-Caveat Lector-

WJPBR Email News List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peace at any cost is a prelude to war!



STRATFOR.COM
Global Intelligence Update
November 3, 1999

U.S. Vietnam Policy Guided by Strategy, Not Economics

Summary:

The United States donated over 25,000 tons of wheat to Vietnam Nov.
2, the largest agricultural donation to Hanoi since the end of the
Vietnam War. The U.S. donation is another move in its diplomatic
chess game with China, as both sides maneuver to woo Vietnam. As
such, these moves are not signs of U.S. confidence in the Vietnamese
economy, but are instead motivated by strategy.


Analysis:

Since the Asian economic meltdown, the United States has been
uninterested in Vietnam's economy. Rampant corruption discredited
the economic reformers in the government and a resurgent Communist
Party has reasserted control.
[ http://www.stratfor.com/asia/commentary/c9908030055.htm ]. Economic
restructuring by the Party has resulted in increased centralization
[ http://www.stratfor.com/services/giu/020598.asp ] and state control
of firms, often at the expense of efficiency. As of March this
year, Vietnam's state-owned enterprises
[ http://www.stratfor.com/asia/aiuarchive/b990305.htm ] accounted
for two-thirds of the country's industrial output, but at least 30
percent of those firms were operating at a loss. In most countries,
such major economic difficulties would generally discourage heavy
U.S. involvement.

Nevertheless, on Nov. 2, U.S. Ambassador Pete Peterson presented
the Vietnamese Ministry of Finance with a 25,000-ton wheat donation
and proclaimed that the U.S.-Vietnamese relationship had reached "a
new height." Peterson went on to predict that the success of the
program would lead to further cooperation between the two
countries. Cooperation would be extremely valuable to both
sides. For the Vietnamese, the sale of the wheat will bring in more
than $3 million for humanitarian projects such as rural
development, dikes and hospitals. The United States, on the other
hand, stands to gain an increased role in Southeast Asia.

The end of the Asian economic boom not only renewed the
geopolitical competition between the United States and China, but
shook up the old system of U.S. alliances in the region
[ http://www.stratfor.com/asia/commentary/m9910231510.htm ]. As a
result, both nations have been working to re-establish links with
the rest of Asia, especially the Southeast. Vietnam is a key part
of both country's strategies, as it borders China and Cambodia -
where the United States has shown increased interest - and maintains
a claim to the disputed Spratly Islands.

Vietnam has been the object of entreaties from both sides, as
Chinese and U.S. government officials have increased visits to
Hanoi. Visitors have included U.S. Senator Richard Shelby, the
chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee and Secretary of
State Madeline Albright. Not to be outdone, the Chinese set up
separate meetings in China between Vietnamese leaders, Chinese
Defense Minister Chi Haotian and delegations from the Central
Committee of the Communist Party. To top it off, Chinese Premier
Zhu Rongji is to visit Vietnam in December.

Aside from the rather obvious gift of grain, the major U.S.
diplomatic effort toward Vietnam has been the negotiation of a
trade agreement. Since 1996, the two sides have worked to open
Vietnam's markets and increase trade with the United States. The
agreement was finalized in July. However, the Vietnamese postponed
signing the deal, leading to speculation about Chinese influence in
Hanoi. At the same time, China was working on its own trade deals
with Vietnam.

Meanwhile, the diplomatic dance continues. The U.S. will continue
to play to its strengths, namely economic benefits such as outright
gifts like the grain donation, and the promise of increased private
investment within Vietnam. Economic engagement makes sense for the
U.S. government, but not necessarily for potential investors. The
U.S. interaction with Vietnam is based on strategic reality, rather
than economic reality. The U.S. policy does not mean Vietnam's
economy has recovered from its past corruption and inefficiency.


Related Stories include:

Vietnam Sets Stage for New Government Purge - May 25, 1999
http://www.stratfor.com/SERVICES/GIU/052599.ASP

Missing Assets May Lead to Political and Economic Changes in
Vietnam - 21 May 99
http://www.stratfor.com/asia/aiuarchive/990521.htm

Hard-liners Retaking Control of the Communist Party of
Vietnam - 8 January 1999
http://www.stratfor.com/asia/aiuarchive/b990108.htm

Unrest in Vietnam Shakes Communist Party - February 13, 1998
http://www.stratfor.com/services/giu/021398.asp




(c) 1999, Stratfor, Inc.


**COPYRIGHT NOTICE** In accordance with Title 17 U. S. C. Section 107,
any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use
without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest
in receiving the included information for nonprofit research and educational
purposes only.[Ref. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml ]

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to