-Caveat Lector-
WJPBR Email News List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peace at any cost is a prelude to war!
Tuesday November 9, 11:37 PM
Starr: 'Major Facts' in Whitewater Probe Still to Come
Could there be major Clinton scandal bombshells yet to explode?
That's what recently retired independent counsel Kenneth Starr seemed to
suggest Tuesday night, in an exclusive interview with Fox News Channel's
Paula Zahn.
Travelgate and alleged attempts to intimidate Clinton assault victim Kathleen
Willey remain under active investigation. But the all-encompassing Whitewater
probe, which covered those areas as well as Vince Foster's death, Filegate
and Sexgate, was thought to be winding down.
Starr bluntly indicated that there were "major facts" yet to be revealed when
questioned directly by the Fox host:
ZAHN: Is there a lot more about this investigation that we're not privy to,
that we're going to hear more about in the months to come? Or do we basically
know all the major facts?
STARR: No, you do not. There are still aspects of the investigation that are
under way. I can't comment on them. It's now out of my hands and in the good
hands of [newly appointed independent counsel] Bob Ray. So I would just say,
let's allow him to do his work in a professional way.
ZAHN: Can you tell us if any of that information you've been privy to could
possibly lead to more indictments?
STARR: I don't think I should be commenting with respect to that. But there
were active phases of the investigation when I was still the independent
counsel. But that's now three weeks ago.
And what about Hillary? Starr strongly hinted that his prosecutors believed
she had committed crimes. But they didn't think they could prove it in court.
ZAHN: Is it fair to say, if Hillary Clinton had done anything wrong legally,
she would have been indicted by now? Is she off the hook?
STARR: Well, with respect to the first part of the question the short answer
is, prosecutors have to determine, and it's a tough determination, that there
is evidence admissible in court that would convince a fair-minded jury to
convict beyond a reasonable doubt. Prosecutors typically say there's a
difference between what we know and what we can prove beyond a reasonable
doubt.
ZAHN: So what does that mean? Is she home free and clear?
STARR: I'm going to leave it right there. But the investigation does continue
in certain aspects, and it's in very good hands with Bob Ray.
**COPYRIGHT NOTICE** In accordance with Title 17 U. S. C. Section 107,
any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use
without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest
in receiving the included information for nonprofit research and educational
purposes only.[Ref. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml ]
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
