-Caveat Lector- http://www.worldnetdaily.com/bluesky_smith_news/20001030_xnsof_federal_co.shtml Federal cookies track Internet users Government report says many agencies' websites violate privacy policy By Charles R. Smith The federal government is collecting cookies from your computer, in violation of its own policy, according to a newly released General Accounting Office report. Titled "Internet Privacy: Federal Agency Use of Cookies," the report shows that the government is collecting "persistent" cookies to track Internet users. Cookies are files stored on a computer by Internet browser software when a website is visited. According to the GAO report, persistent cookies "can be used to track users' browsing behavior by identifying their Internet addresses." The federal agencies that collect cookies include the Federal Emergency Management Agency, U.S. Customs Service, U.S. Postal Service, Small Business Administration, U.S. Forest Service and Office of Personnel Management. Agencies not checked in the random survey include the Central Intelligence Agency, National Security Agency and Department of Defense. The White House responded to the report by noting that the administration had banned the collection of Internet cookies in June. "Cookies should not be used unless there is clear and conspicuous notice, a compelling need to gather the data on the site; appropriate and publicly disclosed privacy safeguards for handling of information derived from cookies; and personal approval by the head of the agency," wrote Sally Katzen, the deputy director of the Executive Office of the President in an Oct. 19 letter to the General Accounting Office. The letter from the White House drew a sharp response from privacy advocates, one of which said the federal cookies policy failure is a small example of a much larger problem. "Cookies are something very public and easy to monitor," noted David Kopel, research director for the Colorado-based Independence Institute. "Just what is going on when nobody is watching is a better question. "Despite the White House mandate, you have to wonder whether there are other things going on behind the scenes -- projects withheld from the public view such as the recent FBI 'Carnivore' program, secret ATF databases on firearms owners and numerous secret wiretaps. Who knows what is going on?" said Kopel. "The report is very disturbing and shows how far behind federal agencies are at understanding the technological and civil-liberties issues underlying Internet privacy," stated Barry Fagin, a privacy and telecommunications adviser working for RMI.NET. "If a commercial website does something with a cookie that you don't like, or if they don't disclose their privacy policy to your satisfaction, you don't have to use it. Government sites, however, are often the sole source of information and have legal force behind them. So the standards for privacy protection should be much more rigorous than the private sector. In practice, at least right now, things are exactly backwards," he said. "The present administration's commitment to civil liberties and privacy issues has been, in a word, terrible," asserted Fagin. There is evidence supporting Fagin's assessment of the Clinton-Gore administration. For example, Vice President Al Gore has previously endorsed federal government monitoring of computer communications. In 1994, Gore endorsed a government-designed computer "Clipper" chip intended to monitor all secure computer communications, according to a letter written by the vice president. "We also want to assure users of key escrow encryption products that they will not be subject to unauthorized electronic surveillance," noted the vice president in his July 20, 1994, letter to Cantwell. "As we have done with the Clipper chip, future key escrow schemes must contain safeguards to provide for key disclosures only under legal authorization and should have audit procedures to ensure the integrity of the system. Escrow holders should be strictly liable for releasing keys without legal authorization," wrote Gore. Yet, in 1994, government officials were keenly aware that the Clipper chip design that Gore endorsed did not have safeguards against unauthorized surveillance. According to a top secret 1992 memo, FBI official J. R. Davis, wrote, "The most serious concern is that the scenario regarding the use of the 'exploitable' chip could surface publicly." In 1993, Benita A. Cooper, NSA associate administrator for management systems and facilities, wrote "There is no way to prevent the NSA from routinely monitoring all (CLIPPER) encrypted traffic. Moreover, compromise of the NSA keys, such as in the Walker case, could compromise the entire (CLIPPER) system." The GAO cookie report drew no reaction from the various political camps. Maria Cantwell, a well-known dot-com millionaire is currently the Democratic candidate running in a close bid against Sen. Glade Gordon, R-Wash. Neither Cantwell's Senate campaign office in Washington nor Gordon's campaign office both responded to requests for a comment. The Republican National Committee headquarters and the Democratic National Committee headquarters also declined to comment on the cookies report. The lack of response from both major political parties comes as no surprise to privacy experts like Fagin. "Neither major party really seems to 'get it.' That's why we need to take more responsibility for our own Web surfing and online privacy protection," noted Fagin. "If a website doesn't display their privacy policy, e-mail them to ask why, and tell them you won't give them your business until they do. If they have a privacy policy link (most reputable sites display one proudly), click on it, read it and understand it. Finally, learn how to control the privacy settings in your browser. If you don't want any websites to track any information about your site visits, it's easy to do." "Like it or not, when it comes to online privacy, we're on our own," concluded Fagin. "I think in the long run, we're better off that way." ================================================================= Kadosh, Kadosh, Kadosh, YHVH, TZEVAOT FROM THE DESK OF: *Michael Spitzer* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The Best Way To Destroy Enemies Is To Change Them To Friends ================================================================= <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]</A> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
