Title: War on "Drugs"
 

Dave Hartley
http://www.Asheville-Computer.com
http://www.ioa.com/~davehart
 

War on "Drugs"

GROUNDZERO MINNESOTA HOMEPAGE
CAUSES OF WAR
PEACE EFFORTS & AGENCIES
ENVIRONMENT
ENERGY & OTHER RESOURCES
US GOVERNMENT DATA
ECONOMICS
ASSASSINATIONS & CONSPIRACIES
MIND CONTROL RESEARCH
CIVIL LIBERTIES, USA
HUMAN RIGHTS, GLOBAL
WAR ON DRUGS
"RETHINKING THE WORLD" VIDEOS
GROUNDZERO MINNESOTA HOMEPAGE

War on "Drugs"

The war on "drugs" is really a war on people who use drugs, mainly poor people, and on civil liberties precious to almost everyone. This distinction has profound and complex consequences. This war is a well intentioned war in many respects, prompted by obvious and usually legitimate fears about urban decay and social distress. But the casualties of this war have been profound; they number in the tens of millions of lives destroyed or gravely damaged even for a relatively benign drug like marijuana. And like every war, there comes a time to call it off.

Many studies have shown that the main reason for the explosion in the American prison populations is incarceration of non-violent drug offenders. This has some profound racial and class dimensions.

For example, 1/3 of young black males in America today are under some kind of judicial supervision, either prison or parole or court mandated treatment or sanctions of various kinds. No one objects when a murderer is caught and jailed, but the fact is that many of those young men of various colors have had their lives ruined by vigorous application of the War on "Drugs," while the mostly wealthy and mostly white higher level dealers very seldom get caught, or if caught, get prison time. The bankers who launder the money, the accountants who keep the books, and the lawyers who advise them almost never "do time" for "their crimes."

Consider the extraordinary and bizarre dynamics which occur when you look at the details. For example, Federal penalties for 5 grams of crack cocaine (mandatory minimum sentence = 5 years) are essentially 100 times more severe that for powder cocaine (where 500 grams are required to get the mandatory minimum 5 years jail). Thus, rich, well connected white wholesalers can bring in pound quantities of cocaine powder, yet be at far less risk of criminal sanction than the poor young black retailers who are asked to "rock it up" into crack cocaine.

Our book On the Causes of War has a short chapter devoted just to the War on "Drugs" because its consequences are so profound, yet so insidious due to the general appreciation for the bad things drugs can certainly lead to, and lack of appreciation for how much of the violence associated with drugs is a byproduct of making them so illegal. For another example, the Attorney General of Colombia has remarked that the war on "drugs" in America kills thousands of people in his country every year, due to its weird distortions and hypocrisies (of which CIA drug running is merely the most obvious).

There are many good reasons to fear drugs, especially given the dozens of varieties which modern times bring us. But ...

There are also many better ways to fight violent crime, than by criminalizing scores of millions of non-violent people by a swarm of dietary laws, and indirectly making many potential witnesses to murder, rape and other violent assaults afraid to testify due to their own vulnerability to prosecution because of drugs. Retaliation from gangs is fearful enough for many witnesses, without the added disincentive of risking all should police or prosecutors turn against you.

The international consequences of the War on "Drugs" may be as profound as any American national consequences. By criminalizing this consentual behavior, and insisting that other countries do the same, America provides about a $500 billion dollar per year annual windfall profit to the "narco-trafickers." They have close connections to the international market in weapons, and both have close connections to the banks which service this underground part of the "global economy." The result is close connections to many more overt wars, and to corruption of governance on a global scale. Where drugs flow one way, weapons often flow the other. And where this occurs, banks are always involved in both industries, and civil war is a common consequence. For more information, try:

The Drug Policy Foundation: 4455 Connecticut Ave. NW, Suite B-500, Washington D.C. 20008, USA; www.dpf.org; email = [EMAIL PROTECTED]; tel = (202) 537-5005

The Canadian Foundation for Drug Policy: 70 MacDonald St., Ottawa, Ontario K2P 1H6, Canada; fox.nstn.ca/~eoscapel/cfdp/cfdp.html; tel = (613) 236-1027

The North American Industrial Hemp Council: naihc.org (This page has everything you ever wanted to know about the uses of an excellent agricultural crop with manifold markets, which was destroyed by the hysteria over pot.)

The next 2 sites reflect growing awareness that the secret government imports many of the drugs which the overt government prosecutes so severely.

De-Central Intelligence Agency: www.dcia.com. The DCIA is the successor site to the highly acclaimed "Free Speech Newspaper" that disappeared from the WWW in 1996. Created and maintained by Brian Dowling Quig out of Phoenix, a courageous investigative writer who should have a much wider audience than he does. As the name implies, he's big on government imports of the drugs they imprison poor people for using.

Cocaine Importing Agency: speech.csun.edu/ben This site with extensive links to other valuable sites is maintained by Ben Attias, Asst. Prof. of Speech Communications at Cal. State University at Northridge. He has been investigating "the public discourse surrounding the 'war on drugs' as an exercise in disciplinary social control" for many years.

Good starter literature includes:

A Wiser Course: Ending Drug Prohibition, a report of the Bar of New York, 1994.

Drug Warriors and their Prey, by Richard Lawrence Miller, Praeger Pubs., Westport CT, 1996. Or websters can obtain it through www.amazon.com.


   CHECK OUT: "RETHINKING THE WORLD" VIDEOS

Reply via email to