-Caveat Lector-
Doesn't anyone see the constant state and federal legal volleying which is
prolonging this painful 'election', as being a little stagey, odd, contrived,
suspicious? Possibly this is a manufactured event designed to... to what?
Force a crisis? And why? To create more false divisions in the American
public? Foment civil unrest which will be cause to implement and impose the ML
/ FEMA organizational structure? Jim Marrs, author of "Ruled by Secrecy" said
on the Dec 3rd Dreamland broadcast, he believed the situation has been
engineered to call for and hold a constitutional convention, at which time the
constitution could be revised, rewritten and in doing so, pretty well trashed
out. Hadn't thought of that one, and am not familiar with 'Constitutional
convention', which I plan to research.
I wasn't and am not a supporter of either of the bozos either. Like I said
before they are simpy the cardboard cutouts of the corporate plutocracy. Both
parties, along with the legal system, have sold out the ideals of the US
Constitution, Bill of Rights and the American public to the corporate/globalist
interests. We are the commodities. They create monsters and sell fear,
manipulating the mainstream consciousness to react rather than to act with
discerning intelligence and question their decisions, which are seldom, if ever,
good for this nation or its people.
I believe defending either party or candidate is a waste of time and energy, a
diversion from the real issues, such as a health, privacy, government
accountability/secrecy and liberty, largely unnoticed and unchallenged in the
din of confusion and babble of empty rhetoric. Better to use this misdirected
energy learning what to look for and how to fight for something of substance and
real value rather than fighting over or for something that does not even exist,
except in propaganda or a memory.
IMO, that is.
~ M
==============================
"Jayson R. Jones" wrote:
>
> -Caveat Lector-
>
> Hello,
> I have commented on varius posts that fall within my interest
> grouping, but have pretty much refrained from comment on the current
> election. However, a couple of things contained in the flood of postings
> concerning this have caught my attention. Spin, dissinformation and
> blatant ideology aside, there are some issues here that strike to the
> heart of us as a people, and what we believe ourselves to be.
> The percentage of "problem ballots" in states other than Florida
> are substantially lower than the percentage of "problem ballotst" in
> Florida. In the other states, the number of "problem ballots" would not
> cause a change in the winner EVEN IF ALL WERE FOR ONE CANDIDATE. In
> Florida, with the margine so close, every vote counts.
> There seems to be a thread going around that no one with an IQ
> over 70 thinks that Bore won the popular vote in Florida. Well, I can
> safely say that I have an IQ over 70 and I think that, if all the
> disputed votes were to be fairly counted, Bore would be the winner.
> Let me point out that I am NOT a supporter of either of these
> BOZOs. To me they are Twedle de dee and Tweedle de dum. Both have some
> points I agree with and both have so many flaws in ideology and logic
> that I could not in good conscience vote for either of them. I am not a
> listener to the "Talking Heads", I prefer NPR, PBS, CSPAN, Nightline,
> Rush (for comic relief), a state and a local talk show, and Coast to
> Coast. If this "Labels, Categorizes, Pidgeon Holes, or otherwise gives
> an insight into the inner workings of my mind" so be it.
> Bore has offered the proposition that ALL the votes in Florida
> should be counted. That seems logical and fair minded. George II
> refuses to let any votes be counted and relies on legaleese to claim
> victory. I admit a bias against legaleese, but even setting that bias
> aside, Bore's seems to be the logical position. No law can ever be
> written that covers all eventualities, so what is wrong with counting all
> the votes.
> It seems to me that the Florida Supreme Court has made a hash of
> all this by (correctly I think) ordering the recount, but failing to give
> enough time to do it. TWICE!!! Florida is the only contested state, so
> far, and Florida is where the power should lie to correct the problem.
> Florida judges, elected and appointed officials, and election officials
> all are ultimately accountable to the Florida voters, so it is up to them
> to fix the problems in their state.
> To me, Judge Saul's ruling was seriously flawed. To rule that
> the the Bore team had failed to prove that the recount would
> 'substantially change' the outcome while at the same time refusing to
> look at the evidence (ballots) that would conclusively prove whether this
> was true or not, is absurd. But then, this sort of thing happens in the
> lower levels of our justice system every day.
> Like people everywhere, and of every time, we are going to get
> exactly what we are willing ot accept. V. Gordon Childe (I will
> elaborate on this reference if you ask, but suffice it to say the he was
> a noted archaeologist in the 40's and 50's) once said: "Man has never
> adapted to reality, only to his perception of reality". On a fundamental
> level this is unimpeachable.
> Are we in a crisis? Well, yes and no. Yes, this could be the
> straw that finally breaks the dam of resentment, unrest, polarization,
> etc. that has built since (at least) the 1950's. If that dam is
> breached, the direction of the flood is hard to ascertain, and the net
> change is hard to assess. I have my own theories about what should stand
> after this flood, but they have no more weight than many others. In
> fact, from the conversations I've had over the years with many people,
> the result I advocate is pretty universal, though the methods stem from
> my own perception of the ills we have today.
> No, there is no crisis unless a majority of the people refuse to accept
> the outcome. This is the more likely outcome for several reasons. We
> (in general) are currently fat, dumb and happy with the economic boom and
> lothe to rock the boat at this time. Secondly, we are sufficiently
> confused as to our core beliefs because there is no real pressure on us
> to make hard choices AT THIS TIME. It is like a frog being dropped in
> hot water; he will jump out. But if you put the frog in cool water, then
> heat the water up; the frog will stay there till he is thoroughly cooked.
>
> Jayson R. Jones
> Oregon
>
> <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
> ==========
> CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
> screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are
> sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
> directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
> major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
> That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
> always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
> credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
>
> Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
> ========================================================================
> Archives Available at:
> http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
> <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
>
> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
> <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
> ========================================================================
> To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
> SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
> SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Om
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
<A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
