-Caveat Lector-

The Exploitive Corporate Global Cartel Economy

      by Darrell Udelhoven

     The Real Political Issues are the Issues the Corporate Media Refuse to Cover
     Publisher of the Series - The Real Political Issues & People Empowerment
©2000



We have a Global Corporate Cartel Economy that is based on heinous
Exploitation

     The immoral unjust and heinous problem we have in the world today is the
     extremely Exploitive global economic policy. The existing global economic
policy
     fosters corporate exploitation of people and the huge production cost
differentials
     between Developed and Developing countries. This has resulted in
     'noncompetitive' production cost relationships with increased concentration
of
     wealth and power to the corporate exploiters.

     The false claim that it substantially reduces the price of manufactured goods
is a
     fairy tale told by the establishment mouth pieces. The Transnational
corporations
     are not competing against the noncompetitive super low production cost
     advantages but rather are merely setting their prices at or slightly under
the prices
     of the homeland products that they are competing against for the consumer
     dollar.

     The TNCs merely keep the huge profit margins they gain through their wholly
     unjust and immoral exploitation of a noncompetitive use of human and other
     resources. In the short term the corporation wins but in the long run
everyone
     will lose including the corporation.

     Why should we allow one economic class to exploit all the other economic
classes
     including all of the economies of countries and their common citizenry. The
idea
     that we have to allow corporations to take advantage of noncompetitive
situations
     and that somehow this inhuman exploitation is going to prosper those people
so
     they can buy our products is just plain hog wash.

     The wealthy corporatists don't understand that they need to broaden the base
of
     the demand side of the economy within the Developed countries and the
     Developing countries in order to expand and sustain an increase in
consumption.
     This is the win-win global economic policy that increases everyone's wealth.

More Proofs of the General Failures of Global Economic Policies

     The special UN General Assembly session in Geneva last week concluded that
     poverty, inequality and insecurity have increased in the world since
globalism was
     launched. The number of people living in absolute poverty has increased from
a
     billion five years ago to 1.2 billion. It is the conclusion of a
collaborative report
     prepared by the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, the Organization
     for Economic Cooperation and Development and the United Nations itself.

     For more than 30 of the poorest national economies, real per capita incomes
have
     been falling for the past 35 years. Asia is the only region in which poverty
rates
     decreased during the past five years.

     Economic progress in Latin America was weakened by the increase in inequality
-
     a global phenomenon. People in the industrial countries now are 74 times
richer
     than those in the poorest. The wealth of the three richest men in the world
is
     greater than the combined GNP of all of the least developed countries - 600
million
     people.

     This impoverishment has occurred at a time when globalization was supposed to
     have launched the poor into sustained economic growth. It has done nothing of
     the kind.

     Globalism as a phenomenon is the product of technological developments that
     allow integrated global communications and the possibility of real time
financial
     transactions and globalized manufacturing. These are politically and socially
     neutral. How they are used is what matters.

     Globalism as ideology demanded that these resources be placed at the service
of
     deregulated markets, and asserted that the action of the marketplace would
bring
     large social and political benefits.

     The experience of the last few years has not been the result of objective
forces
     arising from the nature of the economy itself, or of irresistible
technological
     forces. It has resulted from deliberate policy choices made by the
governments of
     the advanced economies - chiefly, the U.S. government - acting in good faith,
but
     also according to what they considered their national interests and the
particular
     interests of influential political constituencies in their financial and
corporate
     communities.

     The belief that market forces would naturally enforce the general interest
     originated as the sectarian enthusiasm of a minority of writers and theorists
in
     Britain and the United States beginning in the 1970s, and it derives more
from
     their political hostility to so-called big government than from economic
analysis.

     The movements' principal intellectual progenitor was Friedrich von Hayek,
whose
     arguments concerning free markets included the contention that government
     regulation in the economic sphere is connected in a fundamental way to
political
     tyranny.

Global Economic Slavery is Comparable to Slavery in the USA South
during the 17-1800's

     Read history; the only difference is that the plantation owners' of the South
     bought imported slaves from the "Import Slave Trade" and in our global
     economy the corporations (are practicing Export Slave Trading) export their
     industries to the slave labor of human beings that have few rights and have
     few if any better living conditions than the Southern slaves had. Being free
     without the means to sustain life at decent levels can not be considered to
     meet the Constitutional standard of Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of
     Happiness.

     From a purely economic standpoint the Southern slaves would have been
     worse off had the plantation owners hired them at slave wage levels which
     could have resulted in an even lower standard of living. When worker's that
     have few if any enforced political or human rights are hired at below slave
     labor living standards, from an economic hardship standpoint, they are
     worse off than a well kept slave.

     We fought a horrible civil war over exploitive slave labor in America and now
     the Republicans and some Democrats sanction it for the Transnational
     corporations in the name of Free Trade. It is a Trade in Free Slavery that
     these elected representatives are sanctioning! You know what I have stated
     here is TRUE and that it is THE Global Free Trade REALITY!

     Our global economic policies do not improve the general wealth of
     Developing countries or Developed countries by indulging in the inhumane
     EXPLOITATION of SLAVE LABOR.

     Thank God that Ralph Nader speaks to these issues and that Vice President
     Gore said he was for FAIR TRADE, not free trade!

A Look Back at the Mid 1800's in America

     This "corporate trade cartel" has no valid competition to force it to compete
     with homeland domestic
     economies that are tiring to compete with total production costs and cost of
     living standards that existed in America in the mid 1800's when unskilled
     workers only earned 50 to 75 cents a day, Skilled carpenters and blacksmiths
     did well to earn a $1.50 a day, of course living costs were very low and due
     to high transportation costs foreign imports were not the terrible threat
they
     are in the soon beginning of the 21st century, which officially begins in
2001.

