I have been sending a few posts on the conflict occuring in california . The
conflict I find interesting because I can study it dispassionately, unlike
that in my beloved country.
This is the last of this series.

John


>
>Subject: Reconquistas Attack American Patrol
>Date: 20 May 2000 22:22:20 -0000
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>AMERICAN PATROL REPORT UNDER ATTACK
>
>http://www.americanpatrol.com
>
>
>KIEV radio in Los Angeles and its advertisers are receiving calls
>threatening action if our program is not taken off the air.  This is
>very serious.  See  http://www.aztlan.net
>
>Mexican Reconquistas call the American Southwest Aztlan.  They intend
>to liberate it.
>
>
>The American Patrol Report is paid for by Voice of Citizens Together.
>We have no advertisers.  But if the Reconquistas succeed and companies
>pull the advertising off KIEV, they will be forced to take us off the
>air.
>
>Listen to the American Patrol Report this Sunday, May 21, from 1 pm to
>3 pm Pacific time.  We will expose this assault on our freedeom of
>speech and tell you how you can help.
>
>Listen to:
>
>KIEV AM 870 Los Angeles
>
>KCBQ AM 1170 San Diego
>
>KCTK AM 960 Phoenix
>
>WHLO AM 640 Cleveland
>
>Or
>
>KWRD FM 94.9 in Dallas
>
>OR ON THE WORLD WIDE WEB - http://www.kiev870.com
>
>This is the beginning of the end or the end of the beginning.
>
>Glenn Spencer
>American Patrol Report
>http://www.americanpatrol.com
>


-----


<<"Republica del Norte" would include all of the present U.S. states of
California, Arizona, New Mexico, Texas, plus southern Colorado.">>

=====================

[Albuquerque Tribune: News]
May 19, 2000

"I may not live to see the Hispanic homeland, but by the end of the
century my students' kids will live in it, sovereign and free."

Charles Truxillo, UNM professor

Southwest shall secede from U.S., prof predicts

By Frank Zoretich
Tribune reporter

Charles Truxillo, a professor of Chicano studies at the University of
New Mexico, suggests "Republica del Norte" would be a good name for a
new, sovereign Hispanic nation he foresees straddling the current border
between the United States and Mexico.  The Republic of the North -- he
predicts its creation as "an inevitability" -- would include all of the
present U.S. states of California, Arizona, New Mexico, Texas, plus
southern Colorado."

Stretching from the Pacific to the Gulf of Mexico, it would also include
the northern tier of current Mexican states: Baja California, Sonora,
Chihuahua, Coahuila, Nuevo Leon and Tamaulipas. The capital would
probably be Los Angeles.  Truxillo, 47, has said the new country should
be brought into being "by any means necessary."

But in a recent interview at a coffee shop near the UNM campus, Truxillo
said it was "unlikely" civil war would attend its birth.  Instead, he
said, the creation of the Republic of the North will be accomplished by
political process, by the "electoral pressure" of the future majority
Hispanic population throughout the region rather than by violence.

"Not within the next 20 years but within 80 years," he said. "I may not
live to see the Hispanic homeland, but by the end of the century my
students' kids will live in it, sovereign and free."  Truxillo said it's
his task to help develop a "cadre of intellectuals" to begin thinking
about the practicalities of how the Republic of the North can become a
reality.

In the past, of course, wars have erupted when states seceded from
either parent nation -- including the U.S. Civil War to keep the South
in the Union and, in Truxillo's quick description, "the Alamo and all
that" when Texas declared itself independent of Mexico.  Truxillo said
the U.S. Civil War settled the question of secession militarily but not
in a legal sense. States do have the right to secede, he maintained, if
-- as was untrue in the 1860s -- the rest of the country is willing to
let them go.

Professors asked for comment in other departments at UNM were skeptical
that politics alone would find a way to make his proposed new nation
possible. But, they said, given 100 more years -- well, who can say for
sure?  "How realistic is it? That's one of the key issues," Truxillo
said. "It's not unfeasible as a premise -- and a realistic possibility
when you consider global geopolitical trends. It could happen with the
support of the U.S. government."

He listed a number of international developments that he said would have
seemed "far-fetched in the 1950s," including the breakup of the Soviet
Union, the breakup of Yugoslavia, the apparently imminent creation of an
independent West Bank Palestinian state agreed to by Israel, and
ballot-box separatist movements aimed at achieving a Quebec independent
of Canada.  The "tide of history" is moving the U.S.-Mexico border
region toward political autonomy, Truxillo said.

Why does he think there should be a new Hispanic republic?

It's an idea that has been suggested before. In the 1960s, during the
height of Chicano activism, something similar -- a sovereign Hispanic
homeland to be called Aztlan -- was proposed by Rudolfo Gonzales and
others.  When Truxillo was 14, he first met Reies Lopez Tijerina, leader
of a group of New Mexicans who seized the courthouse in Tierra Amarilla,
the Rio Arriba county seat, in 1967. It was a protest against Spanish
land grants being taken by the federal government and set aside for
national forests.

In October, Truxillo was a speaker during a ceremony at UNM's Zimmerman
Library honoring Tijerina when he contributed his personal archives to
the library's Center for Southwest Research.  At the event attended by
about 300 people, Truxillo said it was from Tijerina that he had learned
"that I was a member of a people with a country that had been taken from
them by war, a land that was our own by treaty."

