I read this material on Kathy O'Brien, and wonder who she works for
really. For Huntsville, Alabama - home of the Astronauts and where the
late Werner von Braun helped America reach the moon, it seems to be that
maybe the Clintons are a lot smarter than we gave them credit.
For instance, you read all these things about O'Brien, some of which may
be true, you have to look back to Watergate. From what I have read,
Elizabeth Ray and Fannie Fox were elements of organized crime sent in to
down a few low brow Congressmen, one of which was Wayne Hayes and the
other I think Wilbur Mills, two hicks from the boon docks, who wallked
into a trap. Both vulnerable as vulnerable as Clinton is and was from
all indications.
The idea of the Fama or the Rumour mill is to put out so much false and
ludicrous information about a person, that pretty soon people will not
believe any of it. All these women suing Clinton? And now this Cathy
O'Brien. Who in their right mind, is going to believe any of it.
CIA hired prostitutes, what they called "a few high class prostitutes"
to get people out of the picture. This spy stuff is so fantastic. We
see James Bond, but what do we get? Chuckie Colson and C Howard Hunt
and these were political hacks and whatever they really were, were once
dubbed Laurel and Hardy by one author.
So Clinton is in the masonic order. Most Presidents are and it goes in
degrees, and need to know basis up the ladder to the how many steps that
that spiral staircase I forget.
John F. Kennedy was an Irish Hibernian, for he could not go into the
masons as a Catholic. It is different strokes, for different folks.
When this Fannie Fox destroyed Wilbur MIlls, who had a serious drinking
problem, in her book she stated she had a "chemical wedding" with this
old man Mills (everyone was singing down by the old mill stream when
those two ran into a river that infamous night) and that Wilbur Mills
gave her his masonic ring.
A masonic ring is to protect a mason spiritually; and Wilbur Mills would
never have given his woman his ring.
So now we see why Clinton thrives. People like Cathy O'Neil are sent
out and all these other women with so many charges, nobody believes it.
Psychologically speaking when one is really being "creamed" people
naturally take a defensive.
Hiliary Clinton referred to her husband as an "old hound dog" sitting on
the steps. Now people could identify with that. Clinton with his
little boy innocence has learned to deal with people, for remember this,
like a Christ Child he was removed from his home; it is alleged his
mother was a prostitute, and he was taken away to Egypt for education.
A child prodigy, or a King in waiting.
If it were not for his nose, which increased in size with every snort of
cocaine, and his big lie with regard to Monica Lewinsky, he would be a
pretty good president in many ways, that is if you give him credit for
the economy and you are in higher brackets.
If Wall Street goes, Clinton will be torn apart.
As for the CIA, and Clinton, I doubt very much he would have fit in too
well with the old line Wasps. New breed maybe, but then today you see
Putin is a Mason, as are most all high degree intelligensia. Hasn't
anybody figured that out yet?
Different strokes for different folks. One must remember Masons
segregate. There are black lodges and white lodges. They still use
blackballs to keep out unwanted fellow of local levels but usually when
a person is rejected, the brothers will find a way to get a friend
inside
One thing for sure, when CIA is around you will not know it anymore than
you would if an FBI agent was around. They do not waste their times on
lists where people like Cathy O'Brien push their wares. For if the
truth be know, I think you will find Ms. O'Brien is an ideal candidate
for CIA type lies put out by Clinton. Who in the world is going to
believe all that stuff, and if you cannot believe that, how you going to
believe all those other women who seem too eager to talk. Monica
Lewinsky an intern? Anybody really believe that?
.
Fascists and Nazis always hate the Masons for one reason and one reason
only. The masonic order is an international order. Lower degree masons
often get stuck is a degree never to attain the heights of an Icarus who
could get shot down, if not careful. True Blue Masons do not break
their vows - and to whom do they owe their loyalty? Well, when George
Washington needed someone he could trust, he would say "find a Mason".
If you want to see real Fascism at work, watch Henry Kissinger and
Madeline Albright....for it is alive.
The year is 1941 -- the height of the Second World War when the article
of this week's ezine appeared in print in the USA.
