-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [corp-focus] Amoral Defense
Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 23:33:05 -0500 (CDT)
From: Robert Weissman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: ?
To: undisclosed-recipients:;

Amoral Defense
By Russell Mokhiber and Robert Weissman
April 24, 2000

We've just come from a press conference held by the Center for the
Moral Defense of Capitalism.

The Center called the press conference to announce its opposition to
Earth Day.

At the press conference, the Center's executive director, Robert
Tracinski, asked the question that was on everybody's mind -- why in the
heck would anybody be against Earth Day?

"People think that environmentalism just means being for clean air and
clean water -- and who could possibly be against these things?"
Tracinski asked. "In fact, we believe that environmentalists don't
really care about clean air and clean water. Their real goal is to
destroy technology and to subordinate mankind to nature."

"Watch the crowds of environmentalists who will gather on the Mall
tomorrow, and notice that they have never met a form of technology they
liked," Tracinski said. "Every kind of new technology is attacked, from
nuclear power to genetically modified foods. But they also oppose every
old, existing technology, from fertilizers and pesticides to the
internal combustion engine. And they always place the blame for every
problem on one basic target -- the Industrial Revolution."

We pointed out to Tracinski that most environmentalists don't want to
get rid of all technology -- they just want to get rid of dirty
technologies and replace them with cleaner technologies -- electric cars
for gasoline powered cars, for example.

"If they are for a new technology, let them go out and invent it,"
Tracinski said. "But they say -- get rid of the old technology first and
maybe somewhere in the future we will have some new technology."

Not really Bob. The new technology is here and being actively blocked
by the old technology industries. Don't you read the papers?

The Center, based in Spotsylvania, Virginia, is closely affiliated with
the Ayn Rand Institute. Rand was the philosopher who laid the
intellectual groundwork for Reaganism (Alan Greenspan is a Rand fan) --
no law restraining corporate power is a good law.

The Center for the Moral Defense of Capitalism feels the same way. Its
web site (www.moraldefense.org) is dominated by articles denouncing the
antitrust laws and the government's case against Microsoft.

One article, which is representative of the tone of the others, is
titled "The Injustice of Antitrust Laws as Reflected in the High-Tech
Lynching of Microsoft."

The article is written by Richard Salsman, a senior policy analyst at
the Center. Salsman compared the government's case against Microsoft to
a KKK lynching of a black man.

"Like the black man, the local victim didn't do anything wrong -- on
the contrary, he seems to have done everything right," Salsman writes.
"Still he is hated. He is despised. He is being lynched. For no other
reason. What will you do?"

Comparing the lynching of a flesh and blood human being to the
government's antitrust case against Microsoft is a bit over the top.

So, we wanted to know, who is funding your Center, Bob? Where is this
money coming from, anyway?

"We really don't feel comfortable giving out our donors -- we don't
consider it important," he said.

Wait a second Bob. What do you mean you don't consider it important? Is
this Microsoft money talking?

"I'm not going to answer that question," Tracinski said. "I don't
consider it to be important."

But then Bob breaks down -- a little.

"We have received money from Microsoft, but we aren't going to say how
much," Tracinski said.

Microsoft's Rick Miller confirmed that the company had donated to the
Center, but he too refused to reveal the amount of the contribution.

Miller said that Microsoft gives to a wide range of interest groups
across the political spectrum and doesn't support everything every one
of them says or believes. Gates, for example, is not in favor of
dismantling the antitrust laws, as is the Center, although Gates
believes the antitrust laws are being misapplied in the case at hand.

Still, if implemented, the extremist views of the Center for the Moral
Defense of Capitalism would lead to a society where big corporations would
be allowed to roam freely without restraint -- lawless corporations in a
lawless land.

Tracinski said he didn't understand why we wanted to know whether
Microsoft was funding his operation.

We want to know exactly what beast we are dealing with here, Bob. Don't
be like the Wizard of Oz, yelling at us not to look behind the curtain.

A whole pack of Totos is pulling on that curtain and nothing you can do
will prevent it from being ripped to shreds.

Russell Mokhiber is editor of the Washington, D.C.-based Corporate Crime
Reporter. Robert Weissman is editor of the Washington, D.C.-based
Multinational Monitor. Mokhiber and Weissman are co-authors of Corporate
Predators: The Hunt for MegaProfits and the Attack on Democracy (Monroe,
Maine: Common Courage Press, 1999, http://www.corporatepredators.org)

(c) Russell Mokhiber and Robert Weissman

_______________________________________________

Focus on the Corporation is a weekly column written by Russell Mokhiber
and Robert Weissman. Please feel free to forward the column to friends or
repost the column on other lists. If you would like to post the column on
a web site or publish it in print format, we ask that you first contact us
([EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]).

Focus on the Corporation is distributed to individuals on the listserve
[EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe to corp-focus, send an e-mail
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the text: subscribe

Focus on the Corporation columns are posted at
<http://www.corporatepredators.org>.

Postings on corp-focus are limited to the columns. If you would like to
comment on the columns, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
<A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to