From:

<http://interactive.wsj.com/articles/SB968811511846448251.htm>

"Why are the Bronfmans stumping for Hillary when Lazio has done
more for their cause?"

September 13, 2000


The Strange Politics Of Holocaust Restitution

By Seth Lipsky, a Journal contributing editor. He writes a column
every Wednesday for OpinionJournal.com.


The little band of demonstrators outside New York's Pierre Hotel
Monday evening was shouting "One two three four, Show
Hill-ar-y-the-door" and holding up signs for "One Jerusalem."
Inside were gathering -- at the invitation of the World Jewish
Congress -- a glittering array of leaders of the Jewish
community, as well as their financial backers. They were there to
honor the politicians from home and abroad who have played a role
in pressing Jewish claims for restitution of property stolen and
lives ruined during the Holocaust.

But behind the facade I sensed a real unease about the evening --
and about the juncture the restitution movement has reached. Part
of it had to do with the rank politicization of the event, which
stemmed from the decision of the president of the World Jewish
Congress, Edgar Bronfman, to bring not only the president but the
first lady to be honored. Mr. Bronfman is an important adviser to
Mrs. Clinton's senate campaign. Her opponent, Rep. Rick Lazio,
was pointedly not invited to the dinner, even though he played a
real role in passing legislation in support of the restitution
effort.

Mr. Bronfman's son, Edgar Jr., announced he was exercising a
point of personal privilege, then turned and said, "President and
Mrs. Clinton, thank you for these past eight years." He added
that he looked forward to working with "President Gore and
Senator Clinton." It was an error of judgment that caused a
number of people in the room to wince. The elder Mr. Bronfman
explained his decision to include Mrs. Clinton by disclosing that
he had used a 1996 meeting with her at a fund-raiser for the
Democratic National Committee to try to gain access to the
president on the subject of Holocaust restitution. She responded
by saying, "Edgar, is there a chance that we can get at the Swiss
banks?" She arranged a meeting with Mr. Clinton for the next day.

The president, according to the senior Mr. Bronfman, inquired
about the involvement of then-Sen. Alfonse D'Amato of New York, a
Republican, and asked Mr. Bronfman to tell Mr. D'Amato that Mr.
Clinton was prepared to work with him on the restitution
campaign. One can take that as a willingness to rise above
politics or, as so many are given to do in the wake of the
Clinton-Gore presidency, as an effort in an election year to
deflect the congressional investigation into Whitewater, an
investigation in which Mr. D'Amato played a key role. In any
event, Mr. Clinton proved to be an attentive figure in the fight.

The unease in the room ran deeper than American politics, to
themes that were aired on the eve of the banquet in a courageous
article in the September issue of Commentary, "Holocaust
Reparations -- A Growing Scandal" by Gabriel Schoenfeld. Mr.
Schoenfeld quotes columnist Charles Krauthammer as saying he is
worried about what he terms a "grotesque scramble for money"
whose only certain result is the "revival of Shylockian
stereotypes." And he quotes the Anti-Defamation League's Abraham
Foxman, who has voiced his fear that people may be led to believe
"that the Jews died not because they were Jews, but because they
had bank accounts, gold, art and property."

No one suggests that Jews -- or any organization on behalf of
Jewish individuals or estates -- should be shy about pressing any
claim stemming from the Holocaust. I have come to the view that
neither should they worry much about the consequences. Jews have
long since learned that those in Europe, or elsewhere, who will
be put off by the pressing of such claims are not going to be
mollified by restrained behavior. Anti-Semitism is not, and has
never been, a function of Jewish behavior.

But Mr. Schoenfeld raised, more pointedly than most others, the
problem presented by class-action lawsuits. He cites the
highest-profile of the class-action lawyers, Edward Fagan, and
reports that in the Swiss settlement he claimed an hourly fee of
$640, higher than the average annual pension that Holocaust
survivors receive from the German government. Mr. Fagan disputes
the $640 figure, saying he's billing $295. But whatever the
details of the matter, there can be no doubt the American tort
system provides enormous temptations that must be difficult to
resist. And unfortunately, the entry of the class action lawyers
into the Holocaust restitution fray has elided the distinction
between restitution, meaning the return of a measure of
individual property, and reparations, a word that connotes
repair, which is impossible.

Serious as these questions are -- and in my soundings I find a
lively appreciation for the sentiments voiced by Messrs. Foxman,
Krauthammer and Schoenfeld -- there are still others. As
important as restitution and the fight for historical truth are,
there is a growing recognition that they are not the road to the
Jewish future. The American Jewish community faces a demographic
crisis to which the banquet at the Pierre was largely irrelevant.
It faces an education crisis, in which the only relevant public
policy reform -- vouchers -- is one that the Clinton
administration has set itself athwart.

And if there is a military and diplomatic challenge to the Jewish
future, it is one in which the administration has stood not
behind the Jewish state but between it and its enemies. The very
week that was capped by the World Jewish Congress honoring Mr.
and Mrs. Clinton, the president spent trying to gain an
acceptable way to break the undivided Jewish sovereignty over
Jerusalem to which Yitzhak Rabin went to his grave committed.

The demonstrators were gone when my wife and I left the Pierre,
but my wife leaned over to me in the cab and pointed to where
they'd been standing. Of all the individuals we'd met that
evening, she said, they were the ones who had their eye on the
ball.


=================================================================
             Kadosh, Kadosh, Kadosh, YHVH, TZEVAOT

  FROM THE DESK OF:                    <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
                      *Mike Spitzer*     <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
                         ~~~~~~~~          <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

   The Best Way To Destroy Enemies Is To Change Them To Friends
       Shalom, A Salaam Aleikum, and to all, A Good Day.
=================================================================

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to