: ADC: Protest Massive Israeli Sale of Refugee Lands

: TEXT:

: ADC Action Alert:
: Protest Massive Israeli Sale of Refugee Lands

: In June, the Israeli Knesset voted to allow the sale of 4,000 sq. km. of

: land belonging to Palestinian refugees in Israel to third party
: "owners."
: The land, which is legally owned by Palestinian refugees but has been
: illegally expropriated by the Israeli government, has been held since
: 1948
: by the Israel Land Administration (ILA) which engages in long-term lease

: agreements with Jewish leasers on behalf of the Israeli government.
: These
: new laws allow for the outright sale of the land to private groups,
: mostly
: for the construction of homes for new Russian immigrants.  While not
: unprecedented in nature, this sale is notable for its extraordinary size

: and timing.

: As famed researcher Salman Abu Sitta points out in his briefing paper
: reproduced at bottom, "as long as the land is leased, not sold, the
: legal
: rights of the original owners are not easily extinguished.  The sale to
: a
: third party will complicate the legal structure of the ownership and
: unwinding of the sale transactions."  Thus, such a sale is deeply
: harmful
: to the legal rights of refugee owners, is a blow to their ability to
: assert their property rights, and is a serious threat to implementing
: the
: refugees' right of return.

: ACTION REQUESTED:
: Please contact the State Department and point out to them that any such
: sale of refugee property would constitute a massive violation of
: international law and human and property rights.  Also let them know the

: that the continuing abrogation of the right of return and property
: rights of the Palestinian people is a major impediment to the
: development of a just and lasting peace in the region.  Ask them to
: ensure that this sale does not take place and that Israel begins to
: recognize the human and property rights of the Palestinian people.
: Please use language from this alert or from Abu Sitta's paper below as
: talking points.

: Please contact:
: Secretary of State Madeleine Albright
: Write to her at:
: 2261 C St.., NW
: Washington, DC 20520
: or fax:(202) 647-1533 or
: email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] .

: TEXT OF SALMAN ABU SITTA'S BRIEFING PAPER ON THE SALE OF REFUGEE LANDS:

: Selling Refugees Land

: The Issue
: In mid-June 2000, 52 members of the Israeli Knesset, representing an odd

: coalition, voted in favor of two bills allowing the sale of "Israel’s
: land reserves" (i.e. refugees’ land), approximately 4 million donums
: (4,000 sq. km), to the select group of kibbutz and moshav, whose number
: does not exceed 130,000 members, at a price less than half the land
: value.  Those in turn will sell it to building contractors.  The Israel
: Land Administration (ILA) shall therefore change the designation of
: these lands from agriculture to building plots.  The ILA is the arm
: which administers the refugees’ land since its seizure in 1948.  The
: area of this land is 92% of Israel’s area.  This action is contrary to
: international law and to Israel’s initial law in 1950, which created the

: position of the Custodian of the Absentee Property.  The legal title to
: these lands is held by the Palestinians who are refugees outside Israel
: (5,200,000) and within Israel (250,000).  The sanctity of private
: ownership is held by international law and respected by civilized
: nations.

: UN resolution 54/74 of December 1999 affirms the refugees’ right to
: their property and to their income from it.  Further, it calls upon all
: nations to supply any information or documents they have pertaining to
: this property.

: Background
: In 1948, Israel expelled the inhabitants of 531 towns and villages and
: took over their land and property.  The land in Jewish possession before

: the hostilities began in 1948 was:
: Full possession   1,449,958 donums (donum = 1000 m2)
: Partial possession        56,628 donums (undivided share)
: Concession granted by the British Mandate      175,000 donums (expired
: in 1948)
: Total     1,681,586 d.
: Israel’s area            20,325,000 d.
: Occupied Palestinian land          18,643,414 d.
: Of which:
: Expelled Palestinians’ land          17,178,000 d.
: Remaining Palestinians land* 1,465,000 d.
: *Since 1948, 76% of the remaining Palestinians’ land was confiscated.

: Therefore total Palestinian land under Israel’s custody, for which it
: has no legal title, is:  18,291,400 d, or 90% of Israel.
: If we add the land remaining under Palestinian control today, the total
: will be: 18,643,414 d, or 92% of Israel.

