What is the name of the case, couldn't find it at the onion. 
 
Thanks.
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, October 24, 1999 11:49 AM
Subject: [CTRL] Laugh till you cry.

-Caveat Lector-

========================
    The Onion
http://www.theonion.com


      WASHINGTON, DC--In a historic decision with major
implications for the future of U.S. participatory democracy, the Supreme
Court ruled 8-1 Monday that the American people are unfit to govern.
         The controversial decision, the first of its kind in
the 210-year history of U.S. representative government, was, according
to Justice David Souter, "a response to the clear, demonstrable
incompetence and indifference of the current U.S. citizenry in matters
concerning the operation of this nation's government."
      As a result of the ruling, the American people will no
longer retain the power to choose their own federal, state and local
officials or vote on matters of concern to the public.
      "This decision was by no means easy, but it unfortunately
had to be done," said Justice Antonin Scalia, who penned the majority
decision in the case. "The U.S. Constitution is very clear: In the event
that the voting public becomes incapacitated or otherwise unfit to carry
out its duties of self-governance, there is a danger posed to the
republic, and the judicial branch is empowered to remove said public and
replace it with a populace more qualified to lead."
      "In light of their unmitigated apathy toward issues of
import to the nation's welfare and their inability to grasp even the
most basic principles upon which participatory democracy is built, we
found no choice but to rule the American people unfit to govern at this
time," Scalia concluded.
      The controversial ruling, court members stressed, is not
intended as a slight against the character of the American people, but
merely a necessary measure for the public good.
      "The public's right to the best possible representation is a
founding principle of our nation," Justice Sandra Day O'Connor told
reporters. "If you were on a jet airliner, you wouldn't want an
untrained, incompetent pilot at the controls, and this is the same
thing. As federal justices, we have taken a solemn oath to uphold every
citizen's constitutional rights, and if we were to permit an
irresponsible, disinterested public to continue to helm the ship of
state, we would be remiss in our duties and putting the entire nation at
risk."
      The ruling brings to an end a grueling 10-month process,
during which more than 100 Supreme Court hearings were held to determine
the public's capacity for self-governance. Despite the fact that these
hearings were aired on C-SPAN, a majority of U.S. citizens were unaware
of them because coverage was largely eclipsed by the Clinton-Lewinsky
scandal, the retirement of NBA legend Michael Jordan, and the release of
Titanic on home video.
      The Supreme Court found that, though 78 percent of U.S.
citizens have seen the much-anticipated Star Wars prequel trailer, only
one in 200,000 were aware that the multibillion-dollar "Star Wars"
missile-defense system had been approved by Congress. Additionally,
while 62 percent of citizens correctly identified the cast of Suddenly
Susan, only .01 percent were able to identify Attorney General Janet
Reno beyond "some woman Jay Leno always says looks like a man." Further,
only .0003 percent could correctly identify the ancient Greek city-state
of Athens as the birthplace of the concept of an educated citizenry
participating in democratic self-rule.
  Above: Just some of the millions of empty voting booths that can be
seen across America each November.        But the final straw,
Supreme Court justices said, came last week when none of the 500,000
random citizens polled were aware that Russian President Boris Yeltsin
had threatened global thermonuclear war in response to NATO air attacks
in Yugoslavia.
      "I mean, come on," Justice William Rehnquist said. "Global
thermonuclear war? It's just ridiculous. There was just no way we could
trust such a populace to keep running things after that."
      Populations currently being considered to fill the
leadership void until the American people can be rehabilitated and
returned to self-governance include those of Switzerland, Sweden and
Canada.
      "I'm willing to do what I can to help out in this time of
crisis and make sure that my vote counts," said Stockholm resident Per
Johanssen. "I've been reading up on America a bit, just to get a general
idea of what needs to be done, and from what I can tell, they really
need some sort of broad-based health-care reform over there right away."
      In a provisional test of the new system, the Canadian
province of Saskatchewan will hold primaries next Tuesday to re-evaluate
last fall's gubernatorial election in Minnesota.
      The lone dissenting vote came from Justice Anthony Kennedy,
who, in his minority opinion wrote, "Although the American people are
clearly unable to make responsible decisions at this time, it is not
their fault that they are so uninformed. Rather, the blame lies with the
media interests and corporate powers that intentionally keep them in the
dark on crucial issues."
      Kennedy concluded his opinion by tendering his immediate
resignation and announcing his intent "to move to a small island
somewhere."
      Thus far, reaction to the ruling has been largely
indifferent.
      "The people ruled unfit to govern? Yeah, I I think I
might've heard something about that," said Covington, KY, sales
representative Neil Chester. "I think I saw it on the news or something,
when I was flipping past trying to find that show about the lady
sheriff."
      "If you ask me, voting was a big pain anyway," agreed mother
of four Sally Heim of Augusta, ME. "At least now I'm free to do my
soap-opera-trivia crossword puzzles in peace, without all that
distraction about who's running for Second District Alderperson and
what-not."
      Despite the enormous impact the ruling would seem to have,
many political experts are downplaying its significance.
      "It doesn't really change anything, to be honest," said Duke
University political-science professor Benjamin St. James. "The public
hasn't made any real contributions to the governance of the country in
decades, so I don't see how this ruling affects all that much."
      "I wouldn't worry about it," St. James added. "It's not that
important."

© Copyright 1999 Onion, Inc., All rights reserved.
Masthead | Contact Information | Privacy Policy

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance-not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to