Majority of Supreme Court's nine
               members are millionaires

               June 27, 2000
               Web posted at: 7:24 PM EDT (2324 GMT)

               WASHINGTON (AP) -- A majority of
               the Supreme Court's nine members were
               millionaires as the year began, led by
               Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's family
               wealth estimated at between $7.4 million
               and $33.1 million.

               Financial disclosure reports for 1999
               indicated that at least five, and perhaps
               six, of the top court's members held
               investments worth over $1 million. Chief
               Justice William H. Rehnquist may have
               joined the court's millionaires club, but
               Justice Antonin Scalia sold stock during
               the year and dropped far below the
               million-dollar level.

               Federal judges, members of Congress
               and other high-ranking government
               officials are required to file annual reports. The federal law
               requires only broad ranges of worth for assets and exempts
               personal property and homes.

               Justices Stephen G. Breyer, Sandra Day O'Connor, John Paul
               Stevens and David H. Souter are millionaires, according to their
               reports. None came close, however, to Ginsburg and her lawyer
               husband, Martin, whose long list of investments included six
               worth between $1 million and $5 million each.

               They included retirement accounts and a tax-exempt JMP
               Pierpont bond fund, total assets of $7.4 million to $33.1
million.
               Last year she reported assets from $5.9 million to $24.1 million.

               O'Connor's report reflected the most varied investment
               portfolio, state bonds and Treasury notes to holdings in
               pharmaceutical and communications companies. Her ownership
               of AT&T and MCI Worldcom stock, among others, has forced
               O'Connor to disqualify herself from several cases in recent
               years.

               Rehnquist's total assets were reported in a range between
               $525,000 to $1.3 million, up from $360,000 to $960,000 in
               1998.

               Scalia's reported assets fell to $145,000 to $535,000, down
               from $645,000 to $1.5 million the previous year. He sold off
               significant amounts of shares in 1999.

               Bringing up the rear were Justices Anthony M. Kennedy
               ($65,000 to $195,000) and Clarence Thomas ($150,000 to
               $410,000).

               Rehnquist's annual salary is $181,400; the eight other Supreme
               Court members receive $173,600.

               In addition to the financial reports' usual listings of stock
               holdings, some unusual entries cropped up.

               Rehnquist listed as a donation to the Smithsonian Institution the
               robe he wore during the Senate impeachment trial of President
               Clinton. His report said the robe had been appraised by
               Sotheby's at $30,000.

               The chief justice did not respond when asked Tuesday whether
               he had taken a tax deduction for the donation.

               Among the noninvestment income Rehnquist received in 1999
               was $15,000 from "the Lantz Office," his literary agent.

               Thomas received an $800 commemorative jacket and traveled
               free by private plane when he served as grand marshal of the
               1999 Daytona 500 auto race.

               And O'Connor received a crystal piece and china rose --
               estimated value $500 -- when honored by the National First
               Ladies' Library.

               The financial disclosure reports were filed by May 15, and in
               past years had been released within days or at most a few
               weeks. The six-week delay this year was attributed to new rules
               that allow judges to excise information from the reports they
               feel might compromise their security.

               "I can really say the intent is to get these reports released as
               quickly as possible," said David Sellers, a spokesman for the
               Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts.

               The reports for the nine justices were released Monday, the day
               the Supreme Court announced several important rulings as it
               neared the end of its 1999-2000 term.

               "I guarantee you that was a coincidence," Sellers said. "The
               release date had nothing to do with events occurring in the
               Supreme Court."

               The justices did excise much from their reports. Each signature
               was blacked out, apparently to thwart would-be forgers, as were
               some references to spouses and other family members.

                 Copyright 2000 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This
                material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or
redistributed.

--

**COPYRIGHT NOTICE** In accordance with Title 17 U. S. C.
Section 107, any copyrighted work in this message is distributed
under fair use without profit or payment to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information
for nonprofit research and educational purposes only.
[Ref. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml ]

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to