-Caveat Lector-

From
http://www.globeandmail.com/offsite/International/19991016/UREPUN.html

{{Emailable}}

{{<Begin>}}

U.S. Congress embraces spirit of isolationism
Defeat of test-ban treaty only the latest
of many anti-global stands led by Jesse Helms
ANDREW COHEN
Washington Bureau
Saturday, October 16, 1999

Washington -- If there is a poster boy for American insularity and suspicion,
one need look no further than Senator Jesse Helms of North Carolina, the arch-
conservative, irascible and unyielding chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations
Committee.

When it came to killing the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty this week, Mr. Helms
was front and centre. He didn't like it and he wouldn't have it -- like
virtually every other treaty and international obligation he has met in his 27
years in office.

The White House lobbied hard to postpone the Senate vote on the nuclear test-
ban treaty, knowing it lacked the support for ratification. But Mr. Helms, who
had refused to hold committee hearings on this far-reaching pact, balked. He
had vowed to give the treaty "a Capitol Hill funeral" and he kept his word.

Mr. Helms is not alone; his general antipathy to foreign entanglements is
shared by many others in Congress. No wonder an angry President Bill Clinton
lashed out at the Republicans for handing him one of the most humiliating
defeats of his presidency. He accused them of representing "a new
isolationism."

For the embattled Mr. Clinton, however, there is nothing new about a Congress
determined to avoid global leadership. Rejecting the nuclear pact was only the
latest retreat in a country increasingly suspicious of the world.

"It's not a good sign," said Robert Litan of the Brookings Institution in
Washington. He has studied the growing fear of globalization in the United
States. "There is a know-nothingness in Congress that doesn't augur well."
The nuclear test-ban treaty may have been the most important pact the Senate
has rejected since the Versailles Treaty in 1919, but it is only the latest
example of how the Senate is distancing itself from the world. Since the end of
the Cold War, it has been open season on the internationalism that the United
States once proudly represented.

Mr. Clinton, for his part, is also responsible. He refused to sign the land-
mines treaty and support the world criminal court, both initiatives proposed by
Canada and embraced by other countries.

But it is Congress that has refused to pay $1.7-billion (U.S.) in dues owed the
United Nations. Last year, it also withheld funds for months to the
International Monetary Fund and the World Bank.

The United States did agree to the global warming treaty at Kyoto, Japan, but
that, too, is unlikely to be ratified by the Senate. A prominent senator
declared it "dead on arrival," and its passage is so unlikely that Mr. Clinton
may not even submit it.

If the United States is turning inward, it is largely because of a parochial,
protectionist Congress. In the Senate, Majority Leader Trent Lott and other
senior Republicans are as hostile to an active internationalism as Mr. Helms.
In the House of Representatives, Mr. Litan says, as many as 30 per cent do not
have passports. House Majority Leader Dick Armey, who once taught economics,
said pointedly last year: "I have been to Europe once. I don't have to go
again."

For years, it was also commonly thought that Mr. Helms cared so little about
the world that he refused to leave the country. That isn't true, much as
critics thought it could be. He has travelled abroad but rarely in an official
capacity because, according to an assistant, "he says it costs too much money."
While Mr. Clinton has been successful in brokering peace in Northern Ireland
and the Middle East, he has been dogged in foreign policy by Mr. Helms and a
reluctant Congress from his first days in office.

His earliest victories were trade-related, winning approval for the
establishment of the World Trade Organization and the North American free-trade
agreement. But when he sought a renewal of "fast-track" authority to negotiate
trade agreements in 1997, Congress denied it.

There were other defeats. Led by Mr. Helms, the Senate rejected former governor
William Weld of Massachusetts as Ambassador to Mexico. Although Mr. Weld was a
fellow Republican, Mr. Helms said his support for using marijuana for medicinal
purposes made him inappropriate to serve in a country that exports illegal
drugs to the United States.

More recently, the Senate turned down Mr. Clinton's nominee for Ambassador to
Luxembourg, James Hormel, who is gay, and delayed for a year the appointment of
Richard Holbrooke as Ambassador to the United Nations.

Some observers caution that the defeat of the nuclear test-ban treaty in the
Senate doesn't necessarily mean the country is slipping into a new
isolationism. Rather, they say it reflects the deterioration of relations
between Mr. Clinton and Congress.

The result has been a collapse of bipartisanship in foreign policy. Much has to
do with the disappearance of moderate northeastern Republicans who were mostly
internationalists.

"Much is personal today, much is partisan," said Anthony Cordesman, a senior
fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, who
served as a foreign policy adviser to Senator John McCain of Arizona. "Trent
Lott is a pork-barrel politician, with no national vision. Clinton is a
President who was elected to address the economy. He has shrunk in the job."
Mr. Cordesman cautions that "isolationism" used to mean a rejection of any role
in the world. Today, he allows, there is none of the pressure of the Cold War
to keep the only remaining superpower focused on the world.

But he notes that the United States stations troops in Korea and Europe, among
other places, and has taken on peacekeeping roles in Haiti, Somalia and Bosnia.
As a percentage of its armed forces, which have dropped sharply in numbers, the
United States is still well-represented abroad.

But on the big questions, Mr. Cordesman argues, there is still a consensus.
Maybe so, but it will be hard to convince the frustrated Mr. Clinton of that.
When he sent Americans to Kosovo last spring -- a conflict in which the United
States had no clear national interest -- Congress did approve funds. But with
the exception of Mr. McCain, who supported the war, the Republicans were either
opposed to sending troops or shrewdly ambivalent.

{{<End>}}

<<Armey, originally from No Dakota, doesn't come up here any more either.  Of
course, there are those who have been many places just once and would never go
back again ... A<>E<>R >>

A<>E<>R
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Integrity has no need of rules. -Albert Camus (1913-1960)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
The only real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking
new landscapes but in having new eyes. -Marcel Proust
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said
it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your
own reason and your common sense." --Buddha
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
It is preoccupation with possessions, more than anything else, that
prevents us from living freely and nobly. -Bertrand Russell
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Everyone has the right...to seek, receive and impart
information and ideas through any media and regardless
of frontiers." Universal Declaration of Human Rights
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will
teach you to keep your mouth shut." Ernest Hemingway
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Forwarded as information only; no endorsement to be presumed
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to