The Annihilation of Freemasonry
by Sven G. Lunden
The American Mercury , Volume LII, No. 206, published in February 1941.
There is only one group of men whom the Nazis and the Fascists hate more
than the Jews.
They are the Freemasons.
In Italy, indeed, the anti-Jewish feeling is of recent vintage and
largely artificial, whereas the blackshirt hatred of Freemasonry is old
and deep. In their own countries Hitler and Mussolini Inaugurated their
respective reigns with outrages against Masons and Masonic institutions,
and they have never relaxed the systematic persecution. Now Nazi
conquests of other European nations -- whether by invasion of forcible
"persuasion" -- are followed automatically by hostile measures against
Freemasons.
>From Norway to the Balkans, the progress of the Swastika has brought
outlawry, and often vandalism and death in its wake for all Masons. The
anti-Semetic excesses have been widely reported, the anti-Catholic
outrages have had considerable publicity, but the merciless totalitarian
assaults on Freemasonry have not receive a tithe of the world-wide
attention they richly merit. They are practically an unknown chapter.
Nazi and Fascist publications leave no doubt of their belief that all
evil in the world, from the high mortality rate among the dinner guests
of the Borgias down to the Versailles Treaty, has been the work of
Freemasons, alone or with the help of Israel. In "Mein Kampf", Hitler
merges his twin phobias:
"The general pacifistic paralyzation of the national instinct of
self-preservation, introduced into the circles of the so-called
`intelligentsia´ by Freemasonry, is transmitted to the great masses,
but above all to the bourgeoisie, by the activity of the great press,
which today is always Jewish."
And one of the first official statements made by Hermann Goering in his
capacity as Prime Minister of Prussia, when the Nazis took over power in
1933, was that "in National Socialist Germany there is no place for
Freemasonry.: That view was not news. It had run through all the Nazi
propaganda and had been an intrinsic part of the Fascist attitude in
Mussolini's realm.
After the German debacle of 1918, the frustrated man who had been the
virtual master of Germany's destinies, General Erich Ludendorff, south
an outlet for his bitterness in diatribes against Freemasonry. Right up
to his death, Ludendorff devoted himself wholly to propaganda intended
to prove that the war, the ensuing German revolution, and most other
world ills had been the doing of the Masons. He published a pamphlet
entitled "Annihilation of Freemasonry Through the Revelation of Its
Secrets" wherein the so-called secrets of Freemasonry were "revealed"
for the hundredth time since the foundation of the Order in 1717,
without, however, annihilating Masonry. The senile general's main thesis
was that Freemasonry is a Jewish device intended to make "artificial
Jews." On one page the hand that had led Germany to disaster in 1918
wrote: "It is cheating the people to fight the Jew while allowing his
auxiliary troop, Freemasonry ... to function."
The Nazis continued where Ludendorff left off.
But others had preceded them in Mason-baiting. In 1917, as one of their
acts, the Bolsheviks dissolved all lodges in Russia. In 1919, when Bela
Kun proclaimed the dictatorship of the proletariat in Hungary, one of
his first decrees ordered the dissolution of Masonic lodges. In 1925,
Spain's first dictator of this generation, General Primo de Rivera,
ordered the abolition of Freemasonry in his country.
Benito Mussolini went about the same business more methodically. Having
established his regime, Il Duce proceeded step by step to exterminate
the lodges and the influence of Italian Freemasonry. Even the Nazi
apostle, Dr. Alfred Rosenberg, has admitted in his book "Masonic World
Policies" that the Freemasons had been the creators of the united
democratic Kingdom of Italy. But this did not win them any mitigation of
horrors at the hands of ultra-patriotic Fascists. In 1924, Mussolini
decreed that every member of his Fascist Party who was a Mason must
abandon one or the other organization.
Thereupon General Cappello, one of the most prominent Fascists, who had
held the post of Deputy Grand Master of Grande Oriente, Italy's leading
Grand Lodge, gave up membership in Fascism rather than betray his
Masonic ideals.
