Catherine -- excellent post.  Loved the Nationsbank bit - 5% yield on $110
Billion is, of course, $5.5 billion profit for NO RISK whatsoever.  Now
that's what I call a scam.

David

> Fabulous post, Linda.
>
> You know, it used to amaze me at HUD. HUD had say $20-30 billion of
subsidy,
> and was putting out $50-100 billion of mortgage insurance credit, doing
> workouts and various things on that defaulted credit, and doing all sorts
of
> things in regulatory stuff.
>
> All the big private profits and stock market plays was in the mortgage
> insurance and regulatory area....but no one could ever see it..it was this
> magical stuff that only bankers understood. I will never forget when I
first
> went to Washington, an endless stream of Congressional staff and OMB staff
> and HUD staff would feed me this complete yah-yah on why we could not do
> stuff that we for the taxpayers because of all this financial mumbo-jumbo
> that we bankers use that no one understood. I must have used the
> expression..."That's ridiculous, of course you can do this or that, you
just
> have to......" Lee Williams has this great song about Jesus is a waymaker.
> Boy did I feel like a waymaker...all those years of finance suddenly
> culminating in helping people see that taxpayers and communities were one
> group and there was an endless series of win-wins.
>
> But it taught me that we don't know where most of the money is or how it
> works, particularly how it works by place. How does all this mumbo jumbo
> come down plop and infect or infuse the little ecosystem that I and my
> family swim around it. I think that is what we are all figuring out how to
> do.
>
> For example, I have read so many descriptions of the Federal
Reserve/banking
> system that did not resonate. I do not think these guys are making a
fortune
> charging interest on our currency. I think they are making a fortune in
> using the currency and the credit to understand how all the money works.
Fed
> profits get paid into Treasury, but the data and knowledge is used to make
> sure the banking system can arbitrage the federal credit like crazy for
> rigged profits, but then manipulate the lending so that the taxpayers pay
> for the folks in the circle to control all the equity on highly leveraged
> basis.
>
> Bid rigging and insider trading. The bankers are using the banking system
> and the data that comes from doing that to manipulate and rig the finance
> system and equity ownership.
>
> Meantime, we think because the Fed's interest earnings are coming back to
> the Treasury we are getting something. I say, let's let them keep the
> interest and we control all the data and they can not see it or have
access.
>
> It is what Negroponte said. In a digital age, data about money is worth
more
> than money.
>
> One little story as illustration that I have told before, but will tell
> again. In the early 1990's the head of commercial banking at Nationsbank
> complained to me that the Mayor of DC was out of place for criticizing
> Nationsbank for not making small business loans in the district. He
pointed
> out that small business loans were not profitable for Nationsbank, they
> could do better with their money elsewhere. The implication was that she
was
> out of order and out of place interfering with the private sector. I
pointed
> out that Greenspan was "pumping" short term money so the banks were able
to
> access short term deposits and money at very low prices using the federal
> credit (that means guaranteed by the taxpayers)as well as using the
federal
> credit to soak up huge amounts of retail deposits from all of us citizens
> around the country. In the meantime, Nationsbank had $110BB invested in
what
> appeared to be medium and long term Treasury bonds, for an automatic
profit
> of 5% above cost...(know as the spread). OK, so what that meant was that
> Nationsbank got to use our credit to suck up all our money and then
reinvest
> it in bonds in which we guaranteed the payment plus interest and while
they
> got huge profits because of Greenspan pumping away to flow the trouble
banks
> out......the same people who guaranteed all the risk and provided all the
> money, were not good enough credits to have their businesses funded......
>
> Now you know why corporations have a low cost of capital and you can't get
> funded starting a business.....your money is to busy in big pools which
> consider you and me to be not good investments..
>
> A week later I read that Nationsbank announced a new multibillion
initiative
> with the Mayor to do mortgages and small business loans in the
> District.....what a chuckle I got. That meant NationsBank bought another
> year or so getting 5% pure profit simply trading our bonds with our credit
> and guarantees....a pure money machine. It reminds me of a study we did at
> Dillon Read in the late 1980's. We discovered that if we had filled the
> trading floor chairs with monkeys and just run the average balance during
> the period, we would have made more money.....
>
> If you want to see an example of this today, go look at the same game on
the
> balance sheet of the banks and Freddie, Fannie and Sallie Mae......these
are
> all "federal credit arbitrages"
>
> That is why I was so astounded in Miami to see the complete absence of
money
> laundering enforcement in federal credit. What a scam.....
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Linda Minor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2000 8:08 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [CIA-DRUGS] Re: Amnesty Int
> >
> >
> > Does anyone wonder why institutional investors donated heavily to GWB's
> > campaigns for Texas governor--when he gets to decide who invests
> > the huge UT
> > endowment?  Texas isn't alone in the amount of money these venture
> > capitalists want to get their hands on.  See article below.  The
> > question to
> > ask is how the investors are appointed at the other universities.
> >  Privately
