The New Australian-No. 153, 8-14 May 2000 Hillary’s Amerika By James Henry The woman who condemned the NYPD; who stood aside while her race-baiting anti-Semitic buddies demonised the men and women in blue and smeared Giuliani by comparing him to Adolf Hitler; the woman who claimed, as the instinctive collectivist that she is, that "it takes a village to raise a child" once again revealed her authoritarian nature and contempt for the rule of law by jumping out of her box to support hubby’s jackbooted kidnapping of Elian Gonzalez. The same woman who wrote: "The pretense that children's issues are somehow above or beyond politics endures and is reinforced by the belief that families are private, nonpolitical units whose interests subsume those of children." Unless, of course, the drug-running Fidel Castro says otherwise. The woman who argued that little children should be allowed to sue their parents rationalised an assault by a heavily armed swat team on a defenceless American family, and all without due process. But since when did legal trifles like the Constitution bother a I-feel-your-pain Clinton? That Rudy came out fighting for Elian and demanding hearings into the latest Clinton outrage is no surprise considering Hillary is running against him. Nevertheless, I don’t doubt Rudy’s sincerity in this matter. He recognises, as do so many other thoughtful Americans, the terrible violence this raid did to the rule of law and the 4th amendment. Hillary and Bill, however, see amendments like promises and eggs — something to be broken. Lacking any sense of shame or respect for the truth, Hillary had the gall to accuse Giuliani of politicising Elian’s situation, piously declaring to adoring journalists that the case should be dealt with in court. Quite so. But this is what Bill Clinton, Reno and Castro are trying to prevent. It was Clinton, not Reno, who politicised the issue by turning it into a federal case. It was Reno, on Clinton’s instructions, who denied Elian due process. It was Clinton and Reno (and let’s not forget Castro) who mocked the 11th US Circuit Court of Appeals ruling. It was Clinton’s appointee to the head of the INS, Doris Meissner, who instructed that a search warrant be fraudulently obtained. And Hillary Rodham Clinton, or whatever she calls her self these days, has the chutzpah to accuse Rudy of playing politics with Elian. Did the fearless reporters from the New York Post or the New York Slimes expose her hypocrisy and callousness? Of course not. They are always too busy bootlicking and kowtowing to their political dowager, even if it means rolling over for her goons, to notice little things like lying, cheating and abuse by Reno’s corrupt Justice Department. What should cause particular concern is that the establishment press has cheerfully turned itself into an extension of the Clinton political machine. Christopher Hitchens, a noted left-wing journalist, has observed with alarm the passivity of journalists when it comes to questioning the Clinton’s, and commented: "It is amazing that the New York press should congratulate itself on being so fierce and unappeasable and brave and searching when it has so far not asked [Mrs. Clinton] one single tough question." Amazing isn’t the word. This is the same press that refused to report the roughing up of journalists by Hillary’s security goons during the St Patrick’s Day parade. Perhaps now we can gain a glimmering of understanding into why the Clinton’s fascist-like police raid on an American family was supported by the media. Fascists, unlike communists, tend to be hot on the appearance of law. (The Gestapo, for example, had far less powers of harassment and arrest than Stalin’s secret police). The fascist mentality demands the appearance of law, of some kind of legal form. It genuinely has difficulty distinguishing between the appearance of law and the existence of law. To the fascist mind the law is whatever the state says it is. Therefore, the state is the rule of law, but only in a fascist state. In a truly free society, which can only exist under the rule of law, fascists, and Marxists too, feel free to subvert the law and challenge its foundations. This, I believe, is where we are today with the majority of mainstream journalists. America is entering waters so dangerous that even the Founding Fathers, in all their wisdom, would have considered their existence inconceivable. ================================================================= Kadosh, Kadosh, Kadosh, YHVH, TZEVAOT FROM THE DESK OF: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> *Mike Spitzer* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ~~~~~~~~ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The Best Way To Destroy Enemies Is To Change Them To Friends Shalom, A Salaam Aleikum, and to all, A Good Day. ================================================================= <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html <A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]</A> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om