-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Fwd:Waco Remembered
Date: 19 Aug 2000 22:42:31 -0000
From: "Oscar " <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

On 18 Aug 2000 00:38:22 -0000 Agent Smiley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Subject: Waco Remembered
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (FMARTINO3)
Date: 2000/08/16
Newsgroups: alt.culture.ny-upstate
Copyright © 1995 Public Domain

Written by Frank Martino

  Here are the circumstances surrounding the death of twenty-three childen at
Waco, April 19, 1993, much of which was sworn testimony given before a
Congressional hearing:

  a) The FBI and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobbaco and Firearms (BATF) arranged
for an attack with tanks and helicopter gunships. They were allowed the use of
military weoponry legally only by swearing an affidavit that drug manufacturing
was being done on the site. That claim was not only false but was a deliberate
perjury by the Feds. The ones responsible for that affidavit were neither
prosecuted for the perjury of swearing a false affidavit nor were they fired
from their positions.

   Moreover, the National Guard units which supplied the military equipment and
personel were from the States of Alabama and Texas. Those units were selected
for the reason that they specialized in anti-drug activity, hence the reason
for the perjured affidavit concerning drug manufacturing at Waco. Neither the
governor of Alabama nor the governor of Texas gave consent for the use of the
National Guard at Waco either verbally or in writing, as is required by law
when the National Guard is utilized for any mission other than training.

   The Economy Act requires the Justice Department to reimburse the Department
of Defense for the cost of equipment and personnel support provided to it. The
Justice Department indeed reimbursed the Department of Defense for the use of
National Guard personnel and equipment used at Waco. That tells us that the
personnel and equipment were not under state control at Waco but were indeed
under Federal control. The use of military personnel and equipment for law
enforcement against the American citizenry except in the case of illegal drug
activity is a clear violation of the Posse Commitatus Act.

  The Joint Chief of Staffs approved of the use of National Guard units at Waco
and the National Guard commanders followed their orders. However, it is not
within the powers of the Joint Chief of Staffs to commit National Guard units
into service. Only the Governors of the States or the President of the United
Staes has the legal authority and power to do that.

  Janet Reno swore under oath at the Congressional hearings that the White
House had no roll in the Waco planing or execution. Bill Clinton also stated
publically that he had no role. Some time later, during the investigation of
illegal campaign finances to the Democratic Party, Robert Conrad, head of the
Justice Department's investigation, questioned Clinton about James Riady's
visit to the White House on April 19, 1993, the day on which the farmhouse in
Waco burned. Clinton made the following statement to Conrad about Waco: "I gave
in to the people in the Justice Department who were pleading to go in early,
and I felt personally responsible for what happened, and I still do. I made a
terrible mistake."

  From that statement, the following facts are determined:
a) Janet Reno committed perjury and obstruction of justice when swearing that
the White House was not informed about Waco at the Congressional hearing.
b) Clinton had lied to the public.
c) Clinton violated the Posse Commitatus by directly ordering military
equipment and personnel to assault a farmhouse in Waco.

  The Feds claimed Posse Commitatus was not violated by virtue of Bill Clinton
not signing a sheet of paper, but Bill Clinton, nevertheless, gave the orders.

  b) The Feds staked out the place for two months, watching with binoculars
everyone's coming and going. They swore they never saw Koresh go into town. The
Feds committed perjury.

  c) An unidentified newsman tipped off Koresh's brother-in-law that the Feds
were about to stage a raid. The brother-in-law then telephoned Koresh. Thus the
Feds had compromised security and thusly contributed to the possiblity of a
stand-off. The fact that Koresh knew they were coming was welcomed (if not
planned by the Feds) because they were wanting a media event, which is why they
had arranged for both the tanks and the news media to be there. It is also why
they didn't call off the raid upon learning that Koresh knew. The Feds later
denied knowing of Koresh's knowledge of the raid. The Feds committed perjury.


  d) The Feds knew that the children attended local schools. Had they waited to
serve the warrant the next day, on a Monday instead of a Sunday, the children
would not have been
there. With the children present, they were able to stage a media event with
"hostages."  They staged an event with maximum rather than minimum danger to
the children. By serving the warrant on Sunday morning, they knowingly placed
the children in harm's way and committed a reckless endangerment to minors.
This deliberate action was in violation of State Law, in violation of common
sense and inexcusable.

