Subject: Re: [cancercure] Conspiracy in UNITED NATIONS
If this woman is correct--Did you know?
1. Gore re-structured the Constitution?
2. Prince Charles' has strong ties to United Nations?
3. We will have a world tax?
4. There is news blackout on the real United Nations?
5. "Sustainable Development" is communism? ...it is United Nations'
control of the world's money...and [Hitler's] "population control"?
6. "Public-Private Partnership" is communism & fascism--the marriage
between government and business? [leads to feudalism]
7. Before 1992, the world is ruled by Judeo-Christian ethic; in 1992, the
United Nations perverted and changed it to Gaia, or paganism.
8. House Bill, HR 4453, says Congress to send 6,000 of U.S.'s best troops
to United Nations, to quench resistance of any nation to a world
government? [also allows UN troops on U.S. soil]
9. Clinton signs New Constitution?
10. Note: This world government (from the European Common Market) is
prophecied in Revelations of the Bible to be ruled by the Anti-Christ (a
satanic kingdom).
Read what the woman says below.
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2000 18:53:01 -0400
From: International Advocates for Health Freedom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [IAHF] Q&A The U.N.'s shocking millennium agenda: Learn How the
Rug is Being Pulled Out From Under US If You Value Your Access to
Vitamins- (or ANY of your freedoms) Read this Interview!
[ Some characters may be displayed incorrectly. ]
International Advocates for Health Freedom - http://www.iahf.com
IAHF List: This Interview is DEEP. The woman being interviewed has been
to numerous UN conferences world wide in an effort to unravel and make
sense out of the globalists greed and power driven agenda, and what she
reports here is shocking! By reading it you'll begin to grasp the speed
with which the globalists are trying to move, and how they're moving to
destroy all of our freedoms along with the sovereignty of all nations. I
don't want to be a slave, do you? Check out all the links at the end of this.
If you value your access to dietary supplements, I hope you grasp the
implication of what is being said here. All of us who oppose the Pharma
Cartel's UN Codex Vitamin Agenda had better make the effort to grasp what
is going on with the fast approaching UN Millenium Assembly- and if you
read this you'll see things very clearly. An effort is being made here to
pull the rug out from under us, and the people who are trying to do it
figure no one will notice or protest...This is a genocide agenda,
folks.... wake up and forward this to more people... Anyone can be on
the IAHF distribution list by signing up at http://www.iahf.com or by
sending email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SUNDAY Q&A The U.N.'s shocking millennium agenda
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/bluesky_metcalf_news/20000827_xngme_the_uns_sh.shtl
Geoff Metcalf interviews United Nations expert Joan Veon
http://www.womensgroup.org/
By Geoff Metcalf © 2000 WorldNetDaily.com
Several years ago, businesswoman Joan Veon had no idea she would one
day be standing toe-to-toe with world leaders, challenging their ideas on
global government. Since that time, however, Veon
http://www.womensgroup.org/ has done extensive research on the United
Nations and the organization's agenda and has attended dozens of U.N.
conferences. In her book, "Prince Charles -- The Sustainable Prince,"
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1575580217/o/qid=966805581/sr=2-1/103-08
6584-4603863
Veon explores the prince's connections to both the U.N. and the most
powerful corporate leaders in the world.
WorldNetDaily reporter and talk show host Geoff Metcalf recently
interviewed Veon about her analysis of the United Nations and its plans
for the future. Metcalf's daily radio show can be heard on TalkNetDaily
weekdays from 7 p.m. to 10 p.m. Eastern time.
http://www.wnd.com/talknetdaily/
Question: Please explain to our readers the path to your discovery
about the United Nations and its agenda.
Answer: Before I went to Cairo to attend a U.N. conference, I
thought I was sophisticated; I thought I was well informed. I was a
community activist and was very concerned with what was going on in the
schools -- abortion, condom distribution, outcome-based education. I was
testifying at the county level and at the state level on various social
issues. I really thought I had it together.
