<< Hey, just wanted to let you know that I've got an embyronic Paranoia web site up, including a link to Konformist.com. Also, I've been meaning to ask you for permission to excerpt a piece you wrote a while back about JonBenet and ritual sacrifice. If we can use it, I would of course put your website address and any other info at the end. It would go in either the December or April issue of Paranoia. Thanks. Al Hidell Editor, PARANOIA: The Conspiracy Reader http://members.aol.com/alhidell/paranoia/ >> Thanks for the link. A likewise will be up on my front page with my one week delayed update of the site. Of course you can excerpt the JonBenet piece. It will be a main piece of the first Konformist book, "A Pack of Lies!!!: A Konformist Krap Kollection," which should be out in 2000. Two recent updates on JonBenet: 1) The recent revelation that JonBenet appears to have been molested on multiple occassions is old news to those who read The Konformist, though now this claim is solidified. For those who want to pin this crime on Patsy Ramsey (or, even worse, the other Ramsey child) must account for the evidence of regular sexual penetration by an adult male penis. Hmm, wonder who it could have belonged to? 2) Stephen Singular, in his first book since his investigation of the Simpson case and LAPD deceit ("Legacy of Deception"), has written about the Jon-Benet case with "Presumed Guilty". Despite the title, he is not an apologist for the Ramsey parents. Indeed, he heard convincing evidence that Ramsey's company Access Graphics (the Lockheed shell corporation) was involved in the underground child pornography market. There is a reason he didn't investigate it further though he suspected it would be true: if he himself downloaded kiddie porn (which would have been neccesary to prove the case), he could have been arrested for possessing illegal materials. Singular did inform the Boulder authorities of the evidence, and they did not investigate it. Further, he requested that he be given their authority to investigate it further (so as to be shielded from prosecution.) They refused. Therefore, one of the key allegations of suspicion that I raised in the Jon-Benet Ramsey article was fully known by investigators, and given to them by a well-respected source. Despite this, they did nothing. Robert Sterling