He was to pay dearly for this loyalty. Less than a year later, he was
charged with complicity in an attempt on Mussolini's life. It was a
palpable frame-up by an OVRA stoolpigeon name Quaglia, but General
Cappello was sentenced to thirty years in prison, where he probably
still lingers.
In the summer of 1925 Mussolini got around to dissolving Italian
Freemasonry. In an open letter to Il Duce, the Grand Master of the
Grande Oriente, Domizio Torrigiani, had the courage to stand up for
democracy and freedom of thought. The price he paid was exile to the
Lipari islands. After nearly going blind there, he died soon afterwards.
Hundreds of other prominent Masons shared the harsh Lipari exile with
him. At the peak of the anti-Mason agitation, in 1925-27, blackshirt
strong-arm squads looted the homes of well-known Masons in Milan,
Florence and other cities, and murdered at least 100 of them.
The Nazis acted more swiftly. Immediately on Hitler's rise to power, the
ten Grand Lodges of Germany were dissolved. Many among the prominent
dignitaries and members of the Order were sent to concentration camps.
The Gestapo seized the membership lists of the Grand Lodges and looted
their libraries and collections of Masonic objects. Much of this loot
was then exhibited in an "Anti-Masonic Exposition" inaugurated in 1937
by Herr Dr. Joseph Goebbels in Munich. The Exposition included
completely furnished Masonic temples.
The persecution was carried over into Austria when the country was
captured by the Nazis.
The Masters of the various Vienna lodges were immediately confined in
the most notorious concentration camps, including the horrible living
hell at Dachau in Bavaria. The same procedure was repeated when Hitler
took over Czechoslovakia, then Poland. Immediately after conquering
Holland and Belgium, the Nazis ordered the dissolution of the lodges in
those nations. It was also Point One on the agenda of Major Quisling in
Norway. It may be taken as part of the same ugly picture that General
Franco of Spain in 1940 sentenced all Freemasons in his realm
automatically to ten years in prison. When France fell last June, the
Vichy government caused the two Masonic bodies of France, the Grand
Orient and the Grenade Loge to be dissolved, their property being seized
and sold at auction.
The countries which are still ostensibly independent, but actually under
the heel of Germany, must prove their conformity to the Nazi pattern by
taking harsh measures against Masonry. In Hungary the dissolution of the
lodges was unnecessary because they were never allowed to resume after
Bela Kun was overthrown. Mason-baiting is one "principle" on which White
Terrors and Red Terrors have always agreed. Rumania recently prohibited
Freemasonry to prove its subservience to Germany. Bulgaria and
Yugoslavia, inhabited by levelheaded and tolerant peasantry, were also
obliged to enact the twin sets of laws -- anti-Semitic and anti-Masonic
-- that demonstrate "friendship for Hitler".
The summary does not begin to convey the full terror of the Calvary to
which Freemasonry has been subjected wherever the totalitarians took
power. Murder, imprisonment, economic looting, social outlawry have been
the bitter lot of individual Masons. Rapine has been the fate of their
organizations, their treasures, their institutions of charity.
II
Why does this implacable and fanatic hatred of the Order obsess the
totalitarian mind? The answer is in the whole history and temper of
Freemasonry. For more than two centuries its leaders have been
consistently on the side of political freedom and human dignity, reaping
a harvest of persecution at the hands of tyrants. Before going into
that, however, we must distinguish clearly between two things:
Freemasonry and Freemasons. The chief trick of mason-haters through the
generations, a trick followed by the Nazis, is to direct their
accusations not against Freemasons personally but against the whole
Masonic Order.
Freemasonry is made up of Masonic bodies: lodges, Grand Lodges and other
groupings. All of these scrupulously refrain from meddling in politics
or any other subject not directly related to Masonic matters or charity.
The Constitution of the Order stipulates that every member must be a
loyal citizen of his country, and it professes adherence "to that
religion in which all men agree" -- that is, belief in a Divine power,
in morality and in charity. In contrast to narrow nationalism, it
believe in serving Humanity as a whole. That is all that the Masonic
Order itself professes and is interested in. What individual Masons do
as citizens of their respective countries to serve the ideals they
personally believe is, is their own business.