: Before declaration of the state of Israel, the Haganah created a
: Committee for Arab Properties in villages, then in cities, to control
: the confiscated property.  Six months after the state was established,
: in December 1948, the Minister of Finance issued the Emergency
: Regulations Relative to Property of Absentees.  Finally, the Knesset
: passed the Law of the Acquisition of Absentees’ Property (1949 - 1950).
: All Arabs in Palestine were considered “absentees” by this definition.
: This includes Arabs who remained under Israel’s rule and who were not in

: their villages on one particular day, even if they have been away for a
: day or visiting in another village two kilometres away.  The Custodian
: responsible for Absentees’ Property has full discretion to apply the
: term to any non-Jew who was residing in Palestine.  In 1950, the Israeli

: government included all Wakf (Islamic endowment) in the absentee
: property, except strictly religious shrines.  All mosques and cemeteries

: of depopulated villages were not allowed to be used or repaired till
: today.  Protestations that ‘God is present’ - cannot be treated as
: absent, or that similar treatment should be accorded to Wakf as to
: Christian and other religious bodies who were left untouched, were to no

: avail.

: The Knesset established a web of legal structures to obscure the
: illegality of seizing Palestinian property.  In January 1949, the
: Knesset passed the Emergency Regulations for the Exploitation of
: Uncultivated Lands - uncultivated because the owners were expelled and
: made refugees.  Those who tried to return and cultivate their land, or
: just retrieve some belongings, were shot at the spot as “infiltrators”.
: Another law, the Emergency Land Requisition Law of 1949 gave the
: government the right to seize any land necessary for “public security”,
: which was interpreted at will.

: To establish an intermediary between the Custodian and the end user, a
: Development Authority was created to which the Custodian can sell and
: which can develop the land but cannot transfer the property to any party

: other than Jews.

: The Land Acquisition (Validation of Acts and Compensation) Law of 1953
: permitted the Finance Minister to vest ownership of any Palestinian land

: in the Development Authority, thus in effect giving an air of legality
: to any prior illegal expropriations.

: The Palestinians who remained in Israel are also considered Absentees -
: dubbed Present Absentees - and lost their land.  Furthermore, if a
: Palestinian land legally held is coveted by the government, it was
: declared a “closed area”, which no one is allowed to enter.  After a
: passage of time it is declared uncultivated and confiscated under the
: Uncultivated Land Law!

: A dispute between the Jewish National Fund (JNF) and the state of
: Israel, which lasted 10 years, culminated in an agreement concluded in
: 1961, by which it was agreed that lands previously owned by JNF and
: (Palestinian) land ‘sold’ to JNF by the government, together with
: Palestinian land confiscated by the government to be run jointly by a
: new administration, Israel Land Administration (ILA), on JNF rules,
: i.e., no sale, lease, use or cultivation except by Jewish institutions
: and individuals.  Thus in effect the land of dispossessed Palestinians
: became the property of “Jewish people everywhere and in perpetuity”,
: subject to JNF regulations prohibiting its lease or use in any way by
: Arabs.

: The administration of all lands by ILA, remained till today, although in

: February 2000, JNF disputed ILA practices as being contrary to JNF
: rules.  Today, ILA administers 93% of Israel’s area, of which the
: overwhelming majority is Palestinian land.

: Present Situation
: Almost all Palestinians’ land was leased by ILA to Kibbutz and Moshav
: cooperatives in a 49-year lease.  The members of the Kibbutz are
: considered the elite of the Israeli society.  They are army generals,
: Knesset members and they wield much more power than their numbers
: justify.

: It soon became apparent that the Kibbutz system has failed miserably,
: both ideologically and economically.  It was not possible to recruit new

: members and there was desertion from the farms to city life.  After all,

: it turned out that the Zionist is not cut out for agricultural life.

: Economically, the Kibbutz became loaded with debts.  Only 26% of the
: settlements were viable, producing 75% of the produce.  They consumed
: 75% of the water in Israel at a subsidized rate (80% of production
: cost).  With such vast resources of land, water and subsidies they
: produced only 1.8% of Israel’s GDP.

: The accumulated debts incurred by the Kibbutz were carried over by the
: government.  Out of $5 billion debt, the government wrote off $2
: billion, retabled $2 billion and asked the private sector to contribute
: $1 billion.

