn�t want to be directly involved in [the operation], and did not want to be 
dragged into it. Delta Force operators � continually cautioned the FBI against 
attempting an �Open Air Assault� on the target, and continually stated they did not 
want to be involved in firing on or [an] assault [upon] American civilians. These 
official and unofficial comments went ignored and, in fact, one Special Operations 
officer was threatened with court-martial if he continued to protest."

This perspective, coming from a veteran of the Special Forces, underscores a critical 
point: The release of the redacted notes may have been intended to make the military 
the scapegoat for the FBI�s debacle. This is not to say that the military was 
blameless in this matter or immune to political considerations. Both Boykin and 
Schoomaker have been promoted. (In fact, as the commanding general of the U.S. Special 
Operations Command Gen. Schoomaker has enthusiastically embraced the concept of 
"build[ing] training links" between U.S. Special Forces and comparable units of the 
Red Chinese People�s Liberation Army; see "Green Berets Going Red?" in our September 
28, 1998 issue.) In addition, if the account offered by ex-CIA officer Gene Cullen is 
accurate, then Delta Force was directly involved in the final siege, despite the fact 
that the unit didn�t have "a dog in that fight."

More to Come

Publication of the notes of the April 14, 1993 meeting precipitated a crisis at the 
Army�s Fort Bragg Special Forces headquarters. "Special Forces command has sent the 
orders down the ranks that nobody is to talk to the press," a Special Forces source 
who has provided detailed legal depositions regarding the Waco tragedy told The New 
American. "There�s nothing they can do about the facts that have already been 
publicized, of course, but they are trying to forestall the disclosure of even more 
damaging information. There are other shoes yet to drop, and I don�t think that 
they�re going to be able to catch them all."

As the controlled implosion of yet another Clinton scandal produces new revelations, 
it is important not to lose sight of the most damning evidence: forward-looking 
infrared (FLIR) footage suggesting that FBI personnel gunned down Davidians who sought 
to flee from their burning home. SAC Rogers� go-ahead order to use pyrotechnic 
grenades was recorded on an aerial infrared videotape � presumably the same recording 
on which the incriminating FLIR footage is found. That order was issued at 7:49 a.m., 
several hours before the fire was ignited and the tell-tale heat signatures of 
automatic weapons fire directed at the compound were recorded. Mike McNulty, producer 
of the forthcoming documentary Waco: A New Revelation, asserts that Delta Force 
commandos were "deployed and pulling triggers" during the final siege at Mt. Carmel.

Two years ago in these pages ("Quartered Among Us," September 1, 1997), U.S. Army 
Sergeant First Class Steven Barry (ret.), who at the time was an active duty Special 
Forces soldier, pointed out that the Waco episode illustrates the danger of "fusing � 
military and law enforcement operations." SFC Barry noted that the FBI�s Hostage 
Rescue Team is a carbon copy of the Combat Action Group (CAG) of the Pentagon�s Joint 
Special Operations Command: "HRT uses the same equipment, the training is identical, 
and HRT uses CAG�s training facilities, instructors, and standard operating 
procedures."

"Trial Balloon"

"Waco was not an aberration," concluded SFC Barry. "It was a �trial balloon� sent up 
by those who perceive a �coalition� of military and law enforcement to be a good 
thing. It was, therefore, a portent of the future. And the military�s involvement in 
that unspeakable outrage, along with its subsequent cover-up of its involvement, bodes 
ill for America�s future."

As this is written, it appears that the Clintonite spin control ministry, displaying 
the institutional "loathing" for the military for which the Administration is properly 
notorious, appears to be angling to make the military the scapegoat for the Waco 
massacre. While military officials involved in the episode have much to answer for, it 
must be remembered that Bill Clinton himself must have issued a presidential waiver 
authorizing Delta Force involvement. Filmmaker Mike McNulty, producer of the 
award-winning documentary Waco: Rules of Engagement and its forthcoming sequel Waco: A 
New Revelation, told Internet newshound Matt Drudge that the "chain of command" in the 
Waco tragedy eventually leads to the late White House Counsel Vince Foster. Might the 
incriminating presidential waiver have been among the documents removed from Foster�s 
office by Clinton operatives following his "suicide"? 
 
  
 
 � Copyright 1999 American Opinion Publishing Incorporated
http://www.thenewamerican.com/tna/1999/09-27-99/vo15no20_waco.htm

Bard 

Reply via email to