-Caveat Lector-
Microsoft and liberty
Llewellyn H. Rockwell Jr.
Is free enterprise legal in America or not?
Joshua
This isn't free enterprise. It's monopoly capitalism. The natural
outcome of of unregulated free enterprise. Monopoly Capitalism is
more destructive than global warming is in the short run.
MJ:
You have no understanding of capitalism NOR monopolies.
There are two types of monopolies; natural (where the best
service is provided at the best price) which has NEVER
existed AND coercive which requires the Government to enforce
its advantages.
Microsoft is NOT a monopoly no matter how hard the MONOPOLY Judge
agrees with the MONOPOLY Justice Department that the MONOPOLY
Leviathan Government must step in and provide illusion.
Joshua
To give businessmen and women a free hand in manipulating
a nation's economy is suicidal. Business people should
only be licensed to sell each other shoes. That's all.
MJ:
Better to let politicians decide.
The more complex the society, the more government
control we need. by Leonard Reed
Argued a college president at a seminar: "Your free
market, private property, limited government theories
were all right under the simple conditions of a century
or more ago, but surely they are unworkable in today's
complex economy. The more complex the society, the
greater is the need for governmental control; that
seems axiomatic."
It is important to expose this oft-heard, plausible,
and influential fallacy because it leads directly and
logically to socialistic planning. This is how a
member of the seminar team answered the college
president:
"Let us take the simplest possible situation -- just
you and I. Next, let us assume that I am as wise as
any president of the United States who has held
office during your lifetime. With these qualifications
in mind, do you honestly think I would be competent to
coercively control what you shall invent, discover, or
create, what the hours of your labor shall be, what
wage you shall receive, what and with whom you shall
associate and exchange? Is not my incompetence
demonstrably apparent in this simplest of all societies?
"Now, let us shift from the simple situation to a more
complex society -- to all the people in this room. What
would you think of my competence to coercively control
their creative actions? Or, let us contemplate a really
complex situation -- the 255 million people of this nation.
If I were to suggest that I should take over the management
of their lives and their billions of exchanges, you would
think me the victim of hallucinations. Is it not obvious
that the more complex an economy, the more certainly will
governmental control of productive effort exert a retarding
influence? Obviously, the more complex our economy, the
more we should rely on the miraculous, self-adapting
processes of men acting freely. No mind of man nor any
combination of minds can even envision, let alone
intelligently control, the countless human energy
exchanges in a simple society, to say nothing of a complex
one."
It is unlikely that the college president will raise that
question again.
While exposing fallacies can be likened to beating out
brush fires endlessly, the exercise is nonetheless
self-improving as well as useful -- in the sense that
rear guard actions are useful. Further, one's ability to
expose fallacies -- a negative tactic -- appears to be a
necessary preface to accenting the positive influentially.
Unless a person can demonstrate competence at exploding
socialistic error, he is not likely to gain wide audiences
for his views about the wonders wrought by men who are free.
Of all the errors heard about the "bargaining tables" or
in classrooms, there is not one that cannot be simply
explained away. We only need to put our minds to it.
Regard$,
--MJ
The anointed don't like to talk about painful trade-offs. They
like to talk about happy "solutions" that get rid of the whole
problem -- at least in their imagination. -- Thomas Sowell
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
