Dear Bill, I have asked you several times to do something about the daily limit on my posts (I have seen that other ppl over the years have been allowed to exceed the daily limit!), but you have not responded. To refresh your memory, you once told me to just send you the bounced posts of mine, BUT THAT DIDN'T WORK, i.e., I never saw EVEN ONE OF THEM MAKE IT TO LIST after I took the time to RESEND them all to you! What's up with that?!? Look...I take a lot of time finding good shit to send to your list, AND I DO NOT APPRECIATE ALL THE GOOD STUFF THAT BOUNCES. And, it TAKES TOO MUCH TIME to save them all up so as to be able to figure out which of them are worthy of being posted in the first place, LET ALONE to REpost some of the very good ones that might be worthy of sending again (and, besides, this is a SUBJECTIVE CALL ANYWAY, i.e., some ppl would certainly feel that SOME of the ones I might choose to NOT send or resend MIGHT be more germane than the ones that DID get sent or resent). It also takes A SHIT LOAD OF TIME TO PICK AND CHOOSE WHAT TO POST WITHIN MY DAILY LIMIT, Bill, time that I quite honestly DO NOT WISH TO DEVOTE, i.e., TIME THAT SHOULD NOT BE NEEDED TO BE SACRIFICED IN THE FIRST PLACE (i.e., ALL my posts ARE good and NONE SHOULD BE BOUNCED!). Again, I'm talking about the UNNECESSARY WASTE OF MY TIME (and your obvious lack of respect for my ATTEMPTED contributions to your list) to figure out which ones should be eliminated and which should be forwarded, and/or to try to post them the next day, OR which BY THEN have been posted by other list members, OR, as you TOLD ME A YEAR OR SO AGO in personal correspondence with you ON THIS EXACT SAME MATTER, it just takes TOO LONG FOR ME TO FIGURE OUT WHICH ONES BOUNCED IN ORDER TO SEND THEM TO YOU AS A NON-ATTACHMENT, ESPECIALLY WHEN YOU SIMPLY IGNORE THEM, brother man! CAN YOU HEAR ME?!? Do you understand what it feels like to waste/spend all the time it requires to RE-send them to you for Re-posting, and then for you to ignore them?!? Come ON, MAN! GEEESH! And, like I say, MANY OF MY BOUNCED POSTS ARE *VERY* GOOD SHIT!!!!!) SO, I would AGAIN like to NOW ask you to PLEASE DO SOMETHING TO KEEP MY POSTS FROM BOUNCING. I have sent no more than one or two frivolous posts in the 5 PLUS YEARS I have been on your list, SO THAT SHOULD NOT BE A CONCERN FOR YOU. To give you an idea of what I am talking about, I am going to send you the messages that have bounced in just the last few days (some of them MAY have made it to list by now from other list members, BUT THIS WOULD NOT BE THE CASE IF THEY MADE IT WITHOUT BEING BOUNCED IN MY FIRST ATTEMPT TO POST THEM). One of them is included below, and the others I will forward to you under separate emails to follow immediately after this email. Look, Bill, it IS NOT all that common for me to exceed the daily limit, but SOMETIMES THERE IS THE NEED TO DO SO, so WORK WITH ME HERE, okay? Sincerely, Mike Spitzer ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2000 17:26:37 -0400 From: "L-Soft list server at America Online (1.8d)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Michael Spitzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Rejected posting to [EMAIL PROTECTED] The distribution of your message dated Fri, 28 Apr 2000 14:26:28 -0700 (MST) with subject "CNS: Law Enforcement Group Launches Drive to Fire Reno (fwd)" has been rejected because you have exceeded the daily per-user message limit for the CTRL list. Other than the list owner, no one is allowed to post more than 7 messages per day. Please resend your message at a later time if you still want it to be posted to the list. ------------------------ Rejected message (121 lines) ------------------------- Received: from mx0-smtp.goodnet.com (sloth.goodnet.com [207.98.129.103]) by listserv.aol.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA06981 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 28 Apr 2000 17:26:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from goodnet.com (goodnet.com [207.98.129.1]) by mx0-smtp.goodnet.com with ESMTP id OAA09469 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 28 Apr 2000 14:26:28 -0700 (MST) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2000 14:26:28 -0700 (MST) From: MICHAEL SPITZER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Conspiracy Theory Research List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: CNS: Law Enforcement Group Launches Drive to Fire Reno (fwd) Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII "I believe that this administration has proved that, if this had been local officers involved in such an action with as much force, targeting minorities, the DOJ would be preparing to file criminal charges against those officers. It is time to stop the double standard. Janet Reno, and those in the Clinton-Gore administration that supported this action, should be held accountable," Fotis said. Law Enforcement Group Launches Drive to Fire Reno 4/28/00 5:52:16 AM By Jim Burns, CNS Senior Staff Writer (CNSNews.com) - The Law Enforcement Alliance of America, a Washington-based group of over 65,000 members that calls itself a "nonprofit, nonpartisan coalition of law enforcement professionals, crime victims and concerned citizens united for justice," have begun a petition drive designed to have Janet Reno "fired" as Attorney General of the United States. The petition reads in part, "Attorney General Janet Reno should be immediately removed from office for malfeasance and abuse of power. Janet Reno's infamous 5:00 am raid in the Elian Gonzalez case transcends the issues of custody, revealing a US government willing to invade private homes at gunpoint in violation of Constitutional protections." "Janet Reno's America", according to the petition, "is one where an American President and Vice President are allowed to obstruct justice with the complicity of the top law enforcement officer in the land." "We believe in an America where individual rights are protected from the power of the federal government, and not merely tolerated until the government's patience runs out. We, the undersigned, urge that Janet Reno be fired because her America must be rejected for freedom to stand." LEAA has set a petition due date for July 4th. The petition recipients will be Presidential candidates Al Gore and George W Bush plus Senate Republican Leader Trent Lott (R-MS) and House Speaker Dennis Hastert (R-IL). LEAA Executive Director Jim Fotis, a retired New York City police officer, said in a statement that federal agents seized a "little boy" hopelessly embroiled in a custody battle that had gone bad. "There are many disturbing aspects to this raid, not the least of which is that the Department of Justice (DOJ) took provocative action and unwarranted action and then left it to local law enforcement to clean up their mess," Fotis said. Fotis was also disturbed over the amount of force the federal government used to snatch Elian. "A basic law enforcement principal, although Janet Reno can't seem to operate this way, is to use the minimum amount of force needed to accomplish a task and overcome resistance. Every street cop in America knows this is the standard that is applied. This has been the standard that local cops have used to defend themselves from needless prosecution by Reno's DOJ for offenses much less serious than what has occurred here," Fotis said. By carrying out the raid, Fotis thinks, the Clinton administration may have damaged the "public's confidence in law enforcement, especially among minorities." "I believe that this administration has proved that, if this had been local officers involved in such an action with as much force, targeting minorities, the DOJ would be preparing to file criminal charges against those officers. It is time to stop the double standard. Janet Reno, and those in the Clinton-Gore administration that supported this action, should be held accountable," Fotis said. ================================================================= Kadosh, Kadosh, Kadosh, YHVH, TZEVAOT FROM THE DESK OF: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> *Mike Spitzer* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ~~~~~~~~ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The Best Way To Destroy Enemies Is To Change Them To Friends Shalom, A Salaam Aleikum, and to all, A Good Day. =================================================================
