-Caveat Lector- WJPBR Email News List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Peace at any cost is a Prelude to War! ARTICLE 4 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Political Opinion: General Wesley Clark - Does He represent Today's Military? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Ed.: Thought provoking comments. Did we ever learn the truth about the Kosovo operations? Is our foreign policy as even handed as we claim? Are some of our senior generals out of control? About Stella: A career military officer's wife, Stella Jatras has traveled widely and has lived in many foreign countries where she learned about other cultures and, through personal experience, became very knowledgeable regarding world affairs and world politics. *********************************************************** By Stella L. Jatras On 26 September, I had the opportunity to speak to General Wesley Clark, former NATO Supreme Allied Commander, who was a guest on C-SPAN. I began with the following comments: "When the Russians were the first to go into Pristina airfield, you, General, wanted to take out the Russians, and to his credit, British General Sir Michael Jackson said, "I'm not going to start WW III over you." (No reaction from General Clark - nor did he acknowledge the comment). A previous caller had stated that the Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA) was dealing in drugs and that we have turned Kosovo over to the Albanian mafia cartel. I backed the caller up by saying that, "The KLA were armed and trained in Osama bin Laden's terrorists camps." And then came "The Big Question, "General, we now know there were no mass graves of 100,000 victims as claimed by Secretary of Defense Cohen, nor were there 700 Albanian victims lying in the Trepca mines according to "eyewitnesses." In fact, investigators did not find any bodies. And that there was no genocide according to the Wall Street Journal and Eli Wiesel of the Rosenthal Center, ("2,500 bodies on all sides cannot be considered to be a genocide"). As for ethnic cleansing, ethnic Albanians ran to Belgrade to their relatives to get away from our bombs!" "Can you tell me on what basis you justified bombing the Serbian people when that Justification was based on lies?" Of course the question was ignored. The general went on to defend the Kosovo Liberation Army and said that, in the beginning, the KLA was nothing more than a small band of rebels that merely wanted to liberate their people from Serb domination. I guess the good general conveniently forgot that the State Department, "in the beginning," had labeled the KLA as a terrorist organization. POINTS TO CONSIDER 1. In an interview with Inside the Pentagon (28 Oct 1999), Clark insisted that 11,000 genocide victims HAD ALREADY BEEN FOUND, when, to this day, fewer than 3000 bodies have been found. And those are an undetermined mixture of ethnic Albanians, Serbs, Jews, Romanians and others. Yet nearly a year ago General Clark, even after being asked to verify that he had spoken correctly, stuck to his false claim. 2. During the 1995 Operation Storm, the Croatian Army, with U.S. military aid and technology, ethnically cleansed over 250,000 Serbs from the Krajina, murdering thousands in a matter of days. Those too old or infirm to flee remained behind only to have a bullet to the head or their throats slit. There was no humanitarian aid from the United States, no tents, no food, no medicine-not even water. "As the Serbian refugees were bombed and strafed by the Croatian air force in violation of the 'no-fly zone,' General Wesley Clark said on national television, 'AT LEAST THIS DEFINES THE MAP'," (Kosovo Crisis, a Study in Foreign Policy Mismanagement by Dr. Vojin Joksimovich). 3. Clark's aggressive policies became evident when he delivered a message to a dozen generals and colonels when he traveled to a NATO base in Banja Luka. He instructed his officers that they could "impose any law," and to "Use your martial law-like authority." Furthermore, "Don't be afraid of disorder and isolated incidents of violence against NATO troops." But here's the kicker. He stated, " Most important, don't ask or wait for leadership or direction from superiors in Washington, Paris, London, Rome or Ottawa." (The Washington Post, 28 Sep - "A Four-Star Foreign Policy). Perhaps I am somewhat uninformed in these matters, but to me, this smacks of arrogant insubordination. BIRDS OF A FEATHER or THE CASE OF DR. STRANGELOVE During the C-SPAN program, General Clark commented that he was involved with the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) on a pro bono basis. There he joins Col. William Taylor, Jr. During the Bosnia Conflict, Col. Taylor appeared on CNN and other TV and radio programs as a "military analyst." His stated solution to the Balkan crisis was that we should bomb Belgrade [which we eventually did and we can see the disastrous results] and send no fewer than 100,000 troops for as long as 15 to 20 years to solidify Secretary Perry's "meanest dog in town" rhetoric. The troubling thought is that these characters may be representative of today's military leadership. You be the judge. =========================================================== ARTICLE 5 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Training Avoidance Deteriorates Combat Readiness ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Ed.: Red addresses how training opportunities are missed in Guard and regular Army units. Oftentimes, weapons and equipment never leave the arms or supply rooms, thus depriving soldiers the opportunity to become proficient and gain confidence. *********************************************************** By Red E. Ness Former Paratrooper, now Mechanized Infantryman One of the things lost when we embraced liberal "Pc'ness," was that the warriors were no longer to be trusted. The days of taking out weapons and assembling/reassembling them for time and blind-folded, except for annual EIB train-up/testing became "extreme" and too war-like. Now it's a pain to get weapons out of the arms room. A case in point is my current unit that employs NCO-nullification of officer plans. Like "jury-nullification", it's when you decide to do what you want, facts be damned. In our