I was challenged to go to this economic conference in Cairo because
I write an economic newsletter and I really wanted to see up close what
the United Nations was, because I realized I didn't know who they were or
what they did.
I was quite shocked and amazed at what I saw at this United Nations
conference. It wasn't just the conference itself, it was the structure.
It was the sophistication of advancement of an agenda that I had
absolutely no knowledge about. I remember Vice President Gore -- he was
just elected at that time -- giving a keynote address about reducing
population. And I thought, "What? Do the American people know what's
going on?"
Cairo was my wake-up call. I came home from Cairo mad, upset and
with a suitcase full of their material. I wanted to find out how big,
deep, vast, broad, how far advanced the whole agenda was. When I got back
home, I realized there was a complete dumbing-down, a complete blackout of
what the whole agenda was and what it meant.
Q: What was the difference between when you attended the Cairo
event, ostensibly as an innocent, and when you went to Gorbachev's party
in San Francisco in '95?
A: That was about a year later. In between those two conferences, I
went to about seven others. I was still in the process of trying to
figure out the agenda when I went to my first Gorbachev "State of the
World" forum. For two and a half years, I felt like my head was in a bowl
of Jell-O because I was trying to connect, I was trying to understand.
You know, when you and I talk about this agenda, it's not a short,
24-second stringer like they have us do in radio because that's how long
people's attention span is. It really takes some time to get into the
agenda. In six years, I have attended 36 conferences and have talked with
presidents and prime ministers all over the world.
Q: I'd like to throw a few key phrases at you and get your response.
"Public-private partnerships." That sounds pretty benign.
A: One of the things to remember is the United Nations never defines
words. Actually, words end up becoming very hidden in their meaning.
That was part of what I was trying to figure out in trying to understand
what their agenda was.
Public-private partnerships is a phrase I first came across in 1996.
I spent six months researching it. I've written two books about it. It
is extremely simple and very, very key. And let me say, it is Al Gore who
has spearheaded a complete structural change of our government through
public-private partnership.
Interestingly enough, he's not even talking about it as to why the
American people should elect him president when he has already
restructured our Constitution. But a public-private partnership is
exactly what it says.
Q: Break it down for us into its various components.
A: First of all, it is a partnership. It is a business arrangement.
That is extremely important. The idea of any business is profit. The
partners in this particular arrangement are both public and private.
The public partners pertain to government: local, county, state,
federal, foreign and international governments. They can all be involved,
one or two or three can be involved.
Q: We have a real good example that was just pushed through and it
seemed benign at the time.
The agreement that Andy Cuomo blackmailed Smith and Wesson to sign
was ostensibly a public-private partnership, which would have resulted in
government control of a private industry.
A: The private partners are business, multinational, transnational
corporations -- as well as nongovernmental organizations, these minions of
a different philosophy other than the Constitution who are all funded by
the foundations of the multinational, transnational corporations.
So, what is a public-private partnership? It is the shifting of
government responsibility and government services into a partnership with
other parties -- primarily those who have deep pockets -- because your
county, local and state governments are all bankrupt.
What they are now saying is, "Look, we need stronger hands, deeper
pockets to help us do what we used to do. We're going to do it a little
differently."
Q: Once again, the golden rule: The guy with the gold makes the
rules.
A: Exactly. They say, "We're going to do it in a partnership, a
public-private partnership."
The people of Dallas don't want their taxes raised, so they have to
use what they call "innovative financing." The city sewer system has just
shifted from being owned by the people of Dallas into this new entity,
which is a partnership jointly owned by government and business. These
people are sitting around the corporate table. The bottom line is, who
has the power? Obviously, you and I know very clearly -- whoever has the
deepest pockets and the most money has the power. What has just happened?
Q: A redistribution of assets?
A: Yes, sir. A major asset has been shifted out of governmental
hands into a new relationship, a public-private partnership that is for
business, which is, by way of philosophical bent, fascism, because fascism
is the marriage between government and business. The bottom line now is
profit -- and the citizens now become customers.
