Narco News relay...

(Now back in América...)

Al Giordano
Publisher
The Narco News Bulletin
http://www.narconews.com/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


http://www.lasvegassun.com/sunbin/stories/archives/2000/aug/10/081100461.html

August 10, 2000
Cheney, North Relationship Probed
ASSOCIATED PRESS

WASHINGTON (AP) -- As a member of Congress in 1986, Dick Cheney was present
for one of the defining moments in the Iran-Contra scandal -- a White House
meeting where Oliver North misled members of the House Intelligence
Committee.

The episode, however, didn't keep Cheney from defending North at the
Iran-Contra hearings a year later or from stumping for him in 1994 when
North ran for the U.S. Senate.

With his record scrutinized anew as George W. Bush's running mate, Cheney is
declining to discuss his role as a top Republican on the House committee
that investigated the Iran-Contra scandal in the mid-1980s.

"This race is about the future and what Governor Bush and Secretary Cheney
will do for the country, not on a resolved situation from the past," Cheney
spokesman Dirk Vande Beek explained.

Thirteen years ago, Congress held nationally televised hearings into whether
the Reagan administration improperly arranged for military assistance to the
Contra rebels battling communism in Nicaragua at a time when U.S. aid to the
rebels had been banned by Congress.

Cheney helped lead the Republican defense of the Reagan administration and
North, trying to counter Democratic accusations of lying and cover-up by
highlighting North's tireless efforts on behalf of the communist-fighting
guerrillas.

Cheney even gave away some of his own time for asking questions at the 1987
hearings so North, dressed in crisp military uniform, could give a tutorial
on Soviet-financed military might in Central America and the dire straits of
the Contra fighting force.

"Colonel North has been, I think, the most effective and impressive witness
certainly this committee has heard, and I know I speak for a great many
Americans when I thank him for his years of devoted service to the nation,
both in the United States Marine Corps and as a member of the NSC (National
Security Council) staff," Cheney said in July 1987, concluding his
questioning of North.

Cheney's intersection with the scandal actually began earlier.
When news stories in mid-1986 suggested that North was overseeing a secret
arms network to the Contras at a time when such assistance was banned,
then-House Intelligence Committee chairman Lee Hamilton, D-Ind., pressed for
a meeting.

In the White House Situation Room on Aug. 6, 1986, North told Cheney,
Hamilton and nine other lawmakers on the intelligence committee that his
"principle mission" was to coordinate contacts between U.S. officials and
the Contras.

North told the lawmakers he gave the Contras advice on human rights and
stressed the need for an improved civic image.

As the Aug. 6 discussion ended, Hamilton "expressed his appreciation ... and
indicated his satisfaction in the responses received."
But minutes after the congressmen departed, North returned to his work
coordinating military supplies to the Contras.

A year later, after being granted immunity from prosecution at the
Iran-Contra hearings, North admitted he'd made false statements and "misled
the Congress" in the Aug. 6 meeting. "I tried to avoid telling outright
lies. But I certainly wasn't telling the truth," North explained in his 1991
book.

North did not return phone messages and a written request for comment sent
to his office this week.

Of the eight Republicans who signed the minority report on the Iran-Contra
affair, Cheney was the only one who had been lied to face-to-face by North
at the 1986 meeting. Still, he remained supportive of the Reagan White House
and North.

In an interview, Hamilton credited Cheney and the Republicans with doing an
effective job of protecting President Reagan.

"My impression of the position of the House Republicans generally, of which
he (Cheney) was one, was that they really took the attitude that the end
justifies the means," Hamilton said.

"In other words, the support of the Contras was so important that if you
fudged the law a little bit and fudged the truth it was justified because we
were fighting communism," Hamilton added.

Former Democratic Rep. Bob Kastenmeier, another member of the committee, was
less complimentary.

"Cheney was a member of the minority serving the White House and not the
committee, and he was the only member on the other side I would say that
about," Kastenmeier said.

Washington attorney Dick Leon, who worked as a lawyer for Republicans at the
Iran-Contra hearings, defended Cheney.

"It was made very clear to us by Mr. Cheney personally that we were there to
get to the bottom of the facts wherever they would lead us," Leon said.

He also noted Cheney and other congressional Republicans signed a final
report that was "quite critical of some of the most senior members of the
administration, from the secretaries of defense, state and the White House
chief of staff on down to North and his immediate superiors."

Cheney and seven House and Senate Republicans characterized the White
House's deception as "a fundamental mistake" but suggested the deception was
not designed to hide any illegalities.

Cheney and his GOP colleagues, however, refused to join Republican Sens.
Warren Rudman and William Cohen and Democrats in concluding that Reagan
failed in his constitutional duty to "take care that the laws be faithfully
executed."

Seven years later, Cheney campaigned for the former Marine colonel in his
unsuccessful bid for a U.S. Senate seat from Virginia. Cheney praised North
for embracing the same conservative principles as Ronald Reagan.

________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com


--------------------------------------------------------------------<e|-
Best friends, most artistic, class clown Find 'em here:
http://click.egroups.com/1/8014/6/_/475667/_/966022288/
--------------------------------------------------------------------|e>-





Reply via email to