[astro-revelation] This is Scary Stuff People - Mark Of The Beast
Date:
Tue, 18 Apr 2000 04:30:16 -0700
From:
Victoria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization:
Global Glory
Someone asked privately about NID
I have written articles on National ID.
http://presys.com/~ekklesia/issue9w.htm
The ekklesia Newsletter issue 9
The Seal Deal - Neither buy nor sell
NATIONAL IDENTIFICATION
The 666 section
Redemption
They have been turning drivers license into N ID behind the
scene with free computers and software to the states.
This is a long post but it shows you how this stuff comes
about. All they need is a good national emergency and people
will line up for new IDs and the system is already present
to do it through DMVs.
SCAN THIS NEWS
July 4, 1999
THE REPUBLICAN NATIONAL ID PLAN
This article memorializes, for posterity sake, the
establishment of the national identification system in
America.
A lot of people, just now being confronted with the national
ID laws, are quick to blame President Clinton. He certainly
is an easy target. But the reality is that the Republicans
are solely responsible for these programs, as you will see
below.
How The Republicans Implemented the Democrats' National ID
Plan
An Historical Account
By Scott McDonald
http://www.networkusa.org/fingerprint/page1/fp-republican-id-plan.html
One day, in the not too distant future, a generation of
Americans is going to wake up and ask: "How did we become
shackled with a government that tracks, monitors, regulates,
controls, and dictates our every move?" Let the historical
record show, it was the Republican-led Congress implementing
the Democrat's "locating and tracking" database program that
resulted in the U.S. national identification system.
Just how did this massive control mechanism get established?
And, who were the key players? For a clue, their first names
were: Bob, Newt, Bill, and Patsy -- with honorable mention
for Rush.
It all came about rather gradually beginning in 1994 -- the
political period referred to as the "Republican Revolution."
It happened during a time when the nation's attention was
diverted to such trivial issues as funding for free school
lunch programs. It began when the Republicans in Congress
proudly and pompously announced, in a huge ceremony held on
the front steps of the U.S. Capitol Building, that they were
implementing their "Contract With America."
Under the "Contract," the Republican Congress enacted not
one, but TWO
national ID laws. The "Welfare Reform Act of 1996" and the
"Illegal Immigration Reform Act of 1996" both included
requirements which, in application, constitute a national
identification system. Together, these two laws made up the
foundational backbone -- and provided the financial impetus
-- for the most massive national identification system ever
devised by mankind. These two programs are now being
implemented throughout America. As a result, everyone is
required to identify themselves using a social security
number in order to engage in virtually all societal
activities. Consequently, SSNs are now required as a
condition to drive, work, fly, bank, get married, get
divorced, hunt, fish, buy stock, obtain insurance, get born,
and even to die.
These two laws are in addition to the health care reform
measures, also enacted under the Republican Congress, which
are resulting in massive database systems that will be used
to exchange private information about citizens, all linked
to one's social security number.
How could such Draconian laws get enacted with little or no
meaningful public debate? No small amount of blame must go
to the diversionary antics of the immensely popular,
pseudo-conservative, part-time comedian, Republican
mouthpiece, radio talk-show host Rush Limbaugh. For, it was
he who, on cue from Newt Gingrich, effectively distracted an
otherwise concerned and otherwise trusting populace with
relentless babble and mindless chatter. All that was ever
discussed on his weekday program was whether or not the
Republican's Welfare Reform plan included a "spending
increase," a "spending decrease," or simply a "decrease in
the proposed increase." Occasionally, Rush would also
complain about Clinton's threat to veto the great Republican
overhaul bill because it did not include enough money for
free school lunch programs. Clinton followed through with
his threat, by the way, but that obviously is not the end of
the story. Meanwhile, Congress was busy enacting the most
sophisticated -- most horrendous -- locating, tracking, and
identification system ever suffered under by mankind. None
of this was ever once so much as mentioned by the celebrity
who's most bragged-about credential is that half 'his brain
encumbered.
