-Caveat Lector-   <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">
</A> -Cui Bono?-

from:
http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/story.hts/metropolitan/499130
Click Here: <A
HREF="http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/story.hts/metropolitan/499130">HoustonChroni
cle.com</A>
----
March 21, 2000, 9:06PM


Contempt charges possible in CIA case

By DEBORAH TEDFORD
Copyright 2000 Houston Chronicle

A federal judge in Houston must decide whether to hold three other federal
jurists and high-level Justice Department employees in contempt for
submitting false evidence in a case that has kept a CIA employee imprisoned
since 1982.

Ex-CIA operative Edwin Wilson asked U.S. District Judge Lynn Hughes to issue
contempt citations against 17 current and former government attorneys or top
CIA officials. All helped prosecute him in 1982 for smuggling explosives to
Libya.

Justice Department attorneys have acknowledged using an affidavit from
then-CIA Executive Director Charles Briggs even though they knew it was
false.

The affidavit, which stated that Wilson did no work for the CIA after his
1971 retirement, was characterized as a crucial piece of evidence by jurors,
Justice Department trial attorneys and Wilson's appellate attorney.

"It shredded any possibility of the jury thinking that the government had
actually asked him to do this," said David Adler.

Among those who played a role in Wilson's case and could now be cited for
contempt are U.S. District Judges D. Lowell Jensen and Stanley Sporkin, who
recently took senior status; Stephen S. Trott, who sits on the 9th U.S.
Circuit Court of Appeals; Houston attorney Dan Hedges, who was U.S. attorney
in Houston during Wilson's trial and Assistant U.S. Attorney Jim Powers, a
federal prosecutor in Houston.

Justice Department spokesman John Russell refused to comment on the contempt
motion.
A request that Wilson's conviction be overturned was filed with the motion.
In it, Adler contends that 22 government documents show that prosecutors and
CIA officials knew before the jury verdict, and verified after the verdict,
that the affidavit was false.

In January federal prosecutors acknowledged the government knowingly
submitted a false affidavit to help convict Wilson. But they say he's not
entitled to a new trial because the bogus evidence was inconsequential and
unrelated to the charges.

The Justice Department maintained the ex-agent shipped arms to Libya from Texa
s and Virginia and had plotted the murder of the New York prosecutor who
spearheaded the cases. Wilson was sentenced to 52 years in prison.

If Hughes overturns Wilson's conviction in the Texas case, Adler said the
other two cases could crumble.

Wilson could be eligible for mandatory release if the cases are overturned,
Adler said.

At the core of the Texas arms-smuggling case was the CIA's claim that Wilson
had done no work for the agency after his Feb. 28, 1971, retirement.

But prosecutors now admit Wilson had at least 80 "nonsocial" contacts with
CIA personnel after his retirement, according to documents filed by the
government.

Adler speculated prosecutors used the affidavit when plans to call an expert
witness went awry.

The expert, referred to in court documents by the pseudonym "Larson" and
later identified as the then-chief of the CIA's Information Management
Section, was not called to testify because the trial judge refused a
government request to limit his questioning by the defense.

According to documents released to Wilson under the federal Freedom of
Information Act, "Larson" had told prosecutors the agency would "deal with
the devil" if need be.

"Larson" also acknowledged the CIA might consider providing 40,000 pounds of
explosives to someone in Libya if "great" information could be obtained.

Then-U.S. District Judge Ross Sterling allowed the government to submit an
affidavit from CIA Director Briggs because of security concerns, even though
he could not be cross-examined.
Briggs' affidavit stated, "Wilson was not asked or requested, directly or
indirectly, to perform or provide any services, directly or indirectly, for
the CIA" after Wilson's 1971 retirement.

Court documents state that CIA attorneys, concerned about the accuracy of the
affidavit, urged Justice Department prosecutors not to use it in the trial.
But prosecutors insisted it was the backbone of their case

Adler has asked Hughes to enter a finding that Wilson's conviction was
illegally obtained through the prosecutors' knowing use of perjured
testimony.
-----
Aloha, He'Ping,
Om, Shalom, Salaam.
Em Hotep, Peace Be,
All My Relations.
Omnia Bona Bonis,
Adieu, Adios, Aloha.
Amen.
Roads End

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soap-boxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to