Q: One of the things we have to try to explain to our readers is a
phrase that is starting to be repeated more and more -- "sustainable
development." What does that really mean?
A: Sustainable development came out of the 1992 Rio Earth Summit
and, in fact, I titled my book, "Prince Charles -- The Sustainable Prince"
after sustainable development. He was the one who has been pushing this
Orwellian agenda.
The bottom line is, it is a new concept. The phrase "sustainable
development" was never used in any U.N. document before 1992. The Rio
Earth Summit is where it made its debut.
Sustainable development basically says there are too many people on
the planet, that we must reduce the population, that the United Nations is
the only organization in a position to help monitor and control the assets
of the world.
Q: When you tried to look for the genesis of the philosophy, you
looked in the Constitution, and, not surprisingly, it's not there. But
you did find it somewhere. Tell us where.
A: One day I was analyzing these concepts, and I thought, "Wait a
minute. It's not in my Constitution." So, I immediately thought, "What is
the opposite of my Constitution?" It is the Russian constitution. And I
had just purchased a book, a copy of the 1977 U.S.S.R. constitution, and
I got as far as Chapter 2, Article 18, and there it was. Not using the
words "sustainable development," but there was a full description of
sustainable development as to having to care for the earth for future
generations.
If I needed any proof that the United Nations agenda was communist,
that was the document that handed me the proof. When you look at all the
countries in the world, the United States is the only country with the
kind of representative government we have, with a Constitution with
inalienable, God-given rights, not guaranteed or dependent on what you say
or do -- they are your rights, period. In those rights, we have personal
property rights. All of a sudden, we have the United States supporting,
orchestrating, enhancing an evil agenda I realized was communist.
Q: Where does this spiritual link to Gaia come in? Is that just
window dressing to try to sell it to the masses? It's like these would-be
controllers are attempting a major spiritual shift from the
Judeo-Christian ethic to Gaia. What is Gaia?
A: I guess you could call it window dressing. Gaia is Greek for
"Mother Earth." What really happened at the United Nations Rio Earth
Summit was, first and foremost, philosophical.
The world up until 1992 -- and it still is in our opinion -- was
under the Judeo-Christian ethic.
Under the Judeo-Christian ethic, God gave man dominance over the
earth. In 1992, what the United Nations did was, they perverted,
inverted, that truth, and they basically said man was no longer dominant
over the earth, but the earth was dominant over man. They said that we,
as men, as living human beings, were equal to the plants and the animals.
And so, what Gaia really is, is paganism. So, we now have the United
Nations espousing a pagan religion and they are trying to make it equal
for each one of us and therefore stamp out the validity and personhood of
Jesus Christ as the Son of God and the savior of the world.
Q: In their effort to use as a tool these public-private
partnerships and all these non-governmental organizations, wouldn't it be
reasonable to try to exploit the traditional churches as part of that
public-private partnership?
A: That's coming; it's on the docket. Interestingly enough, we are
seeing public-private partnerships in each area. It's not only the water
system and the sewer but it is all areas, all levels of services that the
government used to provide. We are now seeing, and interestingly, Rep.
J.C. Watts from Oklahoma City has been spearheading, public-private
partnerships between governments and churches.
Q: That's rather like a return to feudalism, isn't it?
A: Yes it is. That's exactly what's happening.
Under our form of government, we the people had rights and we had
ownership in the government. When you shift the assets of government into
a public-private partnership, as you are shifting those assets (which is a
transfer of wealth), those of us who are paying taxes have to say, "Hey,
what are my tax dollars going for?" Before, when we had government under
the Constitution, I knew I was supporting government to provide certain
services. Now, under public-private partnership, when all of these things
and all of these assets have been shifted out from the aegis of
government, where are my tax dollars going and for what reason?
That equates to the same kind of feudal system whereby the serfs had
to pay rent on the land that they worked.
Q: What I really see is an incremental progression from the republic
we still think we enjoy to fascism to eventually feudalism. Is that the
long-term plan?
A: Absolutely. And that is where I have been going in my research.
