-Caveat Lector-

(Don't worry about humans, just bury it...  :-(

EPA reconsidering decision to bury radioactive soil in Denver

Copyright © 1999 Nando Media
Copyright © 1999 Associated Press

By JUDITH KOHLER

DENVER (September 21, 1999 3:54 p.m. EDT
http://www.nandotimes.com) - Back in 1991, the Environmental Protection
Agency thought a creative idea for entombing contaminated soil at the old
Shattuck Chemical Co. plant had literally laid the problem to rest. Now that
decision may come back to haunt the agency.

Instead of digging up the more than 50,000 cubic yards of radioactive dirt
and hauling it away, the EPA decided to mix it with concrete and fly ash
and bury it on the spot under rock and clay, creating a tomb designed to
last hundreds of years.

City leaders and residents of the blue-collar neighborhood surrounding the
Shattuck Superfund Site contend the waste is sinking and fear that
contamination may have already seeped into water supplies. They are
demanding the tomb be dug up and shipped out of state.

"That's supposed to last 2,000 years," neighborhood resident Irma
Zimmerman said as she stood, hands on hips, surveying the unmarked
chain-link fence surrounding the 10-foot mound of rocks that stretches
nearly two blocks. "But if it can't make it through one or two years, I don't
know what's going to happen."

Neighbors say photos and videotape of the "hot rocks" - as Zimmerman
calls them - show that they are sinking.

The EPA's ombudsman has launched an investigation to determine if the
buried waste really is settling and whether it poses a health risk to the
neighborhood, which is about four miles from downtown.

In its preliminary findings, an independent firm, S. Cohen & Associates of
McLean, Va., found no immediate threat but said the EPA failed to
address long-term effects, the extent of groundwater contamination and
possible runoff into the nearby South Platte River.

"The major concern here is the protection of the citizens of Denver and the
people around the site, not just in the near term, but also in the long term,"
said Assistant EPA Administrator Tim Fields.

Fields said he expects to decide by November what to do about the waste.
"It's clear to me right now, at a minimum, some changes are going to have
to be made," he said.

>From the early 1920s to 1984, Shattuck operated a plant at the site,
processing uranium, radium, molybdenum and rhenium for such things as
X-ray equipment and glow-in-the-dark clocks and gauges. The soil and
groundwater became contaminated.

EPA and state health officials initially proposed shipping the waste out of
state but decided the best plan was to bury it on the site. The decision has
been criticized ever since by residents and city officials.

"We're not at all confident we know what's at the site," said Celia
VanDerLoop, a city environmental-health supervisor. The city of Denver
has filed notice of its intent to sue.

Some neighbors believe the waste was buried rather than removed
because it is a working-class neighborhood, home to modest bungalows
and such businesses as lumber yards and auto-repair shops. That
allegation is part of the EPA investigation.

Officials with the EPA and Shattuck said the decision to bury the waste on
the spot came down to cost and to uncertainty about the ability of the
company that was managing the only place the radioactive soil could have
been shipped, a waste dump in Utah. Federal law also gave preference to
on-site solutions, said Rebecca Thomas, former EPA project manager.

Shattuck officials will not object to waste removal; they just do not want to
pay for it, said attorney John Faught. Shattuck paid more than $26 million
for the cleanup. Removing the waste would have cost $46 million.

The investigation itself has been fraught with controversy. EPA employees
have refused to cooperate unless the interviews are off-the record. And
Sen. Wayne Allard, R-Colo., held up Fields' appointment until the agency
agreed to investigate.

Allard wants EPA executives to promise to release all documents on
Shattuck and to make staffers available for on-the-record interviews.

"Why is it they're reluctant to share that information?" asked Allard, who
hasn't taken a position on what should be done with the waste.

Hugh Kaufman, the ombudsman's chief investigator on Shattuck, said: "The
office has always had access to EPA personnel for on-the-record
interviews. It's the first time it's been stonewalled by a regional office."

EPA Regional Administrator Bill Yellowtail has said some information must
remain confidential because of pending lawsuits.

Last spring, EPA officials in Denver released some previously secret
records, including one showing the agency's radiation-control expert
believed burying the waste was the wrong choice.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Steve Wingate

California Director
SKYWATCH INTERNATIONAL

Anomalous Images and UFO Files
http://www.anomalous-images.com

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to