This attitude is no subterfuge. On the contrary, the enlightened
Freemason not only admits but prides himself in the fact that modern
democracy and human progress owe so much to the heroism and idealism of
individual Freemasons. Unless he is a very naive person he will also
admit that the lodge is a place where congenial people meet to gather
that moral strength which they need to stand up for the ideals of
liberty and equality outside the lodge. At the same time, however, to
true Masons the lodge is hallowed ground, and inside its gates politics
and the other concerns of the market-place are taboo.
Some of the less critically-minded Masons like to trace the origins of
the Order back to ancient Egypt. But in its present form, Freemasonry
originated in England, probably in the Seventeentyh Century, while the
first Grand Lodge was founded in London in 1717 and the regulations,
by-laws and constitutions of Masonry were laid down in what is known as
Anderson's Constitutions in 1722-23. The spiritual elements underlying
these precepts were decidedly "advanced" for their time, emphasizing as
they did tolerance for other men's religions and the brotherhood of all
human beings.
The intellectual and spiritual foundations of modern democracy,
including the American Revolution and the American Constitution, are to
be found in large part in the teachings of Jean Jacques Rousseau and in
the ideas cemented into the great first Encyclopedia. And it is a fact
that most of the authors of that epoch-making Encyclopedia -- Diderot,
D'Alembert, Condorcet, the famous Swiss philosopher Helvetius, etc. --
were Freemasons.
The envoy to France from the rebellious American colonies, Benjamin
Franklin, also was an ardent Freemason. So ere George Washington, sixty
among his generals, John Hancock and a great many of his co-signers of
the Declaration of Independence. Both Washington and Franklin long held
the post of Grand Master.
The most distinguished among the Masonic lodges of Paris in the
Eighteenth Century was the "Lodge of the Nine Sisters" -- that is, the
nine Muses -- and its membership included the intellectual cream of
France. When Voltaire paid a visit to Paris in the year of his death, at
the age of 79, he was initiated into Freemasonry in this lodge. The
climax of the ceremony came when Brother Benjamin Franklin of
Philadelphia handed to Voltaire the Masonic apron which the great
Helvetius had worn before him. Voltaire raised the apron to his aged
lips.
Six years before that memorable day, something even more memorable
happened in Boston. It has come down in history as the Boston Tea Party.
And it is no secret that the "Indians" who dumped the cargo on December
16, 1773, had emerged from the building which housed the St. Andrews
Lodge, the leading Masonic body in Boston. Their job done, the "Indians"
were seen to troop back ti the lodge building -- and no Indians ever
again emerged from the lodge. Instead, a lot of prominent Bostonians,
known to be Masons, did emerge.
And in the book which used to contain the minutes of the lodge and which
still exists, there is an almost blank page where the minutes of that
memorable Thursday should be. Instead, the page bears but one letter --
a large T. Can it have anything to do with Tea? It is perhaps the only
instance in the History of Freemasonry were a lodge, as a body, has
taken an active part in politics.
III
Practically everywhere, INDIVIDUAL Masons have thus been in the
forefront in movements of liberation. Goethe, who considered himself a
European more than a German and so often criticized his fellow-Germans,
was a fervent Freemason, as was Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart. Mozart's opera
"The Magic Flute" is full of allusions and symbolism relating to
Freemasonry. In fact, its theme is the search for truth and the victory
of tolerance over the fanaticism that springs from ignorance, a theme
which Mozart shared with his brother Masons.
But few Masons today, listening to the delightful tunes of Mozart's "The
Marriage of Figaro", realize that they are enjoying a "revolutionary"
play, set to music by a Mason who believed in the "revolutionary"
principle of the equality of all men. Beaumarchais' Figaro comedy was
written and staged under Louis XV of France as an attack against the
prevalent feudal social system. Mozart's choice of this play, at a time
when the success of the yound American democracy was firing the
imagination of the world, was not accidental.