> > chartered universities provide for the method of selecting successors as
> > trustees or regents retire.
> >
> > http://www.nacubo.org/website/press/021199.html
> > >>College and University Endowments Ran with The Bulls
> > Institutions Hold More Than $178 Billion:
> > NACUBO RELEASES RESULTS OF ENDOWMENT STUDY
> > Washington, DC, February 11, 1999 -------- Fiscal year 1998 proved to be
> > another successful year for college and university endowments due to
> > investments made in a bull stock market. A recent study found
> > that colleges
> > and universities hold more than $178 billion in endowment assets.
> >
> > This and other useful information can be found in the annual NACUBO
> > Endowment Study (NES), which surveys over 700 colleges and
> > universities. The
> > figures reported in the 1998 NES are for fiscal year ending June 30,
1998
> > and do not reflect recent volatility in the stock market. ....
> > Endowments are stocks, cash, and real estate that colleges and
> > universities
> > receive as gifts. Earnings from these investment pools are essential to
> > higher education institutions because they generate funds for operating
> > expenses and financial aid.
> >
> > The 10 participating institutions with the highest endowment fund
> > assets as
> > of June 30, 1998, are listed below, with comparison totals for fiscal
year
> > 1997.
> >
> >
> > Institution  Endowment Funds '98  Endowment Funds '97
> > 1) Harvard University  $13,019,736,000  $10,919,670,000
> > 2) University of Texas System  $ 7,647,309,000  $ 6,709,945,000
> > 3) Yale University  $ 6,624,449,000  $ 5,742,000,000
> > 4) Princeton University  $ 5,582,800,000  $ 4,940,900,000
> > 5) Emory University  $ 5,104,801,000  $ 4,273,543,000
> > 6) Stanford University*  $ 4,559,066,000  $ 4,473,825,000
> > 7) University of California  $ 3,787,884,000  $ 3,133,252,000
> > 8) Massachusetts Institute of Technology  $ 3,678,127,000  $
3,045,756,000
> > 9) The Texas A&M University System and Foundations  $ 3,531,517,000  $
> > 2,951,463,000
> > 10) Washington University  $ 3,445,743,000  $ 2,798,221,000
> > * = reports August 31, 1998
> >
> > Colleges and universities did not perform as well as Standard & Poor's
500
> > Stock Index, which had a 30.2 percent return rate, nor the Wilshire 5000
> > with a return rate of 28.9 percent. However, the institutions surveyed
> > continued to outperform the Lehman Brothers Bond Index which registered
a
> > 10.5 percent rate of return. The Consumer Price Index for the year was
1.7
> > percent.
> >
> > The NES contains tables, charts, and graphs that clearly illustrate
> > essential data on all aspects of endowment management.
> > Information presented
> > includes endowment size, rankings, historical investment
> > performance, asset
> > allocation, spending policies, management expenses, and manager
selection
> > and evaluation. ......
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Tuesday, April 18, 2000 4:02 AM
> > Subject: [CIA-DRUGS] Re: Amnesty Int
> >
> >
> > >Roger Bunn wrote:
> > >
> > >> <snip> I know the parties involved, including Michael Williams
> > who talked
> > to
> > >> me 2 days ago from Switz. I know the importance of this particular
case
> > of
> > >> Pan Am 103 people[Les C] .. Also others such as
> > Michael[Williams]... And
> > I
> > >> consider it important to us all, to discover
> > >> what Amnesty thinks of this.
> > >>
> > >> Rr
> > >
> > >Thanks, Roger, you're a pro.
> > >
> > >On CSPAN today there was live and repeat broadcast
> > >of Mobe for Global Justice, the DC IMF/WB protest
> > >umbrella org, and the speakers who would have been
> > >outside at the stage on the ellipse were only on CSPAN
> > >Monday because of rain. This is the only transparent
> > >coverage in real time. Afterward there will be
> > >documentary on Freedom of Speech TV, a fairly
> > >obscure channel on digital satellite which is a
> > >real thinking person's media source and carries
> > >a full plate of WTO/IMF/WB type issues and
> > >Seattle WTO documentary.
> > >
> > >GWU student Tanya Margolis said a few words
> > >to prove GWU is 100% biased against the protest,
> > >then the last was best. It turns out that GWU owns
> > >the land between the White House and GWU that both
> > >the IMF and World Bank buildings are built on! Beyond
> > >being a really cute proof of GWU bias, and beyond the
> > >irony, I'm sure there is a parallel to Texas higher ed
> > >foundations being the biggest contributors to Bush & Son,
> > >Inc, and Harvard endowment being so protective of the
> > >corrupt setup for HUD loan and property sales
> > >that they would be very violent and dirty in
> > >defending their turf. That makes three higher
> > >ed endowments that are blood-money holding
> > >companies. We suspect they might even be involved
> > >in drug smuggling ;-) and private prison investments
> > >at the same time.
> > >
> > >-Bob
> > >
> > >
> >
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >Get paid for the stuff you know!
> > >Get answers for the stuff you don't. And get $10 to spend on the site!
> > >http://click.egroups.com/1/2200/3/_/475667/_/956048548/
> >
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Get paid for the stuff you know!
> > Get answers for the stuff you don't. And get $10 to spend on the site!
> > http://click.egroups.com/1/2200/3/_/475667/_/956102538/
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Avoid the lines and visit avis.com for quick and easy online
> reservations. Enjoy a compact car nationwide for only $29 a day!
> Click here for more details.
> http://click.egroups.com/1/3011/3/_/475667/_/956113200/
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Avoid the lines and visit avis.com for quick and easy online
reservations. Enjoy a compact car nationwide for only $29 a day!
Click here for more details.
http://click.egroups.com/1/3011/3/_/475667/_/956157877/
------------------------------------------------------------------------




Reply via email to