-Caveat Lector-
At 03:30 PM 1-4-2000 -0600, Mack White wrote:
>The government didn't build those Y2K command posts for nothing.
>Something may yet happen, further down the line--something as bad,
>if not worse, than Y2K might have been.
>
>In less than 12 months, we will see the real turn-of-the-millennium.
>"Millennial madness" still has plenty of mileage left as a propaganda,
>or PsyOps, tool. Terrorism, World War Three, or, at the very least,
>a revival of the Cold War are all possibilities.
________________________________________________
Inside Cover - Sunday August 29, 1999
With Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff
For the story behind the story...
Bill Clinton's "Third Term"
Sean David Morton is a futurologist. He says he can predict the
future.
Morton, no doubt, has many friends in Hollywood that like such new
age stuff. A NewsMax reader sent us a copy of Morton's "The Delphi
Associates Newsletter." The following caught Inside Cover's eye:
"I have now heard confirmation from three different sources who are
very close to the Clintons that Bill has no intention of leaving
the White House! At first I thought it was just right-wing
paranoia. But a powerful woman friend of mine in entertainment
(who must remain nameless!), who is a friend of Hillary's 'special
friends,' was at the White House recently for a holiday. She said
that Clinton spoke openly about finding a way to circumvent the
Congress and the Constitution and find a way to stay on for another
term, or stay president indefinitely. Incredulously, she asked how
he was going to swing this feat of magic, and she said he got the
most chilling, evil, demonic look in his eye that she had ever seen
come from a human being, and he said, 'World War III.'"
"This same story I heard from my lady friend, and another relation
of the Clintons, was recently confirmed in an article by Ralph
Forbes. It seems Clinton has been running this scheme past a
number of his inner circle, and is actively seeking ways to
implement his goal."
________________________________________________
Does Clinton plan to stay?
This is an excerpt from 'Cover Up: The Art and Science
of Political Deception.' Reprinted with permission.
By David M. Bresnahan
Tuesday, February 02, 1999
© 1999 WorldNetDaily.com
It is vital that we remember that President Clinton is
extremely predictable. Those who know him best have
told us to examine his past to determine his future.
Clinton's past is frightening, because he served as
Governor of Arkansas longer than the Arkansas
Constitution allowed. He did so through an amendment to
the state constitution which enabled him to run for
another term.
Watch Clinton carefully. Does he look like a president
on his way to retirement? He has been spending a
significant amount of time building relationships with
foreign powers, and much more foreign travel is planned.
Is it possible that Clinton is planning to run for
president again? Is it possible he could have the U.S.
Constitution changed in time to permit that? The answer
is an absolute yes to both questions, but even more
unnerving is the fact that he has been reported to have
more than one plan under way to keep him in office.
There has been a secret committee meeting in the White
House on a weekly or more frequent basis with the
assignment to come up with a plan of action for when the
U.S. economy collapses, according to a source who does
not wish to be named but who is in a position to know.
That committee is not functioning on a basis of if the
economy will go belly up, but when. They are not
considering ways to stop that from happening, since they
consider it to be inevitable. Underlying all this is
their plan to keep Clinton in office because of the
economic emergency.
The committee is considering all possibilities for
keeping their buddy as president. Re-election for a
third term is considered a very real possibility. They
believe the states would ratify a change to the U.S.
Constitution within one to two months and have a bill
already drafted and ready for passage under the right
circumstances. They are so confident this could be done
that they have a Republican and a Democrat who have each
prepared a bill to accomplish the change.
Another possibility would be to have the president
himself declare a state of national emergency and enact
the terms of previously instituted presidential
executive orders and directives which would suspend the
Constitution during the emergency. Once enacted, even
Congress could not stop such an act by the president.
Congress has foolishly permitted presidents to abuse the
powers of executive orders time and time again.
Presidents have taken advantage of this and Clinton has
granted himself more and more power through executive
orders that have gone unchallenged by Congress. In fact,
as I have called various members of Congress about
specific executive orders their response has always been
that they have not known anything about them.
One of the latest such orders delayed the printing of
this book. Just as this book was about to go to press,
Clinton staged his latest grab for power. He did it
quietly and without notice from the press while he was
in Birmingham, England, on May 14, 1998. When he signed
Executive Order 13083 it was posted on the White House
Internet site unnumbered and titled as "Federalism" for
all the world to see. If you go to that site now you
will not find it listed. The effects of this act of
dictatorship are so far-reaching that I stopped the
publication of this book in order to include the text
for all to see.
It is so very craftily written that you must read
carefully. It appears to be quite innocent at first
glance, apparently reaffirming concepts on the
limitations of power by the federal government over the
states, and it seems to support the 10th Amendment.
One word stands out very clearly throwing up a red flag
about two thirds of the way through. The first part of
the order tells all the reasons the federal government
can't take power from the states nor enact mandates upon
the states, and then comes the magic word "UNLESS."
What follows are nine different reasons the federal
government can do anything it wants to do at any time it
wishes, and the states have no say. Those nine reasons
for federal action give Clinton the ability to do
anything he wants any time he wants. In an apparent
effort to head off criticisms, the order states the
federal government will "permit elected officials and
other representatives of State and local government to
provide meaningful and timely input in the development
of regulatory policies." Input means nothing. All that
means is that government will still do just exactly what
it pleases.
Presidential Decision Directive 63 is an example of an
additional grab for power. It is so vague that it is
difficult to determine the full implication, but it
seems to establish a new federal bureaucracy designed to
deal with the inevitable consequences of a computer
disaster by the year 2000. PDD 63 does not mention the
year 2000 computer bug causing chaos for the nation, but
it seems to point to that. The 15-page document seems
to call for a plan to insure the public safety in the
event of a massive computer and communications breakdown
by the year 2000. Plans begin with the Defense
Department, but then at the end of this fiscal year the
Commerce Department takes over. A new bureaucracy is
created called the National Infrastructure Protection
Center, and in the event of an emergency the NIPC "may
be placed in a direct support role to either DOD (Dept.
of Defense) or the Intelligence Community."