  e) The Feds had no prior evidence of child abuse. When Janet Reno swore that
the Feds had to raid for the benefit of the children she committed perjury.

  f) An FBI memo to the leadership at Waco, which came up at the hearings,
stated to the effect that no action was to be taken without first having
approval from the White House. When Janet Reno gave sworn testimony at the
hearings that the White House had never been advised and had no role in the
events at Waco, she committed perjury.

  g) They used CS gas which could aspyhxiate children. When they said that CS
gas couldn't harm children, they commited perjury.

  h) The Feds used their tanks to destroy and bulldoze the remains of the
building into the fire. They literally destroyed any and all evidence that
would have showed what had actually happened. That action made it impossible to
have a credible investigation of the circumstances that took place. The
bulldozing was a cover up.

  i) The Feds had over two-hundred agents armed with M-16s and later stated
that there were forty illegal weapons in the hands of the cult. After all was
over, in an effort to gain public sympathy, they publically claimed to have
been "out-gunned" by the Branch Davidians. The Feds lied.

  j) A few days before the hearings, government records were reported missing
or stolen, records that had to do with Waco, Ruby Ridge, Whitewater and Vincent
Foster's death. Missing records would later become the modus operandi of the
Clinton-Gore Administration.

  Here is a listing of some of the actions and the laws that were broken by the
Clinton-Gore Administration:

  a) Conspiring to create an action to gain the interest of the media in order
to generate anti-gun support among the American people: USE OF GOVERNMENT MONEY
AND EQUIPMENT TO ADVANCE A POLITICAL AGENDA.

  b) Deliberately compromising security to allow the brother-in-law of David
Koresh to have advance knowledge of the raid so that he would tip off Koresh.
The intent was to encourage the possibility of a fire-fight to add to the media
publicity: EXCESSIVE USE OF FORCE.

  c) Perjury by the ATF and FBI in requesting the military to supply armored
personel carriers, tanks and helicopter gunships: VIOLATION OF THE LAW
RESTRICTING THE USE OF MILITARY FORCE AGAINST THE AMERICAN CITIZENRY: THE POSSE
COMMITATUS ACT.

  d) Creating a media publicity event by refusing to neutralize the leadership
by arrresting Koresh when he was in town, thereby exposing the children to
danger by an assault that would otherwise have been rendered needless: WRONGFUL
DEATH OF CHILDREN.

  e) Choosing to raid on a Sunday morning rather than a Monday morning when
most of the children would have been in public school and out of harm's way.
Thus they intentionally created a plan that incorporated maximum danger for the
children rather than minimum danger: DERELECTION OF DUTY.

  f) Introducing gas into the building while knowing it would contribute to
creating both a fire hazard and a hazard of asphyxiation to the children:
RECKLESS ENDANGERMENT TO MINORS.

  g) An FBI memo sent to the leadership at the Waco seige instructed that no
action be taken unless approval was first received from the White House. The
Attorney General nevertheless testified under oath that the White House had no
knowledge of or role in the events at Waco:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES COMMITTED FELONY PERJURY.

  h) In using psychological warfare by broadcasting with loud speakers the
alternating sounds of calming classical music and that of the disturbing
squealing of tortured rabbits, the Feds engaged in a program of mood and mind
control that would inflict psychological trauma and
psychotic behavior into the lives of the children of Waco. Mood manipulation is
used both by cults that thrive on mind control and also by sociopaths who
manipulate the actions of those whom they have targeted for servitude or
destruction. SUCH ACTIVITY IS RECOGNIZED TO BE AN ENDANGERING HARRASSMENT AND
THE LAW RIGHTFULLY REGARDS IT TO BE CRIMINAL ACTIVITY.

  i) CRUELTY TO RABBITS.

   The facts have not been addressed by either the news media or by Congress.
Documents have been destroyed, and the White Wash of a corrupt Administration
and a corrupt Justice Department continues to this very day.

The Congressional Report on the Waco hearings is given at the below webpage:
http://www.ideasign.com/chiliast/pdocs/waco.htm


_____________________________________________________________
Email your boss can't read - sign up for free disinfo.net email
at http://www.disinfo.com, your gateway to the underground



----------
Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Webmail account today at 
http://home.netscape.com/webmail/

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to