: Early in the nineties, Ariel Sharon and Raphael Eitan introduced
: regulations permitting the rezoning of the agricultural (Palestinian)
: land leased to the Kibbutz to construction plots to accommodate Russian
: immigrants.  The Kibbutz would then be “compensated” for this
: transaction at 51% of its value.  This made the bankrupt farmers very
: rich overnight by getting the value of (Palestinian) land they never
: owned.

: This angered tax payers living in the cities who are the absolute
: majority of Jews (90% of Israelis live in 11% of Israel).  A series of
: committees (latest by Prof. Boaz Ronen) reduced the “compensation” to
: 25% of the land value. Thus, the notion of sacred spiritual property was

: transformed into commercial real estate.

: Since 1997, ILA started to sell refugees land.  Its average contribution

: to the treasury amounted to $1.0 billion a year, excluding
: “compensation” to the Kibbutz.  One donum in the centre sells for
: $1,000,000.

: In 1998, 110 Kibbutz were allowed to expand their residential area
: (i.e., zoning from agriculture to residential) by 115% which can be sold

: to others.  ‘Others’ may include any Jew living anywhere, not
: necessarily Israeli.  150,000 residential units were planned in the
: Kibbutz, out of a general plan for 500,000.

: Ariel Sharon, who expropriated for himself a farm of several thousand
: donums in Iraq Al Manshiya (Kiryat Gat), said: “… The only way to absorb

: the immigrants was by taking land from the Kibbutz...  I knew the
: (economic) hardship they are experiencing… it is better they build on
: the land and sell houses…”

: The Implications
: The implications of such disposition of refugees’ land are many fold.
: First, as long as the land is leased, not sold, the legal rights of the
: original owners are not easily extinguished.  The sale to a third party
: will complicate the legal structure of the ownership and unwinding of
: the sale transactions.

: An interesting intervention was made by the impoverished Sephardic
: community who did not enjoy the extravagant benefits showered on the
: Kibbutz.  They formed a group, Hakeshet Hamizrahit, which petitioned the

: High Court this week against sale of land to the Kibbutz and stated that

: “the land in question was largely expropriated from Palestinians and
: thus transferring property rights to the inhabitants of the rural
: communities means negating forever the Palestinian refugees’ right of
: return”.

: Second, the portion slated now for sale exceeds sixty billion US
: dollars.  This value belongs to the Palestinians, who, although they
: will NEVER accept to sell their land, only to restitute (recover) it,
: this amount could be allocated to a fund to pay for their material and
: psychological damages and lost revenues.

: Third, the Arab League has already resolved on 16 September 1998 to
: apply to the UN to send a fact-finding mission to investigate the status

: of the Palestinians property, to appoint a Custodian to monitor changes
: to such property and report periodically to the UN and finally to
: activate the UN Conciliation Commission on Palestine.  This action by
: the Arab League should now be activated and updated.

: Recommendations:

: 1. The Arab League should activate its previous resolution and to put it

: into effect.

: 2. The Arab League should apply to the UN to send, under the UN CCP
: auspices, a fact-finding mission to report fully on the disposition of
: the Palestinian property by the Israeli government.  Such mission shall
: list all transactions made by ILA and other Israeli government bodies
: from 1948 till today, shall present to the General Assembly ways of
: protecting the ownership of the Palestinians and shall determine the
: monetary amounts which has been received by the Israeli treasury and
: other bodies due to the transfer of ownership and the exploitation of
: property for 52 years.

: 3. The Palestine mission at the UN together with the Arab bloc should
: lobby for a UN resolution which,
: (a) condemns Israeli action of property transfer and urges Israel to
: undo it,
: (b) demands that Israel facilitates the work of the UN mission,
: (c) request other countries, in accordance with relevant UN resolutions,

: to supply any information, documents and maps they have on Palestinian
: property.

: 4. The Arab League should encourage Arab members of the Knesset to
: resist the bill of 52 by all means possible.

: 5. Consultations should be made as to the definition of Israeli actions
: and its violation of the sanctity of private ownership in terms of
: international law, Human Rights and Geneva Convention.  Here,
: appropriate NGO’s may be activated for public action.

: These tasks are obviously not easy to implement.  Nevertheless every
: effort must be made to put them into effect.  If no action is taken, the

: resulting effect on the Palestine Question will be devastating.  This
: should be avoided at all costs.

: Salman Abu Sitta
: June 23, 2000

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to