New Technology Out Of Africa In Early Ice Age

Using geological clues from an ancient shift in the Earth's magnetic field,
scientists working in Israel have significantly pushed back the date of an
"out of Africa" migration of early humans that brought new technologies to
Eurasia in the midst of the early Ice Age.
Their findings also indicate that our ancestors' tool-making skills were more
sophisticated for that time than previously believed.

In an article in today's issue of Science, a team working at the
archaeologically rich site of Gesher Benot Ya'aqov (GBY) in the Dead Sea Rift
of northern Israel reports that early humans belonging to the species Homo
erectus traversed the corridor between Africa and Eurasia 780,000 years ago,
bringing with them new technologies.

According to co-author Craig Feibel, a geologist and assistant professor of
anthropology and geology at Rutgers, the findings indicate this migration
occurred some 250,000 years earlier than had been suspected.

They also confirm that the site's abundant trove of stone tools, including
handaxes and cleavers, reflects a higher level of skill and sophistication
than scientists thought existed at that time.

Feibel, who was one of two geologists on the team, reconstructed the
geological sequence from sediments at GBY. The sediments showed clear
evidence dating them to the most recent reversal in the Earth's magnetic
field 780,000 years ago, says Feibel.

"Until this recent work, we didn't have a clear age estimate. Scientists had
estimated the technology and associated flora and fauna at a half million
years, but that was conservative," Feibel said. "This time, we were fortunate
to find in the sediments a record of the shift in the Earth's magnetic field,
which is a well-dated phenomenon."

Feibel noted the discovery was a serendipitous one that the team had not been
seeking, but one that solved a long-standing mystery regarding the site's
true age.

Thousands of extremely well-preserved artifacts along with fossils have been
found at GBY, which is a "wet" site. Organic matter is well preserved at GBY,
in contrast to sites in Africa where much evidence of hominin occupation and
flora and fauna has disintegrated over time.

GBY was discovered in the 1930s and has been the site of many excavations.

The article's authors note that the "archaeological data from the site
portray strong affinities with African stone tool traditions. It also
reflects adroit technical skills and in-depth planning abilities."

Early Pleistocene hominins were bringing with them their lithic technologies
that would eventually be found throughout Eurasia.

"What we see at GBY is a whole new technology that also was found at Olduvai
Gorge in Tanzania. All of the technological breakthroughs seem to have been
made in Africa, and they came out of Africa," Feibel said.

The migration through GBY was occurring during the Pleistocene Epoch, when
the climate would have concentrated movement near the equator. The article
notes that more than a dozen "archaeological occurrences" are identified in
the geological sequence, showing repeated occupations of the same area over a
prolonged period.

The interdisciplinary team included two archaeologists, two geologists, one
paleontologist and two paleobotanists. The project began at GBY in 1989.

In addition to Feibel, the article's authors are Naama Goren-Inbar and Idit
Saragusti of the Institute of Archaeology at Hebrew University, Jerusalem,
Israel; Kenneth L. Verosub of the department of geology at the University of
California at Davis; Yoel Melamed and Mordechai E. Kislev of the department
of life sciences at Bar-Ilan University in Ramat Gan, Israel; and Eitan
Tchernov of the department of evolution, systematics and ecology at Hebrew
University. Goren-Inbar is the lead author and project leader.

The project is supported by the L.S.B. Leakey Foundation and the National
Geographic Society. - By Sandra Lanman

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to