-Caveat Lector-   <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">
</A> -Cui Bono?-

From:

http://dallasnews.com/texas_southwest/28995_WACO09.html

Judge seeks final plan for Davidian field tests
Secrecy of procedures, results likely to be issue

02/09/2000

By Lee Hancock / The Dallas Morning News

Both sides in the Branch Davidian lawsuit and the federal judge
hearing the case will gather in St. Louis next week to finalize
plans for field tests aimed at resolving key questions about
government gunfire.

An order issued late Monday by U.S. District Judge Walter Smith
announced the Feb. 16 meeting at the office of Waco special
counsel John C. Danforth.

The order indicated that lawyers for the sect and the government
and their scientific experts will discuss proposed protocols for
the field test.

The judge dictated that specifics of the test, outlined by a
court-appointed expert, must be kept secret, and he threatened to
impose sanctions against anyone who revealed them "to the press
or the public."

The order does not specify where the test will take place. But
officials recently told parties for both sides that the Defense
Department has given clearance for the test to be conducted at
Fort Hood, Texas, in the latter part of March.

Two lawyers representing the sect said Tuesday that they are
concerned that the imposition of strict secrecy will be extended
to the test. They predicted Tuesday that such a move would
further inflame public doubts about the controversial Branch
Davidian case.

"I'm sure that the Justice Department opposes any participation
by the press in the demonstration," said Mike Caddell, lead
lawyer for the sect. "Our concern is, rightly or wrongly, by
excluding the press, you're confirming the fears of some people
about the integrity of the test."

He and other lawyers for the sect said they plan to argue for
media coverage of the test "so there can be an independent report
back to the American people about how thorough and fair this
demonstration is."

Officials with the special counsel's office and the Justice
Department have declined to comment on the matter.

"We'll let our views be known to the judge," a Justice Department
spokesman said Tuesday evening.

The question of whether government agents fired guns at the
Branch Davidian compound on April 19, 1993, has become a pivotal
issue in the Branch Davidians' wrongful-death lawsuit.

Government officials have long denied that anyone from their side
fired a shot that day, when FBI agents bashed the sect's
embattled compound with tanks and sprayed in tear gas to force a
surrender.

More than 80 Branch Davidians died in a fire that began six hours
into the FBI tear-gas assault. Government arson investigators
ruled that the sect deliberately set the building on fire.

But lawyers for the sect contend that government gunfire kept
innocent people from escaping the inferno.

The cornerstone of their argument is a videotape shot by an FBI
airplane circling the compound on April 19. The plane's infrared
camera, designed to detect and create images from differences in
temperatures of objects on the ground, recorded repeated,
rhythmic white blips that appeared to emanate from government
positions in the last hour before the fire.

Retired Defense Department experts hired by the sect have said
those flashes are distinctive heat signatures of gunfire. Their
analysis has been echoed by some independent experts and a
scientist who recently evaluated the recording for the House
Government Reform Committee.

But government experts have contended that the camera was too far
away to capture the tiny blips of heat generated from gunshots.
They contend the flashes are sunlight glint or electronic
glitches.

But they have refused to discuss general information about the
camera's capabilities or even its manufacturer, contending that
such information is classified.

Mr. Danforth's office jumped into the fray last fall, asking
Judge Smith for a court-supervised field test to resolve whether
the FBI's camera could detect gunfire and whether the Waco
flashes came from gunshots.

The court ordered a test using the FBI's camera and airplane and
a similar, borrowed camera system to record test shots from guns
like those carried by government agents and Branch Davidians.

A spokesman with the British Defence Ministry said the American
investigators recently requested the use of a Royal Navy Lynx
helicopter outfitted with a near-identical infrared camera for
the Texas test.

The camera is a GEC-Marconi "Sea Owl," and the Lynx helicopter
that carries it is flown by a two-member crew from British
frigates and destroyers, the British military spokesman said. It
is commonly used to monitor shipping and sea traffic.

The British government has been asked to provide the aircraft and
a crew for a week of U.S. operations, the spokesman said. But
left unresolved is the question of who will pay to get the
helicopter to Texas, which could cost $250,000 or more.

Mr. Caddell said that will be explored at next week's meeting in
St. Louis.

James Brannon, another lawyer for the sect, said he also will use
the meeting to air his concern that secret protocols proposed for
the test lack "enough checks and balances to completely allay my
fears of a stacked deck."

"I am very concerned about what controls we're going to have, or
be given, to make certain that the FBI, if it's going to put its
own plane up there, is not going to be in a position to cheat,"
Mr. Brannon said.

Independent experts in infrared technology say that ensuring
accuracy will require careful calibration of the British and FBI
cameras before and after their deployment at Fort Hood.

They said they would expect such calibration to include thorough
pre-test examination to ensure that each camera's internal
processing system matches the manufacturer's original design
specifications.

Both cameras also should be subjected to lab tests aimed at
ensuring they do not contain optical filters that could hamper
their ability to capture the relatively short detectable energy
bursts or "spectral wavelengths" of gunfire, the experts said.
Such filters are sometimes used in infrared cameras to eliminate
unwanted images, and they could be hard to detect without
specific spectral sensitivity tests, experts said.

Flying each of the cameras over a small, known heat source, such
as a burning trash can, before and after the gunshot tests also
would be an easy way to confirm their reliability, said one
expert who spoke on condition on anonymity.

"If they run a test of its ability to see small hot spots and
then fly the test, and then re-verify its ability to detect those
same hot spots, I think you are pretty safe," the expert said.

It also will be necessary to include relatively large samplings
of gunfire from each weapon being tested, because the British
infrared technology, known as SPRITE Forward Looking Infrared, is
capable of capturing only a fraction of such small thermal
signatures, he and other experts said.

"It is difficult to see gun flash with a SPRITE FLIR. Since it is
difficult to see them, there must be many gun flashes in any
test," said the expert. He added that the difficulty precludes
the probability that some gunshots can be detected. "A short test
is therefore likely to favor the FBI," he said.



1999 The Dallas Morning News

=================================================================
             Kadosh, Kadosh, Kadosh, YHVH, TZEVAOT

  FROM THE DESK OF:                    <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
                      *Mike Spitzer*     <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
                         ~~~~~~~~          <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

   The Best Way To Destroy Enemies Is To Change Them To Friends
       Shalom, A Salaam Aleikum, and to all, A Good Day.
=================================================================

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soap-boxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to