case, firing the M249 Light Machine Guns would take more work, ordering the belted 5.56mm ammo, studying proper techniques for employment, staying out longer on the range, when you can be drinking beer instead. So to avoid firing the M249 LMGs, you first make sure it's not clear who-is-who by line number, duty position on the MTOE, so when you go to the annual weapons qualification range there are no soldiers who see the M249 LMG as their weapon of expertise. No belted 5.56mm ammo is ordered so the NCO nullifiers have the ready-excuse: "We don't have the proper ammo". The final clincher is to not take the M249 LMGs by insuring that no one puts them on the truck going out to the range, since there is no ammo to shoot them (seems logical, right?). This way if someone takes the initiative to get some ammo for them or simply wants to do dry-firing drills, its fait accompli. The result of this is when you go to the Training Centers, like JRTC, the officers rightly demand we look the part of a fully-equipped Bradley Fighting Vehicle (BFV) dismount rifle squad and M249 LMGs are taken. Gunners now fumble with these weapons and finger their M16 rifle blank adapters in an attempt to get them to fire blanks reliably for the MILES laser-tag war. When the gun fails to work because of a wrong adapter, they call it a "piece of garbage" and leave it in the track, so when the FTX is over, there are even more reasons to keep the M249 LMGs in the arms room where they will stay cleaner and pass the next Inspector General (IG) inspection. The same approach is true for much of our equipment. The M203 40mm grenade launcher, vests and flak jackets that never leave the supply room, and Night Vision Goggles (NVGs) not worn for night firing. The solution is to get a giant board and list by line#, duty position every Soldier's place in the MTOE, posted in the armory drill hall or in the main unit building if the unit is active duty. Make it clear what weapons we have to be experts at and enforce that when we get a chance to shoot. Use every opportunity to load 5.56mm into 30 round rifle magazines and shooting short bursts through the M249 LMG, if it doesn't work at least you'll know. Train and Drill your men to be proficient with all their equipment. It may mean staying late and no beer, or maybe if we got our act together getting the training knocked out smartly and still getting done early enough to relax? It means officers being unpopular and not letting their NCOs nullify good plans for unit excellence and achieving mediocrity. If the NCOs are not motivated to be the best, find out why they are "turned off". =============================================================== ARTICLE 6 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Navy: Mandatory ESWS: Promotion of Mediocrity ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Ed.: Have once coveted qualification badges become feel-good giveaways? *********************************************************** By MRCS (SW) Leland Lawrence (retired) I earned my Enlisted Surface Warfare Specialist (ESWS) badge in 1985, onboard the USS New Jersey (BB-62) as a 2nd class petty officer. It was a better part of a year's work, but the pride in having my "water wings" pinned on was awesome. I felt a cut above those who weren't qualified, and saw sailors who'd earned them as professionals and knew the systems and their ship of war. The program was initiated around 1977, and was demanding. You stood watches, had to demonstrate knowledge of systems, which could only be learned by going to different work centers. You had to actually work with the systems, look at them, trace them out and ask a lot of questions. Then you had to pass an oral board with CPO's and officers. It worked. Selection boards for E-7 thru E-9 began to put a big emphasis on this qualification. Around 1992, the program began to weaken. On the USS Yorktown (CG-48) the CO allowed Midshipmen on their summer cruise to qualify, handing out 12 undeserved pins. The enlisted crew was livid, and the first question was "how in the hell can the "Middies" qualify in 4 to 6 weeks, but the crew who run the systems no less, have to follow the program to the letter?" Many stopped working on their quals. More than a few mentioned this at their EAOS. A weak Command Master Chief only made matters worse. One Senior Chief came onboard TAD just to qualify for his pin. Another 60 day wonder. No oral board, and further erosion of the program. Several times I failed someone during an oral board, and they would squeal like a stuck pig: "But I'm leaving PCS next week!" Some board members who demanded these sailors know their stuff often didn't get invited back to the makeup 'board' prior to the failed sailor transferring. Putting a pin on someone who memorized facts, who wasn't a crew member, or just to politically enhance someone's service record strayed far from the program's original intent. Former Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy John Hagan destroyed what little integrity the program had left. It is now mandatory in the fleet for everyone serving on a ship to get qualified. A boot seaman with a pin is something I question, as most have little grasp of their own rates at this point in their Navy careers, let alone earning a pin. Plus the stack of PQS books handed to sailors coming onboard a ship today is absurd. What happens is that the line items in ESWS and PQS books get "discussed" in a class room type setting (mostly on the mess decks), and the line items get signed off. Or the sailor just needs to "observe" vice participate in shipboard evolutions. There are guidebooks published for each ship class, with the ideal answer, and you would be surprised at the amount of memorization that goes on, instead of participating at a workcenter to see what is happening, or how equipment is configured. Damage Control PQS, both basic and advanced, suffers from the same thing. I honestly believe MCPON Hagan had good intentions, but he in no way solicited input from the CPO community afloat. The ESWS program is now watered down to make everyone "feel good" about themselves, and "level the playing field" for females now stationed on combatant ships. Political correctness? Sure looks that way. Plus the proliferation of new