-Caveat Lector-
{{<Begin>}}
www.wsws.org
WSWS : News & Analysis : Europe : Britain
British Prime Minister Blair tells Labour Party conference "the class war is
over"
By Chris Marsden
5 October 1999
Back to screen version
There was an unreal quality to proceedings at this year's Labour Party
conference. In his 55-minute keynote speech, Prime Minster Tony Blair set out a
messianic vision for the 21st century with all his, by now familiar, grandiose
pomposity.
It would be a "century of progressive politics after one dominated by
Conservatives", with Britain, a "nation, based not on privilege, class or
background, but on the equal worth of all."
Naturally, Blair's "distaste" for privilege was not meant to imply a commitment
to genuine social equality. Quite the contrary. "Not equal incomes... Equal
rights. Equal responsibilities." Blair boasted, "The class war is over".
Even the term "conservatism" was redefined. "The 21st century will not be about
the battle between capitalism and socialism but between the forces of progress
and the forces of conservatism", amongst whom were listed anyo
ne committed to old-style social reformism, including those within Labour's own ranks.
In place of this would be "economic competence", "prudence", “welfare to work”
policies and authoritarian “law-and-order” measures. "It is time to move beyond the
social indifference of right and left, libertarian nonsens
e masquerading as freedom... This generation wants a society free from prejudice, but
not from rules, from order." Mussolini would have been proud.
Coming as it did on the 100th anniversary of the founding of the Independent Labour
Party, Blair took the opportunity to once more bemoan what he considers the
historically mistaken attempt to create a party for the worki
ng class. "One hundred years ago, the circumstances of our birth and our political
childhood was such we never realised our potential. Born in separation from other
progressive forces in British politics, out of the visce
ral need to represent the interests of an exploited workforce, our base, our appeal,
our ideology was too narrow."
The assembled delegates lapped all this up. The pro-Labour press was equally ecstatic,
none more so than the Guardian. Columnist Jonathan Freedland wrote that, "Labour's
struggle is no longer to be limited to the narrow b
attles of class interest: now it is to fight a larger war, one that relates to the
whole British people and what kind of society we create. This has been the grammar of
US progressive politics for most of the century; now
Britain is catching up."
"Morale is sky high", said Polly Toynbee. "Everything looks good, everything is
working, money is starting to flow, nothing serious has gone wrong. There has been no
great betrayal... it's hard to find a cloud in the sky"
.
Toynbee was even enamoured of the "packed meetings" which "earnestly debate the
intricacies of policy", amidst the admitted "usual flotillas of besuited young men
with muted ties and mobiles, that political cadre of wanna
bes on the make".
Of course, the Labour conference long ago ceased to be a genuine debate about policy,
having become a media event along the model of a US-style party convention. So much so
that even Jeremy Paxman of the BBC described suc
h party assemblies as "gatherings of the undead" and "a fraud on the public".
But the self-congratulation, mutual backslapping and fawning upon the "Great Leader"
were not all contrived. The Labour leadership and its hangers-on give every indication
of believing their own immense publicity machine.
On one level this can be accounted for by the fact that there has never been a
government that is so isolated from the people it claims to represent. The conference
itself summed this up. Those in attendance were well-pai
d party functionaries, members of a largely sycophantic press corps and businessmen
seeking to build relations with the ruling party and collectively willing to pay £1
million for the privilege of sharing breakfast and di
nner in Blair's company on the day of his conference address. On top of this, the
Conservative Party shows no sign of recovering from its devastating loss of support,
while the main issue discussed within the Liberal Demo
crats is how far they should go in merging their fortunes with New Labour.
More significantly still is the virtual absence of the working class from political
life. The major demonstrations outside conference were by farmers and the pro-fox
hunting Countryside Alliance, with only one small lobby
organised by loyal Labour critics amongst Britain's small radical left groups. Blair
himself considers the working class a spent political and social force. His many
boasts to congress included the statement: "Here's one
for us to put back down a few Tory throats—fewer days lost in strikes than any of the
18 years of Tory Government."
Whatever jibes he may make against the Tories, Blair is a professed admirer of
Margaret Thatcher. His political outlook has been shaped by the belief that the
defeats her government was able to inflict on the working clas
s, coupled with the collapse of the Stalinist regime in the former USSR, were really
the last hurrah for socialism and the workers' movement. Though he sometimes feels the
need to distance himself from the trade unions in
order to please his big-business backers, he has also taken full measure of the
rightward lurch of his counterparts in the TUC, and their determined role in ensuring
that no challenge is made to corporate interests.
Blair and his advisers are aware of the ever-diminishing popularity of his government
and its policies in Labour's former working class base. In this year's European and
local elections, as well as in recent parliamentary
by-elections, Labour lost votes and seats, while those going to the polls declined to
as little as 20 percent of the electorate, particularly in the inner-cities that were
once Labour strongholds. A recent poll found tha
t 42 percent of those questioned believed Labour had reneged on its promises. This
included 27 percent who had voted Labour at the 1997 general election. On the crucial
issue of health, the majority considers that Labour
has failed and there should be higher social spending in this and other areas.
But Blair believes that passive disillusionment is the worst he faces, which can be
answered by consolidating his standing amongst the affluent middle classes—who have
generally determined electoral success and do so more
decisively when workers do not bother to vote at all. That is why he followed his
conference speech with an appeal to disillusioned Tory voters, declaring, "There is a
place for you in today's Labour Party".
What Blair conceives of as New Labour's strength, however, will reveal itself to be
its Achilles heel. This is a government without any significant social base. The
privileged layer from which it draws support is only abl
e to dominate political life because the broad mass of working people have
found themselves politically disenfranchised by the degeneration of their old
organisations. But the widespread disillusionment amongst working people
towards official politics, parties and the trade unions will inevitably assume
far more explosive forms in the not too distant future. The Labour Party
conference revealed the complete unpreparedness, even blindness, of the British
political establishment regarding such an eventuality.
Copyright 1998-99
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved
{{<End>}}
A<>E<>R
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The only real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking
new landscapes but in having new eyes. -Marcel Proust
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said
it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your
own reason and your common sense." --Buddha
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
A merely fallen enemy may rise again, but the reconciled
one is truly vanquished. -Johann Christoph Schiller,
German Writer (1759-1805)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
It is preoccupation with possessions, more than anything else, that
prevents us from living freely and nobly. -Bertrand Russell
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Everyone has the right...to seek, receive and impart
information and ideas through any media and regardless
of frontiers."
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will
teach you to keep your mouth shut."
--- Ernest Hemingway
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Forwarded as information only; no endorsement to be presumed
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
