Wednesday September 13 2:35 PM ET
Voters Want Third Party Candidates in Debates

UTICA, N.Y. (Reuters/Zogby) - Likely voters agree that third party
candidates should participate in the debates, but should be limited to
those with higher profiles, a recent Zogby poll shows.

The nationwide survey of 1,005 likely voters reveals that a great deal of
support is shown for Green Party's Ralph Nader
(<http://search.news.yahoo.com/search/news?p=Ralph%20Nader&c=&n=10&yn=c>news
  -
http://dir.yahoo.com/Government/U_S__Government/Politics/Parties/Green_Party
/2000_Presidential_Candidates/Nader__Ralph/>web sites) (60.9% to 29.0%) and
Reform candidate Pat Buchanan
(<http://search.news.yahoo.com/search/news?p=Pat%20Buchanan&c=&n=10&yn=c>new
s -
<http://dir.yahoo.com/Government/U_S__Government/Politics/Parties/Reform_Par
ty/2000_Presidential_Election/Candidates/Buchanan__Pat/>web sites) (58.7%
to 34.2%) to be allowed to participate in the presidential debates. Less
support can be seen for Libertarian Harry Browne (44.2% to 39.9%).

Voters were not so supportive of the lesser-known party representatives:
Natural Law's John Hagelin
(<http://search.news.yahoo.com/search/news?p=John%20Hagelin&c=&n=10&yn=c>new
s -
<http://dir.yahoo.com/Government/U_S__Government/Politics/Parties/Natural_La
w_Party/2000_Presidential_Election/Candidates/>web sites) (38.3%
participate to 41.7% not participate), Constitution party's Howard Phillips
(38.5% participate to 42% not participate), and Socialist David McReynolds
(<http://search.news.yahoo.com/search/news?p=David%0AMcReynolds&c=&n=10&yn=c
 >news -
http://dir.yahoo.com/Government/U_S__Government/Politics/Elections/2000_Elec
tions/Presidential_Election/Candidates/Undeclared_and_Draft_Candidates/>web
sites) (35.3% participate and 45.4% not participate).

Support for particular candidates' participation differs among the three
major party affiliations.

Democrats support Nader (60.6% to 27.5), Buchanan (54.8% to 37.2%), Browne
(42.7% to 39.3%) and Hagelin (39.9% to 37.1%), while not supporting
Phillips (39.1% to 37.7%) or McReynolds 41.5% to 35.6%).

Republicans support Nader (55.6% to 34.5%) and Buchanan (56.7% to 37.1%),
while not supporting Browne (43.5% to 40.8%), Hagelin (48.4% to 32.6%),
Phillips (48.6% to 33.6%) and McReynolds (52.2% to 30%).

Independents show a margin of support for all candidates' participation in
the debates, but they are split on the participation of Socialist David
McReynolds with 42.5% not supporting his participation and 41.6% supporting
him.

What we asked''

``I'm going to read you a list of presidential candidates. Please tell me
if you believe each candidate should or should not be allowed to
participate in the upcoming Presidential debates with Democrat Al Gore
(<http://search.news.yahoo.com/search/news?p=Al%20Gore&c=&n=10&yn=c>news -
<http://dir.yahoo.com/Government/U_S__Government/Politics/Parties/Democratic
_Party/2000_Presidential_Election/Candidates/Gore__Al/>web sites) and
Republican George W. Bush
(<http://search.news.yahoo.com/search/news?p=George%20W.%20Bush&c=&n=10&yn=c
 >news -
http://dir.yahoo.com/Government/U_S__Government/Politics/Parties/Republican_
Party/2000_Presidential_Election/Candidates/Bush__George_W_/>web sites).

Green Party's Ralph Nader

Reform Party's Pat Buchanan

Natural Law's John Hagelin

Libertarian Harry Browne

Constitution's Howard Phillips

Socialist David McReynolds''

----------
Copyright © 2000 Yahoo! Inc., and Reuters Limited. All rights reserved.

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to