DETAILED HISTORY OF THE LOCATING AND TRACKING LAWS
The national "locating and tracking" system, (by the way,
that's how it's referred to in the Act), began as the "Child
Support Responsibility Act of 1994" (H.R. 4570). The first
version of the bill most like the one that was eventually
enacted, was originally sponsored by Democratic
Congresswoman Pat Schroeder (D-CO). Her bill was introduced
in June of 1994 on behalf of "the Congressional Caucus
for Women's Issues." Several previous attempts by the
Women's Caucus to get similar legislation enacted failed
miserably while the Democrats held the majority. And
Representative Schroder's 1994 attempt likewise failed.
But that was all before the Republicans took the majority in
the Fall of 1994. As you will see, the ladies were about to
receive the life-sustaining support they so desperately
needed.
In January of 1995, during what was referred to as the
"First One-hundred Days," Congresswoman Nancy Johnson (R-CN)
sponsored a new version of the same child support bill
previously championed by Representative Pat Schroeder. This
time the bill was called the "Child Support Responsibility
Act of 1995" (H.R.785). In re-introducing the bill, Ms.
Schroeder had these comments about the new and improved
version:
"The central component of the Child Support Responsibility
Act of 1995 is the creation of a national databank that
expands the Federal Parent Locator Service and establishes a
Federal Child Support Registry. ... We do not want
noncustodial parents playing economic hide-and-seek from
their kids."
"Highlights of the new bill include:
"Restricts professional, occupational, and business licenses
of noncustodial parents who have failed to pay child
support.
"Restricts driver's licenses and vehicle registration of
noncustodial parents who fail to appear in child support
proceedings."
(Congressional Record pg. H892, 1995)
REPUBLICANS QUICKLY BEGAN TO CLIMB ONBOARD
The same "child support enforcement" wording as discussed
above was also included in another bill known as the "Child
Support Enforcement Reform Act of 1995," (H.R.906). This
bill was introduced by Congressman Robert Andrews (D-NJ) on
February 13, 1995. Senator Olympia Snowe (R-ME) presented
the Child Support Enforcement bill to the Senate "on behalf
of [him]self and Senator Bob Dole." In introducing the bill,
Senator Snowe said the bill's purpose was:
"To strengthen efforts to locate parents, it expands the
Federal parent locator system and provides for
State-to-State access of the network.
"And, to facilitate child support enforcement and
collection, the bill expands the penalties for child support
delinquency to include the denial of professional,
recreational, and driver's license to deadbeat parents, the
imposition of liens on real property, and the automatic
reporting of delinquency to credit unions."
(Congressional Record, pg. S2841)
In the process of implementing the "Contract With America,"
all of the democrats' Child Support Reform Act measures were
gradually incorporated into the Republican "Personal
Responsibility Act of 1995." At this stage, however, the
Democrats were still having to fight to keep the locating
and tracking enforcement measures alive.
On March 23, 1995, Congresswoman Marge Roukema (D-NJ)
offered an
amendment to re-incorporate back into the Republican's
Personal Responsibility Act the license suspension measures
which had just previously been removed by the Ways and Means
Committee.
Ms. Roukema's proposal also included a new provision to
amend Title 42 of the U.S. Code, Section 666(a)(13) with
regard to welfare funding requirements so as to require that
states must obtain social security numbers from all license
applicants as a condition for the states to receive social
benefits funding. The strong-armed tactic,
funding-contingent incentives also required that the states
must
implement:
"Procedures under which the State has (and uses in
appropriate cases) authority to withhold or suspend, or to
restrict the use of driver's licenses, professional and
occupational licenses, and recreational licenses of
individuals owing overdue support or failing, after
receiving appropriate notice, to comply with subpoenas or
warrants relating to paternity or child support
proceedings." (Congressional Record pg. H3628)
Congresswoman Barbra Kenelly (D-CT) stated in her
introduction for the
amendment:
"[W]hen we come to the amendment of the gentlewoman from New
Jersey,
[Mrs. Roukema] the amendment for child support enforcement,
revoking the licenses of delinquent parents, I think it is
very nice we can come together on both sides of the aisle
and agree on this amendment to revoke licenses of people who
do not pay.
"When we say licenses, we are talking about a driver's
license, we are talking about a professional license. We are
talking about saying to somebody if you want to have what
society can give you and be according to the law in the area
of what you want to do, such as drive a car under the
rulings of the State, then you will
pay your child support."
