-Caveat Lector-

[Is that "pampered son of the super-rich" referring to Bush or
Gore?  --MS]


http://examiner.com/001015/1015op-scheer.html

What is it with white men and their buddy, Bush?

By Robert Scheer Contributing editor and columnist at the Los
Angeles Times, Editor of USC's Online Journalism Review:
www.ojr.org.


 SANTA MONICA - Why are white men so screwed up? If you can
believe the polls, they identify by a huge margin with George W.
Bush as one of them.

What gives with these delusions of grandeur in which Joe Six-Pack
puts himself in the same boat with a pampered son of the
super-rich? Did average white males grow up in the lap of luxury
and get to squander funds invested by family friends in failing
oil ventures? Can they fashion a well-greased political career
based solely on their fathers' names?

Obviously not, but what has traditionally bound white males to
men like Bush is that they, too, like to think of themselves as
being winners simply as a perk of birth. That way, if they also
got poor grades in college, they could still think of themselves
as smart enough to be president, when even the brightest women
couldn't.

Not that all white males are actually winners, but they don't
have to feel like losers, since they can still feel superior to
women and minorities.

But now, with equality growing between the sexes and even the
races, white males feel their privilege threatened by the
prospect of an even playing field. They blame this on the
Democrats for pushing affirmative action, which started to break
up the old-boy network.

So they tend to vote for Republicans in large numbers, thinking
that progress can be held back and traditional values restored,
meaning that women will be put back in their place.

Such a reversal of white female fortunes would be a disaster for
white males, if they would only stop to think about it — but
being white males, they don't.

The brute truth of the statistics on the boom in American family
prosperity is that it is based on females entering the work force
and obtaining better pay. Particularly white females, who have
been the main beneficiaries of efforts to make the job market a
bit less biased.

White men are inclined to think that a rise in women's pay means
a decline in males' standard of living. That's because white
males have not grasped the fact that women tend to intermarry —
with men — meaning that their incomes are shared with husbands
and male offspring and even fathers, whom they occasionally help
support.

But beyond the economics of equal pay for equal work, there are
those other "women's issues," which the Democrats support and to
which men are indifferent, most significantly the issue of
"choice." If males would just ponder for a second how women get
pregnant, they might not be so quick to define abortion as a
"women's issue."

Let's say that George W. gets to make good on his expressed
desire to pick U.S. Supreme Court justices in the mold of Anthony
Scalia and Clarence Thomas, who then overturn Roe vs. Wade.

Where does that leave men who have gotten women pregnant and
decide they are not ready for fatherhood? Well, in the bad old
days, it left them accompanying fearful women on a trip to
Tijuana or some back-alley abortion mill in this country, in the
process not only betraying the health needs of a woman they
claimed to love but incurring legal risks as well.

It's perplexing how a host of other issues that would seem to
affect men equally with women got to be gender-defined in polls.

Why are women more pro-environment, pro-children and pro-health
care, or more concerned about saving Social Security? Is it that
Darwinian nesting thing?

Women want the civilizing effect of government to protect the
vulnerable. Men see themselves as cowboys at war on the frontier
in need of personal arms and a strong cavalry at the fort to back
them up.

Do men not know that if Social Security gets wrecked with this
privatization gamble Bush is hustling, they will be hurt?

Even younger men who might have to cut into their discretionary
income to take care of their aging parents could be at risk.

As for the environment, one has to assume men's lungs are not
gender-protected from the poisonous fumes that now make Houston
the pollution capital of the nation. Surely males can appreciate
the wonders of hunting and fishing in the pristine environment of
Alaska that is threatened by the Bush-Cheney team's promise to
rape its energy resources and turn it into another Texas.

If being pro-choice, pro-environment and in favor of the security
of older people makes Al Gore a wimp, shouldn't we men re-examine
our macho standards?

Remember that limp cigarette in the mouth of the cowboy in those
anti-tobacco ads that link smoking with impotency? Macho men are
a dying breed.


=================================================================
             Kadosh, Kadosh, Kadosh, YHVH, TZEVAOT

  FROM THE DESK OF:                    <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
                      *Mike Spitzer*     <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
                         ~~~~~~~~          <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

   The Best Way To Destroy Enemies Is To Change Them To Friends
       Shalom, A Salaam Aleikum, and to all, A Good Day.
=================================================================

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to