Recently Sen. Robert Bennett, R-UT, held a meeting of
the Senate Special Committee on the Year 2000 Technology
Problem, of which he is the chairman. Deputy Defense
Secretary John Hamre met with the committee and Bennett
asked a surprising question. "In the event of a
Y2K-induced breakdown of community services that might
call for martial law," will the military be ready?
"We've got fundamental issues to deal with that go
beyond just the year 2000 contingency planning, and I
think you're right to bring that up," answered Hamre.
Both men seemed to expect a crisis so large there would
be civil unrest.
Bennett then went on to predict that even if the U.S.
government and private industries solve the problem
here, the unsolved problem in the rest of the world
could bring the U.S. to a grinding halt anyway. He then
added that a "major worldwide recession with absolutely
devastating consequences" would be the result.
It would seem that PDD 63 has created an organization
which has been given license to develop a plan to enact
martial law, or any other remedy it deems appropriate
for a computer or other emergency, real or imagined.
Bennett and Hamre seem to expect a disaster that would
require martial law. If the computer problem, or some
other problem, creates a national disaster, do we want
some bureaucrat appointed by Clinton to establish the
way the problem will be dealt with? Do we want such a
government agency as the NIPC to have the powers and
authority it has been granted? Do we want the federal
government to have total power over the states as
granted in EO 13083?
The executive orders are not over. Clinton promised
that he would be issuing many more. The attitude seems
to have changed from "let's see what we can get away
with," to "the time has come to do exactly what we like
since we have never been challenged."
The secret committee planning ways to deal with a
financial crisis has expanded to include any national
emergency, perceived or real. Under such an emergency
the president could enact the Federal Emergency
Management Agency on a national basis rather than on a
local basis. Normally FEMA goes to work in a local area
after a natural disaster. Clinton changed the functions
of FEMA, by executive order, and it can now function on
a national basis completely taking over all functions of
government on a local and national level.
Naturally, if FEMA were to be enacted in such a crisis,
the U.S. Constitution could be suspended and the
president would continue in office in the "interest of
national security." It is interesting to note that
Clinton loyalist Buddy Young (former head of Governor's
Security) is purposely in the number two position in
FEMA. Some time ago there were rumblings that there
were differences of opinion between Clinton and FEMA
head James Lee Witt. Young was quickly moved from his
regional office to a new office just down the hall from
Witt, reportedly so he would be prepared to take Witt's
place at a moment's notice. You can do your own
research and discover for yourself that FEMA has been
granted immense power and authority by going to
http://www.fema.gov as well as http://www.whitehouse.gov
where you should click on "The Virtual Library" for
access to most (but not all) executive orders.
All of this seems absurd to the casual observer until
you look into the executive orders and presidential
directives. There are so many it is impossible to list
them all or print them all here, but a partial index of
the majority of them can be found in the appendix. You
can get a copy (free) using the government's fax on
demand system. See for yourself, and be sure to read
with the eyes of a lawyer. Often the legal meaning of
words used in these cleverly written documents will be
something far different than the words mean to the
common man.
Could Clinton be preparing for absolute power? Is he
planning to stay in office beyond the end of his second
term as president? Maybe. One thing is for certain.
It appears that he is putting his ducks in a row to
maintain power through several different means. In fact,
if he continues to get away with one scandal and
criminal accusation after another he will ultimately
become untouchable. The public perception will be that
Clinton's enemies have manufactured all these crimes and
that Clinton is a victim, not a perpetrator. Sooner or
later we will reach a point where no one will dare
challenge him and he can and will do anything he wants.
Evil takes its form in many ways. Clinton is a very
crafty, subtle liar. We will never know the full extent
of his deceptions, but we can at least learn his tactics
and not allow ourselves to be deceived any longer. Once
we have been warned, we must warn our neighbor.
The vast number of members of the House and Senate are
silent on the various Clinton scandals. They are silent
out of fear. They fear the polls that tell them Clinton
has a strong approval rating. We must flood every member
of congress with letters, e-mail, faxes, and phone calls
to give them the courage to support what is right, not
what is politically easy. Encourage, do not be critical.
Use positive reinforcement whenever your elected
representatives respond favorably.
Make it a daily task to write, call, e-mail, or fax at
least one of your elected leaders. Educate and inform,
but keep it brief and to the point. Lengthy letters
have less impact than short ones. Keep each
communication limited to one topic. Point out the
deceptions you see and help them to understand that you
expect them to take action. Always request a response
in writing detailing their personal stand on the issue.
Whenever possible, get your friends, neighbors, and
family to do the same. Elected leaders are hearing from
lobbyists, bureaucrats, and corrupt elected officials.
The squeaky wheel gets the grease so if you want some
action become the squeaky wheel.
Do not wait until the next election. If you want to
change the path America is on you must act now. There
is still time to save this great nation, but time is
slipping away. There is no other priority with greater
importance than to reverse the level of dishonesty
currently in our government. We are as accountable for
our actions as for our inactions, and one day we will
all be held accountable. By working together in a
united way we can make a difference. Let's get to work.
David M. Bresnahan, a contributing editor for
WorldNetDaily.com, is the author of "Cover Up: The Art
and Science of Political Deception," and offers a
monthly newsletter "Talk USA Investigative Reports."
He may be reached through email and also maintains a
website.
© 1999 Western Journalism Center
.
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
