-Caveat Lector-   <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">
</A> -Cui Bono?-

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: ON - Refusing to answer census questions
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 22:58:55 -0600 (CST)
From: MichaelP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: ?
To: undisclosed-recipients:;

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/bluesky_fosters_news/

 2000 WorldNetDaily.com

TUESDAY MARCH 28 2000

   THE POWER TO DESTROY

Judge puts brakes on Census Bureau Attorney: 'Huge victory for the
Constitution and for privacy-loving Americans'

By Sarah Foster

Americans who refuse to answer questions they consider invasive on their
Census questionnaires will be able to sleep a little easier -- at least
for now.

A federal judge ruled yesterday that the Census Bureau has no automatic
right to ask questions felt to be personal or intrusive and that it cannot
threaten or prosecute citizens who refuse to answer such questions.

U.S. District Judge Melinda Harmon granted attorney Mark Brewer, of the
Houston-based firm of Brewer and Pritchard, a temporary restraining order
in a Census suit filed by five Houston, Texas, residents. Attorneys for
the government conceded that none of the five plaintiffs will be subject
to actual or threatened prosecution during this litigation which is
expected to go to the U.S. Supreme Court.

The ruling is especially far-reaching.

"For the moment, this will prevent prosecution against any American who
chooses not to answer questions other than the number of people living at
their address -- that's all that's required by the Constitution," Brewer
told WorldNetDaily. "It's a huge victory for the Constitution and for
privacy-loving Americans, because we now have a ruling in a federal court
case.

"The Census Bureau cannot extract this information under threat of
criminal prosecution -- that was the issue I presented to the court," he
said.

The penalty for not answering each question asked on the forms is $100.
False answers can cost up to $500 in fines.

The five -- Edgar Morales, Laique Rehman, Nouhad Bassila, George
Breckenridge and William Jeffrey Van Fleet -- are American citizens.

Brewer said his clients are not part of any organized group, "though that
is what people have assumed. They are just ordinary people who want to be
counted, but who do not want to give up their privacy to do so. That's the
bottom line."

"What the court did today," Brewer explained, "was to order that the
Bureau could neither threaten nor actually prosecute these people for not
answering any question other than how many folks live at that address.
It's the first time to my knowledge that this has happened in the 213
years since we've had a Constitution."

As he put it, "We hit a home run."

Recalling his day in court, Brewer said he told the judge she was "the
only barrier standing between government on the one hand and these five --
I think very brave -- people and the American people generally on the
other. I pointed out that the government lawyer had just told her that he
can ask anything he darn near pleases -- where does it stop?"

Almost as important as the ruling itself is that the government conceded
that the plaintiffs have "standing," meaning they had a right to bring an
action against the Census Bureau in the first place.

"This removed what was potentially the biggest impediment to the case
moving forward," said Brewer. "We're now looking forward to phase two,
which is when the case will be submitted on summary judgement in two
weeks."

"This is what they call a three-judge court case," he explained. "It's
federal, but it's a very unusual procedure. There are only a few instances
where it's permitted by federal law, this being the primary one:
pertaining to census and apportionment. The case is filed like any other
case in federal court, then it is referred by the chief judge of the
circuit."

In this case, that's the Fifth Circuit in New Orleans, headed by Judge
Carol King.

Said Brewer, "The way it works is that when a motion of temporary
restraining order is filed, which we did on March 23, the single judge
that gets the initial assignment of the case can hear it. That's really
about the only thing the judge can hear and rule upon. Then the
three-judge court is convened and the case is submitted on trial -- and
here it's for a summary judgment because there's no dispute of the facts.

"Both sides have the right of appeal," Brewer continued, "and we're
assuming they (the Census Bureau) will appeal it. And if we lose -- we'll
appeal it. Either way, it's on its way to the Supreme Court."

Brewer is handling the case pro bono -- that is, without charge, but and
for the public good.

"One of the things I stressed to the judge," said Brewer, [is that]
neither the plaintiffs nor I want to interrupt the census. To the
contrary. I want to ensure its constitutional integrity and validity. But
when you look at the lowered response rate, which by the Census Bureau's
own admission is going to occur with the use of the long form, then you
can only conclude that they are intentionally erecting a roadblock to
getting an accurate count. They are intentionally sacrificing an accurate
count in order to obtain information through statistics that they're not
even entitled to obtain.

"Unfortunately, we know the government is capable of misusing census
data," he said. "The federal government was only able to find, round up
and imprison Americans of Japanese ancestry in 1942 by the illegal use of
Census Bureau data."
                                ___________

   Sarah Foster is a staff reporter for WorldNetDaily.

======================

*** NOTICE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material
is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest
in receiving the included information for research and educational
purposes. Feel free to distribute widely but PLEASE acnowledge the
source. ***

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soap-boxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to