And Congresswoman Constance Morella (R-MD) stated:
"[T]his license revocation amendment is so very important to
child support enforcement. It had its inception in the
Women's Caucus child support bill in the last Congress. It
was also contained in the Women's Caucus bill this year,
too.
"This says States must have license revocation procedures in
place. We now have 19 States that have revocation procedures
in place, and in those cases we have found that people
immediately get out and write their checks for child
support, because they do not want to lose their hunting
license, their driver's license, or their professional
license." (Congressional Record pg. H3630, 1995)
In providing additional examples of states' "success" in
implementing similar license suspension measures, Rep.
Morella stated:
"For example, in Maine, they only had to revoke 41 licenses.
Just the fear of the revoking of the license brought in $23
million. In California, they collected $10 million without
revoking one license.
"I am really glad there has been a change of heart on the
other side [Republicans] and that they are now going to put
this in their bill and that now all the bills will be as
strong as they can be on child support enforcement because
it has been much too long in coming.
"The children of America deserve this." (Congressional
Record pg. H3631, 1995)
And Congresswoman Nancy Johnson (R) of Connecticut added:
"The Child Support Responsibility Act, which we introduced
earlier this year along with Congresswomen Connie Morella,
Patricia Schroeder, and Eleanor Holmes Norton, has been
largely adopted into the welfare reform bill before us
today.
"The legislation sets up interacting State databases of
child support orders, which will be matched against basic
`new hire' data so that State child support officials can
locate missing, non-paying parents.
"Finally, this legislation contains my provision adopted in
the Ways and Means Committee that will put work requirements
on many noncustodial parents who are behind in paying child
support, often due to their not having a job. ... This
provision requires parents to either pay their child
support, enter into a repayment plan through the courts, or
work in a government-sponsored program.
Congressman Randy Cunningham (R-CA) interjected:
"I rise in support of the amendment. I would like to advise
the gentlewoman from Colorado, it is the Republican bill
that is passing it."
And, Congressman Martin Hoke (R) from Ohio stated:
"[W]hen you combine the establishment of a paternity
requirement along with this revocation of a license
requirement, what you are going to do is for the first time
you are going to actually create consequences for teenage
boys who will have to think twice about the consequences of
their actions because they will become accountable.
"I applaud the child support provisions in the welfare
reform bill before us, which are based on the Child Support
Responsibility Act that I, along with many members of the
congressional caucus for women's issues, cosponsored. I was
distressed to learn, however, that the Ways and Means
Committee omitted a critical provision which requires States
to enact laws denying professional, occupational, and
driver's licenses to deadbeat parents. The Roukema amendment
would reinsert this critically important enforcement
provision.
"The child support provisions are built around a key element
of the Child Support Responsibility Act, the creation of
centralized registries for child support orders and `new
hires' information, and the centralization of child support
collections and distribution." (Congressional Record pg.
H3633, 1995)
The Roukema amendment was subsequently adopted by the House
433-0.
REPUBLICANS DEMAND CREDIT
Gradually, the momentum shifted in favor of the new
measures. Soon, the Republicans and Democrats would actually
be competing to see who would receive "credit" for getting
the license withholding and SSN reporting requirements
enacted. On March 23, 1995, Congressman Weller, (R., IL.)
spoke on behalf of the Republicans regarding their position
on the proposed "child support enforcement measures." In
support of final passage of the Personal Responsibility
Reform Act (H.R. 4), (which now included the Roukema
amendment), Rep. Weller said:
"[A]s one of the chief sponsors of the Family Reinforcement
Act, I rise in strong support of the goals of child support
enforcement provisions and the Personal Responsibility Act.
All are Republican welfare reform initiatives.
"Republicans are working to change our child support
collection system.
"The bill also provides better tools to locate absent
parents, making additional information available to the
States, including law enforcement systems and data on
licenses, newly hired employees and members of organized
labor.
"H.R. 4 also provides streamlined procedures to collect
child support... It also requires licensing agencies to
collect social security numbers so States may match child
support and licensing records and impose restrictions on
licenses held by people who fail to support their children.