Hebert, Andre Chenier, Camille Desmoulins and many other "Girondins" of
the French Revolution were Freemasons. The Masonic ideal of freedom was
strong in the heart of a Frenchman who became a Mason while in the
youthful United States of America -- the Marquis de Lafayette. He
remained an enthusiastic Mason all his life, and was until his death in
1829 Grand Master of the Grand Orient de France.
And during the whole of the Nineteenth Century, to be a Freemason was
tantamount to being a champion of democracy. Many of the leaders in the
great year 1848, which saw so many uprising against feudal rule in
Europe, were members of the Order; among them was the great Hungarian
hero of democracy, Louis Kossuth, who found temporary refuge in America.
Like Kossuth, another celebrated champion of democracy, Guiseppe
Garibaldi, was a thirty-third degree Freemason and Grand Master of the
Italian Freemasons. Most leaders of the Young Turkish Committee, which
in 1908 forced Sultan Abdul Hamid "the Damned" to give his nation a
parliamentary form of government, and who deposed the "Red Sultan" in
the following year, were likewise Masons. In Latin America, too, the
process of liberation from the Spanish yoke was the work of Freemasons,
in large measure. Simon Bolivar was one of the most active of Masonry's
sons, and so were San martin, Mitre, Alvear, Sarmiento, Benito Juarez --
all hallowed names to Latin Americans.
Thus, while the Order as such kept out of politics, it attracted to
itself the most democratically minded, the champions of human decencies
-- and won for itself the undying hatred of those who feared progress.
Yet Masonry has never been a subversive movement. In countries where
democracy is a reality, even Royalty belongs to the Order. Both King
George VI and the Duke of Kent are Freemasons; so is the Duke of
Windsor. His grandfather, Edward VII, was the chief of British Masonry,
and he was succeeded in the post by the aged Duke of Connaught. King
Gustav V heads the Freemasons of Sweden.
It is clear, consequently, why the Nazis and
Fascist and Bolsheviks must hate an organization so steeped in
humanitarian traditions. They know that Maosns, as individuals, have
founded a great number of modern democratic states, have drafted the
Declaration of Independence and created liberal Constitutions the world
over. But the totalitarian hatred for the Order is not merely emotional.
It is clearly defined in the fundamental divergence between their creed
and the Masonic ideal. In his book to which we have already referred,
the Nazi Dr. Rosenberg writes:
"Without doubt the Masonic dogma of Humanity is a relapse into worlds of
the most primitive conceptions; everywhere where it is put into practice
it is accompanied by decadence, because it conflicts with the
aristocratic laws of Nature".
Thus in his own dogmatic terms he indicts Freemasonry for what is its
greatest pride, its ideal of equality.
In 1938 Hitler's own publishing house, which puts out both "Main Kampf"
and the official "Volkischer Beobachter", issed a volume on
"Freemasonry, Its World View (Weltanschauung), Organization and
Policies".
The preface is written by Herr Heydrich, second in command of the
Gestapo, and hence an expert on oppression and violence, and hints
openly at the seizure of libraries and property of German Freemasonry.
The book itself, by one Dieter Schwarz, discloses that every new Nazi
member must "confirm by his word of honor that he does not belong to a
Masonic lodge." In outlining the official Nazi on the subject, it says
in part:
"Nordic is the Nazi conception of the world, Jewish-Oriental that of the
Freemasons; incontrast to the anti-racial attitude of the lodges, the
Nazi attitude is race conscious...."
"Masonic lodges are... associations of men who, closely bound together
in a union employing symbolical usages, represent a supra-national
spiritual movement, the idea of Humanity... a general association of
mankind, without distinction of races, peoples, religions, social and
political convictions."
I have read several hundred books about Freemasonry and scores of
original Masonic documents. But never have I seen masonry's basic ideals
expressed more clearly than by its mortal enemies in the passage above.
Herr Heydrich and Herr Schwarz are right -- the gulf between their
"Weltanschauung" and the Masonic Ideals can never be bridged.
This page is on-line since : 06-05-1998
This counter shows the correct count for this page :
This page hosted byGet your own Free Home Page
A. Saba
Dare To Call It Conspiracy
A. Saba
Dare To Call It Conspiracy
http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Acropolis/8291/fascism.html