I'm looking to write my third book about 21st century feudalism because
that is exactly the shift we are making.
Q: Recently, you sent me a chart that I think was intended to
crystallize and clarify things for me. I thought I was looking at some
kind of DNA chart in a science class I didn't sign up for. Can you please
try to explain the chart?
A: It's all interconnected. Two years ago when I wrote "Prince
Charles -- The Sustainable Prince" -- and this book is as up-to-date today
as it was then in the material and in the message -- I realized that this
thing looks like an ameba.
Q: It looks like something Gene Rodenberry invented when he was way
behind a deadline. There are financial bodies, U.N. agencies,
multinational corporations, professional bodies, NGOs and a lot of arrows.
A: Let me explain. The United Nations has had the Security Council,
which is composed of the five permanent members, and they decide whether
or not we're going to go to war as a world. Then we have representatives
from every country, which they call the "lower assembly" or the "first
chamber," and that's composed of ambassadors from the different countries
to the United Nations. What they have been working on in the United
Nations since 1988, and even before, is a second chamber, a people's
chamber or "the peoples parliament."
Q: The "perception" of democratization?
A: Yes. And so I include this chart to show that where the United
Nations is evolving is toward a people's chamber or representative
government on the international level that bypasses our Congress.
What we are seeing with the U.N. is, first of all, that all the
countries are reinventing their governments. They are all shifting
governmental assets into public-private partnerships. There are a few
chosen in the inner circle who are busy as part of the multinational,
transnational corporations.
Q: We are now seeing legislation in Congress to authorize about
6,000 troops for a United Nations army. Is this another part of the
incrementalism?
A: Absolutely. Let me just mention, when we start taking a look at
the United Nations and the power it has amassed over the last 55 years --
its structure -- it is pretty big, pretty vast and pretty deep. The
bottom line is, there are three things missing to make it full world
government.
Number one, representative government at the international level,
which is the People's Millennium Assembly. They want the people of the
world to have their own voice.
Q: They want them to "think" they have their own voice.
A: That's correct. Number two, global taxation.
Believe me: they are not going to rest until they have a way of
unlimited income from you and me. Number three would be a rapid
deployment force. And yes, we now have a House Bill, HR 4453, to allow
America to send 6,000 of her finest to the United Nations to serve under
United Nations jurisdiction and control. I think they want 42,000, so
it's seven countries to begin with.
Q: Several countries have already agreed to this, and the core of
the rapid deployment force is in place.
A: That's right. What that means is, every time somebody doesn't
want world government, they already have a rapid deployment force that can
be sent immediately to take care of the problem.
Q: How integral is the British Royal Family in all this?
A: That is something I have been researching and constantly I am
finding connections to the British Royal Family with the United Nations.
For example, Prince Charles, in the Prince of Wales Business Leaders
Forum, which we haven't had time to go into, basically is writing books on
corporate governance. You see, when you shift government from government
to a public-private partnership, corporations now are in a position of
governance. They call it corporate governance.
Interestingly enough, Prince Charles and his Prince of Wales
Business Leaders Forum are leaders and trendsetters in what corporate
governance means and how to do it through public-private partnerships.
Q: In an interview that Prince Charles gave on BBC in 1994, he said,
"So much I try to do is behind the scenes. So it is difficult for people
to understand how all the things fit together."
Frankly, isn't part of his objective not to let people know how "all
the things fit together"?
A: Absolutely! And that's why I find it fascinating that Charles is
coming out of the closet for the Gorbachev State of the World Forum, which
will be donuted around the People's Millennium Assembly. The agendas are
the same. Mikhail Gorbachev, the United Nations and Prince Charles --
their agendas are all the same. And my question is, which throne does
Charles really want?
Q: I know people who have received death threats for writing less
compelling, less researched and documented stuff than you have. Yet you
still continue to attend all these events. You are going to be in New
York in September right?
A: Yes.
Q: How are you received at all these U.N. conferences? Are you
considered the crazy aunt in the basement no one wants to acknowledge?
A: Not at all, because I understand their agenda.
