-Caveat Lector- <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"> </A> -Cui Bono?- http://www.worldnetdaily.com/bluesky_exnews/20000206_xex_bible_trial.shtml SUNDAY FEBRUARY 6 2000 TESTING THE FAITH Bible on trial Rebellion brewing against Canada's pro-'gay' ruling By Julie Foster � 2000 WorldNetDaily.com A decision is months overdue on a complaint brought against a Saskatchewan newspaper and one of its advertisers by the province's Human Rights Commission for printing an ad, consisting of four Bible verses, which the commission says violates homosexuals' human rights. Though a decision is expected any day, defenders of the ad say the case will surely make its way to the Canadian Supreme Court. The case originated from complaints made by three homosexual men who saw the ad in the Saskatoon StarPhoenix. Paid for by Hugh Owens, the ad displayed citations of four Bible verses on the left, an equal sign and a picture of two male stick figures holding hands inside the international symbol for "no" on the right. It ran June 30, 1997. Each complaint letter asserted Owens' advertisement "tends to restrict the enjoyment of rights which I am entitled to under the law, and exposes me to hatred and otherwise affronts my dignity because of my sexual orientation, contrary to Section 14 of the Saskatchewan Human Rights Code." That code prohibits publication and radio and television broadcasts of "any statement or other representation" that offends any individual or group based on "race, creed, religion, color, sex, sexual orientation, family status, marital status, disability, age, nationality, place of origin or receipt of public assistance." Two years later, in August 1999, a board of inquiry heard the case with witnesses from both sides of the debate -- the StarPhoenix and Owens saying the ad is an expression of free speech, and the plaintiffs along with government-procured witnesses claiming the ad incited hatred and violence against homosexuals. Canadian law outlines a complaint system for human rights violations from within the government's administration that is intended to lighten the load of the courts. Complaints filed with the Human Rights Commission follow one of two paths: An early settlement may be pursued in which the two parties -- the complainant and the accused -- undergo mediated discussion, or the commission may investigate a complaint to determine its validity. If the complaint is not valid, it is discarded. Once an investigation is completed and the commission determines a violation of the nation's Human Rights Code occurred, the case goes before a one-person tribunal, called a board of inquiry, who is required to have a "legal background." A government attorney pleads the case of the complainant while the accused is left to find his own counsel. The commission has asked that both the StarPhoenix and Owens pay $2,000 in damages to each of the three complainants and that the defendants share the $4,500 cost for two of the province's expert witnesses. One of those witnesses was Dr. Didi Khayatt, an education professor currently in the middle of a six-year study on how "lesbian" desire is expressed in Egypt. Khayatt testified that sexual identity is an integral part of one's personality and is constantly developing throughout a person's lifetime. She also said homosexuals face "misunderstanding and hostility ... in a heterosexist society." The Bible quotes chosen by Owens promote that hostility, according to the commission. StarPhoenix's publisher, Lyle Sinkewicz, disagrees. "In that the Bible is the best-selling book in the world and it is generally not thought to be hate literature, I thought it was OK to run the ad," Sinkewicz told the board. In a strange turn of events, the commission set to prove him wrong by changing the focus of the hearing from judging a possible human rights violation to determining whether or not the Bible condemns homosexuality. To accomplish that goal, Rev. Brent Hawkes testified to the commission that the Bible does not necessarily condemn homosexuality. According to the commission's closing arguments, "Rev. Brent Hawkes cast doubt on the Biblical passages which Owens purports to be the word of God, pointing out that many scholars are now questioning whether those passages refer to homosexuality at all." Hawkes also declared Roman Catholics and Orthodox Jews will be punished by God for holding that the practice of homosexuality is wrong. Darien Moore, counsel for the commission, continued his statement by saying, "We heard several witnesses from religions other than Mr. Owens' who explained that homosexuals may or may not be accepted as full members of their congregations. It is obvious that the issue of homosexuality is being debated in all of the mainline churches." Now the issue is also being debated by the Canadian government. The Saskatchewan Human Rights Commission has effectively turned the Owens/StarPhoenix case into a theological debate that will be settled by Valerie Watson -- the young lawyer comprising the board of inquiry for this case. Certainly, the nature and weight of the debate has led to the delay of a ruling by Watson. But this isn't the only case in Canada that shows government restrictions on freedom of speech and expression -- a right Saskatchewan's justice minister insists has not been infringed by the Human Rights Commission. Rory Leishman of the London Free Press, told WorldNetDaily of similar situations around the country. Scott Brockie, owner of a Toronto print shop, has a case pending in Ontario. Based on his religious convictions, Brockie refused to print letterhead for the homosexual activist group Lesbian and Gay Archives, whose mission is to collect historical information on homosexuality. Brockie suggested other print shops in the area, but the group filed its complaint, accusing the printer of affronting their dignity. Brockie was ordered by the commission to pay the group $5,000 in damages and submit a written apology. The printer has vowed he will not comply with the order. Canada's Human Rights Code allows each provincial commission "to do anything [short of imprisonment] that, in the opinion of the board, the party ought to do to achieve compliance with this Act, both in respect of the complaint and in respect of future practices." Should defendants refuse to comply with a board's order, a commission may bring the case before the Canadian justice system. Punishments could then result in jail time. Brockie is not alone is his stand against a board ruling. London, Ontario Mayor Dianne Haskett did not respond when requested to proclaim a "gay pride" weekend. "Homophiles," the pro-homosexual group who made the request, complained. Haskett was ordered by an Ontario board of inquiry to made the proclamation, despite her religious convictions, and pay $5,000 in damages to Homophiles. Haskett refused to obey the order, and the incident became a central issue in the subsequent mayoral election. She was overwhelmingly re-elected. In her victory speech, the mayor said, "I only sought to maintain my constitutional right as a Canadian to freedom of expression. Until our Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is overthrown, we as Canadians still have the right to choose what we will say and what we will not say. And no Human Rights Commission, acting outside the law, can take that right away from us." Others join Haskett in her disapproval of human rights commissions. Critics view the commissioners' actions as overreaching, much the same as some Americans' complaints of "judicial activism." Leishman calls the commissions "a perverse invention of the 1960s." He says Canada had "one of the world's best records of respect for basic human rights and fundamental freedoms" before the Human Rights Code was written and perceives the commissions' actions as an attempt to achieve perfection in human affairs. "Mandating human rights commissions and other state authorities to try to achieve perfection is a formula for tyranny," Leishman said. He quotes Thomas Sowell of Stanford University: "If you are free only when others think you are right, then you are not free at all." Leishman also issues a wake-up call to his fellow Canadians with the words of John Philpot Curran: "The condition upon which God hath given liberty to man is eternal vigilance; which condition if he break, servitude is at once the consequence of his crime, and the punishment of his guilt." Julie Foster is a staff reporter for WorldNetDaily. http://www.worldnetdaily.com/bluesky_exnews/20000206_xex_bible_trial.shtml Bard "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." -- Goethe <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soap-boxing! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
