.............................................................. >From the New Paradigms Project [Not Necessarily Endorsed]: Conspiracy Shopping Cart: http://a-albionic.com/shopping.html From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: SNET: Another Reason Not To Fly....... Date: Monday, April 10, 2000 11:18 AM -> SNETNEWS Mailing List Study Finds Wide Disparities In Customs' Intrusive Searches By Stephen Barr Washington Post Staff Writer Monday, April 10, 2000; Page A01 African American women returning from abroad were disproportionately singled out for strip-searches by U.S. Customs Service inspectors at airports, according to a congressional report scheduled for release today. Black women were nearly twice as likely to be strip-searched on suspicion of smuggling drugs as white men and women, the report by the congressional General Accounting Office said. Moreover, black women were three times as likely as African American men to be strip-searched. The intrusive searches were not justified by a higher rate of discovery of contraband among minority groups, according to the report. Only about 102,000 of the roughly 140 million Americans returning from abroad were subject to special searches in fiscal years 1997 and 1998. The GAO said 95 percent of those were given simple pat-downs and were not required to disrobe. Another 4 percent underwent strip-searches and 1 percent were X-rayed. African American men and women were nearly nine times as likely as white men and women to be X-rayed, while Hispanic American men and women were nearly four times as likely, the report said. The GAO prepared the report for Sen. Richard J. Durbin (D-Ill.), and it is the first comprehensive analysis of "personal-search" patterns by the Customs Service. The report follows two years of criticism by minority women in Chicago and other cities who have complained of "racial profiling" and humiliating treatment by Customs inspectors. Since 1998, the Customs Service has tightened up search procedures and put its lawyers on 24-hour duty to advise inspectors who detain travelers suspected of smuggling drugs or other contraband. "We have made it clear to our people that racial profiling will not, cannot, be tolerated," Customs Commissioner Raymond W. Kelly said in an interview. Customs said the number of intrusive searches has dropped by about half, and those that are conducted are far more likely to find drugs. But Durbin said the GAO analysis showed the need for legislation that would ban racial profiling by Customs and "make sure this is a permanent policy that lives beyond Kelly and this particular report." Durbin has drafted a bill to require Customs to document its reasons for frisking or intrusively searching individuals and submit such information to Congress annually. Rep. John Lewis (D-Ga.), who also has investigated claims that Customs mistreats international travelers, has introduced similar legislation in the House. Every year, the Customs Service seizes hundreds of pounds of cocaine and heroin that international air passengers carry inside their clothes or in their bodies. Growing numbers of smugglers swallow cocaine-filled balloons or insert packages of heroin and cocaine into their body cavities, officials said. Customs has far-reaching powers, upheld by the courts, to take travelers to holding rooms for pat-downs. Customs inspectors look for passengers who give evasive answers to their questions, exhibit signs of nervousness or give off other clues, such as wearing thick-soled shoes. Often inspectors act on general information about a flight from "source countries" of the drug cartels or on intelligence tips about a specific passenger. If a frisk or strip-search fails to ease an inspector's suspicions, the passenger can be handcuffed and taken from the airport to a hospital or clinic where doctors probe the person's body or take X-rays. Travelers may be forced to drink laxatives to enable inspectors to monitor bowel movements. Detention times can last from hours to days. About 3 percent of the passengers undergoing a pat-down were caught with contraband. Twenty-three percent of strip-searches turned up drugs and 31 percent of X-rays were positive, the GAO found. In its study, the GAO analyzed the data by gender and race and said women and men were equally likely to carry drugs, and whites and blacks were equally likely to be caught smuggling drugs. Some passengers, however, were more likely than others to be forced to undergo an intrusive search, the GAO found. "The most pronounced difference occurred with black women who were U.S. citizens," the GAO report said. "They were nine times more likely than white women who were U.S. citizens to be X-rayed after being frisked or patted down in fiscal year 1998. "But on the basis of X-ray results, black women who were U.S. citizens were less than half as likely to be found carrying contraband as white women," the GAO said. Hugh Price, president of the National Urban League, said the GAO report showed "a major profiling problem. . . . It is a pattern of outrageous behavior." Amanda Buritica of Port Chester, N.Y., said the GAO report showed why Customs needed to change its procedures. "I don't want people put through the hell they put me through," she said. Buritica was held for 22 hours at a San Francisco hospital in 1994, given a laxative and X-rayed. Her lawyers argued that Customs had no reason to suspect her of being a drug courier, and a federal jury agreed, awarding her $450,000. In Chicago, Customs faces a class-action lawsuit originally brought by about 80 women, but the number has grown to about 1,300 women, lawyer Edward M. Fox said. Fox said Kelly's policy changes "are a step in the right direction." Customs officials said Kelly's changes have reduced the number of intrusive searches from 1,386 in the first six months of fiscal 1998 to 649 for the same period in fiscal 2000. According to Customs data from Oct. 1, 1999, to March 31, 2000, more African Americans and Hispanics than whites were X-rayed, but Customs found drugs in more than half the cases involving minorities, officials said. "We have to factor in where the drugs are coming from," Kelly said. "We are never going to have searches that reflect in a proportionate way people who are traveling. It is skewed by where the drugs come from and skewed in some sense by the intelligence information we collect." During the past year, Kelly began a new policy requiring Customs supervisors to approve all pat-downs and senior managers to approve body searches that involve taking a traveler to a medical facility. Kelly also revised the handbook used by inspectors, increased their training and ordered more systematic collection of data on searches. Customs purchased 10 body-scan machines, which see through clothing, to make the search process less intrusive. The machines have been installed at major airports, including Atlanta, Chicago, Los Angeles, Miami, New York and Washington. Customs also plans to spend $9 million this fiscal year to install on-site X-ray machines at nine airports. © 2000 The Washington Post Company -> To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________ Enlighten your in-box. http://www.topica.com/t/15 Shop for Cars On-Line: http://a-albionic.com/ads/srch.html Forwarded for info and discussion from the New Paradigms Discussion List, not necessarily endorsed by: *********************************** Lloyd Miller, Research Director for A-albionic Research (POB 20273, Ferndale, MI 48220), a ruling class/conspiracy research resource for the entire political-ideological spectrum. Quarterly journal, book sales, rare/out-of-print searches, New Paradigms Discussion List, Weekly Up-date Lists & E-text Archive of research, intelligence, catalogs, & resources. To Discuss Ideas: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://msen.com/~lloyd/ For Ordering Info & Free Catalog: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://a-albionic.com/formaddress.html For Discussion List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] text in body: subscribe prj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> **FREE RARE BOOK SEARCH: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ** Explore Our Archive: <http://a-albionic.com/a-albionic.html> Every Diet Has Failed! What Can I do? Click Below to "Ask Dr. Kathleen"! http://www.radiantdiet.com/cgi-bin/slim/deliver.cgi?ask-1364 *********************************** <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html <A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]</A> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