"Ladies and gentleman, H.R. 4 provides tough tools to help
deadbeat parents be located and, of course, be forced to
meet their responsibilities. If you look at the facts, if
you look at the record, H.R. 4 helps kids. "Let us vote for
real reform that helps kids, helps children. Let us pass
H.R. 4 tomorrow on Friday."
(Congressional Record pg. H3705, 1995)
On August 05, 1995, Senator Dole (R-KS) offered the final
version of the Child Support Enforcement amendments as
incorporated into the "Work Opportunity Act of 1995" (the
Act that eventually passed both Houses) which later became
known as the "Personal Responsibility Act of 1995." This Act
is more loosely referred to as the "Welfare Reform Act"
(H.R.4). (Congressional Record pg. S11640, 1995)
The huge Welfare Reform bill was heralded as being the
Republican Congress' plan to "restore the American family,
reduce illegitimacy, control welfare spending, and reduce
welfare dependence" -- as so stated by Senator Bob Dole in
the Senate. And now, the Republicans were determined to
claim full credit for the Dead-beat dad laws.
In the House, Congressman Bill Archer (R-TX) proudly
introduced the final version of H.R.4 -- the "Personal
Responsibility Act" -- including all of the child support
enforcement locating and tracking, social security number
reporting, and license suspension measures.
In introducing the bill, Congressman Archer echoed the very
same words
used by Senator Dole previously in the Senate:
"I call up the conference report on the bill (H.R. 4) to
restore the American family, reduce illegitimacy, control
welfare spending, and reduce welfare dependence."
Representative Goodling said this about H.R. 4:
"This conference report comes at the end of a long and often
difficult process. I want to express my appreciation of my
colleagues who have not only worked so hard to achieve a
conference agreement but stood firm in helping us negotiate
with the other body to achieve a final agreement. I
especially want to express my
appreciation to the Speaker [Newt Gingrich (R-GA)] and to
the majority leader, as well as to Chairman Archer and
Chairman Shaw for their leadership during the conference
with the Senate." (Congressional Record, pg. H15511, 1995)
Representative Archer then offered his final comments
regarding
H.R. 4. With great exuberance, Rep. Archer stated:
"Mr. Speaker, this is truly an historic day. With this vote
we arrive at a defining moment in our Nation's welfare
reform debate.
"At long last, the Congress and this President have an
opportunity to show that we mean what we say.
"We bring forward today a great bill, which includes
participation and input from many Members on both sides of
the aisle and the White House, a bill that after too long in
waiting does truly reform our Nation's failed welfare
system; not by rhetoric, but by substance.
"Earlier today 30 governors signed a letter to the President
calling on him to sign this bill, to keep his word, to put
his name, William Clinton, on the line. But if he does not,
he will demonstrate that when it comes to welfare reform,
this President is all talk and no action. He said he would
end welfare as we know it. If he vetoes
this bill, he will be remembered as the very liberal
President who kept welfare as we have it.
"Mr. Speaker, this is a great bill and a great opportunity
to solve one of our Nation's most vexing problems.
"This is a bill that only an extreme liberal could oppose. I
urge all my colleagues to fix welfare and vote for his
conference report." (Congressional Record, pg. H15511, 1995)
PRESIDENT CLINTON DOES NOT GO ALONG - VETOS THE BILL!
By now, the Republicans were pressuring Democratic President
Bill Clinton to sign into law the Welfare Reform Act.
President Clinton had already indicated an unwillingness to
sign the legislation -- at least partly because it did not
include enough federal money for school lunch programs.
On December 29, 1995, Congress PASSED H.R. 4, the Welfare
Reform Act
of 1995, (Congressional Record, H15658, 1995).
But, on January 9, 1995, President Bill Clinton VETOED H.R.
4, (Congressional Record, H342 1996). The Republican
Contract With America and the Welfare Reform Act was
wounded... but not dead!
ROUND TWO FOR CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT BILL
On May 14, 1996, during the second session of the 104th
Congress, Congresswoman Roukema again sponsored the "Child
Support Enforcement
Reform Amendments of 1996," (H.R. 3453), (also referred to
as the Child Support Improvement Act of 1996). The wording
in this bill was the exact same wording included in the bill
vetoed by President Clinton just five months earlier.
In introducing Roukema's bill, Senator Snowe stated:
"Mr. President, I am pleased to introduce the Child Support
Improvement Act of 1996.
