On Mon, 24 Jul 2000 10:05:39 -0500 (CDT) Ian Goddard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: http://users.erols.com/igoddard/flir-osc.htm July 24, 2000 Special Counsel John Danforth Office of Special Counsel 200 N Broadway 15th Floor St Louis, MO 63102 Dear Mr Danforth, Your Office of Special Counsel appointed by the U.S. Attorney General to investigate Waco and the 1993 Waco FLIR should make the full FLIR videotape and the Vector Data Systems (VDS) report -- which were paid for by the public -- available to the public over the Internet. Both the FLIR and the VDS report, which your office authorized, are on CDs (digitized) and thus could be posted to your website. [1] Your interim report asks the public to agree with your conclusion that the FLIR shows no gunshots and yet it does not contain any of the actual evidence that you needed to come to that conclusion. [1] I do not see why the public should be asked to come to a conclusion about the FLIR without having the same access to the FLIR and VDS report that you had and needed. Considering that this material exists in a computer-file format, is there any reason why this important public property cannot be made available to its owners over the Internet? I agree with your conclusion that the Waco FLIR flashes are reflections, [2] however, I was only able to believe that after I acquired a good copy of the Waco FLIR. It therefore seems to me that those who are still concerned that the Waco FLIR shows government gunshots and who do not have access to the entire FLIR and VDS report should not be asked or expected to accept mere words of denial from a government- appointed office, such as those in your report. Mr Danforth, please address public concerns about the 1993 Waco FLIR by making the full FLIR and the full Vector Data report -- which were paid for by The People -- available to The People over the Internet so that they are given the same opportunity you had and needed to come to a conclusion about the Waco FLIR. This would define your report as a good-faith effort to address public concern; and moreover, it would give the public what they need to agree with your findings regarding the Waco FLIR. Thank you sir for your time and attention. Sincerely, Ian Goddard [1] OSC Interim Waco Report: http://osc-waco.org [2] Ian Goddard Report: http://www.erols.com/igoddard/wacoflir.htm =================================================================== THE WACO FLIR FLASHES: http://users.erols.com/igoddard/wacoflir.htm =================================================================== <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]</A> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