categories of pins tailored for doctors, dentists, and a whole host of other folks is a joke. All fluff and flash, as most of these "qualified" don't know the bow from the stern, or ship's draft from draft beer. No longer do those who qualified as an Enlisted Surface Warfare Specialist stand out as a leader in a shipboard environment. It is a further indication of the cookie cutter and zero defect mentality now rampant in all the services. Paper qualifications do not make the sailor. Too many sailors have died afloat who were qualified on paper to do their jobs, or worse yet killed others because they didn't earn it. ============================================================ ARTICLE 7 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Navy: Ticking Disciplinary Time Bombs ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Ed.: Many will discount this kind of story...but they are more common than you think. The issues at hand are: Standards of discipline, the dangers of co-ed training, the quality of recruits, and the ability of leaders to prevent these incidents. ************************************************************ By a Concerned Parent I read with interest your article today. I want to describe one (there have been many) of my daughter's bad Navy experiences. My daughter trained at Waukegon, Illinois. I never would have believed that her training would be co-ed until I saw it. A great deal of the time among the trainees was spent jockeying for position with the other sex. When it came time to graduate, she foolishly attended an off base party at a local hotel. After drinking too much, she passed out. Two sailors then raped her. She found out the details from another sailor they had bragged to. She reported the incident and was then subject to harassment to drop the complaint. They urged her not to ruin these "boys" careers. She wanted to come home but couldn't get her orders. The legal people told her the medical staff put a hold on her for observation. The medical people denied this and said the legal staff put the hold on her. This was a girl who had just been raped and wanted to go to her family but they were playing games with her in an effort to make her give up. Her desire to get home was strong and she did give up and dropped her complaint. I often wonder how many more problems these "boys" have caused. ========================================================= ARTICLE 8 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ California Guard: Broken Promises ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Ed: I have recently received many letters that express the same concern. As the Guard becomes more integrated, it seems to contract the same diseases as the regular Army. A believer in the citizen soldier force as powerful backup for a swift-strike professional Army, I see a dire need to reform for the ARNG and reserve components. When in doubt about using limited time for combat training or maintenance vs. compliance drills, combat training and maintenance must always come first. A good command climate leads to higher retention. *********************************************************** By a California Guardsman For a variety of reasons, I decided that I no longer want to be a member of the California National Guard. Whether the "straw that broke the camel's back" in my decision to get out was the poor leadership, focus on recruiting and family support groups over training, lack of significant education benefits, the long drive to and from drill, the numerous civilian work conflicts, or the amount of work that I consistently had to do outside of the drill weekend to make up for the laziness of the full-timers, I don't know. What I do know is that I can't get out, despite having completed my obligation. It seems that the Division Commander has instituted a "stop-loss" for the Division until after he briefs the next one and maybe two USR reports. This means that soldiers who have signed Active Duty contracts won't be released from the Guard to join the Active Component until after the stop-loss. This means that soldiers who are not MOS qualified in their present Divisional assignments but are MOS qualified in critically short non-divisional slots cannot transfer. Most disturbingly, this means that the "powers that be" won't have any idea of the true strength of the Division. When I came into the Guard from the Regular Army, I was an idealist. I thought that with the right kind of company level leadership, enforcement of Army standards, and an abundance of well-planned mission-focused training, a unit could be "successful." What I have found is that the Guard in California is sorely missing senior leadership with vision broader than "let's institute a stop-loss to hide the true numbers." I see more and more full-time Guard Techs and other careerist "insiders" in key part-time officer and NCO positions. Their motto: "Don't rock the boat!" What I leave behind is an organization full of politicians and short of leaders, an organization unwilling to confront (let alone not promote) incompetence, and an organization that is comfortable telling the world that it's ready, willing, and able while its soldiers remain inadequately trained, inadequately led, and not held to the same standards as the Regular Army. *COPYRIGHT NOTICE** In accordance with Title 17 U. S. C. Section 107, any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for nonprofit research and educational purposes only.[Ref. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml ] Want to be on our lists? Write at [EMAIL PROTECTED] for a menu of our lists! ****************************************************************************** ******************* A vote for Bush or Gore is a vote to continue Clinton policies! A vote for Buchanan is a vote to continue America! Therefore a vote for Gore or Bush is a wasted vote for America! Don't waste your vote! Vote for Patrick Buchanan! Today, candor compels us to admit that our vaunted two-party system is a snare and a delusion, a fraud upon the nation. Our two parties have become nothing but two wings of the same bird of prey... Patrick Buchanan <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]</A> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om