"Fourteen months ago, Senator Dole and I introduced our
bill, the Child Support Responsibility Act of 1995, which
later became an important piece of the welfare reform bill.
Since that time, Congress has twice passed welfare reform,
and twice it has been vetoed.
"And now, we are in much the same place we were 14 months
ago. While it is my sincerest hope that child support will
pass as part of a comprehensive welfare reform bill this
year, I believe that we must seize this opportunity to move
forward on child support. Because this issue is too
important to the future of American children to stand by and
wait any longer.
"In all fairness, Congress has tried to strengthen child
support enforcement mechanisms prior to this term. In 1975,
Congress did pass the Child Support Enforcement and
Paternity Establishment Program as part of the Social
Security Act, and then it enacted further improvements to
this effort by way of the 1984 Child Support Enforcement
Amendments and the Family Support Act of 1988.
"As co-chair of the Congressional Caucus for Women's Issues,
we made child support enforcement one of our top legislative
priorities in previous Congresses, where some 30 bills were
introduced to address this problem. But I believe we have
come to a point where everyone agrees that child support
enforcement is one of the most important aspects of our
campaign to revamp the welfare system of this country. It
affects every State--children at every income level--and it
affects both single mothers and single fathers. As a
national problem, child support enforcement merits a
national solution.
"That's why I have joined forces again with the
distinguished majority leader, Senator Dole, to introduce
the Child Support Improvement Act of 1996. I should add, Mr.
President, that this bill has true bipartisan support, and
is intended to complement the efforts of my House
colleagues, Congresswomen Nancy Johnson
and Barbara Kennelly, who have introduced companion
legislation in the House. Together, we have introduced the
same child support provisions which received overwhelming
support from both parties of Congress, as well as the
administration, during welfare reform.
"The bill contains commonsense reforms which achieve the
following:
"To strengthen efforts to locate parents, it expands the
Federal parent locator system by creating Federal and State
data banks of child support orders, and allowing
State-to-State access of the network. It also creates
Federal and State directories of new hires, to allow for
basic information supplied by employers from W-4 forms to be
compared against child support data.
"To ensure that collected funds go to families as soon as
possible, it establishes a centralized State collections and
disbursements unit, and requires employers that garnish
wages from employees to pay those withheld wages to the
State within 5 days.
"And to facilitate child support enforcement and collection,
it requires States to adopt the Uniform Interstate Family
Support Act, to encourage the seamless enforcement of child
support orders across State lines.
"Finally, this bill expands the penalties for child support
delinquency to include the denial of professional,
recreational and driver's license to deadbeat parents, and
permits the denial of a passport for individuals who are
more than $5,000 in arrears." (Congressional Record pg.
S5095, 1996)
The Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reform Act
of 1996,
(H.R. 3734), was later signed into law. The PRWORA, Public
Law 104-193, included all the new requirements for reporting
of social security numbers on virtually every single
document used in interactions with virtually every single
state agency so that individuals can now be located and
tracked at government's whim.
A very similar shameful legacy follows the enactment of the
Immigration Reform Act of 1996 which established the
provisions that are now resulting in all states
standardizing their state-issued driver's licenses. The
driver's license documents, once standardized, WILL BE the
de facto National Identification documents.
With the support of Republicans Newt Gingrich, Bob Dole,
Bill Archer, and a willing Republican Congress, Pat
Schroeder and the "Congressional Women's Caucus" finally
realized their long awaited dream -- a method to locate,
track, and financially annihilate every single human being
in America.
by: Scott McDonald
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Note: Make sure you check out the link at the top of the
page about the "SEAL" bill and the Social Security Bill. Is
this SEAL spoken of in the Bible. Is this USC 666 Social
Security Law an indication that the SSN is the mark of the
beast as of its passing.
To Post a message, send it to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, send a blank message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
home page
http://presys.com/~ekklesia/welcome.htm
--
God Bless! Live Free!
Victoria
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Avoid the lines and visit avis.com for quick and easy online
reservations. Enjoy a compact car nationwide for only $29 a day!
Click here for more details.
http://click.egroups.com/1/3011/2/_/23357/_/956056936/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid
matters
and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
<A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