     When you consider the tremendous changes in transportation
     communications and those present advantages in foreign investments you
     have a perfect setup for corporate imperialism and colonization of Developing
     countries. The present corporate monopolization of global foreign corporate
     manufacturing and trade make it possible to rig the global economy in their
     favor no matter what it does to the average person within any of the
     countries worldwide.

     Corporations as a polico-economic and governing class are far more
     powerful than any country and have developed the organizations to control
     global economic policy making. Whether specific corporations succeed or fail
     in the present global economic system has nothing to do with the detrimental
     effects of global corporate cartelism and colonialism.

     When labor was mistreated in America for many years by industry they
     couldn't just arbitrarily quit buying all products and put those industries
out
     of business; it took legislation by Democrats in the legislature and in the
     Executive Office of the White House to improve their working conditions and
     their quality of life!

It is Time to Empower the Economic Opportunities of Our Worlds'
Citizenry

     We can develop and must have policies that provide the opportunities toward
that
     will empower the economic earnings and purchasing powers of our worlds'
     citizenry.George Soros - The Crisis of Global Capitalism

     It is critical the the global that the vast majority of its 6 billion
population be
     economically empowered so that the demand side of the global economy is
     expanded to enrich the citizens of every country.
     http://aidc.org.za/archives.html(I just found these Archives of support -
     06/02/2000)
     NEWS IN REVIEW - QUESTIONABLE ECONOMIES


Unprincipled Standards that Promote the Creation of Noncompetitive
Relationships in every Arena of Production Costs must not be allowed

     Worldwide sustainable economic growth requires a balance between economic
     communities and will also require that renewable energy sources be used for
all
     economic development. This will save lives and preserve the land air and
     environment while saving tremendous amounts of money which will lead to
     mutual prosperity and quality of life.

These New Global Economic Policy Decision Making Standards will
balance trade among countries and produce broad based worldwide
sustainable -- stable economic growth

     Trade deficits are being created due to the untenable noncompetitive
production
     costs between countries with disparate; regulations, labor, land, taxes, and
other
     costs. This production cost advantages are not acquired by a mere country of
     origin so called "comparative advantage," but rather are "noncompetitive"
     structural stage of development and dictatorial regime exploitation of the
masses
     that we should not allow corporations to exploit any further.

     All of the citizens within each country should have the opportunity to vote
on
     those persons they want to represent them.

The Democratic Sovereignty of Countries and their Citizenry's is at
Stake

     It appears that these policy making organizations are brought into existence
and
     function in the interest of TNCs. Of the 136 member countries of the World
Trade
     Organization WTO, the Quad countries which consist of the U.S., European
Union,
     Japan, and Canada can and do meet behind closed doors and influence rulings,
     and those decision maker's are primarily working for corporate interests.

     The WTO permits countries (primarily on behalf of corporation interests) to
     challenge each other's laws and regulations as violations of WTO rules. These
     challenge cases are heard by a three member trade bureaucratic tribunal,
which
     are usually corporate interest lawyers.

     My point is that, these policies are deal directly with your fundamental
     constitutional rights which ought to be sovereign. It's about your jobs, it's
about
     your environment, it's about your communities; fundamentally it's about your
     democracy: This is about whether We The People are going to rule or these
     corporations are going to rule.

The WTO and all Global Economic Policy Making Organizations should
be the Central Issue of all Elections World-wide

     Your vote should turn on - where each candidate stands in respect to the WTO
     issues and your democratic sovereignty! This is the only way there will be
any
     in-depth media coverage of this critical issue to every world citizen's
future.
     Remember The Green Party and Ralph Nader; and The Reform Party and Pat
     Buchanan -- they must be in the presidential debates!

Poor George, Vice President Al Gore Is Talking About Real Human
Being Issues—Oh How Unfair!

     I'm very concerned about those crocodile tears over supposed class warfare
     that George is suffering from? Yes George, no one in high office is ever
     supposed to mention any of the "Real Human Being Political Issues,"
     however, "class differentials in equity of economic opportunity policy making
     is a real quality of life political policy issue that must be debated."

     The reality is that 95% of the people, in fact even the wealthy, should be
     rejoicing over Vice President Gore's standing up for a new economic
     paradigm of win-win verses the present zero-sum win-lose economic policy
     making formula.

     The increasing concentration of wealth now has it that 1% of American's
     own 49% of this countries wealth and it is getting worse under present
     global economic policy making principles. The present and past economic
     policy making contain no "high order principles of economic equity of
     opportunity across economic class lines."

     I want everyone in America, and all around the world, to think about this
     wholly immoral public policy debacle. If America's leaders do not take the
     lead in the resolution of this economic equity of opportunity problem, there
     will be too many revolutions and wars fought for economic justice to ever
     begin to deal with.

     Now, this message to America's and the World press! Within these issues lies
     the ultimate life and death destiny of hundreds of millions of human beings.
     We have a six billion world population that have human economic and
     biological needs to be met through the making of a rightly principled global
     economic policy making agenda.

     This economic policy making agenda must include incentives to promote the
     worldwide use of renewable energy coupled with recycling of precious
     metals and other materials so that real per capita incomes can be raised on a
     worldwide basis without poisoning our sources of life.

     "Yes, we can have a win-win principle based global economy."

     Send comments to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

     MY PEOPLE EMPOWERMENT - PAGE Links

     THE REAL POLITICAL ISSUES - Initial Home Page

     The Real Political Issues and People Empowerment
     Empowerment Communications

     Posted: 8/24/00
     Updated: 8/28/00
     Copyright © 2000
     All rights reserved


============================
-- CUT OUT THE MIDDLEMEN --
JUST VOTE FOR A CORPORATION
============================

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to