-Caveat Lector-   <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">
</A> -Cui Bono?-

 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2000
 Subj: THE WASHINGTON POST SHOWS ITS ALLEGIANCE

 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
 April 3, 2000
 Contact: Kyle Key
 (202) 646-5172

 THE WASHINGTON POST SHOWS ITS ALLEGIANCE

 A LIBERAL NEWSPAPER BACKS DEMOCRATS/CLINTON INSTEAD OF PRIVACY RIGHTS

 (Washington, D.C.) In a ridiculous editorial of today, The Washington
 Post sides with Democrats and the Clinton-Gore Administration in
 criticizing the Honorable Royce Lamberth for upholding the law which,
 ironically, liberal Democrats wrote in response to the Watergate era.
 The law, commonly known as the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. Section 552(a)
 et seq., states plainly on its face that it applies to the Executive
 Office of the President, among other government agencies. The Privacy
 Act simply provides that when the government keeps information on
 individuals in a record-keeping system, it must obtain the consent of
 these individuals before it can publicly release this information.
 The purpose behind this civil rights law, which is punishable with up
 to one year in prison, is to prevent the government from using its
 record-keeping system as a way to intimidate, threaten, coerce and/or
 blackmail its citizens. The editorial also effectively endorsed the
 Clinton-Gore White House's refusal to abide by the Privacy Act.

 Indeed, this is what the Clinton-Gore Administration, and most
 particularly Bill and Hillary Clinton, have been doing over the last
 seven years with FBI and other government files. The results of this
 "campaign of terror" were most clearly felt during the impeachment
 proceedings, where the House Managers were "outed" in an attempt to
 intimidate, threaten, coerce and blackmail them. This sent a coercive
 signal to Senators that similar treatment was in store for them if
 they convicted the President. Sure enough, the Senate "caved" and
 failed to convict.

 In Judicial Watch's $90-million class-action Filegate lawsuit, the
 Court has correctly held that a pattern of violating the privacy
 rights of American citizens by the Clinton-Gore White House will
 raise evidentiary inferences that the FBI files were also misused. In
 this context, Judge Lamberth found that the President and his
 collaborators (who include Mrs. Clinton, by the Clinton-Gore White
 House's own admission -- see www.JudicialWatch.org) criminally
 violated the privacy rights of Kathleen Willey. Previous rulings
 involved Linda Tripp, and the Clinton-Gore Department of Defense.

 "The Washington Post, owned and operated by Katharine Graham (and the
 Graham family), who dined with the President shortly after it was
 revealed he had been procuring oral sex from a 23-year-old White
 House intern, and who has close ties with the Democratic Party,
 obviously unleashed her left-leaning editors to write the editorial
 of today criticizing Judge Lamberth for upholding the law. Coupled
 with threats against the Judge by Democrats, published by Paul Bedard
 in U.S. News and World Report (see other Judicial Watch press release
 of today), that any further appointment of Lamberth would be blocked,
 it is clear that Democrats are running scared because for once there
 may be one judge in this country who will uphold the rule of law
 against the most corrupt President, First Lady, and Administration in
 U.S. history," stated Judicial Watch Chairman and General Counsel
 Larry Klayman.




.

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soap-boxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to