He listed a number of Spanish and Mexican treaties dating back to 1494
and ending with the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo in 1848, by which Mexico
granted to the United States -- after the Mexican-American War --
possession of parts of what are now California, Arizona, Nevada, New
Mexico, Colorado, Utah and Wyoming.  "None of the rights of the Treaty
of Guadalupe Hidalgo were fulfilled," he told Tijerina. "None of the
obligations were upheld. You told us this was our country, our patria,
and that we should fight for our rights, that all colonized and
exploited peoples should rise up in struggle for independence.

"We will one day be a majority and reclaim our birthright by any means
necessary -- and we shouldn't shy away."

Truxillo's tone was more scholarly during the coffee-shop interview. He
said New Mexico is the first "minority-majority state" in which
Hispanics and Indians and other minorities on a national level outnumber
non-Hispanic whites.

(U.S. census estimates of New Mexico's 1998 population: 52 percent
Hispanic, Indian, Black and Asian; 48 percent non-Hispanic white. The
Hispanic population alone was estimated at 40.3 percent. The 2000 census
is expected to provide more precise figures.)  Texas is likely to become
the next minority-majority state, Truxillo said, adding Hispanics are
already in the majority in the border regions of all the Southwest
states, largely because of a long and continuing immigration from
Mexico.

The "overwhelming bulk of Mexican immigrants are attracted by the
American economic way of life," Truxillo said. "Not as attractive to
them is the American cultural way of life, but they are willing to make
the exchange of economic security for cultural anarchy."  Hispanics in
the American Southwest "have been ruled by three empires, Spain, Mexico
and the United States," Truxillo said. "Under all three systems, we have
failed to achieve self-determination.

"Among native-born American Hispanics, there is the feeling that we are
strangers in our own land," he continued. "We remain subordinated. We
have a negative image of our own culture, created by the media.
Self-loathing is a terrible form of oppression. The long history of
oppression and subordination has to end. There has to be an
alternative."  Truxillo, who describes himself as a Chicano, said he was
born in Albuquerque. He attended public schools in Albuquerque and
earned his undergraduate and graduate degrees from UNM, majoring in
Latin American, borderlands and Asian history.

He was an assistant professor of history at New Mexico Highlands
University from 1992 to 1997, but after being denied tenure there, he
began teaching in the Chicano Studies Program at UNM where he is now a
visiting professor on a year-to-year contract.

Truxillo said Hispanics who have achieved some positions of power or who
are otherwise "enjoying the benefits of assimilation" are most likely to
be in the vanguard of opposition to his concept of the Republic of the
North.  "There will be the negative reaction, the tortured response of
someone who thinks, 'Give me a break. I just want to go to Wal-Mart.'
But the idea will seep into their consciousness, and cause an internal
crisis, a pain of conscience, an internal dialogue as they ask
themselves: 'Who am I in this system?'"

Along both sides of the U.S.-Mexico border "there is a growing fusion, a
reviving of connections," Truxillo said. "Southwest Chicanos and Norte�o
Mexicanos are becoming one people again."




From: http://www.vdare.com/

America's Imported Caste System

Part 3 of a Series on the Mexican racial hierarchy and its implications
for America




From: http://www.vdare.com/




President Zedillo is the classic manifestation of Mexico's "technocrat"
trend. Extremely well-educated young men with state-of-the-art
managerial skills shove aside the old guard "dinosaurs." The great
majority of these bright young things are all or almost all white. In
the U.S., we see an IQ gap of roughly half of a standard deviation
between non-Hispanic whites and Mexican-American mestizos, and something
like that probably holds true in Mexico too, after all this assortative
mating.

Why does the Mexican government need so many technocrats? After all,
Chicago's similar one-party machine clanks along just fine under the
guidance of endearingly mediocre minds. Mexico's Left, however, demanded
the intrusion of the state into the business world, such as the
nationalization of the oil business in 1938 by the sainted President
Cardenas (father of the leftist candidate for President in 2000).
Ironically, nationalizing industries started the need for technocrats in
government, which turned out to mean more whites at the top.

Mexico has in some ways become an IQ meritocracy rather like Imperial
China. Enormous prestige and power have gone to graduates of American
Ivy League universities. (Or at least to people who claim to have
graduated from these universities -- quite a number of cabinet officials
were recently found to have failed to complete the degrees on their
official resumes.) Still, the educational levels of top government
officials is radically higher than in the past, and may even be higher
than in the U.S.

The technocratic ascendancy, though, has not decreased corruption or
brought more justice to Mexico. Nepotism and cronyism remain rampant.
The leaders became less in touch with their subjects, and less
sympathetic to their needs, than at any time since the Revolution.
Having a lot of Ivy League PhD�s run a semi-literate country where maybe
only 2% or 3% of the population subscribe to newspapers is not
necessarily a recipe for good government. In a political culture where
the current President personally picked the next President, this IQ
stratification meant that Presidents increasingly picked their own
elitist technocrat aides, many of whom had never won an election before,
rather than traditional slap-on-the-back politicians who were more in
tune with the masses.

The technocrats have some successes to their names, such as Mexico's
highly rational process of developing new tourist destinations. But
after several decades of hideous corruption and mismanagement, the
average Mexican is sick of technocrats. So the PRI made sure to nominate
a presidential candidate this year who only had a bachelor's degree.


>

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
<A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to