To be honest, I have had some absolutely hilarious run-ins with major
movers and shakers on a global level who, when I level THE question at
them, are so dumbfounded, they answer it. Then, they get mad at me or
they get mad at themselves for answering it. I'm doing a job, just like
you and WorldNetDaily. I'm looking to help the American people understand
the threats to our sovereignty, the threats to our freedom, our personal
property rights and the fact that we appear to be on the deck of the
Titanic and going down. It's up to Americans to make sure that doesn't happen.
Q: So how do how do we stop it?
A: Number one, the battle at this point has basically shifted down
to the local, county and state levels. That's where our battle is.
Get involved; look around; ask questions; don't be afraid. I
believe it is a spiritual battle above all and, therefore, I think it
begins with us, with our own humbleness and repentance before God.
The bottom line is, once freedom is lost, it is lost forever. It is
irretrievable. It would be a lot harder to get freedom once we lost it
versus protecting it and saving it while we still have it.
Related story: World government meeting in September
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/bluesky_dougherty/20000127_xnjdo_world_gove.shtml
Related column:
World government by September?
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/bluesky_btl/20000808_xcbtl_world_gove.shtml
Geoff Metcalf is a staff reporter for WorldNetDaily.
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Geoff Metcalf)
==============================================================================
Very Urgent Action Message: "Millennium Assembly" September
6-10, 2000
http://www.InsideTheWeb.com/mbs.cgi/mb1075995
HR:4453 - U.N. Police and Security Force Act of 2000
http://www.InsideTheWeb.com/mbs.cgi/mb1075995
CLINTON SIGNS A "NEW CONSTITUTION" FOR THE 21ST CENTURY CREATING
A PARTNERSHIP (BYPASSING CONGRESS) TO INTEGRATE THE 34 COUNTRIES
OF THE WESTERN HEMISPHERE BY 2005
Report by Joan Veon, Journalist to the Summit of the Americas
http://www.womensgroup.org/SUMMITPR.html#SOFC
EXCUSES FOR UN CONFERENCES
http://www.womensgroup.org/PRESS1.html#SOFC
New Davidian evidence discovered
http://www.InsideTheWeb.com/mbs.cgi/mb1075995
Indianapolis Baptist Temple Update 8/25/00
http://www.InsideTheWeb.com/mbs.cgi/mb1075995
THE MILITIA
http://www.InsideTheWeb.com/mbs.cgi/mb1075995
Time ticks for tyranny
http://www.InsideTheWeb.com/mbs.cgi/mb1075995
Political Uproar Expected Over New EU Secrecy Code
http://www.InsideTheWeb.com/mbs.cgi/mb1075995
Chinese Company Completes World's Largest Port in Bahamas
http://www.InsideTheWeb.com/mbs.cgi/mb1075995
Asset forfeiture reform takes effect
http://www.InsideTheWeb.com/mbs.cgi/mb1075995
GLOBAL TERRORISM ALERTS? [Ussamah Bin Laden?]
http://msanews.mynet.net/Scholars/Laden/
Population Control
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/population.htm
Electronic Mind Control
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/electronic.htm
If you would like to pledge a contribution to APFN:
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/contributions.htm
APFN "...a network of networkers'..." - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The American's Creed
"I believe in the United States of America as a Government of the people
by the people, for the people, whose just powers are derived from the
consent of the governed; a democracy in a Republic; a sovereign Nation of
many sovereign States; a perfect Union, one and inseparable; established
upon those principles of freedom, equality, justice, and humanity for
which American patriots sacrificed their lives and fortunes.
I therefore believe it is my duty to my Country to love it; to support its
Constitution; to obey its laws; to respect its flag, and to defend it
against all enemies." http://www.apfn.org
----------------------------------------------------------------
International Advocates for Health Freedom, http://www.iahf.com, email:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel. Within N.America 800-333-2553, Overseas 540-745-6534; Fax 540-745-6535
Donations to: IAHF POB 625 Floyd, VA 24091 USA
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
<A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
