>From http://www.guardian.co.uk/freespeech/article/0,2763,331533,00.html

>>Ah, cummon, how else can they properly assess the I-Net tax?  A<>E<>R <<

}}>Begin

Internet monitoring 'time bomb' for e-commerce
Allowing MI5 to monitor people's internet habits goes further than George
Orwell's worst nightmare argues Online editor Victor Keegan
Lords to fight email tap bill
Tuesday June 13, 2000

Anyone who has been following it has long known that the government's RIP
(Regulation of Investigatory Powers) bill is a time bomb waiting to explode.
The government has casually brushed aside strong objections of civil liberty
lobbies on the grounds they don't have many votes. It is only - at the eleventh
hour - when business has suddenly woken up to the dangers it presents to e-
commerce that the government is being forced to take serious notice.
It reads like a script that would have been deemed unrealistic for an update of
the film 1984. Under the terms of the bill - which is going through its
committee stage in the Lords this week - every internet service provider will
have to install a black box with a direct line to MI5.
This would enable the intelligence authorities to monitor the pattern (though
not the content) of all our emails and internet habits and chat room visits -
who we send emails to and which web sites we visit.
Further powers enable the authorities on production of a warrant to demand our
passwords or encryption keys under pain of two years in jail. If you have
forgotten your password (a daily occurrence for many net users) then you will
be presumed guilty until proved innocent by the courts.

Bang goes another principle of British justice - that a person is innocent
until proved guilty.

If MI5 demand that you hand over your personal or corporate encryption key then
you could be liable for five years imprisonment if you tell your boss or your
spouse.

Last week the government started to wake up when the Institute of Directors
published a critical report. But that was mild beer compared with a devastating
report over the weekend by the British Chambers of Commerce drawn up by an
expert panel including professor Ian Angell of the London School of Economics.
It dismisses the bill as "entirely inadequate" in its primary aim of achieving
reasonable surveillance and its effect "is likely to be loss of confidence in e-
commerce, unacceptable costs to business and to the UK economy, confusion and
uncertainty at numerous levels of business activity, and an onerous imposition
on the rights of individuals".

The penny may at last be starting to drop in Whitehall.

If this bill goes through in its present form, far from making Britain the best
place to do e-commerce in (as is Tony Blair's stated aim) it will produce one
of the most draconian regimes in the world driving e-commerce to safer havens
like Ireland and most countries in Europe.

Unless Tony Blair wants to create a furore that will make this encounter with
the Women's Institute seem like a picnic, he should rewrite this appalling
bill. Now.

End<{{

A<>E<>R
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Integrity has no need of rules. -Albert Camus (1913-1960)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
The only real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking
new landscapes but in having new eyes. -Marcel Proust
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said
it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your
own reason and your common sense." --Buddha
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
It is preoccupation with possessions, more than anything else, that
prevents us from living freely and nobly. -Bertrand Russell
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Everyone has the right...to seek, receive and impart
information and ideas through any media and regardless
of frontiers." Universal Declaration of Human Rights
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will
teach you to keep your mouth shut." Ernest Hemingway
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Forwarded as information only; no endorsement to be presumed
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
<A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to